OrthodoxChristianity.net
September 02, 2014, 02:54:06 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: If you are not OC, are you really Christian?  (Read 4547 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Victoria
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: inquirer in Orthodox Faith
Posts: 113



« on: December 10, 2010, 09:06:09 PM »

One of the posters asked me this-If the Orthodox are the Body of Christ and the others are not part of His Body then how can they be Christians in the same sense?
What does everyone thinks?
Logged

Humility and fear of God are above all virtues-Saint John Kolobos
Shiny
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 13,267


Paint It Red


« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2010, 09:11:53 PM »

Only God can judge.
Logged

“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan
Victoria
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: inquirer in Orthodox Faith
Posts: 113



« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2010, 09:33:52 PM »

Only God can judge.
good answer Smiley
Logged

Humility and fear of God are above all virtues-Saint John Kolobos
stashko
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: ИСТОЧНИ ПРАВОСЛАВНИ СРБИН
Jurisdiction: Non Ecumenist Free Serbian Orthodox Church
Posts: 4,998


Wonderworking Sitka Icon


« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2010, 09:46:04 PM »

They confess a different Confession than we the Orthodox do...So there Trinity Isn't the Same As Our Most Holy Trinity..The worship a different god....Holy Orthodoxy doesn't recognize R C sacraments or it's church....There's only One Holy Orthodox Catholic Church not two....Some of the Orthodox Ecumenists  Recognize and accept R C , but True Holy Orthodoxy doesn't.....How we pray is what we believe... This is what i learned reading this forum ......So we are not the same as R C.....and there not Christians........Or let's say the don't follow the scriptural jesus ,there's is the Jesus and Mary of recent talking apparitions unkown to the Holy Fathers Faith once delivered unto salvation....


Another apparition Incorporated into the catholic church...


Story here .....Church: Wis. site 1st US Virgin Mary apparition
AP – Wed Dec 8, 8:48 pm ET   AMPION, Wis. - The Roman Catholic Church on Wednesday designated a Wisconsin spot where an apparition of the Virgin Mary allegedly appeared three times to a Belgian-born nun in 1859 as the only of its kind in the United States. Full Story »Link......http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101209/ap_on_re_us/us_virgin_mary_apparition

« Last Edit: December 10, 2010, 10:07:43 PM by stashko » Logged

ГОСПОДЕ ГОСПОДЕ ,ПОГЛЕДАЈ СА НЕБА ,ДОЂИ И ПОСЕТИ ТВОЈ ВИНОГРАД ТВОЈА ДЕСНИЦА ПОСАДИЛА АМИН АМИН.
ChristusDominus
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Latin Rite
Posts: 936


Saint Aloysius Gonzaga


« Reply #4 on: December 10, 2010, 09:50:38 PM »

They confess a different Confession than we the Orthodox do...So there Trinity Isn't the Same As Our Most Holy Trinity..The worship a different god....Holy Orthodoxy doesn't recognize R C sacraments or it's church....There's only One Holy Orthodox Catholic Church not two....Some of the Orthodox Ecumenists  Recognize and accept R C , but True Holy Orthodoxy doesn't.....How we pray is what we believe... This is what i learned reading this forum ......So we are not the same as R C.....and there not Christians........

That makes sense: Rely on an internet forum to formulate your beliefs.
Logged

There is no more evident sign that anyone is a saint and of the number of the elect, than to see him leading a good life and at the same time a prey to desolation, suffering, and trials. - Saint Aloysius Gonzaga
theistgal
Byzantine (Ruthenian) Catholic gadfly
Site Supporter
Archon
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Follower of Jesus Christ
Jurisdiction: Byzantine Catholic
Posts: 2,082


don't even go there!


« Reply #5 on: December 10, 2010, 10:14:46 PM »

stashko, the OP didn't mention RC's at all.
Logged

"Sometimes, you just gotta say, 'OK, I still have nine live, two-headed animals' and move on.'' (owner of Coney Island freak show, upon learning he'd been outbid on a 5-legged puppy)
biro
Excelsior
Site Supporter
Warned
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox
Posts: 13,105


Και κλήρονομον δείξον με, ζωής της αιωνίου

fleem
WWW
« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2010, 10:16:56 PM »

stashko, the OP didn't mention RC's at all.

That never stopped him before.  Roll Eyes
Logged

Charlie Rose: If you could change one thing about the world, what would it be?

Fran Lebowitz: Everything. There is not one thing with which I am satisfied.

http://spcasuncoast.org/
Justin Kissel
Formerly Asteriktos
Protospatharios
****************
Offline Offline

Faith: Agnostic
Posts: 29,581



« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2010, 10:19:20 PM »

One of the posters asked me this-If the Orthodox are the Body of Christ and the others are not part of His Body then how can they be Christians in the same sense?
What does everyone thinks?

Fwiw, Alexei Khomiakov suggested (and perhaps Met. Kallistos agrees?) that non-Orthodox who are Christians might be "invisibly" part of the body of Christ the Church.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2010, 10:19:49 PM by Asteriktos » Logged
theistgal
Byzantine (Ruthenian) Catholic gadfly
Site Supporter
Archon
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Follower of Jesus Christ
Jurisdiction: Byzantine Catholic
Posts: 2,082


don't even go there!


« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2010, 10:22:12 PM »

I seem to remeber Jesus saying that anyone "who called Him by name would in no wise be cast out" and "He who is not against us is with us" and "whatever you do to the least of these, you do unto Me."

But of course, He wasn't Orthodox ... Wink
Logged

"Sometimes, you just gotta say, 'OK, I still have nine live, two-headed animals' and move on.'' (owner of Coney Island freak show, upon learning he'd been outbid on a 5-legged puppy)
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Warned
Hypatos
*****************
Offline Offline

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 37,483



« Reply #9 on: December 10, 2010, 10:24:58 PM »

No.

But then if you are a sinning Orthodox Christian, you aren't really a  Christian either. But if you are a Donastist, you aren't really a Christian.

On a practical note, only those whose attempts at baptism we can receive by economy can be called, by economy, Christian.
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
Justin Kissel
Formerly Asteriktos
Protospatharios
****************
Offline Offline

Faith: Agnostic
Posts: 29,581



« Reply #10 on: December 10, 2010, 10:25:33 PM »

I seem to remeber Jesus saying that anyone "who called Him by name would in no wise be cast out" and "He who is not against us is with us" and "whatever you do to the least of these, you do unto Me."

