OrthodoxChristianity.net
December 18, 2014, 05:45:43 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: OO Monks and Ecumenism  (Read 1165 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Severian
God save Egypt, Syria, Lebanon & Iraq
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Miaphysite Orthodoxy
Jurisdiction: The Church of Alexandria
Posts: 5,047


Saint Severus of Antioch - the Eloquent Mouth

Partisangirl
WWW
« on: September 25, 2011, 08:23:07 AM »

How do our OO monks view ecumenism? Are they as rigidly anti-ecumenical as some (most?) EO monks? I have visited two Coptic monasteries in the USA, but I didn't really ask the monks what they thought about ecumenism, I just don't think it would be that appropriate.
Logged

"These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." -Jesus Christ

I am currently not an active poster on the forum. Please forgive any offense I might have caused in the past. Thank you.
Father Peter
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: British Orthodox Church within the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate
Posts: 2,658



WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2011, 12:12:35 PM »

Don't forget that most bishops are monks, therefore the ecumenical engagement of our bishops and synods may be taken as reflecting at least one stream of monastic thought in regard to dealing with other communities.
Logged

Lord have mercy upon me a sinner
http://www.orthodoxmedway.org

My blog - http://anorthodoxpriest.blogspot.co.uk

The poster formerly known as peterfarrington
Severian
God save Egypt, Syria, Lebanon & Iraq
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Miaphysite Orthodoxy
Jurisdiction: The Church of Alexandria
Posts: 5,047


Saint Severus of Antioch - the Eloquent Mouth

Partisangirl
WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2011, 05:37:26 PM »

^That is true, of course. However, I would think that Monks who are less exposed to dialogues than our Bishops would be stricter concerning dialogues with other communities.

In any case, I don't think this anti-ecumenist attitude is very widespread in OOxy as it is in EOxy. Many EOs seem to be against any sort of dialogues with other groups. I am certainly against any sort of "ecumenism" which undermines the Orthodox faith, but we should dialogue with others, at the very least, to introduce Orthodoxy to them. Though, I do feel uneasy about joint prayers with Protestants because it seems to fall under the condemnation of the canons of the Church.
« Last Edit: September 25, 2011, 05:43:00 PM by Severian » Logged

"These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." -Jesus Christ

I am currently not an active poster on the forum. Please forgive any offense I might have caused in the past. Thank you.
Pikhristos Aftonf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Faith: Coptic Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Diocese of Melbourne
Posts: 210


« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2011, 07:03:42 PM »

from my experience, it seems that the OO monks tend to value simplicity above all things, and in fact they are very submissive to their heirarchs. i do not think they would oppose their heirarchs either supporting or opposing ecuminism.
Logged
Severian
God save Egypt, Syria, Lebanon & Iraq
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Miaphysite Orthodoxy
Jurisdiction: The Church of Alexandria
Posts: 5,047


Saint Severus of Antioch - the Eloquent Mouth

Partisangirl
WWW
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2011, 09:55:04 PM »

I have spoken with a few Priests (including my own) and some Deacons regarding our dialogue with the Byzanto-Chalcedonians and they seem a bit sceptical towards it. Would our Monastics be even more sceptical towards dialogue then our Clergy? As I have said, most (all?) of the Clergy I have met are apprehensive towards the Byzantines. I know our Monks are typically obedient to our Hierarchs, but, still...
« Last Edit: October 03, 2011, 10:00:23 PM by Severian » Logged

"These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." -Jesus Christ

I am currently not an active poster on the forum. Please forgive any offense I might have caused in the past. Thank you.
NicholasMyra
Avowed denominationalist
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian/Greek
Posts: 6,069


On Sabbatical until Mid-December


« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2011, 12:27:22 AM »

Byzanto-Chalcedonians
Should we refer to you fellows as Armeno-Semitic-Deuteroephesians?  Wink
Logged

Quote from: Orthonorm
if Christ does and says x. And someone else does and says not x and you are ever in doubt, follow Christ.
Father Peter
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: British Orthodox Church within the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate
Posts: 2,658



WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2011, 03:09:15 AM »

How aware are the priests you have spoken with about the details of the Christologial controversy, and the extent of the dialogue which has taken place, and the past efforts at reconciliation?

And as I have said, the bishops are monks. And they support the efforts.
Logged

Lord have mercy upon me a sinner
http://www.orthodoxmedway.org

My blog - http://anorthodoxpriest.blogspot.co.uk

The poster formerly known as peterfarrington
Severian
God save Egypt, Syria, Lebanon & Iraq
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Miaphysite Orthodoxy
Jurisdiction: The Church of Alexandria
Posts: 5,047


Saint Severus of Antioch - the Eloquent Mouth

Partisangirl
WWW
« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2011, 04:45:14 PM »

Byzanto-Chalcedonians
Should we refer to you fellows as Armeno-Semitic-Deuteroephesians?  Wink
I did not designate you guys as "Byzanto-Chalcedonians" to be rude, I did so as to distinguish you guys from the Catholics. "EO" is probably just a simpler term, so I'll just use that. But I really like the epithet "Deutero-Ephesian". You know what... *goes to change his jurisdiction status*

@Fr. Peter It is not so much that the Priests, Deacons, and other servers I have spoken don't want a unity per se. I think they would say that the EO are substantially Orthodox in faith, however I think they are just sceptical whether unity will ever happen in reality and I don't think they are comfortable with inter-communion until we officially reunite. So perhaps "conservative" would be a better designation rather than "apprehensive".
« Last Edit: October 04, 2011, 05:18:50 PM by Severian » Logged

"These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." -Jesus Christ

I am currently not an active poster on the forum. Please forgive any offense I might have caused in the past. Thank you.
Father Peter
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: British Orthodox Church within the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate
Posts: 2,658



WWW
« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2011, 05:30:13 PM »

I don't think that such a view is very conservative though.

