Author Topic: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light  (Read 3525 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« on: September 22, 2011, 10:01:03 PM »
Quote
"GENEVA, Sept 22 (Reuters) - An international team of scientists said on Thursday they had recorded sub-atomic particles travelling faster than light -- a finding that could overturn one of Einstein's long-accepted fundamental laws of the universe."

We'll see how this plays out.

« Last Edit: September 22, 2011, 10:01:21 PM by Jetavan »
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Online scamandrius

  • Crusher of Secrets; House Lannister
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,564
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Greek in exile
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2011, 10:11:00 PM »
Einstein wrong?  Heresy!
I seek the truth by which no man was ever harmed--Marcus Aurelius

Those who do not read  history are doomed to get their facts from Hollywood--Anonymous

What earthly joy remains untouched by grief?--St. John Damascene

Offline biro

  • Excelsior
  • Site Supporter
  • Hoplitarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,544
  • Leave me alone, I was only singing
    • Alaska Volcanoes
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2011, 10:24:59 PM »
Vroom!

 :o

My head hurts thinking about this.
He will come again with glory to judge the living and the dead. His kingdom will have no end.

--

And if I seem a little strange, well, that's because I am

Offline primuspilus

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,046
  • Inserting personal quote here.
    • Holy Trinity Orthodox Church
  • Faith: Western Rite Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: AOCNA - Diocese of Charleston and beyond
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2011, 01:47:59 PM »
DUH! All you need is a deuterium and anti-deuterium reaction using a dylithium crystal as a medium which, when sent through specially designed nacelles will form a sub-space field around the vessel in question, allowing faster-than-light-travel. Couple this with a strong inertial dampening field and there you go. Simple  :angel:

PP
"I confidently affirm that whoever calls himself Universal Bishop is the precursor of Antichrist"
Gregory the Great

"Never, never, never let anyone tell you that, in order to be Orthodox, you must also be eastern." St. John Maximovitch, The Wonderworker

Offline Ebor

  • Vanyar
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,482
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2011, 02:12:13 PM »
This is really cool!  Even if it doesn't lead to Warp Factor 10
"I wish they would remember that the charge to Peter was "Feed my sheep", not "Try experiments on my rats", or even "Teach my performing dogs new tricks". - C. S. Lewis

The Katana of Reasoned Discussion

For some a world view is more like a neighborhood watch.

Offline primuspilus

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,046
  • Inserting personal quote here.
    • Holy Trinity Orthodox Church
  • Faith: Western Rite Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: AOCNA - Diocese of Charleston and beyond
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2011, 02:31:24 PM »
This is really cool!  Even if it doesn't lead to Warp Factor 10
you need Borg transwarp for that...oh man..Im a geek.......

PP
"I confidently affirm that whoever calls himself Universal Bishop is the precursor of Antichrist"
Gregory the Great

"Never, never, never let anyone tell you that, in order to be Orthodox, you must also be eastern." St. John Maximovitch, The Wonderworker

Offline Papist

  • Patriarch of Pontification
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,824
  • Praying for the Christians in Iraq
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #6 on: September 23, 2011, 02:35:46 PM »
You mean the universe is not as mechanistic as once thought? Shocking!  :D
You are right. I apologize for having sacked Constantinople. I really need to stop doing that.

Offline Ortho_cat

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,392
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2011, 02:54:06 PM »
i always knew that E=mc2 stuff was for the birds...  ::)

Offline Fabio Leite

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,970
    • Vida Ortodoxa
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2011, 03:09:19 PM »
That together with the possible confirmation of phase-space may bring some inspiring news for space travel. :)

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128241.700-beyond-spacetime-welcome-to-phase-space.html
Many energies, three persons, two natures, one God, one Church, one Baptism.

Offline HabteSelassie

  • Ises and I-ity
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,332
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2011, 03:25:19 PM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Scientists are so cute.  So how did they clock the supra-light speed of this sub atomic particle? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  How did they clock the speed of light in the first place? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  Sounds like a classic case of anthropomorphism to me ;)

So we assumed we were smart enough to conceive of the speed of light by our own silly definitions, and now logically our definitions have expanded with our technology, and surely these current understandings will only change as well in the future.  The problem is that too many scientists today are ideologues about their science, they take it as Gospel truth as the Gospels, and then they are surprised when by their own curious methods they make new discoveries, as if the the fundamental premise of science to begin with wasn't experimentation to learn knew understandings and new perspectives.  To limit one scientific understanding as dogma is to prevent the next discovery and therefore a contradiction to the true ethos of science, but hey, let em have their fun, it only costs a few billion dollars ;)

stay blessed,
habte selassie
"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10

Offline PeterTheAleut

  • The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,494
  • Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2011, 03:37:02 PM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Scientists are so cute.  So how did they clock the supra-light speed of this sub atomic particle? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  How did they clock the speed of light in the first place? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  Sounds like a classic case of anthropomorphism to me ;)

So we assumed we were smart enough to conceive of the speed of light by our own silly definitions, and now logically our definitions have expanded with our technology, and surely these current understandings will only change as well in the future.  The problem is that too many scientists today are ideologues about their science, they take it as Gospel truth as the Gospels, and then they are surprised when by their own curious methods they make new discoveries, as if the the fundamental premise of science to begin with wasn't experimentation to learn knew understandings and new perspectives.  To limit one scientific understanding as dogma is to prevent the next discovery and therefore a contradiction to the true ethos of science, but hey, let em have their fun, it only costs a few billion dollars ;)

stay blessed,
habte selassie
Wow! :o Is somebody having a bad day today?
Not all who wander are lost.

Offline HabteSelassie

  • Ises and I-ity
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,332
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2011, 03:52:32 PM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Scientists are so cute.  So how did they clock the supra-light speed of this sub atomic particle? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  How did they clock the speed of light in the first place? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  Sounds like a classic case of anthropomorphism to me ;)

So we assumed we were smart enough to conceive of the speed of light by our own silly definitions, and now logically our definitions have expanded with our technology, and surely these current understandings will only change as well in the future.  The problem is that too many scientists today are ideologues about their science, they take it as Gospel truth as the Gospels, and then they are surprised when by their own curious methods they make new discoveries, as if the the fundamental premise of science to begin with wasn't experimentation to learn knew understandings and new perspectives.  To limit one scientific understanding as dogma is to prevent the next discovery and therefore a contradiction to the true ethos of science, but hey, let em have their fun, it only costs a few billion dollars ;)

stay blessed,
habte selassie
Wow! :o Is somebody having a bad day today?

