Author Topic: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"  (Read 1670 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vadim

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
  • Bishop Atanasije Jevtic on the photograph
"...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« on: June 20, 2011, 03:46:25 PM »
The Definition of Faith of the Council of Chalcedon

"...therefore this present holy, great, and ecumenical synod, desiring to exclude every device against the Truth, and teaching that which is unchanged from the beginning, has at the very outset decreed that the faith of the Three Hundred and Eighteen Fathers shall be preserved inviolate.  And on account of them that contend against the Holy Ghost, it confirms the doctrine afterwards delivered concerning the substance of the Spirit by the One Hundred and Fifty holy Fathers who assembled in the imperial City; which doctrine they declared unto all men, not as though they were introducing anything that had been lacking in their predecessors, but in order to explain through written documents their faith concerning the Holy Ghost against those who were seeking to destroy his sovereignty."

Doesn't Filioque addition look like as Roman Catholics wanted to "introduce anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"?

Offline ialmisry

  • There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 38,744
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2011, 04:10:19 PM »
The Definition of Faith of the Council of Chalcedon

"...therefore this present holy, great, and ecumenical synod, desiring to exclude every device against the Truth, and teaching that which is unchanged from the beginning, has at the very outset decreed that the faith of the Three Hundred and Eighteen Fathers shall be preserved inviolate.  And on account of them that contend against the Holy Ghost, it confirms the doctrine afterwards delivered concerning the substance of the Spirit by the One Hundred and Fifty holy Fathers who assembled in the imperial City; which doctrine they declared unto all men, not as though they were introducing anything that had been lacking in their predecessors, but in order to explain through written documents their faith concerning the Holy Ghost against those who were seeking to destroy his sovereignty."

Doesn't Filioque addition look like as Roman Catholics wanted to "introduce anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"?
LOL. Exactly.
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth

Offline HabteSelassie

  • Ises and I-ity
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,332
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2011, 04:23:30 PM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!



stay blessed,
habte selassie
"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,260
  • Faith: Melkite Catholic
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2011, 09:24:40 AM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!



stay blessed,
habte selassie

Hi HabteSelassie.

Many different recipes are possible with the same few ingredients.

In this case, the basic ingredients are:
1. Here's our (Orthodox) position ...
2. Here's our (Catholic) position ...
3. The positions are the same.
4. The positions are not the same.

I won't try to list, or even count, the many different conversations that have grown out of them.
- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline podkarpatska

  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9,251
  • Pokrov
    • ACROD (home)
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2011, 09:58:14 AM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!



stay blessed,
habte selassie

POM candidate?

Offline Shiranui117

  • Formerly known as "Wandering Sheep"
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 150
  • PUDDI PUDDI!
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2011, 11:26:27 AM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!



stay blessed,
habte selassie

POM candidate?
I certainly enjoyed it thoroughly  ;D

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2011, 12:33:32 PM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!



stay blessed,
habte selassie
This filly-o-que is a dead topic.
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,260
  • Faith: Melkite Catholic
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2011, 12:49:53 PM »
- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,260
  • Faith: Melkite Catholic
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2011, 12:52:02 PM »


Funny ... earlier I was thinking that looks a little like the scene from "Office Space", with the copier replaced by a horse ... then a few minutes ago I realized that's exactly what it is.
- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline Vadim

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
  • Bishop Atanasije Jevtic on the photograph
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2011, 12:56:13 PM »
Many different recipes are possible with the same few ingredients.

In this case, the basic ingredients are:
What I wanted to say: Roman Catholics often say, that they could change the Creed, because the Second Ecumenical Council did so. But in fact, the Fourth Ecumenical Council, after having read both of these Creeds, explicitly explained, that the Second Ecumenical Council didn't introduce "anything that had been lacking in their predecessors". It introduced the complete teaching on the Holy Spirit, because in the previous Creed there were only four words about Holy Spirit: "...And in the Holy Ghost". Whereas Filioque addition really looks so, as it "had been lacking in their predecessors".

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,260
  • Faith: Melkite Catholic
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2011, 01:36:17 PM »
Many different recipes are possible with the same few ingredients.

In this case, the basic ingredients are:
What I wanted to say: Roman Catholics often say, that they could change the Creed, because the Second Ecumenical Council did so. But in fact, the Fourth Ecumenical Council, after having read both of these Creeds, explicitly explained, that the Second Ecumenical Council didn't introduce "anything that had been lacking in their predecessors". It introduced the complete teaching on the Holy Spirit, because in the previous Creed there were only four words about Holy Spirit: "...And in the Holy Ghost". Whereas Filioque addition really looks so, as it "had been lacking in their predecessors".

