Author Topic: what type of Church is this?  (Read 4408 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Apotheoun

  • "Three realities pertain to God: essence, energy, and the triad of divine hypostaseis." St. Gregory Palamas
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,430
  • St. John Maximovitch
    • The Taboric Light
Re: what type of Church is this?
« Reply #45 on: April 29, 2011, 04:25:02 PM »
I like the Byzantine-Slav liturgy myself, and I have to admit that the Russians do it very nicely, but I wouldn't put down the rites of other Churches.

Here are some excerpts from a lovely Lenten liturgy in Christ the Savior Cathedral:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXq_N9iQY_g
« Last Edit: April 29, 2011, 04:26:35 PM by Apotheoun »
"All that the Father has belongs likewise to the Son, except Causality."
St. Gregory Nazianzen

"We should believe that divine grace is present in the icon of Christ and that it communicates sanctification to those who draw near with faith."
St. Theodore Studite

Offline WetCatechumen

  • Roman Catholic
  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 297
Re: what type of Church is this?
« Reply #46 on: April 29, 2011, 04:32:10 PM »
I like the Byzantine-Slav liturgy myself, and I have to admit that the Russians do it very nicely, but I wouldn't put down the rites of other Churches.

Here are some excerpts from a lovely Lenten liturgy in Christ the Savior Cathedral:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXq_N9iQY_g


Please, by all means, call the Archbishop of LA and put down this "Rite".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ5it20gKqw&feature=related

I have no problem with legitimate criticism. I just don't like criticism because it's not the Rite of Constantinople.

But there are a lot of liturgical shenanigans that need to be fixed.
"And because they have nothing better to do, they take cushion and chairs to Rome. And while the Pope is saying liturgy, they go, 'Oh, oh, oh, filioque!' And the Pope say, 'Filioque? That-uh sound nice! I think I divide-uh the Church over it!'" - Comrade Real Presence

Offline Apotheoun

  • "Three realities pertain to God: essence, energy, and the triad of divine hypostaseis." St. Gregory Palamas
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,430
  • St. John Maximovitch
    • The Taboric Light
Re: what type of Church is this?
« Reply #47 on: April 29, 2011, 04:35:49 PM »
I like the Byzantine-Slav liturgy myself, and I have to admit that the Russians do it very nicely, but I wouldn't put down the rites of other Churches.

Here are some excerpts from a lovely Lenten liturgy in Christ the Savior Cathedral:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXq_N9iQY_g


Please, by all means, call the Archbishop of LA and put down this "Rite".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ5it20gKqw&feature=related

I have no problem with legitimate criticism. I just don't like criticism because it's not the Rite of Constantinople.
Do you believe that that is a normative liturgy in the Roman Church?   I see no problem with pointing out abusive practices and distortions of the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite mass.  Perhaps if these types of abuses were stopped the newer rite of the mass might become attractive to Roman Catholic traditionalists.

P.S. - I do not believe that I have criticized any rite for not being "the Rite of Constantinople," even though that is the particular rite in which I have found my spiritual home.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2011, 04:39:05 PM by Apotheoun »
"All that the Father has belongs likewise to the Son, except Causality."
St. Gregory Nazianzen

"We should believe that divine grace is present in the icon of Christ and that it communicates sanctification to those who draw near with faith."
St. Theodore Studite

Offline dzheremi

  • No longer posting here.
  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 4,383
Re: what type of Church is this?
« Reply #48 on: April 29, 2011, 04:38:07 PM »
Hmm. Alright. I don't really see that way, but then again I'm not Greek or Syriac Maronite. To each their own, I suppose.

Offline Apotheoun

  • "Three realities pertain to God: essence, energy, and the triad of divine hypostaseis." St. Gregory Palamas
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,430
  • St. John Maximovitch
    • The Taboric Light
Re: what type of Church is this?
« Reply #49 on: April 29, 2011, 04:40:09 PM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ5it20gKqw&feature=related

. . .

But there are a lot of liturgical shenanigans that need to be fixed.
I agree. 
"All that the Father has belongs likewise to the Son, except Causality."
St. Gregory Nazianzen

"We should believe that divine grace is present in the icon of Christ and that it communicates sanctification to those who draw near with faith."
St. Theodore Studite

Offline WetCatechumen

  • Roman Catholic
  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 297
Re: what type of Church is this?
« Reply #50 on: April 29, 2011, 04:41:08 PM »
I like the Byzantine-Slav liturgy myself, and I have to admit that the Russians do it very nicely, but I wouldn't put down the rites of other Churches.