Many of our Fathers were willing to make great efforts to try to bring about a reconciliation between the two parties. At the time of St Severus he was very concerned that a separate hierarchy not be established because he considered that the Christological controversy was taking place WITHIN the Church of the Oecumene.

The very fact that from the beginning, and even in the face of severe persecution, the Church insisted that Chalcedonians should not be baptised or chrismated shows that there was always an understanding that the Chalcedonians were not separate from the Church even while in error.

I think that the anti-ecumenical view is rather modern and does not reflect the history of the anti-Chalcedonians as a whole, or even of our own Coptic Orthodox tradition.

The Holy Synod has already agreed that some members of the the Greek Church in Egypt and the Coptic Church may have unrestricted intercommunion. Therefore the principle has already been established. The Syrian and Antiochian Churches already Synodically allow intercommunion. Therefore the principle has already been established.
Logged

Lord have mercy upon me a sinner
http://www.orthodoxmedway.org

My blog - http://anorthodoxpriest.blogspot.co.uk

The poster formerly known as peterfarrington
Pikhristos Aftonf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Faith: Coptic Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Diocese of Melbourne
Posts: 210


« Reply #9 on: October 06, 2011, 10:41:24 PM »

Byzanto-Chalcedonians
Should we refer to you fellows as Armeno-Semitic-Deuteroephesians?  Wink

sounds ubercool, but you forgot the egyptians and africans Smiley
Logged
William
Muted
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,354


« Reply #10 on: October 06, 2011, 10:42:17 PM »

Byzanto-Chalcedonians
Should we refer to you fellows as Armeno-Semitic-Deuteroephesians?  Wink

sounds ubercool, but you forgot the egyptians and africans Smiley
I think that they're covered under "Deuteroephesians."
Logged

Apart from moral conduct, all that man thinks himself able to do in order to become acceptable to God is mere superstition and religious folly. - Immanuel Kant
Severian
God save Egypt, Syria, Lebanon & Iraq
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Miaphysite Orthodoxy
Jurisdiction: The Church of Alexandria
Posts: 5,047


Saint Severus of Antioch - the Eloquent Mouth

Partisangirl
WWW
« Reply #11 on: October 06, 2011, 10:49:00 PM »

As I have pointed out before, the Armenians do not recognize Ephesus II (not formally, anyway).
Logged

"These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." -Jesus Christ

I am currently not an active poster on the forum. Please forgive any offense I might have caused in the past. Thank you.
Pikhristos Aftonf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Faith: Coptic Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Diocese of Melbourne
Posts: 210


« Reply #12 on: October 07, 2011, 12:27:41 AM »

Byzanto-Chalcedonians
Should we refer to you fellows as Armeno-Semitic-Deuteroephesians?  Wink

sounds ubercool, but you forgot the egyptians and africans Smiley
I think that they're covered under "Deuteroephesians."

NO FAIR!! the syrians and the armenians get their names listed and we don't Cry , i think it should be the armeno-semitic-hamitic- deutereoephesians....
anyways back to the point being made:
do the armenians not recognize Ephesus II due to the same reasons we don't hold it as ecumenical, or because they weren't involved ?
honest question Smiley
God bless
Logged
Salpy
Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Armenian Church
Posts: 12,890


Pray for the Christians of Iraq and Syria.


« Reply #13 on: October 07, 2011, 01:01:21 AM »

I think it is because we were not involved. 
Logged

Father Peter
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: British Orthodox Church within the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate
Posts: 2,658



WWW
« Reply #14 on: October 07, 2011, 05:10:58 AM »

I think that the non-Chalcedonians have a slightly different view of councils generally, so it is not a matter of not recognising it. I don't think I recognise it either. It is just part of the historical narrative of the Church. It has a certain value and authority, but the Faith is always paramount. I'd not make someone consider Ephesus II ecumenical, even though that is how it was called and considered. But I would want them to confess the substance of the Faith of Ephesus II.
Logged

Lord have mercy upon me a sinner
http://www.orthodoxmedway.org

My blog - http://anorthodoxpriest.blogspot.co.uk

The poster formerly known as peterfarrington
Malina
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Russian Patriarchate
Posts: 51


« Reply #15 on: October 09, 2011, 12:13:33 PM »

Ecumenism was created by protestants and it proclaim gathering all Christians by protestant`s rules.
We have to be careful regarding such gathering because we can lose our real root of Orthodoxy.
Protestants were become in 1600 after Martin Luther and I always ask them. What did they do until 1600? Where were they been?
Ecumenism may be accepted if all Christians will be build association upon real historical root of Christian history.
I don`t mean customs and traditions of Christianity, I mean root of historical life of Orthodox saints and martyrs. Church may be value  by it`s saints.
Logged
Father Peter
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: British Orthodox Church within the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate
Posts: 2,658



WWW
« Reply #16 on: October 09, 2011, 12:28:55 PM »

That's not the sort of ecumenism being talked about here.

On this thread we are talking about the possibility of the Eastern Orthodox being reunited with the Oriental Orthodox. This is a process that has been taking place since the 5th century and has nothing to do with Protestantism.
Logged

Lord have mercy upon me a sinner
http://www.orthodoxmedway.org

My blog - http://anorthodoxpriest.blogspot.co.uk

The poster formerly known as peterfarrington
Tags: ecumenism  monks  Oriental Orthodox  orthodoxy  heresy Armeno-Deuteroephesians Byzanto-Chalcedonians 
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 44 queries.