I think you've inadvertently supported the Catholic position.
- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline Shlomlokh

  • 主哀れめよ!
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,319
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #11 on: June 21, 2011, 03:19:30 PM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!



stay blessed,
habte selassie
This filly-o-que is a dead topic.
Did Fr. Philly O'Cuay pronounce the last rites?

In Christ,
Andrew
"I will pour out my prayer unto the Lord, and to Him will I proclaim my grief; for with evils my soul is filled, and my life unto hades hath drawn nigh, and like Jonah I will pray: From corruption raise me up, O God." -Ode VI, Irmos of the Supplicatory Canon to the Theotokos

Offline Vadim

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
  • Bishop Atanasije Jevtic on the photograph
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #12 on: June 21, 2011, 04:42:39 PM »
I think you've inadvertently supported the Catholic position.
How?

Offline ialmisry

  • There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 38,744
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #13 on: June 21, 2011, 05:33:31 PM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!



stay blessed,
habte selassie
This filly-o-que is a dead topic.
Did Fr. Philly O'Cuay pronounce the last rites?

In Christ,
Andrew
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth

Offline ialmisry

  • There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 38,744
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #14 on: June 21, 2011, 05:36:17 PM »
I think you've inadvertently supported the Catholic position.
How?
You haven't, but I'll wait for PJ to argue their case.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2011, 05:36:45 PM by ialmisry »
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth

Offline WetCatechumen

  • Roman Catholic
  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 297
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #15 on: June 21, 2011, 06:03:28 PM »
Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!



stay blessed,
habte selassie

Hi HabteSelassie.

Many different recipes are possible with the same few ingredients.

In this case, the basic ingredients are:
1. Here's our (Orthodox) position ...
2. Here's our (Catholic) position ...
3. The positions are the same.
4. The positions are not the same.

I won't try to list, or even count, the many different conversations that have grown out of them.

Usually #3 is satisfied by elijahmaria.
"And because they have nothing better to do, they take cushion and chairs to Rome. And while the Pope is saying liturgy, they go, 'Oh, oh, oh, filioque!' And the Pope say, 'Filioque? That-uh sound nice! I think I divide-uh the Church over it!'" - Comrade Real Presence

Offline WetCatechumen

  • Roman Catholic
  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 297
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #16 on: June 21, 2011, 06:04:42 PM »
I think you've inadvertently supported the Catholic position.
How?
Because the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed was a modification of the Nicene Creed which was in turn a modification of the Apostle's Creed.
"And because they have nothing better to do, they take cushion and chairs to Rome. And while the Pope is saying liturgy, they go, 'Oh, oh, oh, filioque!' And the Pope say, 'Filioque? That-uh sound nice! I think I divide-uh the Church over it!'" - Comrade Real Presence

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,260
  • Faith: Melkite Catholic
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #17 on: June 21, 2011, 06:09:26 PM »
Many different recipes are possible with the same few ingredients.

In this case, the basic ingredients are:
What I wanted to say: Roman Catholics often say, that they could change the Creed, because the Second Ecumenical Council did so. But in fact, the Fourth Ecumenical Council, after having read both of these Creeds, explicitly explained, that the Second Ecumenical Council didn't introduce "anything that had been lacking in their predecessors". It introduced the complete teaching on the Holy Spirit, because in the previous Creed there were only four words about Holy Spirit: "...And in the Holy Ghost". Whereas Filioque addition really looks so, as it "had been lacking in their predecessors".

I think you've inadvertently supported the Catholic position.

Clearly, "not as though they were introducing anything that had been lacking in their predecessors" doesn't mean there are no statements in the Creed of 381 that weren't in the Creed of 325.

The Creed of 381 contained a statement that wasn't in the Creed of 325, but it didn't introduce "anything that had been lacking in their predecessors" because the statement in question was already part of the deposit of faith.

The Creed of Toledo contained a statement that wasn't in the Creed of 381 (i.e. that the eternal procession of the Spirit is from the Son as well as the Father), but it didn't introduce "anything that had been lacking in their predecessors" because the statement in question was already part of the deposit of faith.

- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline ialmisry

  • There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 38,744
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #18 on: June 21, 2011, 06:11:17 PM »
I think you've inadvertently supported the Catholic position.
How?
Because the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed was a modification of the Nicene Creed which was in turn a modification of the Apostle's Creed.
No, it wasn't. The so called Apostles Creed had nothing (except similarity in origins) to do with the Nicene Creed.

filioque is a, heretical, modification of the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed.  The Constantinopolitan Creed is an Orthodox expansion of the Nicene Creed.
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth

Offline ialmisry

  • There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 38,744
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #19 on: June 21, 2011, 06:14:21 PM »
Many different recipes are possible with the same few ingredients.

