Author Topic: The Trinity Statement: Some Evangelicals re-defining the Trinity?  (Read 5926 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline primuspilus

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,990
  • Inserting personal quote here.
    • St. Gregory the Theologian Orthodox Church
  • Faith: Greek Orthodox (former WR)
  • Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Metropolis of Boston
Re: The Trinity Statement: Some Evangelicals re-defining the Trinity?
« Reply #45 on: December 05, 2011, 04:17:33 PM »
I've heard alot of this modalistic talk in churches here. The problem stems from there being no foundation for doctrine, but thats what this whole shin-dig is about in the firstplace.......

PP
"I confidently affirm that whoever calls himself Universal Bishop is the precursor of Antichrist"
Gregory the Great

"Never, never, never let anyone tell you that, in order to be Orthodox, you must also be eastern." St. John Maximovitch, The Wonderworker

Offline Keble

  • All-Knowing Grand Wizard of Debunking
  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,621
Re: The Trinity Statement: Some Evangelicals re-defining the Trinity?
« Reply #46 on: December 05, 2011, 06:47:57 PM »
I can't really see what, if anything, is all that heretical in these theologians' definition of the Trinity. I just don't understand why they think they need to rewrite tradition. Haven't we had a functional dogma of the Trinity since A.D. 325? ???

The Nicene Creed says nothing one way or the other about subordination; the closest thing the west has to a definition against it is found in the Athanasian Creed, in which say in one place: "And in this Trinity none is before, or after another; none is greater, or less than another. But the whole three Persons are coeternal, and coequal." but then says further along that Jesus is "equal to the Father, as touching his Godhead; and inferior to the Father as touching his Manhood." I gather that some Catholic writers want to cast the Eastern churches as subordinating the other Persons to the Father.

I looked at some of Giles's book, and it appears to be the sort of thing where you need to read quite a bit of to get where he is going. Giles is a conservative Anglican, so I would guess he takes the western approach above.

There is a tendency towards restorationism in evangelical thought, so they tend to fail to pay attention to the history of these arguments.

Offline akimori makoto

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,125
  • No-one bound by fleshly pleasures is worthy ...
Re: The Trinity Statement: Some Evangelicals re-defining the Trinity?
« Reply #47 on: December 05, 2011, 07:33:38 PM »
Question: leaving aside the questionable language employed in the article, based on their statement, do you think these people would agree that the Father is the only divine person who is neither begotten nor proceeds from another?

Second question: if that alone [the unbegottenness of the Father] is admitted, does it not immediately follow that there is subordination in God in some sense?

Third question: if this type of subordination is admitted, does Arianism or Arianism-lite necessarily follow, as these people seem to be intimating?
The Episcopallian road is easy and wide, for many go through it to find destruction. lol sorry channeling Isa.

Offline akimori makoto

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,125
  • No-one bound by fleshly pleasures is worthy ...
Re: The Trinity Statement: Some Evangelicals re-defining the Trinity?
« Reply #48 on: December 05, 2011, 07:34:03 PM »
There is a tendency towards restorationism in evangelical thought, so they tend to fail to pay attention to the history of these arguments.

This seems to be the cause of so many problems.
The Episcopallian road is easy and wide, for many go through it to find destruction. lol sorry channeling Isa.

Offline NicholasMyra

  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8,594
    • Hyperdox Herman
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Partially-overlapping
Re: The Trinity Statement: Some Evangelicals re-defining the Trinity?
« Reply #49 on: December 06, 2011, 12:56:39 AM »
How did the Church (here I mean in terms of its human beginnings in the Garden, not from the moment of the creation of the noetic realm) come to know God as explicitly Trinitarian?

In what order?

The Holy Spirit reveals the Word (1 Corinthians 12:3, Matthew 16:17) who exegetes the Father (John 1:18, Colossians 1:15).

So the Holy Spirit is the First Person of the Trinity phenomenologically.