But of course, He wasn't Orthodox ... Wink

Sure he was. Didn't you know that the Orthodox faith established the universe? The 7th Ecumenical Council said so.  police
Logged
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Warned
Hypatos
*****************
Offline Offline

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 37,483



« Reply #11 on: December 10, 2010, 10:26:52 PM »

One of the posters asked me this-If the Orthodox are the Body of Christ and the others are not part of His Body then how can they be Christians in the same sense?
What does everyone thinks?
If a finger is cut off, if it is caught in time and treated, it can be reattached.
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
88Devin12
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 4,864



« Reply #12 on: December 10, 2010, 10:31:18 PM »

Does someone not being Christian condemn them to hell? I think it's unnecessary when we say "Only God judges" when it comes to distinguishing between Christians and non-Christians. By saying a group isn't Christian, that doesn't mean we are condemning them to hell.
I would personally say that non-Trinitarian groups are not Christian. (this would include groups like JW & Mormons)
Logged
lubeltri
Latin Catholic layman
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archdiocese of Boston
Posts: 3,795



« Reply #13 on: December 10, 2010, 11:56:25 PM »

stashko, the OP didn't mention RC's at all.

That never stopped him before.  Roll Eyes

LOL
Logged
lubeltri
Latin Catholic layman
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archdiocese of Boston
Posts: 3,795



« Reply #14 on: December 10, 2010, 11:58:30 PM »

One of the posters asked me this-If the Orthodox are the Body of Christ and the others are not part of His Body then how can they be Christians in the same sense?
What does everyone thinks?

Fwiw, Alexei Khomiakov suggested (and perhaps Met. Kallistos agrees?) that non-Orthodox who are Christians might be "invisibly" part of the body of Christ the Church.

Very interesting! This might jive with the Vatican II understanding of baptized non-Catholics being in some sort of imperfect communion with the Catholic Church.

Logged
lubeltri
Latin Catholic layman
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archdiocese of Boston
Posts: 3,795



« Reply #15 on: December 10, 2010, 11:59:57 PM »


On a practical note, only those whose attempts at baptism we can receive by economy can be called, by economy, Christian.

So I'm a Christian in some Orthodox jurisdictions and a heathen in others?
Logged
John of the North
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christianity
Jurisdiction: Eparchy of Edmonton and the West
Posts: 3,533


Christ is Risen!

tgild
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2010, 12:23:27 AM »

"You ask, will the heterodox be saved... Why do you worry about them? They have a Saviour Who desires the salvation of every human being. He will take care of them. You and I should not be burdened with such a concern. Study yourself and your own sins... I will tell you one thing, however: should you, being Orthodox and possessing the Truth in its fullness, betray Orthodoxy, and enter a different faith, you will lose your soul forever." - St Theophan the Recluse
Logged

"Christianity is not a philosophy, not a doctrine, but life." - Elder Sophrony (Sakharov)
PoorFoolNicholas
Site Supporter
OC.net guru
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Theologoumenon
Posts: 1,664


« Reply #17 on: December 11, 2010, 12:34:18 AM »

"You ask, will the heterodox be saved... Why do you worry about them? They have a Saviour Who desires the salvation of every human being. He will take care of them. You and I should not be burdened with such a concern. Study yourself and your own sins... I will tell you one thing, however: should you, being Orthodox and possessing the Truth in its fullness, betray Orthodoxy, and enter a different faith, you will lose your soul forever." - St Theophan the Recluse
Amen!
Logged
scamandrius
Crusher of Secrets; House Lannister
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Greek Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Greek by desire; Antiochian by necessity
Posts: 5,959



« Reply #18 on: December 11, 2010, 12:41:38 AM »


Fwiw, Alexei Khomiakov suggested (and perhaps Met. Kallistos agrees?) that non-Orthodox who are Christians might be "invisibly" part of the body of Christ the Church.

Those who are non-Orthodox may possess "charismatic" grace but not "sacramental" grace.

What is a Christian? What is a theologian?  Above all, a theologian and Christian do the same thing--pray fervently.  As Orthodox, we have the Church.  Those outside may struggle more and even those inside.  Ultimately, God will judge and save whom He wishes.
Logged

I seek the truth by which no man was ever harmed--Marcus Aurelius

Those who do not read  history are doomed to get their facts from Hollywood--Anonymous

What earthly joy remains untouched by grief?--St. John Damascene
GabrieltheCelt
Hillbilly Extraordinaire
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 6,988


Chasin' down a Hoodoo...


« Reply #19 on: December 11, 2010, 01:12:47 AM »

I believe the question as it's asked in the subject title is could be much better worded.  A much better question, IMO, is, "What are the criterion to becoming a Christian?"  This not only forces us to study the early Christians and their doctrines, along with Holy Tradition and Scripture, but more importantly it forces us to look at ourselves to see if we meet said criterion.

It may sound judgmental, mean-spirited and against the Gospel message to do so, but to not do so would mean that the Mormon, the Baptist, the Holiness Pentecostal, the Roman Catholic, the Jehova's Witness, the Episcopalian/Anglican and the Eastern Orthodox Christian are merely diverse members of the same body.  My friends, only a fool would adopt such an outlook.  

There IS an established, well-trodden set of criterion to answer such a question.  The quote given from our holy father, St. Theophan the Recluse, holds the key to the answer.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2010, 01:14:50 AM by GabrieltheCelt » Logged

"The Scots-Irish; Brewed in Scotland, bottled in Ireland, uncorked in America."  ~Scots-Irish saying
Alveus Lacuna
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 6,861



« Reply #20 on: December 11, 2010, 03:01:18 AM »

This not only forces us to study the early Christians and their doctrines, along with Holy Tradition and Scripture, but more importantly it forces us to look at ourselves to see if we meet said criterion.

But at the same time, I think we need to be very careful in assuming that most people really are research-oriented enough to actually go into an in-depth study of Christian history. And even then, there are many competing histories available to the casual reader. There's the liberal textual critical view which sees competing sects from the beginning, even with apostolic churches disagreeing and breaking into different groups. Then there are "corruption" and "great apostasy" advocates. Then there are the surviving and competing apostolic communions, etc.

Requiring research in a rigorous way makes salvation even more difficult for people to reach out for. There is something to be said for a simple faith in Christ based on what is available to the person who's heart is open. The Orthodox Church isn't exactly a large group in the USA, and missions here at home are almost nonexistent, so we can't expect everyone to just pick up a history book and then head to the local Orthodox Church for catechesis. God is merciful and understands the situations that people find themselves in, and I have a hard time seeing the Lover of Mankind turning away someone who cries out to Him for salvation in simple and humble faith.