In this case, the basic ingredients are:
What I wanted to say: Roman Catholics often say, that they could change the Creed, because the Second Ecumenical Council did so. But in fact, the Fourth Ecumenical Council, after having read both of these Creeds, explicitly explained, that the Second Ecumenical Council didn't introduce "anything that had been lacking in their predecessors". It introduced the complete teaching on the Holy Spirit, because in the previous Creed there were only four words about Holy Spirit: "...And in the Holy Ghost". Whereas Filioque addition really looks so, as it "had been lacking in their predecessors".

I think you've inadvertently supported the Catholic position.

Clearly, "not as though they were introducing anything that had been lacking in their predecessors" doesn't mean there are no statements in the Creed of 381 that weren't in the Creed of 325.

The Creed of 381 contained a statement that wasn't in the Creed of 325, but it didn't introduce "anything that had been lacking in their predecessors" because the statement in question was already part of the deposit of faith.

The Creed of Toledo contained a statement that wasn't in the Creed of 381 (i.e. that the eternal procession of the Spirit is from the Son as well as the Father), but it didn't introduce "anything that had been lacking in their predecessors" because the statement in question was already part of the deposit of faith.
No, it was not.

The Orthodox Creed of 381 contained no heretical statements, which of course weren't in the Orthodox Creed of 325.  Toledo is a different matter.
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,260
  • Faith: Melkite Catholic
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #20 on: June 21, 2011, 06:16:38 PM »
No, it wasn't. The so called Apostles Creed had nothing (except similarity in origins) to do with the Nicene Creed.

Indeed. Theories that the Apostles' Creed predates the Nicene Creed are tenuous at best.

filioque is a, heretical, modification of the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed.

I'd think you'd know by now that saying that doesn't make it true.

- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline ialmisry

  • There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 38,744
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #21 on: June 21, 2011, 06:19:42 PM »
No, it wasn't. The so called Apostles Creed had nothing (except similarity in origins) to do with the Nicene Creed.

Indeed. Theories that the Apostles' Creed predates the Nicene Creed are tenuous at best.

filioque is a, heretical, modification of the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed.

I'd think you'd know by now that saying that doesn't make it true.


Yes.  Saying the Truth makes it true.
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,260
  • Faith: Melkite Catholic
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #22 on: June 21, 2011, 06:29:30 PM »
No, it wasn't. The so called Apostles Creed had nothing (except similarity in origins) to do with the Nicene Creed.

Indeed. Theories that the Apostles' Creed predates the Nicene Creed are tenuous at best.

filioque is a, heretical, modification of the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed.

I'd think you'd know by now that saying that doesn't make it true.


Yes.  Saying the Truth makes it true.

No the truth is true even before you say it. You don't make it true.

That's irrelevant anyhow, since what you said isn't true.
- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline Deacon Lance

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,183
  • Faith: Byzantine Catholic
  • Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #23 on: June 21, 2011, 07:43:58 PM »
I think you've inadvertently supported the Catholic position.
How?
Because the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed was a modification of the Nicene Creed which was in turn a modification of the Apostle's Creed.

The Nicene Creed is a modification of the Baptismal Creed of Jerusalem.  The Apostle's Creed is a modification of the Baptismal Creed of Rome.
My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.

Offline ialmisry

  • There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 38,744
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #24 on: June 21, 2011, 07:54:23 PM »
No, it wasn't. The so called Apostles Creed had nothing (except similarity in origins) to do with the Nicene Creed.

Indeed. Theories that the Apostles' Creed predates the Nicene Creed are tenuous at best.

filioque is a, heretical, modification of the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed.

I'd think you'd know by now that saying that doesn't make it true.


Yes.  Saying the Truth makes it true.

No the truth is true even before you say it. You don't make it true.
Didn't even imply I did.  The Truth is true, whether I repeat it or not.

That's irrelevant anyhow, since what you said isn't true.
You saying it doesn't make it true, especially as the Church, speaking otherwise, says its true.
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth

Offline Vadim

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
  • Bishop Atanasije Jevtic on the photograph
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #25 on: June 22, 2011, 01:12:39 AM »
Clearly, "not as though they were introducing anything that had been lacking in their predecessors" doesn't mean there are no statements in the Creed of 381 that weren't in the Creed of 325.

