Author Topic: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column  (Read 78167 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cyrillic

  • Arbiter Elegantiarum
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,927
  • We must go back!
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1035 on: March 29, 2013, 06:51:24 AM »
Am I a William?
We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
-T.S. Eliot

Offline TheMathematician

  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,849
  • Formerly known as Montalo
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: ACROD
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1036 on: March 29, 2013, 07:37:25 AM »
Am I a William?

No, rather, you are acrylic :-P

Offline Cyrillic

  • Arbiter Elegantiarum
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,927
  • We must go back!
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1037 on: March 30, 2013, 09:14:46 AM »
-
« Last Edit: August 07, 2013, 01:34:11 PM by Cyrillic »
We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
-T.S. Eliot

Offline Justin Kissel

  • •|•|•
  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 31,761
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1038 on: March 30, 2013, 09:53:44 AM »
I find this discrimination outrageous. The Williams and JamesRs of the world are just inexperienced and lacking in confidence. I'm a true loser! So I can hook up with desperate women I meet on the internet, so what does that prove? Why am I excluded from being helped?  ;D
"My doubt in Christ is not like that of a child; it was forged in a furnace of faith." - Dostoevsky

Offline Justin Kissel

  • •|•|•
  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 31,761
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1039 on: April 04, 2013, 11:36:16 PM »
How do you get a girl to leave once you've made the moronic decision to put her on the lease?  ???
"My doubt in Christ is not like that of a child; it was forged in a furnace of faith." - Dostoevsky

Offline SolEX01

  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,282
    • Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Metropolis of New Jersey
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1040 on: April 05, 2013, 12:09:59 AM »
How do you get a girl to leave once you've made the moronic decision to put her on the lease?  ???

How much is left on the lease?

Offline vamrat

  • Vamratoraptor
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8,475
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1041 on: April 05, 2013, 09:06:12 AM »
How do you get a girl to leave once you've made the moronic decision to put her on the lease?  ???

I just waited for the lease to be up and reminded her who had a job and who hadn't.  I then said "Meep Meep" and skedaddled roadrunner style.
Das ist des Jägers Ehrenschild, daß er beschützt und hegt sein Wild, weidmännisch jagt, wie sich’s gehört, den Schöpfer im Geschöpfe ehrt.

Online Jonathan Gress

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,161
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1042 on: April 05, 2013, 11:44:46 AM »
How do you get a girl to leave once you've made the moronic decision to put her on the lease?  ???

I just waited for the lease to be up and reminded her who had a job and who hadn't.  I then said "Meep Meep" and skedaddled roadrunner style.

Interesting that you said "hadn't" not "didn't". Was that just a slip or do you normally say this? I'm not trying to judge your grammar, I'm just professionally interested as a linguist.

Offline TheTrisagion

  • The cat is back and its better than ever!
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 11,517
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1043 on: April 05, 2013, 02:33:23 PM »
Stop paying the rent.  She will then either pay it for you or leave.  Either way, you win.  :P
Quote from: Mor Ephrem
Why can't you just take your spiritual edification like a man? 

Offline Justin Kissel

  • •|•|•
  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 31,761
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1044 on: April 05, 2013, 03:09:49 PM »
She pays no rent as it is. If I move out she will end up homeless. If I make her move out she will end up homeless. If I let her stay it's a crappy relational situation.
"My doubt in Christ is not like that of a child; it was forged in a furnace of faith." - Dostoevsky

Offline vamrat

  • Vamratoraptor
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8,475
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1045 on: April 05, 2013, 03:10:46 PM »
How do you get a girl to leave once you've made the moronic decision to put her on the lease?  ???

I just waited for the lease to be up and reminded her who had a job and who hadn't.  I then said "Meep Meep" and skedaddled roadrunner style.

Interesting that you said "hadn't" not "didn't". Was that just a slip or do you normally say this? I'm not trying to judge your grammar, I'm just professionally interested as a linguist.

If speaking, probably either way depending on the mood.  More likely I would have slurred it to the point that all you'd get out of it would be the "dn't".

If writing, Kipling would have used 'hadn't' so that must be correct.  (Ref: Whatever happens we have got, the Maxim Gun and they have not.)
Das ist des Jägers Ehrenschild, daß er beschützt und hegt sein Wild, weidmännisch jagt, wie sich’s gehört, den Schöpfer im Geschöpfe ehrt.

