OrthodoxChristianity.net
December 22, 2014, 11:04:55 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 »  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Only the Orthodox Church can claim to have it's roots since the 1st century.  (Read 5197 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
deusveritasest
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: None
Jurisdiction: None
Posts: 7,528



WWW
« Reply #45 on: July 13, 2011, 05:18:39 PM »

What commonly passes as the Roman Church today did not exist in the 1st century.

If you actually read the rest of my post you would see that I pointed that out.

I don't think so. I actually quoted near the end of your post. I read the whole thing. Feel free to show where you actually established that point.
Logged

I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com
Wyatt
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Posts: 2,395


« Reply #46 on: July 13, 2011, 05:52:33 PM »

"My Church is the true Church!"

"Nuh-uh! My Church is the true Church!"

"Nuh-uh!"

"Uh-uh!"

"Nuh-uh!"

"Uh-hu!"
This is a very productive thread.
LOL. That sums up this forum, not just this thread. At the end of the day I know that our Church is the true Church, but it's still amusing to watch everyone else flop around about it.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2011, 05:53:14 PM by Wyatt » Logged
Father H
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian--God's One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: UOCofUSA-Ecumenical Patriarchate
Posts: 2,612



« Reply #47 on: July 13, 2011, 05:57:03 PM »

"My Church is the true Church!"

"Nuh-uh! My Church is the true Church!"

"Nuh-uh!"

"Uh-uh!"

"Nuh-uh!"

"Uh-hu!"
This is a very productive thread.
LOL. That sums up this forum, not just this thread. At the end of the day I know that our Church is the true Church, but it's still amusing to watch everyone else flop around about it.

Oh, I think that is just about every forum of a religious nature.  But really it is not confined to forums of a religious nature, as other forums are simply "my thoughts are true and yours are not" or "my adherence is true and yours is not"

Nuh uh
Uh hu
etc. 
Logged
Wyatt
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Posts: 2,395


« Reply #48 on: July 13, 2011, 06:00:58 PM »

"My Church is the true Church!"

"Nuh-uh! My Church is the true Church!"

"Nuh-uh!"

"Uh-uh!"

"Nuh-uh!"

"Uh-hu!"
This is a very productive thread.
LOL. That sums up this forum, not just this thread. At the end of the day I know that our Church is the true Church, but it's still amusing to watch everyone else flop around about it.

Oh, I think that is just about every forum of a religious nature.  But really it is not confined to forums of a religious nature, as other forums are simply "my thoughts are true and yours are not" or "my adherence is true and yours is not"

Nuh uh
Uh hu
etc. 
Very true. I have never been a member of a forum where there wasn't a lot of squabbling going on. I must say that it is much more pleasant on this forum compared to some others I have participated in. It's really tiring trying to defend yourself against a majority of atheists who basically call you stupid for believing in a deity.
Logged
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Moderated
Hypatos
*****************
Online Online

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 38,142



« Reply #49 on: July 13, 2011, 06:02:17 PM »

"My Church is the true Church!"

"Nuh-uh! My Church is the true Church!"

"Nuh-uh!"

"Uh-uh!"

"Nuh-uh!"

"Uh-hu!"
This is a very productive thread.

What right do you have to point that out? You and Isa are the two people on this board who play that game the most.
You weren't supposed to point that out. It ruins the whining.
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
Father H
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian--God's One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: UOCofUSA-Ecumenical Patriarchate
Posts: 2,612



« Reply #50 on: July 13, 2011, 06:28:04 PM »

"My Church is the true Church!"

"Nuh-uh! My Church is the true Church!"

"Nuh-uh!"

"Uh-uh!"

"Nuh-uh!"

"Uh-hu!"
This is a very productive thread.
LOL. That sums up this forum, not just this thread. At the end of the day I know that our Church is the true Church, but it's still amusing to watch everyone else flop around about it.

Oh, I think that is just about every forum of a religious nature.  But really it is not confined to forums of a religious nature, as other forums are simply "my thoughts are true and yours are not" or "my adherence is true and yours is not"

Nuh uh
Uh hu
etc. 
Very true. I have never been a member of a forum where there wasn't a lot of squabbling going on. I must say that it is much more pleasant on this forum compared to some others I have participated in. It's really tiring trying to defend yourself against a majority of atheists who basically call you stupid for believing in a deity.

Yes.  I am personally not bothered by them for saying we are stupid for believing in God, but can understand why many are bothered by it and rightly so.   Some of them are not exactly rocket scientists, and those who are on the more intelligent side are often ignorant of history and what Christianity actually holds.  However, more exhausting than the atheists are the wacky beyond-protestant heretics--non-trinitarians, "red-letterers" (eg the "only what Jesus said and forget the rest of Scripture" crowd), and kooky cultists who think they personally have a corner on prophecy.  I am certainly leaving out a few, but the reality is maddening on some forums.  I actually prefer the atheists to the latter.  Actually, on one forum I participate in, the atheists are fairly reasonable, whereas some of the pseudo-Christian cultists make "Christianity" as they would call it look ridiculous.       
Logged
Wyatt
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Posts: 2,395


« Reply #51 on: July 13, 2011, 06:54:29 PM »

"My Church is the true Church!"

