I understand there's mathematics involved. But in these mathematics I am just wondering about the logic.
1. Imagine a 3 dimensional sphere..
2. Pretend for the sake of argument that this sphere is either material or non-material
3. Now try to collapse a 3 dimensional sphere into a negative sphere, or negative dimensional sphere.
Now this takes some time thinking about a collapsing sphere to understand the following:
Can you have a negative dimensional sphere? Could it exist? Well, the answer is no. Now could it exist with 0 dimensional value? Nope Could the sphere under infinite regress of reality infinitely regress in size without possibly ever reaching 0? The math states that even in the case of infinite regress the sphere could never reach literal 0. That's why most scientists agree that even under such arguments there can never be literal zero. And why they also agree that a collapse of a sphere would likely reach a point of convergence where all 360 degrees of the sphere would converge to a single relative point. And if you tried to regress any further, all 360 degrees of the circumference of the sphere would swap with their polar opposites and cause the sphere to expand again into a larger sphere all while never being able to regress to zero much less regress to a negative. And this is because the sphere is made of the volume to which it's regressing in. So it's already determined that literal zero doesn't exist materially, physically, or literally.
This makes perfect sense. But I don't think you're done. I get it so far. If I deflate a ball, no matter how much I try, I can never get it to zero, and certainly the idea of negative capacity doesn't make any sense.
But in addition to that, so long as we regress the ball as much as possible as close as possible to zero, it will never reach zero. Would the same hold for the ball inflating as much as possible towards the direction of infinity, but never reaching that same number?
expanding to infinity wouldn't be the problem because we can always say that expansion to make something bigger would be possible. Such as infinite expansion of realities depicted in the movie MIB. the boundaries of size, or spatial capacity lay in how small the sphere can get. I can always say that I can have an infinitely expanding sphere in an infinitely large space to expand into. Yes it's hard to comprehend a no end in expanding capacity, but it's set into stone because it can't ever regress to zero or negative to which could be used to establish a beginning or an end. In this argument zero or negative capacity would represent both the beginning and end to capacity, but since they can't exist, capacity is thus infinite
0D = impossible
No zero or negative dimensional values
Big Bang theory: (has all the evidence)
*1D, 2D. 3D. 4D ->
String Theory: (Has no evidence and is really just a hypothesis to where no experimentation has been done)
<--4D, 3D, 2D, 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D -->
M-Theory: (just a hypothesis) It would have to prove inertia to be a spatial dimension in order for it to work.
1D, 2D, 3D, 4D(as a spatial dimension vs just representation of inertia), 5D, 6D, 7D, 8D, 9D, 10D, 11D
The arguments of a spiritual world posted here are trying to state: transcendence of physical capacity, or a beginning and end to physical Capacity.
<-- -4D, -3D, -2D, -1D, 0D, 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D, 3D, 2D, 1D, 0D, -1D, -2D, -3D, -4D -->
But this is not how the flow of energy works
XD = any number of dimensions you want to add to both sides of the formula.
1D-> 2D-> 3D-> 4D-> XD -> 4D- 3D-> 2D-> 1D
represent complete infinity to where no exit is plausible, and non-existence is impossible. I can also represent this model in the real world to show infinite containment. Between every number there can be an infinite number of numbers. you can take 1,2,3 for example and get :
And Time itself is connected to the flow of energy:Dimensional time and space time together equal actual time.
this is in relation to time particle dilation. So the formation to decay and back again can be considered actual progression and regression of time. Thus to increase in dimensional complexity is to move forward in time, and to Decay in dimensional complexity is to move backwards in time. So the state at which something exists is representative of the time frame to which it exists in. The 1 Dimensional plane represents "Zero base time" or "ground state" , this is to which a beginning begins and an end ends in time. So if existence is a progressive and regressive flow of time (inertia / energy) there is no going back forever in time to revisit a moment of history. Things get cycled like the surface of the Earth.
Thus The dimensional time model looks like this:
1D -> 2D-> 3D-> 4D -> XD -> 4D-> 3D-> 2D -> 1D->
So this means everything eventually decays dimensionally back to 1D to where it becomes ground state energy to which then can become borrowed energy to be used for the emergence of new things, or emerging properties. And this is how Quantum Electrodynamics works!.. Hence, back to 0,1. So a Looping or Cycling dimensional time model looks like this:
1D -> 2D-> 3D-> 4D -> XD -> 4D-> 3D-> 2D -> 1D-> 2D-> 3D-> 4D -> XD -> 4D-> 3D-> 2D -> 1D-> 2D-> 3D-> 4D -> XD -> 4D-> 3D-> 2D -> 1D-> infinity
So can the past forever go back in time? Only in memory, provided of course if you were eternal, or if the past is forever recorded and was not forgotten. However, this wouldn't mean that you can literally ever go back in time physically! Hence, duplication is required to keep a process in process! And this is why life must replicate itself. This is DT's correlation to traditional time. So eventually all traces of the past decay back to zero base time (ground state), especially since exact duplication decays over time and transforms into something else. Thus no story will ever remain the same, no pattern will ever retain its pattern.. Traditional time is then subject to dimensional time decay, and can only be averted by exact duplication. This is where duplication will only pro-long it's eventual decay. Hence, you can only sustain a process in a dimensional limbo by duplication. And this is why living organisms must reproduce in order to stay in process.Now the above argument is rather an old one of mine..
So it still remains questionable if our consciousness can continue on outside the biological container to defy dimensional time decay, or to remain an emerging property.