The Creed of 381 contained a statement that wasn't in the Creed of 325, but it didn't introduce "anything that had been lacking in their predecessors" because the statement in question was already part of the deposit of faith.
Once again: the doctrine concerning the substance of the Spirit was absent at all in the Nicene Creed; for this reason the Definition of the Chalcedone Council names the Creed of 381 as the doctrine concerning the substance of the Spirit:
"...it confirms the doctrine afterwards delivered concerning the substance of the Spirit by the One Hundred and Fifty holy Fathers who assembled in the imperial City"

...whereas the doctrine of procession of the Spirit is already explicitly present in the Creed of 381.
Don't you see the difference?

Since that the Creed of 381 is not "modification" of the previous Creed, it's just another Creed concerning different matter (the Spirit).

As we have four Gospels, that don't "modify" each other but supplement each other; and sure we cannot modify neither of them as if they were "lacking" something.
« Last Edit: June 22, 2011, 01:12:59 AM by Vadim »

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,260
  • Faith: Melkite Catholic
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #26 on: June 22, 2011, 08:57:54 AM »
Clearly, "not as though they were introducing anything that had been lacking in their predecessors" doesn't mean there are no statements in the Creed of 381 that weren't in the Creed of 325.

The Creed of 381 contained a statement that wasn't in the Creed of 325, but it didn't introduce "anything that had been lacking in their predecessors" because the statement in question was already part of the deposit of faith.
Once again: the doctrine concerning the substance of the Spirit was absent at all in the Nicene Creed; for this reason the Definition of the Chalcedone Council names the Creed of 381 as the doctrine concerning the substance of the Spirit:
"...it confirms the doctrine afterwards delivered concerning the substance of the Spirit by the One Hundred and Fifty holy Fathers who assembled in the imperial City"

...whereas the doctrine of procession of the Spirit is already explicitly present in the Creed of 381.
Don't you see the difference?

Since that the Creed of 381 is not "modification" of the previous Creed, it's just another Creed concerning different matter (the Spirit).

As we have four Gospels, that don't "modify" each other but supplement each other; and sure we cannot modify neither of them as if they were "lacking" something.

Although you can certainly find, if you look (and it's especially easy with the internet), individual Catholics who think of the Creed of Toledo as a replacement for the Creed of 381, the more official Catholic position is that the Creed of Toledo is simply another (legitimate) creed.
- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline elijahmaria

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,473
    • Irenikin: The Skete
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #27 on: June 22, 2011, 11:23:15 AM »

Usually #3 is satisfied by elijahmaria.

Actually, no.  I do not say that Orthodox and Catholic are the same on all counts.  Far from it!...but we are not so far apart in substantive faith to justify the sin of schism continuing

Mary

Offline elijahmaria

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,473
    • Irenikin: The Skete
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #28 on: June 22, 2011, 11:25:17 AM »
I think you've inadvertently supported the Catholic position.
How?
Because the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed was a modification of the Nicene Creed which was in turn a modification of the Apostle's Creed.

The Nicene Creed is a modification of the Baptismal Creed of Jerusalem.  The Apostle's Creed is a modification of the Baptismal Creed of Rome.

Ha!! So happy to see someone note this!!  thankee... :D

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,260
  • Faith: Melkite Catholic
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #29 on: June 22, 2011, 11:45:24 AM »

Usually #3 is satisfied by elijahmaria.

Actually, no.  I do not say that Orthodox and Catholic are the same on all counts.  Far from it!...but we are not so far apart in substantive faith to justify the sin of schism continuing

Mary

I don't think WetCatechumen was suggesting that the sin of schism is justified.
- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline ialmisry

  • There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 38,744
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #30 on: June 22, 2011, 12:25:48 PM »
Clearly, "not as though they were introducing anything that had been lacking in their predecessors" doesn't mean there are no statements in the Creed of 381 that weren't in the Creed of 325.

The Creed of 381 contained a statement that wasn't in the Creed of 325, but it didn't introduce "anything that had been lacking in their predecessors" because the statement in question was already part of the deposit of faith.
Once again: the doctrine concerning the substance of the Spirit was absent at all in the Nicene Creed; for this reason the Definition of the Chalcedone Council names the Creed of 381 as the doctrine concerning the substance of the Spirit:
"...it confirms the doctrine afterwards delivered concerning the substance of the Spirit by the One Hundred and Fifty holy Fathers who assembled in the imperial City"

...whereas the doctrine of procession of the Spirit is already explicitly present in the Creed of 381.
Don't you see the difference?

Since that the Creed of 381 is not "modification" of the previous Creed, it's just another Creed concerning different matter (the Spirit).

As we have four Gospels, that don't "modify" each other but supplement each other; and sure we cannot modify neither of them as if they were "lacking" something.