Spoiled it.  ;D
« Last Edit: December 06, 2011, 01:01:11 AM by NicholasMyra »
Quote from: Fr. Thomas Hopko, dystopian parable of the prodigal son
...you can imagine so-called healing services of the pigpen. The books that could be written, you know: Life in the Pigpen. How to Cope in the Pigpen. Being Happy in the Pigpen. Surviving in the Pigpen. And then there could be counselling, for people who feel unhappy in the pigpen, to try to get them to come to terms with the pigpen, and to accept the pigpen.

Offline Cleopas

  • Bible Thumping, Tongue Talking, Faith Walking Christian
  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 445
  • If I'm my own Pope then I claim infalliablity. Ha!
    • World May Believe
Re: The Trinity Statement: Some Evangelicals re-defining the Trinity?
« Reply #50 on: December 06, 2011, 02:04:46 AM »
Here's some Sabellianism in "mainstream protestantism" for you.

http://www.christianpost.com/news/evangelicals-take-stand-on-trinity-63436/

What was that about most Christians being able to recite the creed and mean it?

Shamelessly stolen from Father Anastasios.

Had no real trouble with the references to the statement itself, and it's meaning, at the onset. However, as I read and saw the agenda and confusion of equality and role I realized, at least for the individual being quoted, this was errant at best and disingenuous at worst. God is equal in persons, but has a functional hierarchy all the same. The Son is subject to the Father, but he is equally deity at the same time.

It's a shame, what could have been a tool for sound teaching and unity has been "agendized" (to coin a term) for secular notions of "equality" instead of biblical ones.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2011, 02:05:52 AM by Cleopas »
Cleopas
Christopher Hart

"Every one, though born of God in an instant, yet undoubtedly grows by slow degrees” -- John Wesley

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8,599
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: The Trinity Statement: Some Evangelicals re-defining the Trinity?
« Reply #51 on: December 06, 2011, 05:06:17 AM »
Here's some Sabellianism in "mainstream protestantism" for you.

http://www.christianpost.com/news/evangelicals-take-stand-on-trinity-63436/

What was that about most Christians being able to recite the creed and mean it?

Shamelessly stolen from Father Anastasios.

Had no real trouble with the references to the statement itself, and it's meaning, at the onset. However, as I read and saw the agenda and confusion of equality and role I realized, at least for the individual being quoted, this was errant at best and disingenuous at worst. God is equal in persons, but has a functional hierarchy all the same. The Son is subject to the Father, but he is equally deity at the same time.

It's a shame, what could have been a tool for sound teaching and unity has been "agendized" (to coin a term) for secular notions of "equality" instead of biblical ones.
I agree.
Quote
The breath of Thine Holy Spirit inspires artists, poets and scientists. The power of Thy supreme knowledge makes them prophets and interpreters of Thy laws, who reveal the depths of Thy creative wisdom. Their works speak unwittingly of Thee. How great art Thou in Thy creation! How great art Thou in man!
Akathist Hymn- Glory to God for All Things

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8,599
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: The Trinity Statement: Some Evangelicals re-defining the Trinity?
« Reply #52 on: December 06, 2011, 05:10:48 AM »
How did the Church (here I mean in terms of its human beginnings in the Garden, not from the moment of the creation of the noetic realm) come to know God as explicitly Trinitarian?

In what order?

The Holy Spirit reveals the Word (1 Corinthians 12:3, Matthew 16:17) who exegetes the Father (John 1:18, Colossians 1:15).

So the Holy Spirit is the First Person of the Trinity phenomenologically.






Spoiled it.  ;D
No, first they knew Him as the Creator who brought them out of Egypt and was over all other gods and would send a Messiah. Then they knew Christ who calls God His Father, then they knew the Comforter Jesus sent them when He went to His Father.

True, the Spirit is the first Person we interact with, but He does not testify of Himself but only what He hears.
Quote
The breath of Thine Holy Spirit inspires artists, poets and scientists. The power of Thy supreme knowledge makes them prophets and interpreters of Thy laws, who reveal the depths of Thy creative wisdom. Their works speak unwittingly of Thee. How great art Thou in Thy creation! How great art Thou in man!
Akathist Hymn- Glory to God for All Things

Offline akimori makoto

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,125
  • No-one bound by fleshly pleasures is worthy ...
Re: The Trinity Statement: Some Evangelicals re-defining the Trinity?
« Reply #53 on: December 06, 2011, 05:16:10 AM »
Here's some Sabellianism in "mainstream protestantism" for you.

http://www.christianpost.com/news/evangelicals-take-stand-on-trinity-63436/

What was that about most Christians being able to recite the creed and mean it?