Not at all, I was going for a bit more facetious than bitter, but like in text messaging, the emotion of tone of voice doesn't get conveyed as well across the digital bits of 1s and 0s ;)

I love science, I just think scientists are cute how stuck in their assumptions they are, and then when things like this happen, new discoveries, it really shakes them up, but all for nothing really.

stay blessed,
habte selassie
"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10

Offline Fabio Leite

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,970
    • Vida Ortodoxa
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #12 on: September 23, 2011, 04:59:34 PM »
For those so inclined, I recommend Wolfgang Smith refreshing assessment of philosophy of science in these books:

The Quantum Enigma (I'm still reading it)
http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Enigma-Finding-Hidden-Key/dp/089385042X

Science & Myth (not read yet)
http://www.amazon.com/Science-Myth-What-Never-Told/dp/1597310972/ref=pd_sim_b2


Here is a summary of his philosophy in Wikipedia:

Quote
Philosophy

Smith is a member of the Traditionalist School of Metaphysics, having contributed extensively to its criticism of modernity while exploring the philosophical underpinnings of the scientific method and emphasizing the idea of bringing science back into the Aristotlean framework of traditional ontological realism.
Identifying with Alfred North Whitehead's criticism of Scientism's "bifurcationism" and "physical reductionism", i.e., the belief that, first, the qualitative properties of the objects of perception (the "corporeal objects") are ultimately distinct from the their respective quantitative properties (the "physical objects" studied by the different sciences); and second, that the physical objects are "in fact" all there is, meaning the corporeal objects are reduced to their physical counterparts, Smith examines critically in his work Cosmos and Transcendence (1984) the Cartesian roots of modern physical sciences.
Proceeding from his critique of Scientism, in his The Quantum Enigma (1995) Smith poses the questions of whether the scientific method is actually dependent on the Scientistic philosophy and, if it isn't, whether linking it to other philosophical frameworks would provide better solutions to the way we interpret physical phenomena. Demonstrating that in no case either the scientific method or its results depend upon or require adhering to a scientistic metaphysics, he answers in the positive to the first question, with the end result that it's possible to link the scientific method to any underlying metaphysics, or to none at all. Working then into the second question, he proposes linking the scientific method, thus the modern sciences, to a non-bifurcationist, non-reductionist metaphysics in the form of a modified thomistic ontology, showing how such a move can provide a positive outcome by solving the apparent incoherences perceived in Quantum Mechanics' phenomena.
According to Smith, such an interpretation of quantum mechanics allows for the usage of the hylomorphic concepts of act and potential to properly understand Quantum superpositions. For example, instead of considering that a photon is simultaneously a wave and a particle, or a particle in two distinct position, and other counterintuitive constructs, one would consider that the photon (or any other "physical object") at first doesn't exist "in act", but only "in potency", i.e., as "matter" in the hylomorphic meaning of the word, having the potential of becoming a wave, or a particle, or of being here or there etc. Whether one of these outcomes will happen to this undifferentiated matter is dependent on the determination imposed upon it by the macroscopic "corporeal object" that provides to it its actualization. A photon, thus, would be no more strange for having many potentials than, say, an individual who has the "superimposed" potentials of learning French and/or Spanish and/or Greek, all the while reading and/or walking and/or stretching his arms etc. And a further consequence of such an interpretation would be a corporeal and its related physical objects aren't dichotomized or reduced one to the other anymore, but quite the opposite, they all together constitute a whole of which different aspects are dealt with depending on perspective.
Smith's understanding of the relationship between corporeal and physical objects extend to his interpretation of biology, where he has become an opponent of Darwinian evolution, as the fundamental element in a species would be its form, not its causal history, which evolutionists favor. This leads him to be a supporter of the intelligent design movement, even though the hylomorphic approach itself isn't widely adopted by the mainstream intelligent designers, who also favor causal history, even though differently from evolutionists.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Smith

And an article online

The plague of scientistic belief
http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http://www.catholic.net/rcc/Periodicals/HPR/April%25202000/belief.html&date=2008-04-27
« Last Edit: September 23, 2011, 05:01:06 PM by Fabio Leite »
Many energies, three persons, two natures, one God, one Church, one Baptism.

Offline Papist

  • Patriarch of Pontification
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,824
  • Praying for the Christians in Iraq
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #13 on: September 23, 2011, 05:37:07 PM »
i always knew that E=mc2 stuff was for the birds...  ::)
You know, it is quite possible that while Einstein provides for very good predictions in that which we can currently observe and test, there may be laws higher than those of Einstein which govern when Einsteinian physics apply and do not apply.
You are right. I apologize for having sacked Constantinople. I really need to stop doing that.

Offline Papist

  • Patriarch of Pontification
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,824
  • Praying for the Christians in Iraq
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #14 on: September 23, 2011, 05:37:07 PM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Scientists are so cute.  So how did they clock the supra-light speed of this sub atomic particle? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  How did they clock the speed of light in the first place? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  Sounds like a classic case of anthropomorphism to me ;)

So we assumed we were smart enough to conceive of the speed of light by our own silly definitions, and now logically our definitions have expanded with our technology, and surely these current understandings will only change as well in the future.  The problem is that too many scientists today are ideologues about their science, they take it as Gospel truth as the Gospels, and then they are surprised when by their own curious methods they make new discoveries, as if the the fundamental premise of science to begin with wasn't experimentation to learn knew understandings and new perspectives.  To limit one scientific understanding as dogma is to prevent the next discovery and therefore a contradiction to the true ethos of science, but hey, let em have their fun, it only costs a few billion dollars ;)

stay blessed,
habte selassie
Wow! :o Is somebody having a bad day today?

Not at all, I was going for a bit more facetious than bitter, but like in text messaging, the emotion of tone of voice doesn't get conveyed as well across the digital bits of 1s and 0s ;)

I love science, I just think scientists are cute how stuck in their assumptions they are, and then when things like this happen, new discoveries, it really shakes them up, but all for nothing really.

stay blessed,
habte selassie
This is true. Many scientists were not at all pleased when big bang cosmology began to gain traction.
You are right. I apologize for having sacked Constantinople. I really need to stop doing that.

Offline celticfan1888

  • Production Operator - Chemtrusion
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,026
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #15 on: September 23, 2011, 05:37:07 PM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Scientists are so cute.  So how did they clock the supra-light speed of this sub atomic particle? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  How did they clock the speed of light in the first place? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  Sounds like a classic case of anthropomorphism to me ;)

Thanks, I am kinda cute.

It's called a clock. Or do you still use sundials?  ;)
Forgive my sins.

Offline HabteSelassie

  • Ises and I-ity
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,332
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #16 on: September 23, 2011, 07:09:52 PM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Scientists are so cute.  So how did they clock the supra-light speed of this sub atomic particle? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  How did they clock the speed of light in the first place? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  Sounds like a classic case of anthropomorphism to me ;)

Thanks, I am kinda cute.