"Nuh-uh! My Church is the true Church!"

"Nuh-uh!"

"Uh-uh!"

"Nuh-uh!"

"Uh-hu!"
This is a very productive thread.
LOL. That sums up this forum, not just this thread. At the end of the day I know that our Church is the true Church, but it's still amusing to watch everyone else flop around about it.

Oh, I think that is just about every forum of a religious nature.  But really it is not confined to forums of a religious nature, as other forums are simply "my thoughts are true and yours are not" or "my adherence is true and yours is not"

Nuh uh
Uh hu
etc.  
Very true. I have never been a member of a forum where there wasn't a lot of squabbling going on. I must say that it is much more pleasant on this forum compared to some others I have participated in. It's really tiring trying to defend yourself against a majority of atheists who basically call you stupid for believing in a deity.

Yes.  I am personally not bothered by them for saying we are stupid for believing in God, but can understand why many are bothered by it and rightly so.   Some of them are not exactly rocket scientists, and those who are on the more intelligent side are often ignorant of history and what Christianity actually holds.  However, more exhausting than the atheists are the wacky beyond-protestant heretics--non-trinitarians, "red-letterers" (eg the "only what Jesus said and forget the rest of Scripture" crowd), and kooky cultists who think they personally have a corner on prophecy.  I am certainly leaving out a few, but the reality is maddening on some forums.  I actually prefer the atheists to the latter.  Actually, on one forum I participate in, the atheists are fairly reasonable, whereas some of the pseudo-Christian cultists make "Christianity" as they would call it look ridiculous.      
I hear ya. My pet peeve heretical group is the Oneness Pentecostals. Part of it is because there is a whole branch of my family (second cousins) that are Oneness Pentecostals, and I was exposed to their "church" as a child, and secondly is I currently have a friend who is one and gives me static constantly about being Catholic. For them, they don't focus on the red letters so much. They super-emphasize the book of Acts, or rather their misinterpretation of it.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2011, 06:55:15 PM by Wyatt » Logged
deusveritasest
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: None
Jurisdiction: None
Posts: 7,528



WWW
« Reply #52 on: July 13, 2011, 06:56:39 PM »

However, more exhausting than the atheists are the wacky beyond-protestant heretics--non-trinitarians, "red-letterers" (eg the "only what Jesus said and forget the rest of Scripture" crowd)

Amen to that!

I unfortunately have lots of experience with this sort.
Logged

I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com
stanley123
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Roman Catholic
Posts: 3,809


« Reply #53 on: July 13, 2011, 06:56:45 PM »

It is not so much that Rome has lost it's lineage of apostolic succession but rather it has lost grace of apostolic succession by abandonment of the apostolic faith. ...
Still, I think that it can be argued that there are certain practices and teachings in apostolic times which have been abandoned by the Orthodox Church. For another example, take the teaching in apostolic times that slaves should be subject to their masters. Is it not true that the Orthodox Church has abandoned this apostolic teaching?
Logged
deusveritasest
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: None
Jurisdiction: None
Posts: 7,528



WWW
« Reply #54 on: July 13, 2011, 07:01:13 PM »

For another example, take the teaching in apostolic times that slaves should be subject to their masters. Is it not true that the Orthodox Church has abandoned this apostolic teaching?

I don't think that's really the Apostolic teaching. I think was that slaves should be obedient to their masters, which has a very different connotation from subject. "Subject" implies an affirmation of the righteousness of the relationship of slavery, whereas "obedient" simply affirms in the context of that relationship that the believing slave should bear it in obedience to his/her master, while not necessarily affirming that the existence of the relationship is rightful. It's possible that the Orthodox Church's attitude on the rightfulness of slavery has developed while not contradicting the obedience part.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2011, 07:01:27 PM by deusveritasest » Logged

I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com
Peter J
Formerly PJ
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Melkite
Posts: 6,174



« Reply #55 on: July 13, 2011, 08:07:42 PM »

Actually, on one forum I participate in, the atheists are fairly reasonable, whereas some of the pseudo-Christian cultists make "Christianity" as they would call it look ridiculous.      

The topics of Christianity looking ridiculous and conversations with atheists makes me think of a story I read some years ago. (This is from a Q/A from Anthony Dragani. The actual story is in boldface.)

Quote
Papal Primacy #3: How do you reconcile Papal Infallibility with Byzantine theology?

Regarding the Papacy, it is a profound blessing from God. Unfortunately, WE Catholics sometimes present it in the worst light possible. Allow me to give you an example:

A year or so ago I was eating dinner with a fellow Catholic. We were discussing matters of religion, and an Asian gentleman heard the conversation. He politely introduced himself, and wanted to learn what Catholicism was. He was a recent immigrant from Asia, and was nominally Buddhist. He asked us what Catholics believe. Before I had a chance, my friend answered:

"We believe in the Pope! Everyone must obey him in order to be saved."