Shamelessly stolen from Father Anastasios.

Had no real trouble with the references to the statement itself, and it's meaning, at the onset. However, as I read and saw the agenda and confusion of equality and role I realized, at least for the individual being quoted, this was errant at best and disingenuous at worst. God is equal in persons, but has a functional hierarchy all the same. The Son is subject to the Father, but he is equally deity at the same time.

It's a shame, what could have been a tool for sound teaching and unity has been "agendized" (to coin a term) for secular notions of "equality" instead of biblical ones.

I agree, Cleopas. The statement itself isn't so bad, but the content of the article is quite perturbing.
The Episcopallian road is easy and wide, for many go through it to find destruction. lol sorry channeling Isa.

Offline NicholasMyra

  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8,594
    • Hyperdox Herman
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Partially-overlapping
Re: The Trinity Statement: Some Evangelicals re-defining the Trinity?
« Reply #54 on: December 06, 2011, 05:04:43 PM »
How did the Church (here I mean in terms of its human beginnings in the Garden, not from the moment of the creation of the noetic realm) come to know God as explicitly Trinitarian?

In what order?

The Holy Spirit reveals the Word (1 Corinthians 12:3, Matthew 16:17) who exegetes the Father (John 1:18, Colossians 1:15).

So the Holy Spirit is the First Person of the Trinity phenomenologically.






Spoiled it.  ;D
No, first they knew Him as the Creator who brought them out of Egypt and was over all other gods and would send a Messiah. Then they knew Christ who calls God His Father, then they knew the Comforter Jesus sent them when He went to His Father.

True, the Spirit is the first Person we interact with, but He does not testify of Himself but only what He hears.
Volnutt, you gotta get a sense of trollcasmony.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2011, 05:05:07 PM by NicholasMyra »
Quote from: Fr. Thomas Hopko, dystopian parable of the prodigal son
...you can imagine so-called healing services of the pigpen. The books that could be written, you know: Life in the Pigpen. How to Cope in the Pigpen. Being Happy in the Pigpen. Surviving in the Pigpen. And then there could be counselling, for people who feel unhappy in the pigpen, to try to get them to come to terms with the pigpen, and to accept the pigpen.

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8,599
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: The Trinity Statement: Some Evangelicals re-defining the Trinity?
« Reply #55 on: December 06, 2011, 10:37:30 PM »
How did the Church (here I mean in terms of its human beginnings in the Garden, not from the moment of the creation of the noetic realm) come to know God as explicitly Trinitarian?

In what order?

The Holy Spirit reveals the Word (1 Corinthians 12:3, Matthew 16:17) who exegetes the Father (John 1:18, Colossians 1:15).

So the Holy Spirit is the First Person of the Trinity phenomenologically.






Spoiled it.  ;D
No, first they knew Him as the Creator who brought them out of Egypt and was over all other gods and would send a Messiah. Then they knew Christ who calls God His Father, then they knew the Comforter Jesus sent them when He went to His Father.

True, the Spirit is the first Person we interact with, but He does not testify of Himself but only what He hears.
Volnutt, you gotta get a sense of trollcasmony.
Yeah, it's always been hit or miss with me, even in person if you can imagine that lol. Maybe I'm lightly autistic...
Quote
The breath of Thine Holy Spirit inspires artists, poets and scientists. The power of Thy supreme knowledge makes them prophets and interpreters of Thy laws, who reveal the depths of Thy creative wisdom. Their works speak unwittingly of Thee. How great art Thou in Thy creation! How great art Thou in man!
Akathist Hymn- Glory to God for All Things

Offline biro

  • Site Supporter
  • Stratopedarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,913
  • Excelsior
Re: The Trinity Statement: Some Evangelicals re-defining the Trinity?
« Reply #56 on: December 06, 2011, 11:08:18 PM »
I know what a troll is, but what is a casmony?

 ???
My only weakness is, well, never mind