Although you can certainly find, if you look (and it's especially easy with the internet), individual Catholics who think of the Creed of Toledo as a replacement for the Creed of 381, the more official Catholic position is that the Creed of Toledo is simply another (legitimate) creed.
But it's not. It claims to be the Nicea-Constantinopolitan Creed, and it isn't.
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth

Offline Vadim

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
  • Bishop Atanasije Jevtic on the photograph
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #31 on: June 22, 2011, 12:33:47 PM »
The acts of Toledo Councils were corrupted in places concerning procession of the Holy Spirit:

Vid. Zoernicaw. de process. Spir. S. tract. III, p. 288 - 289.

As were the acts of the Seventh Ecumenical Council corrupted, see Hefele on the Seventh Ecumenical Council.
« Last Edit: June 22, 2011, 12:34:08 PM by Vadim »

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,260
  • Faith: Melkite Catholic
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #32 on: June 22, 2011, 01:26:49 PM »
Clearly, "not as though they were introducing anything that had been lacking in their predecessors" doesn't mean there are no statements in the Creed of 381 that weren't in the Creed of 325.

The Creed of 381 contained a statement that wasn't in the Creed of 325, but it didn't introduce "anything that had been lacking in their predecessors" because the statement in question was already part of the deposit of faith.
Once again: the doctrine concerning the substance of the Spirit was absent at all in the Nicene Creed; for this reason the Definition of the Chalcedone Council names the Creed of 381 as the doctrine concerning the substance of the Spirit:
"...it confirms the doctrine afterwards delivered concerning the substance of the Spirit by the One Hundred and Fifty holy Fathers who assembled in the imperial City"

...whereas the doctrine of procession of the Spirit is already explicitly present in the Creed of 381.
Don't you see the difference?

Since that the Creed of 381 is not "modification" of the previous Creed, it's just another Creed concerning different matter (the Spirit).

As we have four Gospels, that don't "modify" each other but supplement each other; and sure we cannot modify neither of them as if they were "lacking" something.

Although you can certainly find, if you look (and it's especially easy with the internet), individual Catholics who think of the Creed of Toledo as a replacement for the Creed of 381, the more official Catholic position is that the Creed of Toledo is simply another (legitimate) creed.
But it's not. It claims to be the Nicea-Constantinopolitan Creed, and it isn't.

It claims that about itself?
- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline Volnutt

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 5,586
  • Lunacy loves company
  • Faith: Semi-Evangelical
  • Jurisdiction: Might become Orthodox
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #33 on: June 22, 2011, 01:59:11 PM »
Nicea=Ecumenical Council
Constantinople=Ecumenical Council
Toledo=Synod of only Western bishops

It doesn't matter whether the Filioque is implied in pre-Toledo beliefs, they simply did not have the authora-tay to amend the Creed (or make a new, binding one).
Every day we should hear at least one little song, read one good poem, see one exquisite picture, and, if possible, speak a few sensible words. -Goethe

I once heard a monk say, “The person of prayer does not need to go any further than his own heart to find the source of all violence in the world.” -Fr. Stephen Freeman

Offline Vadim

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
  • Bishop Atanasije Jevtic on the photograph
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #34 on: June 23, 2011, 01:56:25 AM »
Although you can certainly find, if you look (and it's especially easy with the internet), individual Catholics who think of the Creed of Toledo as a replacement for the Creed of 381, the more official Catholic position is that the Creed of Toledo is simply another (legitimate) creed.
The Symbol of Toledo is indeed another creed; it is not equal to the Constantinople Creed plus Filioque addition: http://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/TOLEDO.HTM

Whereas the Constantinople Creed plus Filioque addition is not "simply another (legitimate) creed". If it was such, it would have had its own name, and in some official documents of the RCC it would have been read along with Nicene Creed and Constantinople Creed, under some third, specific name. In the same way as Chalcedon Council read both Creeds:

The Definition of Faith of the Council of Chalcedon:

"The Creed of the three hundred and eighteen Fathers at Nice.

We believe in one God, etc.

Item, the Creed of the one hundred and fifty holy Fathers who were assembled at Constantinople.

We believe in one God, etc."

And also both these Creeds were read in the Definition of Faith of the Sixths Ecumenical Council.

Can you find any document where Constantinople Creed was read without addition; and immediately after that Constantinople Creed with the addition was read? Or where all the three Creeds were read beginning with the Nicene Creed.
« Last Edit: June 23, 2011, 02:00:37 AM by Vadim »

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,260
  • Faith: Melkite Catholic
Re: "...anything that had been lacking in their predecessors"
« Reply #35 on: June 23, 2011, 08:29:25 AM »
http://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/TOLEDO.HTM

Hmm. I have to admit that I've not seen that before. I'll give it some thought.
- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)