This line of conversation went on for several minutes, with my friend emphasizing the necessity of "submission to Rome." There was no mention of Jesus or the Gospel message. This Asian man was noticeably disturbed, and quickly excused himself before I could get more than a word in. That was a lost opportunity.


In stark contrast, Pope John Paul has been striving to present the Papacy in a positive light. He has been working hard to explain the Papacy in the context of the Gospel message. Frankly, the Papacy only makes sense when understood in this context. Of all the exalted Papal titles, Pope John Paul prefers to be called "The Servant of the Servants of God."

This issue is at the very heart of the Orthodox / Catholic split. Eastern Orthodox Christians erroneously think of the Papacy in terms of "submission" to an earthly power. It doesn't help when some of us call them heretics and demand that they "grovel before the mighty throne of Peter." Orthodox Christians find this approach to be very distasteful, and it keeps them very wary of reunion with Rome.

The fact of the matter is that the Papacy is a magnificent gift for the benefit of the Church. The Papacy does not exist for its own benefit, but for the health and well-being of the entire Catholic Church. Pope John Paul has been stressing this in all of his contacts with the Orthodox world. When understood in this light, the Papacy actually becomes appealing to Eastern Orthodox Christians. In fact, I personally know of at least one former Orthodox priest who joined the Byzantine Catholic Church because of this positive understanding of the Papacy.

Likewise, the great authority of the Pope only makes sense when understood in light of the Pope's role as servant. This authority was not bestowed for the Pope's own glory. Rather, this authority was given by Christ as a tool to be used for the benefit of the Church.

In my work in this forum, I am striving to follow the example of Pope John Paul II and present an attractive and accurate understanding of the Papal ministry. I know as a fact that many Eastern Orthodox Christians are reading this forum, and I want them to understand that the Papacy is a blessing, not a curse. During the pontificate of Pope John Paul we have been blessed to witness the Papacy at its very best. His papacy clearly demonstrates that the Papal ministry is one of service.

For a better understanding of the Papacy, and it's past and present relationship with the Eastern Patriarchs, I would highly recommend reading "Rome and the Eastern Churches" by Fr. Aidan Nichols, OP. Father Nichols is a Roman Catholic priest, and a theologian highly respected in both the East and the West. Unfortunately this book is now out of print, but you can order it from interlibrary loan.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2011, 08:11:20 PM by Peter J » Logged

- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)
Father H
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian--God's One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: UOCofUSA-Ecumenical Patriarchate
Posts: 2,612



« Reply #56 on: July 13, 2011, 10:13:19 PM »

"My Church is the true Church!"

"Nuh-uh! My Church is the true Church!"

"Nuh-uh!"

"Uh-uh!"

"Nuh-uh!"

"Uh-hu!"
This is a very productive thread.
LOL. That sums up this forum, not just this thread. At the end of the day I know that our Church is the true Church, but it's still amusing to watch everyone else flop around about it.

Oh, I think that is just about every forum of a religious nature.  But really it is not confined to forums of a religious nature, as other forums are simply "my thoughts are true and yours are not" or "my adherence is true and yours is not"

Nuh uh
Uh hu
etc.  
Very true. I have never been a member of a forum where there wasn't a lot of squabbling going on. I must say that it is much more pleasant on this forum compared to some others I have participated in. It's really tiring trying to defend yourself against a majority of atheists who basically call you stupid for believing in a deity.

Yes.  I am personally not bothered by them for saying we are stupid for believing in God, but can understand why many are bothered by it and rightly so.   Some of them are not exactly rocket scientists, and those who are on the more intelligent side are often ignorant of history and what Christianity actually holds.  However, more exhausting than the atheists are the wacky beyond-protestant heretics--non-trinitarians, "red-letterers" (eg the "only what Jesus said and forget the rest of Scripture" crowd), and kooky cultists who think they personally have a corner on prophecy.  I am certainly leaving out a few, but the reality is maddening on some forums.  I actually prefer the atheists to the latter.  Actually, on one forum I participate in, the atheists are fairly reasonable, whereas some of the pseudo-Christian cultists make "Christianity" as they would call it look ridiculous.      
I hear ya. My pet peeve heretical group is the Oneness Pentecostals. Part of it is because there is a whole branch of my family (second cousins) that are Oneness Pentecostals, and I was exposed to their "church" as a child, and secondly is I currently have a friend who is one and gives me static constantly about being Catholic. For them, they don't focus on the red letters so much. They super-emphasize the book of Acts, or rather their misinterpretation of it.

Yes, Oneness Pentecostals and the internet don't mix well.  Another group is seventh day adventists, who seem to come and leave forums in swarms.   
Logged
Father H
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian--God's One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: UOCofUSA-Ecumenical Patriarchate
Posts: 2,612



« Reply #57 on: July 13, 2011, 10:18:30 PM »

It is not so much that Rome has lost it's lineage of apostolic succession but rather it has lost grace of apostolic succession by abandonment of the apostolic faith. ...
Still, I think that it can be argued that there are certain practices and teachings in apostolic times which have been abandoned by the Orthodox Church. For another example, take the teaching in apostolic times that slaves should be subject to their masters. Is it not true that the Orthodox Church has abandoned this apostolic teaching?