It's called a clock. Or do you still use sundials?  ;)
Sundials are too primitive for me, I prefer to watch the shadows precede and recede along side the walls of astronomically aligned pyramids, like the ancients ;)

stay blessed,
habte selassie
"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10

Offline xariskai

  • юродивый/yurodivy
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,557
  • יהוה עזי ומגני
  • Faith: Orthodox
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #17 on: September 23, 2011, 08:57:30 PM »
Quote
How did they clock the speed of light in the first place? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  
Just a telescope, a timepiece, and the moons of Jupiter in the right place (first measurement, fairly accurate, was in the 17th century)
« Last Edit: September 23, 2011, 09:03:47 PM by xariskai »

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,275
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #18 on: September 23, 2011, 10:27:24 PM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Scientists are so cute.  So how did they clock the supra-light speed of this sub atomic particle? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  How did they clock the speed of light in the first place? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  Sounds like a classic case of anthropomorphism to me ;)

So we assumed we were smart enough to conceive of the speed of light by our own silly definitions, and now logically our definitions have expanded with our technology, and surely these current understandings will only change as well in the future.  The problem is that too many scientists today are ideologues about their science, they take it as Gospel truth as the Gospels, and then they are surprised when by their own curious methods they make new discoveries, as if the the fundamental premise of science to begin with wasn't experimentation to learn knew understandings and new perspectives.  To limit one scientific understanding as dogma is to prevent the next discovery and therefore a contradiction to the true ethos of science, but hey, let em have their fun, it only costs a few billion dollars ;)

stay blessed,
habte selassie
Wow! :o Is somebody having a bad day today?

And full of it.

You do realize that what you just wrote was a great and sophomoric tearing apart of Christianity if you replace a couple words?

If he were being ironic, it would awesome. But fatuous? Too bad.
« Last Edit: September 23, 2011, 10:28:22 PM by orthonorm »
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #19 on: September 24, 2011, 12:58:59 AM »
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Offline stanley123

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,809
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #20 on: September 24, 2011, 02:01:45 PM »
That together with the possible confirmation of phase-space may bring some inspiring news for space travel. :)

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128241.700-beyond-spacetime-welcome-to-phase-space.html
According to the article, different observers would construct different spacetimes since physics is supposed to take place (according to them) in phase space. But this would destroy the Lorentz symmetry between the two observers and thus contradicts fundamental principles of physics.  And as well, Lorentz invariance has been shown to hold experimentally to great accuracy. I don't see their experiment or tests which confirm their theory to be valid.

Offline stanley123

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,809
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #21 on: September 24, 2011, 02:08:20 PM »
For those so inclined, I recommend Wolfgang Smith refreshing assessment of philosophy of science in these books:

The Quantum Enigma (I'm still reading it)
http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Enigma-Finding-Hidden-Key/dp/089385042X

Science & Myth (not read yet)
http://www.amazon.com/Science-Myth-What-Never-Told/dp/1597310972/ref=pd_sim_b2


Here is a summary of his philosophy in Wikipedia:

Quote
Philosophy

Smith is a member of the Traditionalist School of Metaphysics, having contributed extensively to its criticism of modernity while exploring the philosophical underpinnings of the scientific method and emphasizing the idea of bringing science back into the Aristotlean framework of traditional ontological realism.
Identifying with Alfred North Whitehead's criticism of Scientism's "bifurcationism" and "physical reductionism", i.e., the belief that, first, the qualitative properties of the objects of perception (the "corporeal objects") are ultimately distinct from the their respective quantitative properties (the "physical objects" studied by the different sciences); and second, that the physical objects are "in fact" all there is, meaning the corporeal objects are reduced to their physical counterparts, Smith examines critically in his work Cosmos and Transcendence (1984) the Cartesian roots of modern physical sciences.
Proceeding from his critique of Scientism, in his The Quantum Enigma (1995) Smith poses the questions of whether the scientific method is actually dependent on the Scientistic philosophy and, if it isn't, whether linking it to other philosophical frameworks would provide better solutions to the way we interpret physical phenomena. Demonstrating that in no case either the scientific method or its results depend upon or require adhering to a scientistic metaphysics, he answers in the positive to the first question, with the end result that it's possible to link the scientific method to any underlying metaphysics, or to none at all. Working then into the second question, he proposes linking the scientific method, thus the modern sciences, to a non-bifurcationist, non-reductionist metaphysics in the form of a modified thomistic ontology, showing how such a move can provide a positive outcome by solving the apparent incoherences perceived in Quantum Mechanics' phenomena.
According to Smith, such an interpretation of quantum mechanics allows for the usage of the hylomorphic concepts of act and potential to properly understand Quantum superpositions. For example, instead of considering that a photon is simultaneously a wave and a particle, or a particle in two distinct position, and other counterintuitive constructs, one would consider that the photon (or any other "physical object") at first doesn't exist "in act", but only "in potency", i.e., as "matter" in the hylomorphic meaning of the word, having the potential of becoming a wave, or a particle, or of being here or there etc. Whether one of these outcomes will happen to this undifferentiated matter is dependent on the determination imposed upon it by the macroscopic "corporeal object" that provides to it its actualization. A photon, thus, would be no more strange for having many potentials than, say, an individual who has the "superimposed" potentials of learning French and/or Spanish and/or Greek, all the while reading and/or walking and/or stretching his arms etc. And a further consequence of such an interpretation would be a corporeal and its related physical objects aren't dichotomized or reduced one to the other anymore, but quite the opposite, they all together constitute a whole of which different aspects are dealt with depending on perspective.
Smith's understanding of the relationship between corporeal and physical objects extend to his interpretation of biology, where he has become an opponent of Darwinian evolution, as the fundamental element in a species would be its form, not its causal history, which evolutionists favor. This leads him to be a supporter of the intelligent design movement, even though the hylomorphic approach itself isn't widely adopted by the mainstream intelligent designers, who also favor causal history, even though differently from evolutionists.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Smith

And an article online

The plague of scientistic belief
http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http://www.catholic.net/rcc/Periodicals/HPR/April%25202000/belief.html&date=2008-04-27
So an Orthodox Christian is interested in a system which links the scientific method to the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas?

Offline W.A.Mozart

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 504
  • Lazare, veni foras!
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #22 on: September 24, 2011, 02:15:55 PM »
something that travels the speed of light has reached its destination befor it started travelling  ;D
completely new, especially not yet used

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #23 on: September 24, 2011, 02:16:02 PM »
For those so inclined, I recommend Wolfgang Smith refreshing assessment of philosophy of science in these books:

The Quantum Enigma (I'm still reading it)
http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Enigma-Finding-Hidden-Key/dp/089385042X

Science & Myth (not read yet)
http://www.amazon.com/Science-Myth-What-Never-Told/dp/1597310972/ref=pd_sim_b2


Here is a summary of his philosophy in Wikipedia:

Quote
Philosophy

Smith is a member of the Traditionalist School of Metaphysics, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Smith
....