Offline vamrat

  • Vamratoraptor
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8,475
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1046 on: April 05, 2013, 03:11:19 PM »
She pays no rent as it is. If I move out she will end up homeless. If I make her move out she will end up homeless. If I let her stay it's a crappy relational situation.

Tell her to be more relationshipally pleasant or she can become homeless.
Das ist des Jägers Ehrenschild, daß er beschützt und hegt sein Wild, weidmännisch jagt, wie sich’s gehört, den Schöpfer im Geschöpfe ehrt.

Offline SolEX01

  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,282
    • Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Metropolis of New Jersey
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1047 on: April 05, 2013, 03:15:39 PM »
She pays no rent as it is. If I move out she will end up homeless. If I make her move out she will end up homeless. If I let her stay it's a crappy relational situation.

Let her become homeless.  She'll go back to the library and find someone else on her internet dating portal.

Offline tuesdayschild

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 974
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1048 on: April 05, 2013, 03:21:23 PM »
How do you get a girl to leave once you've made the moronic decision to put her on the lease?  ???

Suddenly develop a LOT of annoying habits and/or hobbies.

Online Jonathan Gress

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,161
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1049 on: April 05, 2013, 03:25:23 PM »
How do you get a girl to leave once you've made the moronic decision to put her on the lease?  ???

I just waited for the lease to be up and reminded her who had a job and who hadn't.  I then said "Meep Meep" and skedaddled roadrunner style.

Interesting that you said "hadn't" not "didn't". Was that just a slip or do you normally say this? I'm not trying to judge your grammar, I'm just professionally interested as a linguist.

If speaking, probably either way depending on the mood.  More likely I would have slurred it to the point that all you'd get out of it would be the "dn't".

If writing, Kipling would have used 'hadn't' so that must be correct.  (Ref: Whatever happens we have got, the Maxim Gun and they have not.)

:)

Actually it's interesting for syntactic reasons. "I reminded her who had a job and who hadn't (a job)". You deleted "a job" because it can be understood from context, and linguists call this "ellipsis". The interesting thing is that I'm sure you wouldn't say "she hadn't a job" but rather "she didn't have a job", so the elided phrase makes me expect "didn't": "I reminded her who had a job and who didn't (have a job)".

Maybe I should have read it as "I reminded her who had a job and who hadn't (had a job)" though that doesn't seem right in context.

Anyway, I have a friend who's working on just these kinds of constructions. I might tell him about this one. ;)

OK enough linguistics geekery.

Offline Justin Kissel

  • •|•|•
  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 31,761
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1050 on: April 05, 2013, 03:51:27 PM »
Ok, back to regular programming then...
"My doubt in Christ is not like that of a child; it was forged in a furnace of faith." - Dostoevsky

Offline Justin Kissel

  • •|•|•
  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 31,761
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1051 on: April 05, 2013, 04:51:40 PM »
Creepy pick up line #45: "You might as well kiss me, because I'm going to tell everybody we did it anyway."
« Last Edit: April 05, 2013, 04:51:48 PM by Asteriktos »
"My doubt in Christ is not like that of a child; it was forged in a furnace of faith." - Dostoevsky

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,275
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1052 on: April 05, 2013, 05:01:06 PM »
How do you get a girl to leave once you've made the moronic decision to put her on the lease?  ???

I just waited for the lease to be up and reminded her who had a job and who hadn't.  I then said "Meep Meep" and skedaddled roadrunner style.

Interesting that you said "hadn't" not "didn't". Was that just a slip or do you normally say this? I'm not trying to judge your grammar, I'm just professionally interested as a linguist.

If speaking, probably either way depending on the mood.  More likely I would have slurred it to the point that all you'd get out of it would be the "dn't".

If writing, Kipling would have used 'hadn't' so that must be correct.  (Ref: Whatever happens we have got, the Maxim Gun and they have not.)

:)

Actually it's interesting for syntactic reasons. "I reminded her who had a job and who hadn't (a job)". You deleted "a job" because it can be understood from context, and linguists call this "ellipsis". The interesting thing is that I'm sure you wouldn't say "she hadn't a job" but rather "she didn't have a job", so the elided phrase makes me expect "didn't": "I reminded her who had a job and who didn't (have a job)".

Maybe I should have read it as "I reminded her who had a job and who hadn't (had a job)" though that doesn't seem right in context.

