Shiny
Übermensch
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
 Online
Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 12,764
Paint It Red
|
 |
« on: May 29, 2011, 09:20:54 PM » |
|
Orthodoxy, from my understanding, embraces mystery much more than a logical interpretation.
Anyway, why exactly is life a mystery? Why is it in mystery that we can come to know God?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Morality and nature are not related at all. Rape is natural yet, it is immoral. Morality isn't defined by nature nor is nature defined by morality. Morality is morality and nature is nature. JamesR pwns, for real |
|
|
|
Asteriktos
|
|
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2011, 01:10:08 AM » |
|
Well, let me start with this... leaving aside which translation is best, what comes to mind when you read something like this...
"The Tao that can be understood cannot be the primal, or cosmic, Tao, just as an idea that can be expressed in words cannot be the infinite idea."
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You mean they all saw her bite your buttons?"
|
|
|
biro
Excelsior
Site Supporter
Merarches
Online
Faith: Orthodox Christian (chrismated 09/29/13)
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Church
Posts: 10,933
Και κλήρονομον δείξον με, ζωής της αιωνίου
|
|
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2011, 01:14:51 AM » |
|
Cute cat.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
orthonorm
|
|
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2011, 07:23:34 AM » |
|
Cute cat. Crypto-Mason. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Not likely to respond to any posts or PMs. If you really must contact me, see my email. Happy Holidays!
|
|
|
|
yeshuaisiam
|
|
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2011, 08:29:12 AM » |
|
Orthodoxy, from my understanding, embraces mystery much more than a logical interpretation.
Anyway, why exactly is life a mystery? Why is it in mystery that we can come to know God?
Today's orthodoxy does embrace a lot of mystery. Not to be rude to Orthodoxy, (I consider myself as an Orthodox Christian), there is a lot of "fluff" that has been added. Many needless, pointless, and ornate things. Much of the power mongering hierarchy has changed what "Orthodoxy" is. Orthodox Christians were never so involved in dogma as they are today pre-nicea. There was no actions such as: cross - bow - venerate icon - cross again, bow. I don't think God really cares about that stuff and its really weird to boot. Sure it can manifest a delusional euphoria of hyper spirituality, but thats all that kind of stuff does. But that DOES NOT render "Orthodoxy" as invalid. Orthodox is literally translated to "The right way". This is not "Constantines way" or any other way. It's the way it was originally done. It was simply about being a Christian and following the teachings of Yeshua. There was no iconostatsis in worship, no icons involved in worship, tons of blessings of objects, no ICXC hand gestures. Oh yea, and Halos. It really got out of hand honestly. Of course, it got out of hand eons ago and has been a long standing tradition so I personally get slapped with "how dare you challenge". Christianity was much more simplistic in the early days, even with all the martyrdom. Without doubt I do believe that the church picked up many pagan elements and implemented them into its own worship practice. Whether or not the church should have done this is another issue, but its "fluff" none the less and uneeded. I believe this is where the "mystery" comes into play. Because it's all "mystical fluff", when in reality what it should be is "simple" and "clear". There always has to be long explanations for fluff. (think about icons for instance). So much dogma, so little clarity without mysticism. In simplicity, logical reasoning is much easier to understand. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Iconodule
|
|
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2011, 10:34:59 AM » |
|
"The Tao that can be understood cannot be the primal, or cosmic, Tao, just as an idea that can be expressed in words cannot be the infinite idea."
That's got to be the most prosaic and clunky translation of Laozi's opening that I've ever seen. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Just ignore iconotools delusions. He is the biggest multiculturalist globalist there is due to his unfortunate background.
|
|
|
Antonis
Prodigal
High Elder
 Offline
Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Metropolis of San Francisco
Posts: 627
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2011, 12:17:00 PM » |
|
Chinese is so hard to really put into words for English, to translate and retain its "form."
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
How shall I not weep when I think of death? For I have seen my brother in his coffin, without glory or comeliness. What, then, do I expect? And what do I hope for? Only grant me, O Lord, repentance before the end.
|
|
|
|
Asteriktos
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 16, 2011, 08:34:32 PM » |
|
"The Tao that can be understood cannot be the primal, or cosmic, Tao, just as an idea that can be expressed in words cannot be the infinite idea."
That's got to be the most prosaic and clunky translation of Laozi's opening that I've ever seen. Out of curiosity, what translation would you suggest (a version that could still be bought as a book would be particularly helpful)? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You mean they all saw her bite your buttons?"
|
|
|
|
Iconodule
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 17, 2011, 12:23:36 AM » |
|
"The Tao that can be understood cannot be the primal, or cosmic, Tao, just as an idea that can be expressed in words cannot be the infinite idea."
That's got to be the most prosaic and clunky translation of Laozi's opening that I've ever seen. Out of curiosity, what translation would you suggest (a version that could still be bought as a book would be particularly helpful)? I think the best translation was probably the one by Red Pine, not just because it's a good translation, but because it contains bits of commentary for each chapter, some of it Taoist, some of it not. But honestly, everything you need to know about Taoism is contained in this scene: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5kmkYMqfYY |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Just ignore iconotools delusions. He is the biggest multiculturalist globalist there is due to his unfortunate background.
|
|
|
theo philosopher
Elder
Offline
Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Self-Ruled Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 315
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 19, 2011, 06:20:50 PM » |
|
Two answers:
1) It is a difficult thing to do, but just sit back and look at everything. The great existentialists have all asked the question, "Why does something exist?" That is the mystery of life.