And an article online

The plague of scientistic belief
http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http://www.catholic.net/rcc/Periodicals/HPR/April%25202000/belief.html&date=2008-04-27
So an Orthodox Christian is interested in a system which links the scientific method to the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas?
If you're referring to Smith,  I believe he is Catholic (Roman).
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Offline stanley123

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,809
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #24 on: September 24, 2011, 02:23:45 PM »
For those so inclined, I recommend Wolfgang Smith refreshing assessment of philosophy of science in these books:

The Quantum Enigma (I'm still reading it)
http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Enigma-Finding-Hidden-Key/dp/089385042X

Science & Myth (not read yet)
http://www.amazon.com/Science-Myth-What-Never-Told/dp/1597310972/ref=pd_sim_b2


Here is a summary of his philosophy in Wikipedia:

Quote
Philosophy

Smith is a member of the Traditionalist School of Metaphysics, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Smith
....

And an article online

The plague of scientistic belief
http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http://www.catholic.net/rcc/Periodicals/HPR/April%25202000/belief.html&date=2008-04-27
So an Orthodox Christian is interested in a system which links the scientific method to the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas?
If you're referring to Smith,  I believe he is Catholic (Roman).
Right. And an Orthodox Christian poster here is interested in his system (system of Wolfgang Smith) which links the scientific method to the philosophy of the Catholic scholasticism or thomism.

Offline stanley123

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,809
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #25 on: September 24, 2011, 02:28:00 PM »
The particles supposedly broke the speed of light by 60 nanoseconds which is an extremely small amount and possibly due to experimental error, even though they are claiming 6 sigma accuracy.

Offline minasoliman

  • Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
  • Section Moderator
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,830
  • Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #26 on: September 24, 2011, 02:35:32 PM »
The particles supposedly broke the speed of light by 60 nanoseconds which is an extremely small amount and possibly due to experimental error, even though they are claiming 6 sigma accuracy.

Question is, what happens if they do it again?  Can this be reproduced, and if so, will it bring forth the same results for accuracy.  One of the questions that this may answer is perhaps there were particles in the Big Bang that moved so fast away from other particles, even faster than light.  It can also explain black holes better.  This is the excitement about this study.  But obviously, before the excitement, it would be nice to confirm the results by reproducing it and challenging it.
Vain existence can never exist, for "unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain." (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.

Offline stanley123

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,809
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #27 on: September 24, 2011, 02:42:51 PM »
One of the questions that this may answer is perhaps there were particles in the Big Bang that moved so fast away from other particles, even faster than light. 
Space can expand faster than the speed of light. See:
http://www.history.com/shows/the-universe/videos/faster-than-light-expansion#faster-than-light-expansion

Offline biro

  • Excelsior
  • Site Supporter
  • Hoplitarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,544
  • Leave me alone, I was only singing
    • Alaska Volcanoes
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #28 on: September 24, 2011, 02:48:36 PM »
Does this mean we'll have the teleporters like they did in Star Trek?
He will come again with glory to judge the living and the dead. His kingdom will have no end.

--

And if I seem a little strange, well, that's because I am

Offline W.A.Mozart

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 504
  • Lazare, veni foras!
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #29 on: September 24, 2011, 04:26:20 PM »
see u yesterday





and of course


completely new, especially not yet used

Offline W.A.Mozart

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 504
  • Lazare, veni foras!
« Last Edit: September 24, 2011, 04:28:47 PM by W.A.Mozart »
completely new, especially not yet used

Offline Justin Kissel

  • •|•|•
  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 31,762
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #31 on: September 24, 2011, 04:38:32 PM »
Does this mean we'll have the teleporters like they did in Star Trek?


Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #32 on: September 24, 2011, 04:47:39 PM »
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Offline Fabio Leite

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,970
    • Vida Ortodoxa
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #33 on: September 24, 2011, 05:12:38 PM »
For those so inclined, I recommend Wolfgang Smith refreshing assessment of philosophy of science in these books:

The Quantum Enigma (I'm still reading it)
http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Enigma-Finding-Hidden-Key/dp/089385042X

Science & Myth (not read yet)
http://www.amazon.com/Science-Myth-What-Never-Told/dp/1597310972/ref=pd_sim_b2


Here is a summary of his philosophy in Wikipedia:

Quote
Philosophy

Smith is a member of the Traditionalist School of Metaphysics, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Smith
....

And an article online

The plague of scientistic belief
http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http://www.catholic.net/rcc/Periodicals/HPR/April%25202000/belief.html&date=2008-04-27
So an Orthodox Christian is interested in a system which links the scientific method to the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas?
If you're referring to Smith,  I believe he is Catholic (Roman).
Right. And an Orthodox Christian poster here is interested in his system (system of Wolfgang Smith) which links the scientific method to the philosophy of the Catholic scholasticism or thomism.

Wolfgang Smith is also a Perenialist of the school of Guenon and Schuon - which I believe were both a bit '"nutty". But I don't stereotype anyone. Not even Aquinas. His philosophy is very good. It is when it is used as theology that the problems start. Pretty much like a car. I repudiate the concept that one can use a Porsche to go to Mars (which is what people try to do with philosophy regarding theology sometimes), but no-one can deny that a Porsche is a very good car itself.

I like Aquinas and Thomism as a philosophy. But precisely because I like it as philosophy that I wouldn't dogmatize about it as it were theology.

Said that, I do believe that a return to classic philosophy would do much good to the philosophy of Science - a very first good step Wolfgang has taken, but I wonder how many with his competence are able to follow and further develop.
Many energies, three persons, two natures, one God, one Church, one Baptism.

Offline Fabio Leite

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,970
    • Vida Ortodoxa
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #34 on: September 24, 2011, 05:15:43 PM »
Aquinas, Saint Thomas Aquinas... Aristotle was his model
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m57m0XiRgBA
Many energies, three persons, two natures, one God, one Church, one Baptism.

Offline stanley123

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,809
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #35 on: September 24, 2011, 05:49:10 PM »
For those so inclined, I recommend Wolfgang Smith refreshing assessment of philosophy of science in these books:

The Quantum Enigma (I'm still reading it)
http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Enigma-Finding-Hidden-Key/dp/089385042X

Science & Myth (not read yet)
http://www.amazon.com/Science-Myth-What-Never-Told/dp/1597310972/ref=pd_sim_b2


Here is a summary of his philosophy in Wikipedia:

Quote
Philosophy

Smith is a member of the Traditionalist School of Metaphysics, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Smith
....

And an article online

The plague of scientistic belief
http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http://www.catholic.net/rcc/Periodicals/HPR/April%25202000/belief.html&date=2008-04-27
So an Orthodox Christian is interested in a system which links the scientific method to the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas?
If you're referring to Smith,  I believe he is Catholic (Roman).
Right. And an Orthodox Christian poster here is interested in his system (system of Wolfgang Smith) which links the scientific method to the philosophy of the Catholic scholasticism or thomism.

Wolfgang Smith is also a Perenialist of the school of Guenon and Schuon - which I believe were both a bit '"nutty". But I don't stereotype anyone. Not even Aquinas. His philosophy is very good. It is when it is used as theology that the problems start. Pretty much like a car. I repudiate the concept that one can use a Porsche to go to Mars (which is what people try to do with philosophy regarding theology sometimes), but no-one can deny that a Porsche is a very good car itself.