Oh, I don't know.  As slave and servant are the same word, it is a general principle that laborers are to listen to our superiors in work and are responsible to them.   "Servants, listen to your bosses."   
Logged
deusveritasest
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: None
Jurisdiction: None
Posts: 7,528



WWW
« Reply #58 on: July 13, 2011, 10:28:30 PM »

It is not so much that Rome has lost it's lineage of apostolic succession but rather it has lost grace of apostolic succession by abandonment of the apostolic faith. ...
Still, I think that it can be argued that there are certain practices and teachings in apostolic times which have been abandoned by the Orthodox Church. For another example, take the teaching in apostolic times that slaves should be subject to their masters. Is it not true that the Orthodox Church has abandoned this apostolic teaching?

Oh, I don't know.  As slave and servant are the same word, it is a general principle that laborers are to listen to our superiors in work and are responsible to them.   "Servants, listen to your bosses."   

Same word?

Could you explain the difference between doulos and diakonos?
Logged

I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com
LBK
No Reporting Allowed
Warned
Toumarches
************
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,644


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #59 on: July 13, 2011, 10:33:59 PM »

Quote
Same word?

Could you explain the difference between doulos and diakonos?


Doulos is servant, worker or slave. Diakonos is someone who goes out seeking alms for the poor and needy. You oughta brush up on your Greek, Jameson.  Wink
Logged
deusveritasest
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: None
Jurisdiction: None
Posts: 7,528



WWW
« Reply #60 on: July 13, 2011, 10:37:36 PM »

I did a search for "servant Greek" and most of the returns referred to diakonos.
Logged

I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com
stanley123
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Roman Catholic
Posts: 3,809


« Reply #61 on: July 13, 2011, 11:02:27 PM »

For another example, take the teaching in apostolic times that slaves should be subject to their masters. Is it not true that the Orthodox Church has abandoned this apostolic teaching?

I don't think that's really the Apostolic teaching. I think was that slaves should be obedient to their masters, which has a very different connotation from subject. "Subject" implies an affirmation of the righteousness of the relationship of slavery, whereas "obedient" simply affirms in the context of that relationship that the believing slave should bear it in obedience to his/her master, while not necessarily affirming that the existence of the relationship is rightful. It's possible that the Orthodox Church's attitude on the rightfulness of slavery has developed while not contradicting the obedience part.
1 Peter 2:18
New International Version (©1984)
Slaves, submit yourselves to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh.
King James Bible
Servants, be subject to your masters with all fear; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the froward.

What does yur Bible say?
Some Orthodox Christians claim that the Roman Church has teachings which vary from those in apostolic times. This claim is pretty hollow when you consider the fact that the Orthodox Church has abandoned certain apostolic teachings as well. And as well, you appear to deny these apostolic teachings.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2011, 11:04:05 PM by stanley123 » Logged
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Moderated
Hypatos
*****************
Online Online

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 38,142



« Reply #62 on: July 13, 2011, 11:08:43 PM »

I did a search for "servant Greek" and most of the returns referred to diakonos.
doulos is owned by his master and is bound to him, i.e. a slave, diakonos works himself to death for his master.
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
deusveritasest
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: None
Jurisdiction: None
Posts: 7,528



WWW
« Reply #63 on: July 13, 2011, 11:20:20 PM »

For another example, take the teaching in apostolic times that slaves should be subject to their masters. Is it not true that the Orthodox Church has abandoned this apostolic teaching?

I don't think that's really the Apostolic teaching. I think was that slaves should be obedient to their masters, which has a very different connotation from subject. "Subject" implies an affirmation of the righteousness of the relationship of slavery, whereas "obedient" simply affirms in the context of that relationship that the believing slave should bear it in obedience to his/her master, while not necessarily affirming that the existence of the relationship is rightful. It's possible that the Orthodox Church's attitude on the rightfulness of slavery has developed while not contradicting the obedience part.
1 Peter 2:18
New International Version (©1984)
Slaves, submit yourselves to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh.
King James Bible
Servants, be subject to your masters with all fear; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the froward.

What does yur Bible say?
Some Orthodox Christians claim that the Roman Church has teachings which vary from those in apostolic times. This claim is pretty hollow when you consider the fact that the Orthodox Church has abandoned certain apostolic teachings as well. And as well, you appear to deny these apostolic teachings.

That passage appears to be essentially what I was imagining in terms of calling slaves to be obedient to their masters, not necessarily calling society to have slaves.
Logged

I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Moderated
Hypatos
*****************
Online Online

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 38,142



« Reply #64 on: July 13, 2011, 11:21:25 PM »

For another example, take the teaching in apostolic times that slaves should be subject to their masters. Is it not true that the Orthodox Church has abandoned this apostolic teaching?