Anyway, I have a friend who's working on just these kinds of constructions. I might tell him about this one. ;)

OK enough linguistics geekery.

I absolutely would say she hadn't a job.

This is not uncommon in certain registers in American. I don't know about the other versions of American they speak in other countries.

I could even probably give the conditions under which such a construction would be used and what is connotes over and against she didn't have a job.

I would say plenty of Americans could as well, well not as well as I could, but as well, even if they are not aware of their use of it. Heck, it makes up a folksy turned whimsical idiom.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2013, 05:01:47 PM by orthonorm »
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline vamrat

  • Vamratoraptor
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8,475
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1053 on: April 05, 2013, 05:56:46 PM »
How do you get a girl to leave once you've made the moronic decision to put her on the lease?  ???

I just waited for the lease to be up and reminded her who had a job and who hadn't.  I then said "Meep Meep" and skedaddled roadrunner style.

Interesting that you said "hadn't" not "didn't". Was that just a slip or do you normally say this? I'm not trying to judge your grammar, I'm just professionally interested as a linguist.

If speaking, probably either way depending on the mood.  More likely I would have slurred it to the point that all you'd get out of it would be the "dn't".

If writing, Kipling would have used 'hadn't' so that must be correct.  (Ref: Whatever happens we have got, the Maxim Gun and they have not.)

:)

Actually it's interesting for syntactic reasons. "I reminded her who had a job and who hadn't (a job)". You deleted "a job" because it can be understood from context, and linguists call this "ellipsis". The interesting thing is that I'm sure you wouldn't say "she hadn't a job" but rather "she didn't have a job", so the elided phrase makes me expect "didn't": "I reminded her who had a job and who didn't (have a job)".

Maybe I should have read it as "I reminded her who had a job and who hadn't (had a job)" though that doesn't seem right in context.

Anyway, I have a friend who's working on just these kinds of constructions. I might tell him about this one. ;)

OK enough linguistics geekery.

From a self-analysis point of view (take it for what it's worth), I did drop the second "a job" because it seemed useless (all in the back of my mind with no conscious forethought) but wanted the had/had not to agree.  Saying "who had a job and who didn't" just seems komisch to me.  I would have used didn't if I'd said "who did have a job and who didn't" because then the dids would agree, but I would typically only say "who did have a job" if I wanted to emphasize the point.
Das ist des Jägers Ehrenschild, daß er beschützt und hegt sein Wild, weidmännisch jagt, wie sich’s gehört, den Schöpfer im Geschöpfe ehrt.

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,275
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1054 on: April 05, 2013, 06:04:09 PM »
How do you get a girl to leave once you've made the moronic decision to put her on the lease?  ???

I just waited for the lease to be up and reminded her who had a job and who hadn't.  I then said "Meep Meep" and skedaddled roadrunner style.

Interesting that you said "hadn't" not "didn't". Was that just a slip or do you normally say this? I'm not trying to judge your grammar, I'm just professionally interested as a linguist.

If speaking, probably either way depending on the mood.  More likely I would have slurred it to the point that all you'd get out of it would be the "dn't".

If writing, Kipling would have used 'hadn't' so that must be correct.  (Ref: Whatever happens we have got, the Maxim Gun and they have not.)

:)

Actually it's interesting for syntactic reasons. "I reminded her who had a job and who hadn't (a job)". You deleted "a job" because it can be understood from context, and linguists call this "ellipsis". The interesting thing is that I'm sure you wouldn't say "she hadn't a job" but rather "she didn't have a job", so the elided phrase makes me expect "didn't": "I reminded her who had a job and who didn't (have a job)".

Maybe I should have read it as "I reminded her who had a job and who hadn't (had a job)" though that doesn't seem right in context.

Anyway, I have a friend who's working on just these kinds of constructions. I might tell him about this one. ;)

OK enough linguistics geekery.

From a self-analysis point of view (take it for what it's worth), I did drop the second "a job" because it seemed useless (all in the back of my mind with no conscious forethought) but wanted the had/had not to agree.  Saying "who had a job and who didn't" just seems komisch to me.  I would have used didn't if I'd said "who did have a job and who didn't" because then the dids would agree, but I would typically only say "who did have a job" if I wanted to emphasize the point.

I used to love non-American speaking people correcting my American abroad. Negation they had a terrible time with. The English were some of the worst.