I like Aquinas and Thomism as a philosophy. But precisely because I like it as philosophy that I wouldn't dogmatize about it as it were theology.

Said that, I do believe that a return to classic philosophy would do much good to the philosophy of Science - a very first good step Wolfgang has taken, but I wonder how many with his competence are able to follow and further develop.
Steven Weinberg considers philosophy of science to be nothing more than a pleasing gloss on the discoveries of science and says that it doesn't provide any help to scientists about how to do their work in science or scientific discovery. See:
http://depts.washington.edu/ssnet/Weinberg_SSN_1_14.pdf

Offline stanley123

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,809
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #36 on: September 24, 2011, 05:57:03 PM »
Aquinas, Saint Thomas Aquinas... Aristotle was his model
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m57m0XiRgBA
Yes!!
 I like it.  Beautiful.
Now for some celebration of the large hadron collider and CERN:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1L2xODZSI4
And of course for the Higgs particle:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVJb4Oid4as&feature=related

Offline Fabio Leite

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,970
    • Vida Ortodoxa
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #37 on: September 24, 2011, 07:35:05 PM »
Steven Weinberg considers philosophy of science to be nothing more than a pleasing gloss on the discoveries of science and says that it doesn't provide any help to scientists about how to do their work in science or scientific discovery. See:
http://depts.washington.edu/ssnet/Weinberg_SSN_1_14.pdf

Well, that is what Wolfgang defends. His approach is that the scientific method does not depend on any philosophy of science in particular. It is, after all, just a method. A philosophy of science has to stand on its own as philosophy and not claim any particular relationship with the method itself.

In a sense, he proposes the positive side of what Sokal did in the 90s. Sokal showed that scientific facts were abused by many in humanities, which is true. Wolfgang, from his own perspective, proposes another philosophical paradigm to understand science. He also defends that this new paradigm can prove less confusing than the current one. I have not read the whole book yet, so I will not try to explain what is still half understood in my mind, but he may be right. It would not change any scientific theory per se, but it would change the "so what" that goes with every theory.
Many energies, three persons, two natures, one God, one Church, one Baptism.

Offline Fabio Leite

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,970
    • Vida Ortodoxa
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #38 on: September 24, 2011, 07:45:39 PM »
"Nothing in the history of science is ever simple. Although after Einstein
there was no place in serious physics research for the old naive mechanical
worldview, some elements of this view were retained in the physics of the first
half of the twentieth century. "

Here Weinberg is complete agreement with what I have already read from Wolfgang.
Many energies, three persons, two natures, one God, one Church, one Baptism.

Offline xariskai

  • юродивый/yurodivy
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,557
  • יהוה עזי ומגני
  • Faith: Orthodox
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #39 on: September 24, 2011, 07:46:35 PM »
Steven Weinberg considers philosophy of science to be nothing more than a pleasing gloss on the discoveries of science and says that it doesn't provide any help to scientists about how to do their work in science or scientific discovery. See:
http://depts.washington.edu/ssnet/Weinberg_SSN_1_14.pdf

Well, that is what Wolfgang defends. His approach is that the scientific method does not depend on any philosophy of science in particular. It is, after all, just a method. A philosophy of science has to stand on its own as philosophy and not claim any particular relationship with the method itself.

In a sense, he proposes the positive side of what Sokal did in the 90s. Sokal showed that scientific facts were abused by many in humanities, which is true. Wolfgang, from his own perspective, proposes another philosophical paradigm to understand science. He also defends that this new paradigm can prove less confusing than the current one. I have not read the whole book yet, so I will not try to explain what is still half understood in my mind, but he may be right. It would not change any scientific theory per se, but it would change the "so what" that goes with every theory.
Philosophers of science deny there is a single scientific method. Paul Feyerebend claimed the whole concept of a scientific method collapses on close inspection. http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/feyerabe.htm I'll not defend the latter, but it's hard to argue against the former. Has anyone here read Kuhn's account of the First Scientific Revolution? Stanley Jaki?
« Last Edit: September 24, 2011, 07:53:16 PM by xariskai »

Offline Fabio Leite

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,970
    • Vida Ortodoxa
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #40 on: September 24, 2011, 08:11:24 PM »
Steven Weinberg considers philosophy of science to be nothing more than a pleasing gloss on the discoveries of science and says that it doesn't provide any help to scientists about how to do their work in science or scientific discovery. See:
http://depts.washington.edu/ssnet/Weinberg_SSN_1_14.pdf

Well, that is what Wolfgang defends. His approach is that the scientific method does not depend on any philosophy of science in particular. It is, after all, just a method. A philosophy of science has to stand on its own as philosophy and not claim any particular relationship with the method itself.

In a sense, he proposes the positive side of what Sokal did in the 90s. Sokal showed that scientific facts were abused by many in humanities, which is true. Wolfgang, from his own perspective, proposes another philosophical paradigm to understand science. He also defends that this new paradigm can prove less confusing than the current one. I have not read the whole book yet, so I will not try to explain what is still half understood in my mind, but he may be right. It would not change any scientific theory per se, but it would change the "so what" that goes with every theory.
Philosophers of science deny there is a single scientific method. Paul Feyerebend claimed the whole concept of a scientific method collapses on close inspection. http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/feyerabe.htm I'll not defend the latter, but it's hard to argue against the former. Has anyone here read Kuhn's account of the First Scientific Revolution? Stanley Jaki?

Kuhn yes, Jaki not. Well, I think the method thing depends on how broadly one defines method. Obviously there are several methodologies, but the one way of discovering things is still, basically, socratic dialetic investigation. When you apply it to different fields it must take different forms, but they are just different species of the same beast.
Many energies, three persons, two natures, one God, one Church, one Baptism.

Offline primuspilus

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,046
  • Inserting personal quote here.
    • Holy Trinity Orthodox Church
  • Faith: Western Rite Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: AOCNA - Diocese of Charleston and beyond
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #41 on: September 24, 2011, 08:13:10 PM »
I think its silly. We all think we're sooooooooooo smart and that we (as a whole of course) got it all figured out. Fools.....


PP
"I confidently affirm that whoever calls himself Universal Bishop is the precursor of Antichrist"
Gregory the Great

"Never, never, never let anyone tell you that, in order to be Orthodox, you must also be eastern." St. John Maximovitch, The Wonderworker

Offline xariskai

  • юродивый/yurodivy
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,557
  • יהוה עזי ומגני
  • Faith: Orthodox
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #42 on: September 24, 2011, 08:13:31 PM »
Steven Weinberg considers philosophy of science to be nothing more than a pleasing gloss on the discoveries of science and says that it doesn't provide any help to scientists about how to do their work in science or scientific discovery. See:
http://depts.washington.edu/ssnet/Weinberg_SSN_1_14.pdf

Well, that is what Wolfgang defends. His approach is that the scientific method does not depend on any philosophy of science in particular. It is, after all, just a method. A philosophy of science has to stand on its own as philosophy and not claim any particular relationship with the method itself.