I don't think that's really the Apostolic teaching. I think was that slaves should be obedient to their masters, which has a very different connotation from subject. "Subject" implies an affirmation of the righteousness of the relationship of slavery, whereas "obedient" simply affirms in the context of that relationship that the believing slave should bear it in obedience to his/her master, while not necessarily affirming that the existence of the relationship is rightful. It's possible that the Orthodox Church's attitude on the rightfulness of slavery has developed while not contradicting the obedience part.
1 Peter 2:18
New International Version (©1984)
Slaves, submit yourselves to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh.
King James Bible
Servants, be subject to your masters with all fear; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the froward.

What does yur Bible say?
Οἱ οἰκέται ὑποτασσόμενοι ἐν παντὶ φόβῳ τοῖς δεσπόταις, οὐ μόνον τοῖς ἀγαθοῖς καὶ ἐπιεικέσιν ἀλλὰ καὶ τοῖς σκολιοῖς.

Some Orthodox Christians claim that the Roman Church has teachings which vary from those in apostolic times. This claim is pretty hollow when you consider the fact that the Orthodox Church has abandoned certain apostolic teachings as well. And as well, you appear to deny these apostolic teachings.
You haven't noticed that slavery has been abolished, and thus, there are no slaves to submit, if you are worried about that.  Neither Christ nor the Apostles laid any obligation to keep that institution (indeed, the Church choked it: for instance, married slaves could not be sold off, lest man put asunder what God had joined).

Why not have us all wear robes, speak Greek and Aramaic, obey a pagan (and persecuting) emperor.....where do you get the idea that all things are equally important?  Neither Christ nor the Apostles taught any such thing.

Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
Wyatt
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Posts: 2,395


« Reply #65 on: July 13, 2011, 11:21:57 PM »

This claim is pretty hollow when you consider the fact that the Orthodox Church has abandoned certain apostolic teachings as well.
When it's us it's heresy, when it's them it's economy. Tongue
Logged
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Moderated
Hypatos
*****************
Online Online

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 38,142



« Reply #66 on: July 13, 2011, 11:25:58 PM »

This claim is pretty hollow when you consider the fact that the Orthodox Church has abandoned certain apostolic teachings as well.
When it's us it's heresy, when it's them it's economy. Tongue
That's because you make the exception the rule.
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
stanley123
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Roman Catholic
Posts: 3,809


« Reply #67 on: July 13, 2011, 11:54:21 PM »

You haven't noticed that slavery has been abolished, and thus, there are no slaves to submit, if you are worried about that.  
You appear to be seriously in error on your claim that there are no slaves today. There is slavery today, and I believe that the Orthodox Church has abandoned the teaching of apostolic times that slaves should submit themselves to their masters with all respect. Therefore, it is pretty unconvincing when an Orthodox Christian claims that the Roman Church has abandoned some of the apostolic teachings.
Here are some of the FACES OF SLAVERY AND BONDAGE
IN THE 21st CENTURY:
http://www.anti-slaverysociety.addr.com/toc.htm
« Last Edit: July 14, 2011, 12:05:57 AM by stanley123 » Logged
stanley123
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Roman Catholic
Posts: 3,809


« Reply #68 on: July 13, 2011, 11:54:54 PM »

Why not have us all wear robes, speak Greek and Aramaic, obey a pagan (and persecuting) emperor.....where do you get the idea that all things are equally important? 
Not at all. I certainly do not place wearing robes or speaking in Greek on the same level as slavery.
http://www.anti-slaverysociety.addr.com/toc.htm
« Last Edit: July 13, 2011, 11:58:51 PM by stanley123 » Logged
deusveritasest
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: None
Jurisdiction: None
Posts: 7,528



WWW
« Reply #69 on: July 14, 2011, 12:18:44 AM »

You haven't noticed that slavery has been abolished, and thus, there are no slaves to submit, if you are worried about that.  
You appear to be seriously in error on your claim that there are no slaves today. There is slavery today, and I believe that the Orthodox Church has abandoned the teaching of apostolic times that slaves should submit themselves to their masters with all respect. Therefore, it is pretty unconvincing when an Orthodox Christian claims that the Roman Church has abandoned some of the apostolic teachings.
Here are some of the FACES OF SLAVERY AND BONDAGE
IN THE 21st CENTURY:
http://www.anti-slaverysociety.addr.com/toc.htm

Where do you get the idea that the OC has abandoned teaching slaves to be obedient to their masters?
Logged

I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com
deusveritasest
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: None
Jurisdiction: None
Posts: 7,528



WWW
« Reply #70 on: July 14, 2011, 12:19:52 AM »

What does yur Bible say?
Οἱ οἰκέται ὑποτασσόμενοι ἐν παντὶ φόβῳ τοῖς δεσπόταις, οὐ μόνον τοῖς ἀγαθοῖς καὶ ἐπιεικέσιν ἀλλὰ καὶ τοῖς σκολιοῖς.