It took me getting a Master's degree in Religious Studies with some solid grounding in early Christian history, then stumbling onto an Orthodox church through a family member, then being an inquirer for a year, then being a catechumen for almost another two years, all before becoming Orthodox. This was just my path, but I know that all of this cannot be required for someone to simply believe in Jesus and trust in Him for saving grace and strength to repent. While Christian history is complicated and takes at least a decade of casual study to begin to get a grasp of the basic issues at play, the gospel is simple and straightforward, ready for any that hear it. I do not say this to downplay the necessity of the Orthodox Church as the full manifestation of this gospel, but we must be ready to admit that this is about more than simple research or whatever. May God save us all!
« Last Edit: December 11, 2010, 03:02:47 AM by Alveus Lacuna » Logged
synLeszka
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Posts: 532


« Reply #21 on: December 11, 2010, 01:12:29 PM »

One of the posters asked me this-If the Orthodox are the Body of Christ and the others are not part of His Body then how can they be Christians in the same sense?
What does everyone thinks?

Fwiw, Alexei Khomiakov suggested (and perhaps Met. Kallistos agrees?) that non-Orthodox who are Christians might be "invisibly" part of the body of Christ the Church.
Khomiakov saying something like that? Does not sound like the Khomiakov I know, tho...
Logged
sprtslvr1973
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA; Jurisdiaction of Dallas and the South
Posts: 680


"Behold I stand at the Door and Knock" Rev. 3:20


« Reply #22 on: December 12, 2010, 08:38:35 AM »

One of the posters asked me this-If the Orthodox are the Body of Christ and the others are not part of His Body then how can they be Christians in the same sense?
What does everyone thinks?
Regarding Heterdox some are some are not Christans. Ditto us
Logged

"Into thy hands I commend my spirit"- Luke 23:46
“Lord, I believe; help my unbelief!” - Mark 9:24
Justin Kissel
Formerly Asteriktos
Protospatharios
****************
Offline Offline

Faith: Agnostic
Posts: 29,581



« Reply #23 on: December 12, 2010, 11:09:10 AM »

Khomiakov saying something like that? Does not sound like the Khomiakov I know, tho...

The Visible and Invisible Church
We Cannot Be Sure Where the Church Is Not

EDIT--just a note to say that I shouldn't have put the word invisibly in quotes in my previous post.
« Last Edit: December 12, 2010, 11:10:59 AM by Asteriktos » Logged
ICXCNIKA
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 661



« Reply #24 on: December 12, 2010, 12:38:25 PM »

I have been recently reading the writings of St Cyprian in the Ante-Nicene Fathers and I do not think that what is qouted by Khomiakov would be acceptable. Here is the response from Bishop Firmilian to St. Cyprian you can read it and come to your own conclusions. I found both their arguements to be overwhelming.

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iv.iv.lxxiv.html
Logged
Trevorthodox
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ecumenical Patriarchate - Exarchate of Parishes of Russian Tradition
Posts: 57



« Reply #25 on: December 12, 2010, 01:35:25 PM »

This not only forces us to study the early Christians and their doctrines, along with Holy Tradition and Scripture, but more importantly it forces us to look at ourselves to see if we meet said criterion.


There is something to be said for a simple faith in Christ based on what is available to the person who's heart is open. The Orthodox Church isn't exactly a large group in the USA, and missions here at home are almost nonexistent, so we can't expect everyone to just pick up a history book and then head to the local Orthodox Church for catechesis. God is merciful and understands the situations that people find themselves in, and I have a hard time seeing the Lover of Mankind turning away someone who cries out to Him for salvation in simple and humble faith.



I agree. There hasn't been a native Orthodox church in England for over a thousand years... The Methodist chapel was the only church in our tiny English country village, and a great many villagers worshipped God there. They were shepherds, farmers and labourers, simple folks who loved God. They had probably never heard of the orthodox church, and new little of other countries and traditions. No great theologian from Greece ever visited and knocked on their door to correct the minister. The people simply prayed to God in faith and love, cared for their families, and read their well-worn Bibles.

I am sure that Christ is willing and able to stretch out his hand and touch people who are not born in Orthodox lands, to make his presence known.

In many cases it is not the faith of the heterodox that is is question, but through a lack of contact with orthodoxy, it is the praxis and not the faith that is at fault.
Logged
GabrieltheCelt
Hillbilly Extraordinaire
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 6,988


Chasin' down a Hoodoo...


« Reply #26 on: December 12, 2010, 03:31:16 PM »

This not only forces us to study the early Christians and their doctrines, along with Holy Tradition and Scripture, but more importantly it forces us to look at ourselves to see if we meet said criterion.

But at the same time, I think we need to be very careful in assuming that most people really are research-oriented enough to actually go into an in-depth study of Christian history.
You are, of course, correct.  I suppose I made a few assumptions.  I was wrong to assume that all people have the resources and inclination to research these things.  I will say, and stand by it, that if one is not an Orthodox Christian, you are not a true Christian no matter how sincere you may be (one can be sincere and be sincerely wrong).  And may I be so bold as to say that ignorance of the truth does not erase the truth.  If one calls himself/herself a Christian, but denies that the saints can and do pray for us, you have placed yourself outside true Christianity, whether out of ignorance or obstinance.  But at the same time, in no way can an Orthodox Christian say of these people that they are doomed to hell for this is not the realm of man to say these things.  In point of fact, an Eastern Orthodox Christian cannot even say that he himself will go to heaven.   

May God save us all!
Amen, Amen, Amen!
Logged

"The Scots-Irish; Brewed in Scotland, bottled in Ireland, uncorked in America."  ~Scots-Irish saying
HabteSelassie
Ises and I-ity
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 3,332



« Reply #27 on: December 25, 2010, 05:11:38 PM »

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!
One of the posters asked me this-If the Orthodox are the Body of Christ and the others are not part of His Body then how can they be Christians in the same sense?
What does everyone thinks?
I believe that anyone of any background or belief or creed who professes the Name of Jesus Christ in any capacity but of absolute sincerity is indeed a Christian, but that if they do not acknowledge the Real Presence of the Divine Mysteries and Sacramentality as do the Apostolic Orthodox and Roman Catholic traditions, then that Christianity is intentionally depriving (notice I said deprived, not depraved there is a difference) itself of the the fullness of Jesus Christ.