In a sense, he proposes the positive side of what Sokal did in the 90s. Sokal showed that scientific facts were abused by many in humanities, which is true. Wolfgang, from his own perspective, proposes another philosophical paradigm to understand science. He also defends that this new paradigm can prove less confusing than the current one. I have not read the whole book yet, so I will not try to explain what is still half understood in my mind, but he may be right. It would not change any scientific theory per se, but it would change the "so what" that goes with every theory.
Philosophers of science deny there is a single scientific method. Paul Feyerebend claimed the whole concept of a scientific method collapses on close inspection. http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/feyerabe.htm I'll not defend the latter, but it's hard to argue against the former. Has anyone here read Kuhn's account of the First Scientific Revolution? Stanley Jaki?

Kuhn yes, Jaki not. Well, I think the method thing depends on how broadly one defines method. Obviously there are several methodologies, but the one way of discovering things is still, basically, socratic dialetic investigation. When you apply it to different fields it must take different forms, but they are just different species of the same beast.
Socrates was a scientist?
« Last Edit: September 24, 2011, 08:14:59 PM by xariskai »

Offline Justin Kissel

  • •|•|•
  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 31,762
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #43 on: September 24, 2011, 09:02:23 PM »
Scientist may be the wrong word, but consider how some of the ancient Greek philosophers approached claims about knowledge/truth: 1) observations and conclusions are suspect until (through repetition) tests can be done to demonstrate their validity; 2) the more testing that can be done, the more sure we can be that something is so; nonetheless, 3) all ideas, no matter how sure we are of them, are only held tentatively and are open to further examination and modification.

Offline Fabio Leite

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,970
    • Vida Ortodoxa
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #44 on: September 24, 2011, 09:15:25 PM »
Quote
Kuhn yes, Jaki not. Well, I think the method thing depends on how broadly one defines method. Obviously there are several methodologies, but the one way of discovering things is still, basically, socratic dialetic investigation. When you apply it to different fields it must take different forms, but they are just different species of the same beast.
Socrates was a scientist?

Yes, of wisdomlogy. ;)

Anyway, Socrates investigative dialetic works universally because that's how the human mind discovers things. Socrates used it to investigate himself, Aristotle to investigate biology (and did an excellent work for the time). He did not create a theory, he described how the human mind works. Whenever you see sound thinking that actually discovers things, it is Socratic, not because Socrates made it, but because he was the first to describe it. That, of course, does not apply to some pseudo-scientific philosophies some people (even scientists) have.
Many energies, three persons, two natures, one God, one Church, one Baptism.

Offline HabteSelassie

  • Ises and I-ity
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,332
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #45 on: September 26, 2011, 02:54:44 PM »
greetings in that divine and most precious name of our lord and savior jesus christ!
Does this mean we'll have the teleporters like they did in Star Trek?



Post of the Year

stay blessed,
habte selassie
"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10

Offline Fabio Leite

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,970
    • Vida Ortodoxa
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #46 on: September 26, 2011, 03:36:27 PM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Jaki


Seems pretty interesting. No surprise liberal university and school teachers wouldn't mention a priest philosopher.
Many energies, three persons, two natures, one God, one Church, one Baptism.

Offline Papist

  • Patriarch of Pontification
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,824
  • Praying for the Christians in Iraq
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #47 on: September 26, 2011, 06:34:51 PM »
For those so inclined, I recommend Wolfgang Smith refreshing assessment of philosophy of science in these books:

The Quantum Enigma (I'm still reading it)
http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Enigma-Finding-Hidden-Key/dp/089385042X

Science & Myth (not read yet)
http://www.amazon.com/Science-Myth-What-Never-Told/dp/1597310972/ref=pd_sim_b2


Here is a summary of his philosophy in Wikipedia:

Quote
Philosophy

Smith is a member of the Traditionalist School of Metaphysics, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Smith
....

And an article online

The plague of scientistic belief
http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http://www.catholic.net/rcc/Periodicals/HPR/April%25202000/belief.html&date=2008-04-27
So an Orthodox Christian is interested in a system which links the scientific method to the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas?
If you're referring to Smith,  I believe he is Catholic (Roman).
Right. And an Orthodox Christian poster here is interested in his system (system of Wolfgang Smith) which links the scientific method to the philosophy of the Catholic scholasticism or thomism.

Wolfgang Smith is also a Perenialist of the school of Guenon and Schuon - which I believe were both a bit '"nutty". But I don't stereotype anyone. Not even Aquinas. His philosophy is very good. It is when it is used as theology that the problems start. Pretty much like a car. I repudiate the concept that one can use a Porsche to go to Mars (which is what people try to do with philosophy regarding theology sometimes), but no-one can deny that a Porsche is a very good car itself.

I like Aquinas and Thomism as a philosophy. But precisely because I like it as philosophy that I wouldn't dogmatize about it as it were theology.

Said that, I do believe that a return to classic philosophy would do much good to the philosophy of Science - a very first good step Wolfgang has taken, but I wonder how many with his competence are able to follow and further develop.
:)
You are right. I apologize for having sacked Constantinople. I really need to stop doing that.

Offline Shiny

  • Site Supporter
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Paint It Red
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #48 on: September 26, 2011, 10:42:57 PM »
Less surprising if the hypothetical holographic model of the universe holds any merit.
“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan

Offline PeterTheAleut

  • The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,494
  • Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #49 on: September 27, 2011, 02:04:27 AM »
There are a lot of things that can travel at the speed of light, but is there anything that can travel at the speed of dark?
Not all who wander are lost.

Offline Justin Kissel

  • •|•|•
  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 31,762
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #50 on: September 27, 2011, 10:38:05 AM »
There are a lot of things that can travel at the speed of light, but is there anything that can travel at the speed of dark?

That's profound dude.

Only thing I can think of is sitcom writing... nothing can take us more quickly into the abyss and darkness and vacuity than that!

Offline W.A.Mozart

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 504
  • Lazare, veni foras!
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #51 on: September 27, 2011, 03:16:43 PM »
i just read that Tesla said(in 1932) that there are particles which travel faster than light... in an interview with John O'Neil in the Brooklyn eagle newspaper from July 10th 1932 btw the date is Tesla's birthday


http://www.24sata.rs/vesti/svet/vest/tesla-jos-1932-znao-za-cestice-brze-od-svetlosti/14364.phtml

http://www.brooklyneagle.com/


« Last Edit: September 27, 2011, 03:16:54 PM by W.A.Mozart »
completely new, especially not yet used

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #52 on: September 27, 2011, 06:04:10 PM »
i just read that Tesla said(in 1932) that there are particles which travel faster than light... in an interview with John O'Neil in the Brooklyn eagle newspaper from July 10th 1932 btw the date is Tesla's birthday

The Scopes' "Monkey Trial" began on 10 July (1925).
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Offline Shiny

  • Site Supporter
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Paint It Red
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #53 on: September 29, 2011, 12:33:02 AM »
There are a lot of things that can travel at the speed of light, but is there anything that can travel at the speed of dark?
The "speed of dark" is the speed of light. Since darkness is the absence of light, however fast light can leave is the speed at which darkness can arrive.
“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan

Offline NicholasMyra

  • Avowed denominationalist
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,378
  • Nepsis or Sepsis™
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Antiochian+Greek
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #54 on: September 29, 2011, 01:01:37 AM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Scientists are so cute.  So how did they clock the supra-light speed of this sub atomic particle? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  How did they clock the speed of light in the first place? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  Sounds like a classic case of anthropomorphism to me ;)

No, it's called an experiment.
Quote from: Orthonorm
if Christ does and says x. And someone else does and says not x and you are ever in doubt, follow Christ.