Here are some excerpts from a lovely Lenten liturgy in Christ the Savior Cathedral:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXq_N9iQY_g


Please, by all means, call the Archbishop of LA and put down this "Rite".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ5it20gKqw&feature=related

I have no problem with legitimate criticism. I just don't like criticism because it's not the Rite of Constantinople.

But there are a lot of liturgical shenanigans that need to be fixed.
Do you believe that that is a normative liturgy in the Roman Church?   I see no problem with pointing out abusive practices and distortions of the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite mass.  Perhaps if these types of abuses were stopped the newer rite of the mass might become attractive to Roman Catholic traditionalists.
It depends on what you mean by normative.

No, that's out of the ordinary, but I see liturgical shenanigans, sometimes very bad, at almost every Mass I go to except my home parish.

And that's not including the commonplace place but still terrible shenanigans such as: extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion and versus populum. Those, really, have no place in the tradition of the Church.

These things need to be fixed.
"And because they have nothing better to do, they take cushion and chairs to Rome. And while the Pope is saying liturgy, they go, 'Oh, oh, oh, filioque!' And the Pope say, 'Filioque? That-uh sound nice! I think I divide-uh the Church over it!'" - Comrade Real Presence

Offline Apotheoun

  • "Three realities pertain to God: essence, energy, and the triad of divine hypostaseis." St. Gregory Palamas
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,430
  • St. John Maximovitch
    • The Taboric Light
Re: what type of Church is this?
« Reply #51 on: April 29, 2011, 04:43:01 PM »
I like the Byzantine-Slav liturgy myself, and I have to admit that the Russians do it very nicely, but I wouldn't put down the rites of other Churches.

Here are some excerpts from a lovely Lenten liturgy in Christ the Savior Cathedral:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXq_N9iQY_g


Please, by all means, call the Archbishop of LA and put down this "Rite".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ5it20gKqw&feature=related

I have no problem with legitimate criticism. I just don't like criticism because it's not the Rite of Constantinople.

But there are a lot of liturgical shenanigans that need to be fixed.
Do you believe that that is a normative liturgy in the Roman Church?   I see no problem with pointing out abusive practices and distortions of the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite mass.  Perhaps if these types of abuses were stopped the newer rite of the mass might become attractive to Roman Catholic traditionalists.
It depends on what you mean by normative.

No, that's out of the ordinary, but I see liturgical shenanigans, sometimes very bad, at almost every Mass I go to except my home parish.

And that's not including the commonplace place but still terrible shenanigans such as: extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion and versus populum. Those, really, have no place in the tradition of the Church.

These things need to be fixed.
Yes, I agree.  I attended mass for 18 years as a Roman Catholic in the Diocese of Oakland, and so I know what it is like to suffer through liturgical abuses, even those that are performed out of a misguided attempt to make the liturgy "relevant," whatever that means.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2011, 04:43:21 PM by Apotheoun »
"All that the Father has belongs likewise to the Son, except Causality."
St. Gregory Nazianzen

"We should believe that divine grace is present in the icon of Christ and that it communicates sanctification to those who draw near with faith."
St. Theodore Studite

Offline WetCatechumen

  • Roman Catholic
  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 297
Re: what type of Church is this?
« Reply #52 on: April 29, 2011, 04:45:18 PM »
I like the Byzantine-Slav liturgy myself, and I have to admit that the Russians do it very nicely, but I wouldn't put down the rites of other Churches.

Here are some excerpts from a lovely Lenten liturgy in Christ the Savior Cathedral:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXq_N9iQY_g


Please, by all means, call the Archbishop of LA and put down this "Rite".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ5it20gKqw&feature=related

I have no problem with legitimate criticism. I just don't like criticism because it's not the Rite of Constantinople.

But there are a lot of liturgical shenanigans that need to be fixed.
Do you believe that that is a normative liturgy in the Roman Church?   I see no problem with pointing out abusive practices and distortions of the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite mass.  Perhaps if these types of abuses were stopped the newer rite of the mass might become attractive to Roman Catholic traditionalists.
It depends on what you mean by normative.

