OrthodoxChristianity.net
October 26, 2014, 12:00:35 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Theory of Knowledge of St. Isaac the Syrian  (Read 1726 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Justin Kissel
Formerly Asteriktos
Protospatharios
****************
Offline Offline

Posts: 30,096


Goodbye for now, my friend


« on: January 30, 2011, 02:09:44 PM »

Rather than a regular book review I thought I might change things up a bit and give an outline of an essay by St. Justin Popovich, titled The Theory of Knowledge of St. Isaac the Syrian. This essay can be found in two books: Orthodox Faith and Life in Christ (pp. 117-168) and Man and God-man (pp. 67-106) (When I give page numbers in this post, they will be for the second book).

St. Justin begins by saying that our organs of understanding are sick and need healed (pp. 70-71). The passions are the sickness of the soul, so it is the virtues which are the cure. St. Justin also says that there is a chronological order to the virtues: First comes faith (pp. 72-75), which helps us concentrate on spiritual things and brings us peace; Second comes prayer (pp. 75-76), which is the language of faith, and is the struggle to redirect our focus more and more on God and less and less on oursleves; Third comes love (pp. 76-78), which is "born of prayer," and causes us to turn from love of self to love of God, and learn the true meaning of love; and Fourth comes humility (pp. 78-79), which is how one thinks by faith when focused on God rather than self.

All of this, St. Justin says, is done in Grace and freedom (pp. 79-81), and thus a person's intellect is purified, with help also coming from fasting, vigils, silence, etc. (pp. 81-85). Eventually we come to the mystery of knowledge (pp. 85-95), which is difficult to define. However, St. Justin believes that the "most exhaustive" answer that St. Isaac gives is that knowledge is the "perception of eternal life," and that the perception of eternal life is "to perceive all things in God." And so elsewhere St. Isaac defines truth as "The perception of things that is given by God." Or, as St. Justin rephrases it: "The perception of God is truth".

The final step is contemplation of God (pp. 95-103). Contemplation comes through the continual pondering on God. “It is the abode of unceasing prayer,” and “purity sees God.” St. Justin says that this contemplation of the Holy Trinity is the goal of the Christian life. They essay concludes (pp. 103-106) with St. Justin saying that “the problem of knowledge is fundamentally a religious and ethnical problem,” and that “One thing is certain: that knowledge on all levels, depends on man’s religious and moral state.”
Logged

Paradosis ≠ Asteriktos ≠ Justin
Rafa999
Warned
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: Latin Rite
Posts: 1,600


« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2011, 06:20:09 PM »

I'm more interested in knowing if this book was written by somebody who would not hesitate in calling Mar Isaac's Church  "Nestorian". If so it is crippled in it's understanding of Saint Isaac's thought.

Same goes for the "scholars" on the work of Saint Ephrem. You absolutely cannot seperate him from his Church.
Logged

I am NOT a representative of the ACOE. Ignore my posts
Rafa999
Warned
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: Latin Rite
Posts: 1,600


« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2011, 08:35:55 PM »

Or others like Aphrahat the Persian Sage (who wrote the earliest known patristic works on repentance amongst other topics by the way), the extant traditions of the Apostles it's posession, or something like the history of the entire Indian Church and all it's Saints (prior to the 16th Century when it ceased being an ACOE episcopate), and so much more...
Logged

I am NOT a representative of the ACOE. Ignore my posts
Justin Kissel
Formerly Asteriktos
Protospatharios
****************
Offline Offline

Posts: 30,096


Goodbye for now, my friend


« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2011, 01:24:06 AM »

I'm more interested in knowing if this book was written by somebody who would not hesitate in calling Mar Isaac's Church  "Nestorian". If so it is crippled in it's understanding of Saint Isaac's thought.

Same goes for the "scholars" on the work of Saint Ephrem. You absolutely cannot seperate him from his Church.

Fwiw, St. Justin considers St. Isaac to be a saint, and I would assume that he'd consider him to not be Nestorian.
Logged

Paradosis ≠ Asteriktos ≠ Justin
Rafa999
Warned
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: Latin Rite
Posts: 1,600


« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2011, 08:30:47 AM »

I'm more interested in knowing if this book was written by somebody who would not hesitate in calling Mar Isaac's Church  "Nestorian". If so it is crippled in it's understanding of Saint Isaac's thought.

Same goes for the "scholars" on the work of Saint Ephrem. You absolutely cannot seperate him from his Church.

Fwiw, St. Justin considers St. Isaac to be a saint, and I would assume that he'd consider him to not be Nestorian.

Did he accuse Bishop Mar Isaac's church?
Logged

I am NOT a representative of the ACOE. Ignore my posts
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.043 seconds with 31 queries.