You'd've thunk they'd've long learnt the tongue of their betters.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline Anastasia1

  • My warrior name is Beyoncé Pad Thai
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,235
  • Faith: Oriental Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Armenian
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1055 on: April 06, 2013, 03:37:23 AM »
[deleted]
« Last Edit: April 06, 2013, 03:42:49 AM by Anastasia1 »
Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation. (2 Cor 2:6)

Offline JamesR

  • Virginal Chicano Blood
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,485
  • St. Augustine of Hippo pray for me!
  • Faith: Misotheistic Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church *of* America
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1056 on: April 06, 2013, 07:40:39 PM »
I have a question that may be inappropriate, but, if as Orthodox Christians we are only allowed to have sex when we are married, how do we know if a woman will be "good" in bed when we marry? I mean, what if you marry someone who does not satisfy you and has no intention of working with you to satisfy each other, and you go forever sexually dissatisfied?
...Or it's just possible he's a mouthy young man on an internet forum.
In the infinite wisdom of God, James can be all three.

Online Jonathan Gress

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,161
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1057 on: April 06, 2013, 09:33:17 PM »
I have a question that may be inappropriate, but, if as Orthodox Christians we are only allowed to have sex when we are married, how do we know if a woman will be "good" in bed when we marry? I mean, what if you marry someone who does not satisfy you and has no intention of working with you to satisfy each other, and you go forever sexually dissatisfied?

What do you mean by "sexually dissatisfied"?

Offline dzheremi

  • No longer posting here.
  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 4,383
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1058 on: April 06, 2013, 09:50:08 PM »
I have a question that may be inappropriate, but, if as Orthodox Christians we are only allowed to have sex when we are married, how do we know if a woman will be "good" in bed when we marry? I mean, what if you marry someone who does not satisfy you and has no intention of working with you to satisfy each other, and you go forever sexually dissatisfied?

You treat your wife like a wife, not like a car.

Online Jonathan Gress

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,161
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1059 on: April 06, 2013, 10:49:43 PM »
If you go into marriage thinking that you are meant to "perform" for her, and she for you, then you have the wrong idea.

Forget what our culture is saying about "sexual compatibility", your "sexual needs", the need for "sexual fulfillment". It's just a particularly pernicious form of consumerism; the media is making you want things you don't need (again). For thousands of years people have managed to live and reproduce successfully without worrying about these notions.

Just don't go there. Stay away from dating advice sites, the "manosphere", pick-up artists, and all that nonsense.

Offline JamesR

  • Virginal Chicano Blood
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,485
  • St. Augustine of Hippo pray for me!
  • Faith: Misotheistic Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church *of* America
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1060 on: April 06, 2013, 10:57:46 PM »
...For thousands of years people have managed to live and reproduce successfully without worrying about these notions.

Oh really?

Then how come most of the world was polygamous for most of human history and even the Torah allowed a man to give his wife a permit and divorce her for whatever reason--which certainly could have included not being good in bed.
...Or it's just possible he's a mouthy young man on an internet forum.
In the infinite wisdom of God, James can be all three.

Online Jonathan Gress

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,161
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1061 on: April 06, 2013, 11:11:12 PM »
...For thousands of years people have managed to live and reproduce successfully without worrying about these notions.

Oh really?

Then how come most of the world was polygamous for most of human history and even the Torah allowed a man to give his wife a permit and divorce her for whatever reason--which certainly could have included not being good in bed.

When you first broached the topic, you wondered if it was inappropriate. What made you ask that? There may be a clue in there.

Hint: Christ specifically forbade us from divorcing our wives, except for fornication. I.e. Moses' divorce law is no longer valid.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2013, 11:11:58 PM by Jonathan Gress »

Offline JamesR

  • Virginal Chicano Blood
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,485
  • St. Augustine of Hippo pray for me!
  • Faith: Misotheistic Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church *of* America
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1062 on: April 06, 2013, 11:13:47 PM »
...For thousands of years people have managed to live and reproduce successfully without worrying about these notions.

Oh really?

Then how come most of the world was polygamous for most of human history and even the Torah allowed a man to give his wife a permit and divorce her for whatever reason--which certainly could have included not being good in bed.

When you first broached the topic, you wondered if it was inappropriate. What made you ask that? There may be a clue in there.