Πάντα μὲν καθαρὰ τοῖς καθαροῖς
Τοῖς δὲ μεμιασμένοις καὶ ἀπίστοις οὐδὲν καθαρόν

Offline stanley123

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,809
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #55 on: September 29, 2011, 01:44:22 AM »
i just read that Tesla said(in 1932) that there are particles which travel faster than light... in an interview with John O'Neil in the Brooklyn eagle newspaper from July 10th 1932 btw the date is Tesla's birthday


http://www.24sata.rs/vesti/svet/vest/tesla-jos-1932-znao-za-cestice-brze-od-svetlosti/14364.phtml

http://www.brooklyneagle.com/



I think that tachyons can travel faster than the speed of light, but not less.

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #56 on: September 29, 2011, 07:43:53 AM »
i just read that Tesla said(in 1932) that there are particles which travel faster than light... in an interview with John O'Neil in the Brooklyn eagle newspaper from July 10th 1932 btw the date is Tesla's birthday


http://www.24sata.rs/vesti/svet/vest/tesla-jos-1932-znao-za-cestice-brze-od-svetlosti/14364.phtml

http://www.brooklyneagle.com/



I think that tachyons can travel faster than the speed of light, but not less.
You're right. That's what K-PAX said.
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Offline W.A.Mozart

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 504
  • Lazare, veni foras!
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #57 on: September 29, 2011, 01:02:53 PM »
i just read that Tesla said(in 1932) that there are particles which travel faster than light... in an interview with John O'Neil in the Brooklyn eagle newspaper from July 10th 1932 btw the date is Tesla's birthday


http://www.24sata.rs/vesti/svet/vest/tesla-jos-1932-znao-za-cestice-brze-od-svetlosti/14364.phtml

http://www.brooklyneagle.com/



I think that tachyons can travel faster than the speed of light, but not less.

u r right my friend

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon


« Last Edit: September 29, 2011, 01:03:18 PM by W.A.Mozart »
completely new, especially not yet used

Offline Heorhij

  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8,576
    • Mississippi University for Women
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #58 on: September 29, 2011, 02:52:06 PM »
Guys, I am not a physicist, so forgive me if this is terribly naive. One argument that I seem to have heard against the possibility that a particle travels faster than light is that if it does, its mass will grow to infinity. Photons have no mass, and that's the reason why their seed is the speed of light (in vaccum). Am I anywhere near the correct physics?
Love never fails.

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #59 on: September 29, 2011, 03:08:13 PM »
Guys, I am not a physicist, so forgive me if this is terribly naive. One argument that I seem to have heard against the possibility that a particle travels accelerates to a speed faster than light is that if it does, its mass will grow to infinity. Photons have no mass, and that's the reason why their seed is the speed of light (in vaccum). Am I anywhere near the correct physics?
Corrected
« Last Edit: September 29, 2011, 03:09:40 PM by Jetavan »
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Offline Heorhij

  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8,576
    • Mississippi University for Women
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #60 on: September 29, 2011, 03:17:15 PM »
Guys, I am not a physicist, so forgive me if this is terribly naive. One argument that I seem to have heard against the possibility that a particle travels accelerates to a speed faster than light is that if it does, its mass will grow to infinity. Photons have no mass, and that's the reason why their seed is the speed of light (in vaccum). Am I anywhere near the correct physics?
Corrected

Thank you; so, how does this "sit" with the discovery of particles that move faster than the speed of light? If they just travel with a speed of, say, 350 or 400 thousand kilometers per hour all the time, rather than accelerate to this speed - they do not increase their mass, correct?
Love never fails.

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #61 on: September 29, 2011, 03:34:37 PM »
Guys, I am not a physicist, so forgive me if this is terribly naive. One argument that I seem to have heard against the possibility that a particle travels accelerates to a speed faster than light is that if it does, its mass will grow to infinity. Photons have no mass, and that's the reason why their seed is the speed of light (in vaccum). Am I anywhere near the correct physics?
Corrected

Thank you; so, how does this "sit" with the discovery of particles that move faster than the speed of light? If they just travel with a speed of, say, 350 or 400 thousand kilometers per hour all the time, rather than accelerate to this speed - they do not increase their mass, correct?
If you're asking whether particles with mass that travel at superluminal speeds all the time (as opposed to accelerating from sub- to supraluminal speeds), whether these particle increase their mass, I'm not sure. But according to Einstein, a mass-particle accelerating from sub- to superluminal speeds would need an impossibly infinite amount of energy.

But the finding might not overturn Einstein physics -- if these neutrinos are actually members of the hypothetical class of particles (tachyons) that always travel at superluminal speeds.
« Last Edit: September 29, 2011, 03:37:21 PM by Jetavan »
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Offline Heorhij

  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8,576
    • Mississippi University for Women
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #62 on: September 29, 2011, 03:40:51 PM »
Guys, I am not a physicist, so forgive me if this is terribly naive. One argument that I seem to have heard against the possibility that a particle travels accelerates to a speed faster than light is that if it does, its mass will grow to infinity. Photons have no mass, and that's the reason why their seed is the speed of light (in vaccum). Am I anywhere near the correct physics?
Corrected

Thank you; so, how does this "sit" with the discovery of particles that move faster than the speed of light? If they just travel with a speed of, say, 350 or 400 thousand kilometers per hour all the time, rather than accelerate to this speed - they do not increase their mass, correct?
If you're asking whether particles with mass that travel at superluminal speeds all the time (as opposed to accelerating from sub- to supraluminal speeds), whether these particle increase their mass, I'm not sure. But according to Einstein, a mass-particle accelerating from sub- to superluminal speeds would need an impossibly infinite amount of energy.

But the finding might not overturn Einstein physics -- if these neutrinos are actually members of the hypothetical class of particles (tachyons) that always travel at superluminal speeds.

Thank you, I think I understand it better now!
Love never fails.