I don't see doulos. Where is the word referring to slave/servant?
Logged

I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com
LBK
No Reporting Allowed
Warned
Toumarches
************
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,644


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #71 on: July 14, 2011, 12:25:43 AM »

Οἱ οἰκέται ὑποτασσόμενοι ἐν παντὶ φόβῳ τοῖς δεσπόταις

That's a pretty accurate definition of slave/servant, AFAIK. As I said, you oughta brush up on your Greek, Jameson.
Logged
deusveritasest
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: None
Jurisdiction: None
Posts: 7,528



WWW
« Reply #72 on: July 14, 2011, 12:27:52 AM »

Stop being ridiculous. You can't just expect someone to know some given foreign language.
Logged

I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com
LBK
No Reporting Allowed
Warned
Toumarches
************
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,644


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #73 on: July 14, 2011, 12:43:45 AM »

Stop being ridiculous. You can't just expect someone to know some given foreign language.

Then get a Greek and brush up on it.
Logged
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Moderated
Hypatos
*****************
Online Online

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 38,142



« Reply #74 on: July 14, 2011, 12:53:26 AM »

What does yur Bible say?
Οἱ οἰκέται ὑποτασσόμενοι ἐν παντὶ φόβῳ τοῖς δεσπόταις, οὐ μόνον τοῖς ἀγαθοῖς καὶ ἐπιεικέσιν ἀλλὰ καὶ τοῖς σκολιοῖς.

I don't see doulos. Where is the word referring to slave/servant?
oiketes is a house slave, practically a member of the family.  There's a connotation of devotion and loyalty, and even affection.
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Moderated
Hypatos
*****************
Online Online

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 38,142



« Reply #75 on: July 14, 2011, 12:56:13 AM »

You haven't noticed that slavery has been abolished, and thus, there are no slaves to submit, if you are worried about that.  
You appear to be seriously in error on your claim that there are no slaves today. There is slavery today, and I believe that the Orthodox Church has abandoned the teaching of apostolic times that slaves should submit themselves to their masters with all respect. Therefore, it is pretty unconvincing when an Orthodox Christian claims that the Roman Church has abandoned some of the apostolic teachings.
Here are some of the FACES OF SLAVERY AND BONDAGE
IN THE 21st CENTURY:
http://www.anti-slaverysociety.addr.com/toc.htm
Slavery is everywhere illegal on the planet. Abolished unfortunately doesn't mean eliminatged. That Apostolic obedience to civil autorities comes into play, besides the moral imperative.

As for your convincing yourself of the Vatican, you seem rather intent on that.  But your unconvincing attempts to bring the Orthodox Faith of the Catholic Church down to the level of the Protean Vatican lays only a foundation of sand.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2011, 12:59:14 AM by ialmisry » Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
deusveritasest
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: None
Jurisdiction: None
Posts: 7,528



WWW
« Reply #76 on: July 14, 2011, 01:00:07 AM »

Stop being ridiculous. You can't just expect someone to know some given foreign language.

Then get a Greek and brush up on it.

 Roll Eyes
Logged

I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com
stanley123
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Roman Catholic
Posts: 3,809


« Reply #77 on: July 14, 2011, 02:30:00 AM »

You haven't noticed that slavery has been abolished, and thus, there are no slaves to submit, if you are worried about that. 
You appear to be seriously in error on your claim that there are no slaves today. There is slavery today, and I believe that the Orthodox Church has abandoned the teaching of apostolic times that slaves should submit themselves to their masters with all respect. Therefore, it is pretty unconvincing when an Orthodox Christian claims that the Roman Church has abandoned some of the apostolic teachings.
Here are some of the FACES OF SLAVERY AND BONDAGE
IN THE 21st CENTURY:
http://www.anti-slaverysociety.addr.com/toc.htm

Where do you get the idea that the OC has abandoned teaching slaves to be obedient to their masters?
Oh. So slaves are supposed to be obedient to their masters according to the teaching of the Orthodox Church? Is that it? Can you kindly supply a reference to some authoritative source for that?
« Last Edit: July 14, 2011, 02:33:17 AM by stanley123 » Logged
stanley123
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Roman Catholic
Posts: 3,809


« Reply #78 on: July 14, 2011, 02:32:16 AM »

You haven't noticed that slavery has been abolished, and thus, there are no slaves to submit, if you are worried about that.  
You appear to be seriously in error on your claim that there are no slaves today. There is slavery today, and I believe that the Orthodox Church has abandoned the teaching of apostolic times that slaves should submit themselves to their masters with all respect. Therefore, it is pretty unconvincing when an Orthodox Christian claims that the Roman Church has abandoned some of the apostolic teachings.
Here are some of the FACES OF SLAVERY AND BONDAGE
IN THE 21st CENTURY:
http://www.anti-slaverysociety.addr.com/toc.htm
Slavery is everywhere illegal on the planet. Abolished unfortunately doesn't mean eliminatged. That Apostolic obedience to civil autorities comes into play, besides the moral imperative.