Hint: Christ specifically forbade us from divorcing our wives, except for adultery. I.e. Moses' divorce law is no longer valid.

Fix'd :) The Bible NEVER condemned fornication.
...Or it's just possible he's a mouthy young man on an internet forum.
In the infinite wisdom of God, James can be all three.

Offline Shiny

  • Site Supporter
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Paint It Red
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1063 on: April 06, 2013, 11:14:25 PM »
Paging LBK on the original Greek for fornication.
“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan

Online Jonathan Gress

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,161
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1064 on: April 06, 2013, 11:22:02 PM »
...For thousands of years people have managed to live and reproduce successfully without worrying about these notions.

Oh really?

Then how come most of the world was polygamous for most of human history and even the Torah allowed a man to give his wife a permit and divorce her for whatever reason--which certainly could have included not being good in bed.

When you first broached the topic, you wondered if it was inappropriate. What made you ask that? There may be a clue in there.

Hint: Christ specifically forbade us from divorcing our wives, except for adultery. I.e. Moses' divorce law is no longer valid.

Fix'd :) The Bible NEVER condemned fornication.

If you want to be a smart-ass about this, go ahead; it's your conscience. I think you know perfectly well how inappropriate you're being.

Your wife is not an object whose purpose is to provide you with sensual pleasure. Being "good in bed" is not a criterion for choosing a spouse in Orthodoxy. That should be the end of it.

And the Greek is porneia, which can mean sexual immorality of various kinds. Obviously, in the context of divorce, it means sleeping with another's husband. You can call it fornication (the traditional KJV translation), you can call it adultery. It means the same thing. You're not smart for nit-picking over irrelevant semantic distinctions.

Offline JamesR

  • Virginal Chicano Blood
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,485
  • St. Augustine of Hippo pray for me!
  • Faith: Misotheistic Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church *of* America
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1065 on: April 06, 2013, 11:36:50 PM »
...For thousands of years people have managed to live and reproduce successfully without worrying about these notions.

Oh really?

Then how come most of the world was polygamous for most of human history and even the Torah allowed a man to give his wife a permit and divorce her for whatever reason--which certainly could have included not being good in bed.

When you first broached the topic, you wondered if it was inappropriate. What made you ask that? There may be a clue in there.

Hint: Christ specifically forbade us from divorcing our wives, except for adultery. I.e. Moses' divorce law is no longer valid.

Fix'd :) The Bible NEVER condemned fornication.

If you want to be a smart-ass about this, go ahead; it's your conscience. I think you know perfectly well how inappropriate you're being.

Your wife is not an object whose purpose is to provide you with sensual pleasure. Being "good in bed" is not a criterion for choosing a spouse in Orthodoxy. That should be the end of it.

And the Greek is porneia, which can mean sexual immorality of various kinds. Obviously, in the context of divorce, it means sleeping with another's husband. You can call it fornication (the traditional KJV translation), you can call it adultery. It means the same thing. You're not smart for nit-picking over irrelevant semantic distinctions.

But it is a big distinction. It's not "irrelevant." What if we've got it wrong the entire time? Adultery means to have sex with a married person, fornication usually means with an unmarried person. The Bible speaks very clearly about the former, but never really about the latter.
...Or it's just possible he's a mouthy young man on an internet forum.
In the infinite wisdom of God, James can be all three.

Offline dzheremi

  • No longer posting here.
  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 4,383
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1066 on: April 06, 2013, 11:40:47 PM »
The Bible says lots of things about sexual relations that you probably don't want to get into if you're looking for a loophole to commit sexual sins...

Offline Punch

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 5,801
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1067 on: April 07, 2013, 01:04:33 AM »
...For thousands of years people have managed to live and reproduce successfully without worrying about these notions.

Oh really?

Then how come most of the world was polygamous for most of human history and even the Torah allowed a man to give his wife a permit and divorce her for whatever reason--which certainly could have included not being good in bed.

When you first broached the topic, you wondered if it was inappropriate. What made you ask that? There may be a clue in there.

Hint: Christ specifically forbade us from divorcing our wives, except for adultery. I.e. Moses' divorce law is no longer valid.

Fix'd :) The Bible NEVER condemned fornication.

If you want to be a smart-ass about this, go ahead; it's your conscience. I think you know perfectly well how inappropriate you're being.