No, that's out of the ordinary, but I see liturgical shenanigans, sometimes very bad, at almost every Mass I go to except my home parish.

And that's not including the commonplace place but still terrible shenanigans such as: extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion and versus populum. Those, really, have no place in the tradition of the Church.

These things need to be fixed.
Yes, I agree.  I attended mass for 18 years as a Roman Catholic in the Diocese of Oakland, and so I know what it is like to suffer through liturgical abuses, even those that are performed out of a misguided attempt to make the liturgy "relevant," whatever that means.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ys4Nx0rNlAM

If you were ever Protestant (as I was) then you will find this video hilarious.
"And because they have nothing better to do, they take cushion and chairs to Rome. And while the Pope is saying liturgy, they go, 'Oh, oh, oh, filioque!' And the Pope say, 'Filioque? That-uh sound nice! I think I divide-uh the Church over it!'" - Comrade Real Presence

Offline Apotheoun

  • "Three realities pertain to God: essence, energy, and the triad of divine hypostaseis." St. Gregory Palamas
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,430
  • St. John Maximovitch
    • The Taboric Light
Re: what type of Church is this?
« Reply #53 on: April 29, 2011, 04:49:47 PM »
I like the Byzantine-Slav liturgy myself, and I have to admit that the Russians do it very nicely, but I wouldn't put down the rites of other Churches.

Here are some excerpts from a lovely Lenten liturgy in Christ the Savior Cathedral:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXq_N9iQY_g


Please, by all means, call the Archbishop of LA and put down this "Rite".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ5it20gKqw&feature=related

I have no problem with legitimate criticism. I just don't like criticism because it's not the Rite of Constantinople.

But there are a lot of liturgical shenanigans that need to be fixed.
Do you believe that that is a normative liturgy in the Roman Church?   I see no problem with pointing out abusive practices and distortions of the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite mass.  Perhaps if these types of abuses were stopped the newer rite of the mass might become attractive to Roman Catholic traditionalists.
It depends on what you mean by normative.

No, that's out of the ordinary, but I see liturgical shenanigans, sometimes very bad, at almost every Mass I go to except my home parish.

And that's not including the commonplace place but still terrible shenanigans such as: extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion and versus populum. Those, really, have no place in the tradition of the Church.

These things need to be fixed.
Yes, I agree.  I attended mass for 18 years as a Roman Catholic in the Diocese of Oakland, and so I know what it is like to suffer through liturgical abuses, even those that are performed out of a misguided attempt to make the liturgy "relevant," whatever that means.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ys4Nx0rNlAM

If you were ever Protestant (as I was) then you will find this video hilarious.
That is hilarious; and yes, I was a Protestant until the age of 25.
"All that the Father has belongs likewise to the Son, except Causality."
St. Gregory Nazianzen

"We should believe that divine grace is present in the icon of Christ and that it communicates sanctification to those who draw near with faith."
St. Theodore Studite

Offline Justin Kissel

  • •|•|•
  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 31,762
Re: what type of Church is this?
« Reply #54 on: April 29, 2011, 06:46:32 PM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ys4Nx0rNlAM

If you were ever Protestant (as I was) then you will find this video hilarious.

Nope, sorry, all it got out of me was a "meh"  :angel:

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,268
  • Faith: Melkite Catholic
Re: what type of Church is this?
« Reply #55 on: April 30, 2011, 08:01:14 PM »
But I'm sick of the Greek superiority complex (and it's been inherited by all the Churches which follow the Greek Rite).

For whatever it's worth to you, I personally feel that this forum has, no so much a Greek superiority complex, but a little anti-Western bias. It really amazed me to read your earlier post:

... please just restrain yourselves and realize that you're talking about real Christians who have a very deep and rich history and a beautiful liturgy.

But please, go ahead, make as many comments about the modern Roman liturgy as you like.
(emphasis added)
- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline deusveritasest

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,528
    • Facebook
Re: what type of Church is this?
« Reply #56 on: April 30, 2011, 08:30:18 PM »
Here are some excerpts from a lovely Lenten liturgy in Christ the Savior Cathedral:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXq_N9iQY_g

Nice!  :)
I stopped posting here in August 2011 because of stark disagreement with the policies of the administration and moderating team of the forums. If you desire, feel free to PM me, message me on Facebook (link in profile), or email me: cddombrowski@gmail.com