As for your convincing yourself of the Vatican, you seem rather intent on that.  But your unconvincing attempts to bring the Orthodox Faith of the Catholic Church down to the level of the Protean Vatican lays only a foundation of sand.
So do you still insist on claiming that "there are no slaves to submit"? Even after I have given you proof that there are slaves today?
Logged
stanley123
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Roman Catholic
Posts: 3,809


« Reply #79 on: July 14, 2011, 02:38:21 AM »

That Apostolic obedience to civil autorities comes into play, besides the moral imperative.
What is the moral imperative with reference to the idea that slaves should submit themselves to their masters?
Logged
deusveritasest
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: None
Jurisdiction: None
Posts: 7,528



WWW
« Reply #80 on: July 14, 2011, 02:38:34 AM »

You haven't noticed that slavery has been abolished, and thus, there are no slaves to submit, if you are worried about that. 
You appear to be seriously in error on your claim that there are no slaves today. There is slavery today, and I believe that the Orthodox Church has abandoned the teaching of apostolic times that slaves should submit themselves to their masters with all respect. Therefore, it is pretty unconvincing when an Orthodox Christian claims that the Roman Church has abandoned some of the apostolic teachings.
Here are some of the FACES OF SLAVERY AND BONDAGE
IN THE 21st CENTURY:
http://www.anti-slaverysociety.addr.com/toc.htm

Where do you get the idea that the OC has abandoned teaching slaves to be obedient to their masters?
Oh. So slaves are supposed to be obedient to their masters according to the teaching of the Orthodox Church? Is that it? Can you kindly supply a reference to some authoritative source for that?

You're the one who was making assumptions. Stop projecting. I never said that the Orthodox Church teaches that. I just said that it might.
Logged

I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com
Wyatt
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Posts: 2,395


« Reply #81 on: July 14, 2011, 03:51:48 AM »

This claim is pretty hollow when you consider the fact that the Orthodox Church has abandoned certain apostolic teachings as well.
When it's us it's heresy, when it's them it's economy. Tongue
That's because you make the exception the rule.
How so?
Logged
Severian
God save Egypt, Syria, Lebanon & Iraq
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Miaphysite Orthodoxy
Jurisdiction: The Church of Alexandria
Posts: 5,050


Saint Severus of Antioch - the Eloquent Mouth

Partisangirl
WWW
« Reply #82 on: July 14, 2011, 03:52:58 AM »

Quote
the Holy Mother Church of all Christendom, Holy Zion, Jerusalem and the three Palestines.  That would be...the Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem.
Indeed, long live the Orthodox Bishop of Jerusalem:

His Beatitude Archbishop Torkom Manoogian of Jerusalem

Quote from: ialmisry
the Pope of Alexandria, the original Pope
The original Pope:

HH Pope Shenouda III Patriarch of Alexandria and all Africa

Quote from: Wyatt
Our Holy Apostolic See was founded Ss. Peter and Paul...
The true successor of Sts Peter and Paul the Apostles:

HH Mar Ignatius Zaka I Iwas Patriarch of Antioch and all the East

Quote from: FatherHLL
And your communion does not have a Bishop of Constantinople
Well mine certainly does...

HB Mesrob II Mutafyan Bishop of Constantinople and all Turkey



Lol!
« Last Edit: July 14, 2011, 04:19:42 AM by Severian » Logged

"These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." -Jesus Christ

I am currently not an active poster on the forum. Please forgive any offense I might have caused in the past. Thank you.
stanley123
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Roman Catholic
Posts: 3,809


« Reply #83 on: July 14, 2011, 04:00:37 AM »

You haven't noticed that slavery has been abolished, and thus, there are no slaves to submit, if you are worried about that. 
You appear to be seriously in error on your claim that there are no slaves today. There is slavery today, and I believe that the Orthodox Church has abandoned the teaching of apostolic times that slaves should submit themselves to their masters with all respect. Therefore, it is pretty unconvincing when an Orthodox Christian claims that the Roman Church has abandoned some of the apostolic teachings.
Here are some of the FACES OF SLAVERY AND BONDAGE
IN THE 21st CENTURY:
http://www.anti-slaverysociety.addr.com/toc.htm

Where do you get the idea that the OC has abandoned teaching slaves to be obedient to their masters?
Oh. So slaves are supposed to be obedient to their masters according to the teaching of the Orthodox Church? Is that it? Can you kindly supply a reference to some authoritative source for that?

You're the one who was making assumptions. Stop projecting. I never said that the Orthodox Church teaches that. I just said that it might.
It might? Can you give an authoritative  reference for that? I really doubt that it teaches anything of the sort.
Logged
deusveritasest
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: None
Jurisdiction: None
Posts: 7,528



WWW
« Reply #84 on: July 14, 2011, 04:16:16 AM »

You haven't noticed that slavery has been abolished, and thus, there are no slaves to submit, if you are worried about that. 
You appear to be seriously in error on your claim that there are no slaves today. There is slavery today, and I believe that the Orthodox Church has abandoned the teaching of apostolic times that slaves should submit themselves to their masters with all respect. Therefore, it is pretty unconvincing when an Orthodox Christian claims that the Roman Church has abandoned some of the apostolic teachings.
Here are some of the FACES OF SLAVERY AND BONDAGE
IN THE 21st CENTURY:
http://www.anti-slaverysociety.addr.com/toc.htm

Where do you get the idea that the OC has abandoned teaching slaves to be obedient to their masters?
Oh. So slaves are supposed to be obedient to their masters according to the teaching of the Orthodox Church? Is that it? Can you kindly supply a reference to some authoritative source for that?