Only the Real Presence is what makes us Christian.  Jesus is not a symbol, or an imaginary friend, or some pie-in-the-sky God is only coming back in the future but today we must continually await is Dawning, no, Jesus Christ comes to us directly, really, tangibly in the form of the Eucharist. Whenever we receive it, or indeed even stand and pray in its midst during the Liturgy, we Orthodox/Catholic come to the truest form of Christianity, to participate directly and actively in the Real Body and Blood of Jesus Christ.

I do not disrespect the faith or intentions of others, but rather I pity those Christians who reject the Real Presence, as they are unintentionally rejecting the very healing and saving Presence of God in our midst.  What separates Orthodox from the rest, is that we believe, confess and believe to our last breath that truly it is He.
stay blessed,
habte selassie
Logged

"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10
Shiny
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 13,267


Paint It Red


« Reply #28 on: December 25, 2010, 06:52:08 PM »

I will say, and stand by it, that if one is not an Orthodox Christian, you are not a true Christian no matter how sincere you may be (one can be sincere and be sincerely wrong).  And may I be so bold as to say that ignorance of the truth does not erase the truth.  If one calls himself/herself a Christian, but denies that the saints can and do pray for us, you have placed yourself outside true Christianity, whether out of ignorance or obstinance.  But at the same time, in no way can an Orthodox Christian say of these people that they are doomed to hell for this is not the realm of man to say these things.  In point of fact, an Eastern Orthodox Christian cannot even say that he himself will go to heaven. 
I agree with this 100%. Even if I do become baptized (and let's just say if I remained the same person I am right now and at baptism) I don't know if I would still consider myself to be a Christian until I continuously each day be more like Christ (That's my own set of expectations, everyone is different obviously).

But once my eyes have been opened to the Truth, I can't close them again and it's hard too not to share the experience because it could come across as prideful. I think Fr. Andrew Stephen Damick said we are not in the nice business but in the Truth business. Why would anyone want some sort of 'falsehood' in what they believe? I know I don't and one of the biggest hurdles I see people who want to join an Orthodox Church is because they would have to 'sacrifice' their community, which if they are an active part of it would be well established, for the Truth.
Logged

“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan
Ortho_cat
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: AOCA-DWMA
Posts: 5,392



« Reply #29 on: December 25, 2010, 07:55:15 PM »

maybe so, maybe no...
Logged
ChristusDominus
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Latin Rite
Posts: 936


Saint Aloysius Gonzaga


« Reply #30 on: December 25, 2010, 08:32:31 PM »



Mathew 12:50

"For whoever does the will of My Father who is in heaven, he is My brother and sister and mother."



John 10:27-28

 My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me. 28 And I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; neither shall anyone snatch them out of My hand.

« Last Edit: December 25, 2010, 08:44:33 PM by ChristusDominus » Logged

There is no more evident sign that anyone is a saint and of the number of the elect, than to see him leading a good life and at the same time a prey to desolation, suffering, and trials. - Saint Aloysius Gonzaga
minasoliman
Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Online Online

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodox Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 11,099


Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)


WWW
« Reply #31 on: December 25, 2010, 11:24:54 PM »

One Lord, One Faith, One Baptism:

You can be a believer in Christ, a Christian in that sense, but one may not have the same faith, and thus, we're not part of the same Church.  One can believe in democracy, a democrat in heart, but cannot truly fulfill his beliefs if he's not in a democratic nation.

If one Lord and one Faith, then there should be a shared sacramental life, starting with baptism.  This is the definition of one Church, that which believes in One Lord, One Faith, and One baptism.
Logged

Vain existence can never exist, for \\\"unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain.\\\" (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.
Thomist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Latin Rite: Archdiocese of Baltimore
Posts: 203



« Reply #32 on: December 26, 2010, 12:41:35 PM »

The Orthodox and the Catholic Churches recognize that each Church has valid apostolic succession, the seven sacraments, and is sufficient to the salvation of its members. This is why those Churches have sworn off proselytization of one another. If each wing did not believe that the other had full membership in the Church, to swear off proselytizing members of it would be a grave sin. I tend to think you have a 'full church' so long as you have Apostolic Succession and the Seven Sacraments. To that end, I would consider the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Churches, the Oriental Orthodox Churches, and the Assyrian Church of the East to all represent the full Church, despite the fact that my loyalties lie with the first.
« Last Edit: December 26, 2010, 12:42:45 PM by Thomist » Logged

"Would heretics dare to come to the very seat of Peter whence apostolic faith is derived and whither no errors can come?" - Saint Cyprian of Carthage
theistgal
Byzantine (Ruthenian) Catholic gadfly
Site Supporter
Archon
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Follower of Jesus Christ
Jurisdiction: Byzantine Catholic
Posts: 2,082


don't even go there!


« Reply #33 on: December 26, 2010, 01:16:52 PM »

What are you talking about? EO's and RC's proselytize each other all the time.

Are you new here? Wink
Logged

"Sometimes, you just gotta say, 'OK, I still have nine live, two-headed animals' and move on.'' (owner of Coney Island freak show, upon learning he'd been outbid on a 5-legged puppy)
mike
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,467


WWW
« Reply #34 on: December 26, 2010, 01:18:28 PM »

The Orthodox and the Catholic Churches recognize that each Church has valid apostolic succession,

No.
Quote
the seven sacraments,

No.

Quote
and is sufficient to the salvation of its members.

No.

Quote
This is why those Churches have sworn off proselytization of one another

No.

Quote
If each wing did not believe that the other had full membership in the Church, to swear off proselytizing members of it would be a grave sin.

Yes.
« Last Edit: December 26, 2010, 01:19:20 PM by Michał Kalina » Logged

Byzantinism
no longer posting here
Apotheoun
"Three realities pertain to God: essence, energy, and the triad of divine hypostaseis." St. Gregory Palamas
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: Melkite Catholic
Posts: 1,388


St. John Maximovitch


WWW
« Reply #35 on: December 26, 2010, 01:21:08 PM »

Are there only seven sacraments?

Many of my Eastern Orthodox friends tell me that there are more than seven holy mysteries.
Logged

"All that the Father has belongs likewise to the Son, except Causality."
St. Gregory Nazianzen

"We should believe that divine grace is present in the icon of Christ and that it communicates sanctification to those who draw near with faith."
St. Theodore Studite
tuesdayschild
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 966



« Reply #36 on: December 26, 2010, 02:26:26 PM »

The Orthodox and the Catholic Churches recognize that each Church has valid apostolic succession,

No.
Quote
the seven sacraments,

No.