Your wife is not an object whose purpose is to provide you with sensual pleasure. Being "good in bed" is not a criterion for choosing a spouse in Orthodoxy. That should be the end of it.

And the Greek is porneia, which can mean sexual immorality of various kinds. Obviously, in the context of divorce, it means sleeping with another's husband. You can call it fornication (the traditional KJV translation), you can call it adultery. It means the same thing. You're not smart for nit-picking over irrelevant semantic distinctions.

But it is a big distinction. It's not "irrelevant." What if we've got it wrong the entire time? Adultery means to have sex with a married person, fornication usually means with an unmarried person. The Bible speaks very clearly about the former, but never really about the latter.

You know, what you really need to do is go to a farm supply store and purchase an automatic milking machine.  Then go lock yourself in a closet with it until you reach 50 years old.  THEN go look for a wife.
I would be happy to agree with you, but then both of us would be wrong.

Offline NicholasMyra

  • Avowed denominationalist
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,345
  • Nepsis or Sepsis™
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Antiochian+Greek
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1068 on: April 07, 2013, 01:35:56 AM »
I have a question that may be inappropriate, but, if as Orthodox Christians we are only allowed to have sex when we are married, how do we know if a woman will be "good" in bed when we marry? I mean, what if you marry someone who does not satisfy you and has no intention of working with you to satisfy each other, and you go forever sexually dissatisfied?
James,

That's not really how sex works.

Fix'd :) The Bible NEVER condemned fornication.
Fornication is a translation of porneia.

Then how come most of the world was polygamous for most of human history
James. For the umpteenth time...

It wasn't.
« Last Edit: April 07, 2013, 01:37:36 AM by NicholasMyra »
Quote from: Orthonorm
if Christ does and says x. And someone else does and says not x and you are ever in doubt, follow Christ.

Πλούσιοι επτώχευσαν και επείνασαν
Οιδε εκζητούντες τον Κύριον
Ουκ ελαττωθήσονται παντός αγαθού

Online Jonathan Gress

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,161
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1069 on: April 07, 2013, 09:51:33 AM »
...For thousands of years people have managed to live and reproduce successfully without worrying about these notions.

Oh really?

Then how come most of the world was polygamous for most of human history and even the Torah allowed a man to give his wife a permit and divorce her for whatever reason--which certainly could have included not being good in bed.

When you first broached the topic, you wondered if it was inappropriate. What made you ask that? There may be a clue in there.

Hint: Christ specifically forbade us from divorcing our wives, except for adultery. I.e. Moses' divorce law is no longer valid.

Fix'd :) The Bible NEVER condemned fornication.

If you want to be a smart-ass about this, go ahead; it's your conscience. I think you know perfectly well how inappropriate you're being.

Your wife is not an object whose purpose is to provide you with sensual pleasure. Being "good in bed" is not a criterion for choosing a spouse in Orthodoxy. That should be the end of it.

And the Greek is porneia, which can mean sexual immorality of various kinds. Obviously, in the context of divorce, it means sleeping with another's husband. You can call it fornication (the traditional KJV translation), you can call it adultery. It means the same thing. You're not smart for nit-picking over irrelevant semantic distinctions.

But it is a big distinction. It's not "irrelevant." What if we've got it wrong the entire time? Adultery means to have sex with a married person, fornication usually means with an unmarried person. The Bible speaks very clearly about the former, but never really about the latter.

Forgive me, James, I should not have used that tone with you. I understand that our culture puts so much emphasis on this nebulous concept of "sexual compatibility", so it's understandable that you would ask this question. But rest assured that this is not something we are supposed to be concerned about as Orthodox Christians. We should be very careful about taking our cues for life from our surrounding secular culture.

"sexual compatibility" implies "trying out" different partners to find the one that "meets your needs". But don't you think this is completely unnecessary? Sex is something you will be able to work out in time with your wife. If you both truly love each other, this is not going to be an issue. It's not like you're going into the adult industry where you have to "perform" from the start. You don't need to "practice" on other people.