You're the one who was making assumptions. Stop projecting. I never said that the Orthodox Church teaches that. I just said that it might.
It might? Can you give an authoritative  reference for that? I really doubt that it teaches anything of the sort.

The burden of proof would actually be on those who want to suggest that the teaching has changed. Otherwise status quo should simply assume that it has remained the same.
Logged

I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com
deusveritasest
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: None
Jurisdiction: None
Posts: 7,528



WWW
« Reply #85 on: July 14, 2011, 04:17:21 AM »

Indeed, long live the Orthodox Bishop of Jerusalem:

His Holiness Archbishop Torkom Manoogian of Jerusalem

The Armenians are not the Apostolic church of Palestine.
Logged

I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com
Severian
God save Egypt, Syria, Lebanon & Iraq
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Miaphysite Orthodoxy
Jurisdiction: The Church of Alexandria
Posts: 5,050


Saint Severus of Antioch - the Eloquent Mouth

Partisangirl
WWW
« Reply #86 on: July 14, 2011, 04:22:16 AM »

Indeed, long live the Orthodox Bishop of Jerusalem:

His Holiness Archbishop Torkom Manoogian of Jerusalem

The Armenians are not the Apostolic church of Palestine.
Oh, whatever.  Tongue 

Just kidding Wink. Technically you are right, but then again, neither are the Catholics. And the Greek Patriarchate of Jerusalem was only established at Chalcedon even though the Bishopric of Jerusaelm has been there since ancient times. And even if he isn't the Apostolic Patriarch, he is the Orthodox Patriarch*.


*Not that I don't consider EOs Orthodox, I do consider them such.



P.S. I liked how you changed your faith status to "drawn to Oriental Orthodox Christianity". May God guide you, Deusveritasest.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2011, 04:42:39 AM by Severian » Logged

"These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." -Jesus Christ

I am currently not an active poster on the forum. Please forgive any offense I might have caused in the past. Thank you.
stanley123
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Roman Catholic
Posts: 3,809


« Reply #87 on: July 14, 2011, 04:26:12 AM »

You haven't noticed that slavery has been abolished, and thus, there are no slaves to submit, if you are worried about that. 
You appear to be seriously in error on your claim that there are no slaves today. There is slavery today, and I believe that the Orthodox Church has abandoned the teaching of apostolic times that slaves should submit themselves to their masters with all respect. Therefore, it is pretty unconvincing when an Orthodox Christian claims that the Roman Church has abandoned some of the apostolic teachings.
Here are some of the FACES OF SLAVERY AND BONDAGE
IN THE 21st CENTURY:
http://www.anti-slaverysociety.addr.com/toc.htm

Where do you get the idea that the OC has abandoned teaching slaves to be obedient to their masters?
Oh. So slaves are supposed to be obedient to their masters according to the teaching of the Orthodox Church? Is that it? Can you kindly supply a reference to some authoritative source for that?

You're the one who was making assumptions. Stop projecting. I never said that the Orthodox Church teaches that. I just said that it might.
It might? Can you give an authoritative  reference for that? I really doubt that it teaches anything of the sort.

The burden of proof would actually be on those who want to suggest that the teaching has changed. Otherwise status quo should simply assume that it has remained the same.
Do you mean then that we should assume that the Orthodox Church teaches that slaves should submit to their masters?
Logged
Severian
God save Egypt, Syria, Lebanon & Iraq
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Miaphysite Orthodoxy
Jurisdiction: The Church of Alexandria
Posts: 5,050


Saint Severus of Antioch - the Eloquent Mouth

Partisangirl
WWW
« Reply #88 on: July 14, 2011, 04:33:51 AM »

Let me just show you all the Patriarch of Constantinople, because I edited my previous two posts:


HB Mesrob II Mutafyan Bishop of Constantinople and all Turkey



Lol!
« Last Edit: July 14, 2011, 04:34:05 AM by Severian » Logged

"These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." -Jesus Christ

I am currently not an active poster on the forum. Please forgive any offense I might have caused in the past. Thank you.
deusveritasest
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: None
Jurisdiction: None
Posts: 7,528



WWW
« Reply #89 on: July 14, 2011, 04:44:48 AM »

Indeed, long live the Orthodox Bishop of Jerusalem:

His Holiness Archbishop Torkom Manoogian of Jerusalem

The Armenians are not the Apostolic church of Palestine.
Oh, whatever.  Tongue 

Just kidding Wink. Technically you are right, but then again, neither are the Catholics. And the Greek Patriarchate of Jerusalem was only established at Chalcedon even though the Bishopric of Jerusaelm has been there since ancient times.

Here is the head of the real Apostolic church of Palestine:

Mor Severios Malke Mourad


Logged

I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com
Tags:
Pages: « 1 2 3 »  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.172 seconds with 72 queries.