2) It is in that mystery that we find God. Why must we find God in mystery and not in rationality? It is not because God is irrational - certainly rational arguments and lead us to God, just as a boat can lead us to a shore - but it is in mystery that we must leap into God (just like we must leap off of the boat if we wish to go ashore). Instead, God is beyond our capacity to reason. He is above us, He is beyond us, He is infinitely greater than us. It's not that He blinds us to His presence so as to play a Divine game of cat and mouse, but instead that because we are very finite in our natures and He is infinite, the Infinite, by logical definition we must approach Him as mysterious.
So in a way, that's the rationality behind the mystery.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“Wherefore, then, death approaches, gulps down the bait of the body, and is pierced by the hook of the divinity. Then, having tasted of the sinless and life-giving body, it is destroyed and gives up all those whom it had swallowed down of old." - St. John of Damascus
|
|
|
|
orthonorm
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 19, 2011, 06:30:03 PM » |
|
//|=O
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Not likely to respond to any posts or PMs. If you really must contact me, see my email. Happy Holidays!
|
|
|
theo philosopher
Elder
Offline
Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Self-Ruled Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 315
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 19, 2011, 08:22:00 PM » |
|
//|=O
Did I say something wrong? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“Wherefore, then, death approaches, gulps down the bait of the body, and is pierced by the hook of the divinity. Then, having tasted of the sinless and life-giving body, it is destroyed and gives up all those whom it had swallowed down of old." - St. John of Damascus
|
|
|
Shiny
Übermensch
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
Online
Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 12,764
Paint It Red
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 19, 2011, 10:09:58 PM » |
|
Two answers:
1) It is a difficult thing to do, but just sit back and look at everything. The great existentialists have all asked the question, "Why does something exist?" That is the mystery of life.
2) It is in that mystery that we find God. Why must we find God in mystery and not in rationality? It is not because God is irrational - certainly rational arguments and lead us to God, just as a boat can lead us to a shore - but it is in mystery that we must leap into God (just like we must leap off of the boat if we wish to go ashore). Instead, God is beyond our capacity to reason. He is above us, He is beyond us, He is infinitely greater than us. It's not that He blinds us to His presence so as to play a Divine game of cat and mouse, but instead that because we are very finite in our natures and He is infinite, the Infinite, by logical definition we must approach Him as mysterious.
So in a way, that's the rationality behind the mystery.
WB Theo! Hey btw your answer on 2) you should pick up Met. Kallistos Ware's The Orthodox Way he goes into it in depth, as far as finding God in mystery. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Morality and nature are not related at all. Rape is natural yet, it is immoral. Morality isn't defined by nature nor is nature defined by morality. Morality is morality and nature is nature. JamesR pwns, for real |
|
|
|
Carl Kraeff (Second Chance)
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 19, 2011, 10:33:34 PM » |
|
//|=O
I have noticed tht you use this (//|=O) often. What does it mean? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Michal: "SC, love you in this thread."
|
|
|
|
Asteriktos
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 19, 2011, 10:36:01 PM » |
|
"The Tao that can be understood cannot be the primal, or cosmic, Tao, just as an idea that can be expressed in words cannot be the infinite idea."
That's got to be the most prosaic and clunky translation of Laozi's opening that I've ever seen. Out of curiosity, what translation would you suggest (a version that could still be bought as a book would be particularly helpful)? I think the best translation was probably the one by Red Pine, not just because it's a good translation, but because it contains bits of commentary for each chapter, some of it Taoist, some of it not. But honestly, everything you need to know about Taoism is contained in this scene: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5kmkYMqfYYThank you for the suggestion, I put a copy in my amazon cart... and also the yt video, lol |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You mean they all saw her bite your buttons?"
|
|
|
|
orthonorm
|
|
« Reply #15 on: July 19, 2011, 10:41:14 PM » |
|
//|=O
I have noticed tht you use this (//|=O) often. What does it mean? Not too often. It is the fuehrer yawning. He is bored with the comments. Usually he is just: //:=| Since some folks need emoticons around here to understand the slightest bit of irony, I figured I would engage in the death of literacy and getting Godwin's Law outta the way ASAP in any thread where I need an pictogram to demonstrate rhetoric. Someone might say it is an ironic use of a emoticon to convey irony. Someone might say I am just being an . . . I wouldn't disagree. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Not likely to respond to any posts or PMs. If you really must contact me, see my email. Happy Holidays!
|
|
|
|
IsmiLiora
|
|
« Reply #16 on: July 19, 2011, 10:58:52 PM » |
|
That's the longest explanation for an emoticon that I've read in quite a while. Congrats.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
She's touring the facility/and picking up slack.
--
"For in much wisdom is much grief, and he who increases knowledge increases sorrow." Ecclesiastes 1:18
--
I once believed in causes too, I had my pointless point of view --
Life went on no matter who was wrong or right
|
|
|
|
Carl Kraeff (Second Chance)
|
|
« Reply #17 on: July 20, 2011, 05:06:07 PM » |
|
That's the longest explanation for an emoticon that I've read in quite a while. Congrats.
Yes, it is quite a work of art ( I mean the explanation). BTW, while it is not against forum rules (hence no green/bold font), would it not be better to just leave the thread instead of airing one's boredom and possibly offending a participant? |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 20, 2011, 05:09:18 PM by Second Chance »
|
Logged
|
Michal: "SC, love you in this thread."
|
|
|
|