"We recognize the Sacraments of the Catholic Church. If a Catholic priest moves over to Orthodoxy we accept him as priest."

Source: http://www.mospat.ru/en/2009/12/14/news10180/
Logged
mike
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,467


WWW
« Reply #37 on: December 26, 2010, 02:27:50 PM »

"We recognize the Sacraments of the Catholic Church. If a Catholic priest moves over to Orthodoxy we accept him as priest."

Source: http://www.mospat.ru/en/2009/12/14/news10180/

Personal opinion of one Bishop does not represent the Church's teaching.
Logged

Byzantinism
no longer posting here
Maksim
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 86


« Reply #38 on: December 26, 2010, 02:34:17 PM »

The Orthodox and the Catholic Churches recognize that each Church has valid apostolic succession, the seven sacraments, and is sufficient to the salvation of its members. This is why those Churches have sworn off proselytization of one another. If each wing did not believe that the other had full membership in the Church, to swear off proselytizing members of it would be a grave sin. I tend to think you have a 'full church' so long as you have Apostolic Succession and the Seven Sacraments. To that end, I would consider the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Churches, the Oriental Orthodox Churches, and the Assyrian Church of the East to all represent the full Church, despite the fact that my loyalties lie with the first.

This is not accurate, at least in terms of Orthodoxy.  I can't tell you how many times I've heard Catholics and Protestants say things like the above, undoubtedly in all sincerity.  And to some extent, this is our own fault for not being more clear.

The Orthodox Church does not recognize sacramental grace outside of Orthodoxy, and I've never heard of any suggestion to "swear off proselytizing".  Which isn't to say that some Orthodox representative at some ecumenical gathering or another didn't say something like that.  I actually think that "Orthodox ecumenists" are now the biggest impediment to genuine discussions with the non-Orthodox.

Logged
tuesdayschild
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 966



« Reply #39 on: December 26, 2010, 02:56:57 PM »

"We recognize the Sacraments of the Catholic Church. If a Catholic priest moves over to Orthodoxy we accept him as priest."

Source: http://www.mospat.ru/en/2009/12/14/news10180/

Personal opinion of one Bishop does not represent the Church's teaching.

It is an official site and, thus, an official statement.

Logged
mike
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,467


WWW
« Reply #40 on: December 26, 2010, 03:00:31 PM »

"We recognize the Sacraments of the Catholic Church. If a Catholic priest moves over to Orthodoxy we accept him as priest."

Source: http://www.mospat.ru/en/2009/12/14/news10180/

Personal opinion of one Bishop does not represent the Church's teaching.

It is an official site and, thus, an official statement.



This is an official site of Metropolitan Hilarion's Department, nothing more than that.
Logged

Byzantinism
no longer posting here
tuesdayschild
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 966



« Reply #41 on: December 26, 2010, 03:02:28 PM »

"We recognize the Sacraments of the Catholic Church. If a Catholic priest moves over to Orthodoxy we accept him as priest."

Source: http://www.mospat.ru/en/2009/12/14/news10180/

Personal opinion of one Bishop does not represent the Church's teaching.

It is an official site and, thus, an official statement.



This is an official site of Metropolitan Hilarion's Department, nothing more than that.

If you say so.  Roll Eyes
Logged
Thomist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Latin Rite: Archdiocese of Baltimore
Posts: 203



« Reply #42 on: December 26, 2010, 03:10:01 PM »

There's no such thing as the "official view" of the Orthdox Church, because there is no person who has the authority to say what the "Orthodox view" is. For that reason I agree that it is impertinent to say what the "Orthodox Church" affirms, and I shouldn't have worded it that way. I was referring to the Ravenna statement.
Logged

"Would heretics dare to come to the very seat of Peter whence apostolic faith is derived and whither no errors can come?" - Saint Cyprian of Carthage
Apotheoun
"Three realities pertain to God: essence, energy, and the triad of divine hypostaseis." St. Gregory Palamas
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: Melkite Catholic
Posts: 1,388


St. John Maximovitch


WWW
« Reply #43 on: December 26, 2010, 03:17:26 PM »

The teaching of the Orthodox Church on the incarnation and the trinity is clear, and so I think it is foolish to say that there is no consensus among Eastern Orthodox Christians.
Logged

"All that the Father has belongs likewise to the Son, except Causality."
St. Gregory Nazianzen

"We should believe that divine grace is present in the icon of Christ and that it communicates sanctification to those who draw near with faith."
St. Theodore Studite
Ortho_cat
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: AOCA-DWMA
Posts: 5,392



« Reply #44 on: December 26, 2010, 03:33:23 PM »

There's no such thing as the "official view" of the Orthdox Church, because there is no person who has the authority to say what the "Orthodox view" is.

Thankfully, the teachigns of the OC are not based on the opinions of one person.
« Last Edit: December 26, 2010, 03:33:55 PM by Ortho_cat » Logged
HabteSelassie
Ises and I-ity
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 3,332



« Reply #45 on: December 26, 2010, 06:34:08 PM »

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Only God can judge.

Logged

"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10
Thomist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Latin Rite: Archdiocese of Baltimore
Posts: 203



« Reply #46 on: December 26, 2010, 06:43:59 PM »

The teaching of the Orthodox Church on the incarnation and the trinity is clear, and so I think it is foolish to say that there is no consensus among Eastern Orthodox Christians.

The teaching is clear, but it is not "official". When there is a matter of controversy among Orthodox about what they believe, there is no authority that can define what the final Orthodox opinion is, and so none of their views becomes the "official" view. I did not mean to imply that there is no such thing as Orthodox doctrine.
« Last Edit: December 26, 2010, 06:44:30 PM by Thomist » Logged

"Would heretics dare to come to the very seat of Peter whence apostolic faith is derived and whither no errors can come?" - Saint Cyprian of Carthage
Marc1152
Warned
Toumarches
************
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Rocor
Posts: 12,653


Probiotic .. Antibiotic


« Reply #47 on: December 26, 2010, 07:47:54 PM »


On a practical note, only those whose attempts at baptism we can receive by economy can be called, by economy, Christian.

So I'm a Christian in some Orthodox jurisdictions and a heathen in others?