Offline stanley123

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,809
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #63 on: September 29, 2011, 04:40:41 PM »
Guys, I am not a physicist, so forgive me if this is terribly naive. One argument that I seem to have heard against the possibility that a particle travels accelerates to a speed faster than light is that if it does, its mass will grow to infinity. Photons have no mass, and that's the reason why their seed is the speed of light (in vaccum). Am I anywhere near the correct physics?
Corrected

Thank you; so, how does this "sit" with the discovery of particles that move faster than the speed of light? If they just travel with a speed of, say, 350 or 400 thousand kilometers per hour all the time, rather than accelerate to this speed - they do not increase their mass, correct?
If you're asking whether particles with mass that travel at superluminal speeds all the time (as opposed to accelerating from sub- to supraluminal speeds), whether these particle increase their mass, I'm not sure. But according to Einstein, a mass-particle accelerating from sub- to superluminal speeds would need an impossibly infinite amount of energy.

But the finding might not overturn Einstein physics -- if these neutrinos are actually members of the hypothetical class of particles (tachyons) that always travel at superluminal speeds.
The mass of a tachyon in standard relativity  involves an imaginary factor which theoretically might be eliminated by condensation.

Offline Justin Kissel

  • •|•|•
  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 31,762
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #64 on: June 09, 2012, 12:11:33 AM »
Faster-Than-Light Neutrinos Aren't

The same lab that first reported the shocking results last year, which could have upended modern physics, now reports that neutrinos 'respect the cosmic speed limit'...

Offline Shiny

  • Site Supporter
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Paint It Red
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #65 on: June 09, 2012, 12:16:40 AM »
Hurray!

The Earth is still only 6000 years old, dinosaurs walked with man and evolution doesn't exist!
“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan

Offline PeterTheAleut

  • The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,494
  • Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #66 on: June 09, 2012, 12:19:45 AM »
Hurray!

The Earth is still only 6000 years old, dinosaurs walked with man and evolution doesn't exist!
???
Not all who wander are lost.

Offline Justin Kissel

  • •|•|•
  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 31,762
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #67 on: June 09, 2012, 12:34:04 AM »
Hurray!

The Earth is still only 6000 years old, dinosaurs walked with man and evolution doesn't exist!
???

Turn your sarcasm-detector™ on ;)

Offline Αριστοκλής

  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,026
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #68 on: June 09, 2012, 05:59:59 AM »
Faster-Than-Light Neutrinos Aren't

The same lab that first reported the shocking results last year, which could have upended modern physics, now reports that neutrinos 'respect the cosmic speed limit'...

This was the same experiment which prompted the head scientist to resign when their work was questioned, right?

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin, again?  :)

"Religion is a neurobiological illness and Orthodoxy is its cure." - Fr. John S. Romanides

Offline PeterTheAleut

  • The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,494
  • Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #69 on: June 09, 2012, 12:34:23 PM »
Hurray!

The Earth is still only 6000 years old, dinosaurs walked with man and evolution doesn't exist!
???

Turn your sarcasm-detector™ on ;)
My sarcasm detector was on, and I still couldn't get the point of his post.
Not all who wander are lost.

Offline minasoliman

  • Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
  • Section Moderator
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,830
  • Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #70 on: June 09, 2012, 02:53:38 PM »
I think the point was one of ridicule against those who discredit science and the system of validating/invalidating other scientists' works.  I could be wrong though.  It could be ridiculing the system itself.
Vain existence can never exist, for "unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain." (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.

Offline Shiny

  • Site Supporter
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Paint It Red
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #71 on: June 09, 2012, 04:22:05 PM »
I think the point was one of ridicule against those who discredit science and the system of validating/invalidating other scientists' works.  I could be wrong though.  It could be ridiculing the system itself.
Ding ding ding.
“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan

Offline biro

  • Excelsior
  • Site Supporter
  • Hoplitarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,544
  • Leave me alone, I was only singing
    • Alaska Volcanoes
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #72 on: June 09, 2012, 04:32:13 PM »
How come you can't break the speed of light by throwing a lamp?
He will come again with glory to judge the living and the dead. His kingdom will have no end.

--

And if I seem a little strange, well, that's because I am

Offline Ebor

  • Vanyar
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,482
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #73 on: June 09, 2012, 10:49:36 PM »
I'm reading Speed of Dark by Elizabeth Moon which I'm finding quite interesting.  While the main idea is the idea of a possible "cure" for persons who are high-functioning autistics, the main character thinks about the "speed of dark" and that it's faster than light because it "gets away" from the light.

This book won the Nebula award in 2003. She drew on the experiences of many people who have autism including her son.

Ebor
"I wish they would remember that the charge to Peter was "Feed my sheep", not "Try experiments on my rats", or even "Teach my performing dogs new tricks". - C. S. Lewis

The Katana of Reasoned Discussion

For some a world view is more like a neighborhood watch.

Offline HabteSelassie

  • Ises and I-ity
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,332
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #74 on: June 09, 2012, 11:05:21 PM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

How come you can't break the speed of light by throwing a lamp?



Like these dudes thought?

stay blessed,
habte selassie
"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10

Offline yeshuaisiam

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 4,697
  • A pulling horse cannot kick.
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #75 on: June 10, 2012, 12:12:17 AM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Scientists are so cute.  So how did they clock the supra-light speed of this sub atomic particle? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  How did they clock the speed of light in the first place? Oh right, with their man-made technology.  Sounds like a classic case of anthropomorphism to me ;)

So we assumed we were smart enough to conceive of the speed of light by our own silly definitions, and now logically our definitions have expanded with our technology, and surely these current understandings will only change as well in the future.  The problem is that too many scientists today are ideologues about their science, they take it as Gospel truth as the Gospels, and then they are surprised when by their own curious methods they make new discoveries, as if the the fundamental premise of science to begin with wasn't experimentation to learn knew understandings and new perspectives.  To limit one scientific understanding as dogma is to prevent the next discovery and therefore a contradiction to the true ethos of science, but hey, let em have their fun, it only costs a few billion dollars ;)

stay blessed,
habte selassie
Wow! :o Is somebody having a bad day today?

Not at all, I was going for a bit more facetious than bitter, but like in text messaging, the emotion of tone of voice doesn't get conveyed as well across the digital bits of 1s and 0s ;)

I love science, I just think scientists are cute how stuck in their assumptions they are, and then when things like this happen, new discoveries, it really shakes them up, but all for nothing really.

stay blessed,
habte selassie

Does Science and Salvation ever meet?  If not is there even a point to Science?  Could we be assuming that Science is important when in the end, we'll find out that we have wasted our time with all the hubub, because it has nothing to do with eternal salvation with our God?

Seriously, those are often questions that I have, and I try to state them as unloaded as I can.
I learned how to be more frugal and save money at http://www.livingpress.com

Offline stanley123

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,809
Re: UPDATE 1-Particles found to break speed of light
« Reply #76 on: June 10, 2012, 12:26:55 AM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!




Like these dudes thought?

stay blessed,
habte selassie
I do. But even more, I like these beautiful ladies singing in the large hadron collider:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1L2xODZSI4&feature=related