Offline Anastasia1

  • My warrior name is Beyoncé Pad Thai
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,235
  • Faith: Oriental Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Armenian
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1070 on: April 07, 2013, 02:15:29 PM »
From what little I know from others/sources, being good in bed can be learned.
Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation. (2 Cor 2:6)

Offline Shiny

  • Site Supporter
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Paint It Red
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1071 on: April 07, 2013, 03:02:52 PM »
From what little I know from others/sources, being good in bed can be learned.
lol I would say no.
“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan

Offline NicholasMyra

  • Avowed denominationalist
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,345
  • Nepsis or Sepsis™
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Antiochian+Greek
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1072 on: April 07, 2013, 03:28:27 PM »
From what little I know from others/sources, being good in bed can be learned.
lol I would say no.
Quote from: Orthonorm
if Christ does and says x. And someone else does and says not x and you are ever in doubt, follow Christ.

Πλούσιοι επτώχευσαν και επείνασαν
Οιδε εκζητούντες τον Κύριον
Ουκ ελαττωθήσονται παντός αγαθού

Offline TheTrisagion

  • The cat is back and its better than ever!
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 11,517
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1073 on: April 08, 2013, 09:30:07 AM »
From what little I know from others/sources, being good in bed can be learned.
lol I would say no.

Being married for 10 yrs now and both my wife and I were virgins when we were married, I would say yes.  It is like anything else, you practice and get better at it.  Both my wife and I are much more satisfied with "marital relations" now than we were at the beginning.
« Last Edit: April 08, 2013, 09:31:45 AM by TheTrisagion »
Quote from: Mor Ephrem
Why can't you just take your spiritual edification like a man? 

Offline Cyrillic

  • Arbiter Elegantiarum
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,927
  • We must go back!
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1074 on: April 11, 2013, 02:30:35 PM »
Orthonorm, what would you have done if you would have been asked out by two different girls?
We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
-T.S. Eliot

Offline JamesR

  • Virginal Chicano Blood
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,485
  • St. Augustine of Hippo pray for me!
  • Faith: Misotheistic Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church *of* America
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1075 on: April 11, 2013, 02:36:32 PM »
Orthonorm, what would you have done if you would have been asked out by two different girls?

Try to have them both come with me on a date and brag to all my friends about it  ;)
...Or it's just possible he's a mouthy young man on an internet forum.
In the infinite wisdom of God, James can be all three.

Offline mabsoota

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,859
  • Kyrie eleison
  • Faith: Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox (Coptic)
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1076 on: April 11, 2013, 02:48:24 PM »
actually that's the best advice!
you should all go out and become friends, maybe invite some other people too.
then once you all know each other well, you can see if either of the 2 ladies is someone you would like to persue a romantic relationship with.

is orthonorm around?
 8)

Offline J Michael

  • Older than dirt; dumber than a box of rocks; colossally ignorant; a little crazy ;-)
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,479
  • Lord, have mercy! I live under a rock. Alleluia!
  • Faith: Catholic
  • Jurisdiction: Eparchy of Passaic
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1077 on: April 11, 2013, 02:55:40 PM »
nvm
« Last Edit: April 11, 2013, 03:12:31 PM by J Michael »
"May Thy Cross, O Lord, in which I seek refuge, be for me a bridge across the great river of fire.  May I pass along it to the habitation of life." ~St. Ephraim the Syrian

"Sometimes you're the windshield.  Sometimes you're the bug." ~ Mark Knopfler (?)

Offline ironchapman

  • A bull of truth in the china shop of falsehoods.
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 792
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1078 on: May 16, 2013, 03:19:00 AM »
Bump, because my dating/romantic life is still nonexistent, and I need to commiserate with people/rectify this.
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." --Bertrand Russell

Offline adampjr

  • Karamazov
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 89
  • Penguin
Re: Orthonorm's Dating and Relationship Advice Column
« Reply #1079 on: May 16, 2013, 03:38:44 AM »
I have a question that may be inappropriate, but, if as Orthodox Christians we are only allowed to have sex when we are married, how do we know if a woman will be "good" in bed when we marry? I mean, what if you marry someone who does not satisfy you and has no intention of working with you to satisfy each other, and you go forever sexually dissatisfied?

I know I'm just catachumen here, but that is not exactly an 'if' for Orthodox Christians, unless I am woefully misinformed.

As to your question, it is very easy to know a if a woman will be 'good' in bed when you marry. If she's following the same moral as you, she emphatically won't be, and neither will you. Nonetheless you will both very likely be satisfied in spite of that, and like any other activity, 'skill' (if we want to look at it this way) increases with time and even remotely regular performance.

I only had sex when I was married, and I promise that such concerns that you raise are not really an issue.