No. A "heathen" is someone who does not believe in the God of Abraham.   
Logged

Your idea has been debunked 1000 times already.. Maybe 1001 will be the charm
Keble
All-Knowing Grand Wizard of Debunking
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,410



« Reply #48 on: December 26, 2010, 11:28:18 PM »

Whenever this question comes up, there are always some who can be counted on to give cruel and self-aggrandizing answers. I am even willing to call the Mormons Christians, though I will call them heretics in the next breath because what they believe about Jesus is plainly wrong. The word "Christian", at least in English, has a perfectly clear meaning, and those of us English Christians are quite willing to allow the Orthodox to go on using the term to describe themselves.
Logged
88Devin12
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 4,864



« Reply #49 on: December 26, 2010, 11:32:11 PM »

Whenever this question comes up, there are always some who can be counted on to give cruel and self-aggrandizing answers. I am even willing to call the Mormons Christians, though I will call them heretics in the next breath because what they believe about Jesus is plainly wrong. The word "Christian", at least in English, has a perfectly clear meaning, and those of us English Christians are quite willing to allow the Orthodox to go on using the term to describe themselves.

I don't see how the Mormons are possibly Christians, they don't even believe in the same God as us. If they are Christians, then so are Muslims and Jews...
Logged
theistgal
Byzantine (Ruthenian) Catholic gadfly
Site Supporter
Archon
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Follower of Jesus Christ
Jurisdiction: Byzantine Catholic
Posts: 2,082


don't even go there!


« Reply #50 on: December 27, 2010, 01:56:59 AM »

Well, some people here say that I (as a Catholic) don't believe in the same God.

Maybe we should keep in mind that there is, after all only one God, and NONE of us knows Him perfectly.
Logged

"Sometimes, you just gotta say, 'OK, I still have nine live, two-headed animals' and move on.'' (owner of Coney Island freak show, upon learning he'd been outbid on a 5-legged puppy)
Shiny
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 13,267


Paint It Red


« Reply #51 on: December 27, 2010, 02:33:20 AM »

Maybe we should keep in mind that there is, after all only one God, and NONE of us knows Him perfectly.

Sure none of us know Him perfectly, but we should make the attempts to be as close to being accurate as we can.
Logged

“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan
Shiny
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 13,267


Paint It Red


« Reply #52 on: December 27, 2010, 02:37:38 AM »

Whenever this question comes up, there are always some who can be counted on to give cruel and self-aggrandizing answers. I am even willing to call the Mormons Christians, though I will call them heretics in the next breath because what they believe about Jesus is plainly wrong. The word "Christian", at least in English, has a perfectly clear meaning, and those of us English Christians are quite willing to allow the Orthodox to go on using the term to describe themselves.

I don't see how the Mormons are possibly Christians, they don't even believe in the same God as us. If they are Christians, then so are Muslims and Jews...

Mark 21-23 21 And then if any one says to you, 'Look, here is the Christ!' or'Look, there he is!' do not believe it. 22 False Christs and false prophets will arise and show signs and wonders, to lead astray, if possible, the elect. 23 But take heed; I have told you all things beforehand.

You are right they are not, we are just worshipping "one spirit child".
Logged

“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan
GabrieltheCelt
Hillbilly Extraordinaire
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 6,988


Chasin' down a Hoodoo...


« Reply #53 on: December 27, 2010, 03:36:49 AM »

Whenever this question comes up, there are always some who can be counted on to give cruel and self-aggrandizing answers.
Why, whatever do you mean?


 The word "Christian", at least in English, has a perfectly clear meaning, and those of us English Christians are quite willing to allow the Orthodox to go on using the term to describe themselves.
Ah, I see now.  Well thanks, sport.  So gracious of you rebel children.  Wink
Logged

"The Scots-Irish; Brewed in Scotland, bottled in Ireland, uncorked in America."  ~Scots-Irish saying
PeterTheAleut
The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
Section Moderator
Protospatharios
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 31,964


Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!


« Reply #54 on: December 27, 2010, 04:02:07 AM »

Whenever this question comes up, there are always some who can be counted on to give cruel and self-aggrandizing answers. I am even willing to call the Mormons Christians, though I will call them heretics in the next breath because what they believe about Jesus is plainly wrong. The word "Christian", at least in English, has a perfectly clear meaning, and those of us English Christians are quite willing to allow the Orthodox to go on using the term to describe themselves.

I don't see how the Mormons are possibly Christians, they don't even believe in the same God as us. If they are Christians, then so are Muslims and Jews...
Did you not read Keble's post far enough to see that he also calls Mormons heretics?
« Last Edit: December 27, 2010, 04:02:27 AM by PeterTheAleut » Logged
David 2007
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 197



« Reply #55 on: December 27, 2010, 12:59:43 PM »

Well, some people here say that I (as a Catholic) don't believe in the same God.

Maybe we should keep in mind that there is, after all only one God, and NONE of us knows Him perfectly.

Yes I agree.

I've never understood the actual 'logic' that one "there is only one God" is different to another "there is only one God".

To be honest, I've only seen this faulty logic come from American Christians. Is it some sort of cultural thing? Political? I don't know.
Then again I know more American Christians online than I do Australian ones full stop.
Logged
theistgal
Byzantine (Ruthenian) Catholic gadfly
Site Supporter
Archon
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Follower of Jesus Christ
Jurisdiction: Byzantine Catholic
Posts: 2,082


don't even go there!


« Reply #56 on: December 27, 2010, 01:13:09 PM »

Hi David - yes, I see it in a lot of the more paranoid fundamentalist literature (end times novels, etc.) - the idea that good people think they're worshipping the true God but find out (at the Rapture, or death) that they were really worshipping Satan in disguise.  (This especially happens to Catholics who pray to Mary - they're really worshipping her, you know. Wink )
Logged

"Sometimes, you just gotta say, 'OK, I still have nine live, two-headed animals' and move on.'' (owner of Coney Island freak show, upon learning he'd been outbid on a 5-legged puppy)
88Devin12
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 4,864



« Reply #57 on: December 27, 2010, 02:36:02 PM »

Whenever this question comes up, there are always some who can be counted on to give cruel and self-aggrandizing answers. I am even willing to call the Mormons Christians, though I will call them heretics in the next breath because what they believe about Jesus is plainly wrong. The word "Christian", at least in English, has a perfectly clear meaning, and those of us English Christians are quite willing to allow the Orthodox to go on using the term to describe themselves.

I don't see how the Mormons are possibly Christians, they don't even believe in the same God as us. If they are Christians, then so are Muslims and Jews...
Did you not read Keble's post far enough to see that he also calls Mormons heretics?

