Actually, while this may seem political, (heck the whole topic of NCs being communicated in EO parishes is a political hot potato), I too am curious about the assertion that the EP has ordered Jerusalem to reordain Antiochian clergy coming over. To me, that would be a big deal. This brings up the following further questions:
1. Does the EP have the authority to order another Patriarchy to do something?
2. If the EP tells Jerusalem that the Antiochian priests need to be reordained, why is he in communion with Antioch, since essentially he is in communion with a jurisdiction who's ordinations he considers defective?
3. I personally know a former Antiochian priest who transferred to the GOA which is controlled by the EP, and he was not reordained. How can this be so?
I personally don't hold credence to this alleged directive from the EP to Jerusalem. For it to be true, then the logical conclusion would essentially be that Antioch is no longer Orthodox, and that Antiochian sacraments are defective.