Author Topic: 2000 vs 2010 At a Glance  (Read 640 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Shiny

  • Site Supporter
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Paint It Red
2000 vs 2010 At a Glance
« on: December 31, 2010, 03:18:58 AM »
“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan

Offline Ortho_cat

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,392
Re: 2000 vs 2010 At a Glance
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2010, 03:28:24 AM »
Thank you for this. I love this kind of data.

Offline minasoliman

  • Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
  • Section Moderator
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,813
  • Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)
Re: 2000 vs 2010 At a Glance
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2010, 01:20:35 PM »
I remember in 2000, I didn't have a cellphone.

Now, my cellphone is my primary number.  And we are now transitioning into an age of smartphones.
Vain existence can never exist, for "unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain." (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.

Offline FormerReformer

  • Convertodox of the convertodox
  • Site Supporter
  • Archon
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,547
    • Music and Orthodoxy
  • Faith: Convertodox
  • Jurisdiction: Netodoxy
Re: 2000 vs 2010 At a Glance
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2010, 02:24:45 PM »
I like how the total number of movie tickets sold has actually gone down by .1 billion, yet the ticket gross has gone up by $2.6 billion.
"Funny," said Lancelot, "how the people who can't pray say that prayers are not answered, however much the people who can pray say they are."  TH White

Oh, no: I've succumbed to Hyperdoxy!

Offline GiC

  • Resident Atheist
  • Site Supporter
  • Merarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,490
Re: 2000 vs 2010 At a Glance
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2010, 02:30:16 PM »
Only statistic that surprised me is a decrease in US power consumption, despite a substantial increase in population. That's a more telling statistic about growth than any financial analysis.
"The liberties of people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." -- Patrick Henry

Offline Ortho_cat

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,392
Re: 2000 vs 2010 At a Glance
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2010, 03:09:35 PM »
Only statistic that surprised me is a decrease in US power consumption, despite a substantial increase in population. That's a more telling statistic about growth than any financial analysis.

That surprised me as well.

Offline vamrat

  • Vamratoraptor
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8,555
Re: 2000 vs 2010 At a Glance
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2011, 02:30:46 PM »
Only statistic that surprised me is a decrease in US power consumption, despite a substantial increase in population. That's a more telling statistic about growth than any financial analysis.

I was thinking the same thing.  Now the question is, are we using less power because we are more efficient or because we are using less energy?  If it is efficiency, then that is a huge thing since, as you noted, our population has gone up so even a minor increase in usage would be expected, but a decrease?  If we are using less energy to do less work then it is another sign of the economy stagnating.  Either way, interesting data.
Das ist des Jägers Ehrenschild, daß er beschützt und hegt sein Wild, weidmännisch jagt, wie sich’s gehört, den Schöpfer im Geschöpfe ehrt.