There is a difference between being a heretic and a non-Christian. One could argue that Protestants and Roman Catholics are heretics, yet they are Christians. Mormons are simply not Christians.

Christian does not equal a belief in Christ, otherwise, as I said, Muslims and Jews would be Christians. (Heck you could even call the demons Christians)

Christian = Nicene Christianity

Also, there is only one God, and that is our God. Our God is not the same as the Mormon God, and it's not the same as the Muslim God, and it's not the same as the Jewish God. (the modern Jews are Jews only by name and ethnicity, they don't worship the same God as OT Jews and Hebrews)

Calling someone a non-Christian isn't judging them, because we aren't making a judgement about their salvation. You can judge someones belief and behavior, but you cannot judge their salvation.
Logged
PeterTheAleut
The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
Section Moderator
Protospatharios
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 31,964


Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!


« Reply #58 on: December 27, 2010, 02:43:49 PM »

Whenever this question comes up, there are always some who can be counted on to give cruel and self-aggrandizing answers. I am even willing to call the Mormons Christians, though I will call them heretics in the next breath because what they believe about Jesus is plainly wrong. The word "Christian", at least in English, has a perfectly clear meaning, and those of us English Christians are quite willing to allow the Orthodox to go on using the term to describe themselves.

I don't see how the Mormons are possibly Christians, they don't even believe in the same God as us. If they are Christians, then so are Muslims and Jews...
Did you not read Keble's post far enough to see that he also calls Mormons heretics?

There is a difference between being a heretic and a non-Christian. One could argue that Protestants and Roman Catholics are heretics, yet they are Christians. Mormons are simply not Christians.

Christian does not equal a belief in Christ, otherwise, as I said, Muslims and Jews would be Christians. (Heck you could even call the demons Christians)

Christian = Nicene Christianity
Then it seems that the foundation of your argument with Keble is a disagreement over how to define the term "Christian". The question of who rates this title and who doesn't is merely a manifestation of this fundamental disagreement over semantics.
Logged
Keble
All-Knowing Grand Wizard of Debunking
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,410



« Reply #59 on: December 27, 2010, 02:47:10 PM »

Whenever this question comes up, there are always some who can be counted on to give cruel and self-aggrandizing answers. I am even willing to call the Mormons Christians, though I will call them heretics in the next breath because what they believe about Jesus is plainly wrong. The word "Christian", at least in English, has a perfectly clear meaning, and those of us English Christians are quite willing to allow the Orthodox to go on using the term to describe themselves.

I don't see how the Mormons are possibly Christians, they don't even believe in the same God as us. If they are Christians, then so are Muslims and Jews...

But that is not how being a Christian is defined: a Christian is a follower of Christ, and the Jews absolutely aren't, and the Muslims effectively aren't (they pay Him some lip service as a prophet, but that's about it). The Mormons are heretics of an extreme variety, to be sure; and I said I was "willing" to call them Christians, not that I was happy to do so. I'm not going to make a big deal out of it if you cannot so include them.

My dogma on the usage of words is that they are to be used in general to mean what people mean by them in general. When push comes to shove I am inclined to qualify "Christian" so that I may refer to a "Nicene Christian" for those who accept the Creed (ignoring the filioque), and so forth. But I hold that the attempt to simply define people out of acceptability is dishonest and not worth of Jesus' followers. If by "Christian" you can only mean "those who follow Jesus as my party does", then you are not Christian, if you do not follow Jesus as my party does. You are certainly welcome to make distinctions between those who are following rightly and those who do so in error, and I think it is even more fruitful to make distinctions as to the degree and nature of the errors.
Logged
Keble
All-Knowing Grand Wizard of Debunking
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,410



« Reply #60 on: December 27, 2010, 03:02:47 PM »

Also, there is only one God, and that is our God. Our God is not the same as the Mormon God, and it's not the same as the Muslim God, and it's not the same as the Jewish God. (the modern Jews are Jews only by name and ethnicity, they don't worship the same God as OT Jews and Hebrews)

You have stepping into philosophically insupportable territory in making this claim. How can what we say about the god to whom we pray possibly affect who that God is? As the OT makes abundantly clear, it is up to God to choose those to whom He listens.

What the Mormons say about God is so utterly incompatible with what we say about Him that it impedes pretty much anything we could do together or hold in discourse. With the Muslims, even more so. But Jesus does hold a central place in Mormon theology so that I can talk about Jesus with them and have some commonality of language, whereas Jesus hardly figures in Islamic thought. With the Mormons I can call Jesus "Savior", and they will in some sense understand and agree (even though their idea of salvation is way off); with the Muslims I cannot. It is important in all of this that both groups add (false) revelation which largely supplants the Orthodox deposit of faith.

The Jews present the opposite side of the coin. Saying that modern Jews are praying to a different God is to my mind nonsensical. It leads one to either making weird (and apparently false) racial claims on the one side, and on the other side stating that for instance the various figures in the gospels are also worshipping the wrong god, when it's quite clear that Jesus is attacking them for worshipping Him wrongly.
Logged
HabteSelassie
Ises and I-ity
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 3,332



« Reply #61 on: December 27, 2010, 03:07:33 PM »

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

There is a fundamental dichotomy here.

In Orthodox we accept Sacramentality and the Real Presence.  For us, Jesus Christ tangibly comes to us in the form of the Divine Mysteries, God's economy and operations are direct, tangible, real, in our daily lives.  We are not waiting for God, if anything God is waiting for us!

Where as Protestants/Pentecostals/Baptists etc etc reject his openly, defiantly, and in fact call us all stupid, superstitious, and even dangerous devil worshipers! Talk about drawing a line in the sand!

Protestants are waiting for a pie-in-the-sky Jesus God to come one day, but Jesus Christ is always here with us, we do not need to wait.  Further, they almost feel at times they are completely on their own, where as we search constantly for God in our lives in Orthodox through fasting, prayer, holy days and liturgies.  This honestly why I converted, and all Protestants should.

