Author Topic: Gibbon's take...  (Read 252 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline primuspilus

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,857
  • Inserting personal quote here.
    • Holy Trinity Orthodox Church
Gibbon's take...
« on: September 27, 2011, 12:31:10 PM »
This morning as I was in my private library (a.k.a. the bathroom) I was reading once again The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire By Gibbon.

I got to the council of Ephesus and now that I am converting to Orthodoxy, I read it in a different light. It seems to me that Gibbon basically drew it as a theological version of the Sharks vs. the Jets (for those who are familiar with West Side Story).

My meaning is that Cyril and Nestorius each brought their gang and that Cyril won out. Almost as if Nestorius' group had been bigger/better that he would have won out.

I'd like thoughts on this. Was Gibbon right in your view or was his view jaded?

PP
"I confidently affirm that whoever calls himself Universal Bishop is the precursor of Antichrist"
Gregory the Great

"Never, never, never let anyone tell you that, in order to be Orthodox, you must also be eastern." St. John Maximovitch, The Wonderworker

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
Re: Gibbon's take...
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2011, 12:39:23 PM »
This morning as I was in my private library (a.k.a. the bathroom) I was reading once again The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire By Gibbon.

I got to the council of Ephesus and now that I am converting to Orthodoxy, I read it in a different light. It seems to me that Gibbon basically drew it as a theological version of the Sharks vs. the Jets (for those who are familiar with West Side Story).

My meaning is that Cyril and Nestorius each brought their gang and that Cyril won out. Almost as if Nestorius' group had been bigger/better that he would have won out.

I'd like thoughts on this. Was Gibbon right in your view or was his view jaded?

PP
Well, from a historian's perspective, Gibbon might have a very good argument. Historians don't assume divine intervention in history -- well, historians at most research universities don't.

But from a divine perspective, things might be a bit more complicated.
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.