We as Christians spent 1500 years unified behind the Sacraments, only in this relatively brief moment has there been division.  I say, that we can not define who are Christians and who are not, but we can define what practices are fully Christian and which are not, and any rejection of Sacramentality is thoroughly deprived Christianity.

stay blessed,
habte selassie
Logged

"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10
88Devin12
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 4,864



« Reply #62 on: December 27, 2010, 03:41:06 PM »

Also, there is only one God, and that is our God. Our God is not the same as the Mormon God, and it's not the same as the Muslim God, and it's not the same as the Jewish God. (the modern Jews are Jews only by name and ethnicity, they don't worship the same God as OT Jews and Hebrews)

You have stepping into philosophically insupportable territory in making this claim. How can what we say about the god to whom we pray possibly affect who that God is? As the OT makes abundantly clear, it is up to God to choose those to whom He listens.

What the Mormons say about God is so utterly incompatible with what we say about Him that it impedes pretty much anything we could do together or hold in discourse. With the Muslims, even more so. But Jesus does hold a central place in Mormon theology so that I can talk about Jesus with them and have some commonality of language, whereas Jesus hardly figures in Islamic thought. With the Mormons I can call Jesus "Savior", and they will in some sense understand and agree (even though their idea of salvation is way off); with the Muslims I cannot. It is important in all of this that both groups add (false) revelation which largely supplants the Orthodox deposit of faith.

The Jews present the opposite side of the coin. Saying that modern Jews are praying to a different God is to my mind nonsensical. It leads one to either making weird (and apparently false) racial claims on the one side, and on the other side stating that for instance the various figures in the gospels are also worshipping the wrong god, when it's quite clear that Jesus is attacking them for worshipping Him wrongly.


I'm sorry, but there is a definite reason that I reject the Protestant definition of Christian. We are the Early Christians, and we are the Early Church, no offense intended, and I'm not meaning to boast or use my "Orthodoxy" (though I'm a poor Orthodox Christian) to argue, but I'm going to say that the members of our Church were the first ones to be called Christians, and so we should let the Church tell us what being a Christian is and what it is not.

It is also blasphemous to say that the Muslims, Mormons and Jews all worship the same God as we do. That is simply NOT true. You absolutely must worship the same God as Christianity. To argue that doctrine, dogmatics, theology, etc... doesn't matter is wrong and that is something I'm not going to sit here and stand for.

I just spent the whole semester taking a class learning about different views of Christ within "Christianity", and I'm going to tell you that there are some brands of "Christianity" that are not Christian at all. To refuse to call Christ God, or to refuse to accept the Holy Trinity is to mean that you are rejecting the essence of Christianity itself.
We were taught in-class that there are some "Christians" who don't believe that any miracles occurred and that all the "miracles", even those by Christ were just metaphors. There are also some "Christians" that don't believe that Christ was a God, and was just a really "holy" man, that is, a moral teacher. There are also some "Christians" that reject 95% of the New Testament, arguing it was all written by the Church, and didn't come from the mouth of Christ himself. I'm sorry, but these beliefs are not Christian.

Doctrine, Dogmatics, Theology, Orthodoxy, Orthopraxis, Faith, Works, it's all a part of being a Christian. To be a Christian doesn't mean you are "good" at it, in fact most of us are very poor at being Christians. But you must affirm not just a belief in Christ, but you must affirm that Christ is God, you must affirm the Holy Trinity. Essentially, you must accept that which is defined in the Nicene Creed, because this is the faith of the Apostles, this is the faith of the Earliest Christians. To be a Christian is much, much more than just a "belief" or "acceptance" of Jesus Christ. This is something that I'm going to have to say should be absolutely rejected by modern Christianity, and is a very unfortunate belief that modern Protestantism has brought to the table.

To illustrate my point, here is a hypothetical situation:

Say I believe in Jesus Christ, and accept him as my Lord and Savior. Yet I also believe that this Jesus Christ is not God himself, but rather a lesser deity. I also believe that he really didn't die on the cross, but that was simply an illusion put forth by Jesus so that people would think he had died, when in reality, he ascended into "heaven" and rules over our world. However, what he did for us, is showed us that every one of us can become deities ourselves. I believe that as long as we live good, moral lives according to how Jesus lived his, then we will attain this godhood. I also believe that there is no Holy Trinity, but rather that the Father is a Force-like entity, and that Jesus was born through this entity. Not only that, but I also believe that the Holy Spirit is the use of this entity, and that through the use of the entity, and your connection with it, that you attain the godlike status that Christ attained. So essentially, if we live moral, "Christ-like" lives, and if we "connect" to this entity (through prayer, good works, etc...) then we are saved from our mortality and our imperfectness (what some call sin) by becoming deities.

Now tell me, is this belief Christian? I'm going to argue that it is not Christian. Just believing in Jesus Christ as your savior, etc... is not the criteria for being a Christian. Nor is just being "Christ-like" because even the non-Christians can be Christ-like.

The Christian faith consists of many aspects, Orthodoxy, Orthopraxis, Dogmatics, Doctrine, Works, Faith etc... We aren't perfect Christians, but that doesn't mean that you can through the baby out with the bathwater and just toss out everything that Christianity stands for just so you can be "tolerant" and "accepting" of any group that wants to call themselves Christian.

I'm not going to stand for this. As much as I love my Protestant brethren, this belief, that to be a Christian is simply to "accept Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior" is nothing but utter bull.

Keep in mind, that I live in an area that is extremely important to Mormons, and I've had many friends that are Mormons. I love them dearly. But I'm not going to refer to them as Christians, because I know what they believe, and although they believe in Jesus Christ, it isn't the same Jesus Christ that Christians worship.

If I sound passionate about this, that is because I am. I'm not suggesting I'm a better Christian than some, I know I'm not. But I am absolutely going to stand against this tendency to try and "blur" the lines between what is being a Christian and what isn't. It is very black and white.

Again, I'm not saying that being a non-Christian condemns you. God saves who he wills to save. Even if Ghandi is saved, that does not mean that his belief system was okay, or that it's okay to be Hindu. Nor does that mean he was a Christian in his earthly life. Christianity does not give you an automatic key to heaven. Being a non-Christian doesn't automatically exclude you.
But we do know that Christianity is the complete truth, and is the correct way to attaining communion with God. We have to stand for Christianity and although we need to be tolerant of other faiths and although we need to be respectful. We need to stand strong against anything that tries to blur the lines and suggest that Christian is a vague term, and we need to stand strong against anything that tries to reduce the Christian faith to just a couple qualifications in order to avoid offending some groups.

Lastly, I'm going to reiterate that I love my Protestant brethren, as well as my Roman Catholic brethren, but I'm going to absolutely stand against anything that tries to blur the lines of Christianity. I love Mormons, Jews and Muslims. But I do stand against Mormonism, Judaism and Islam. (and any other non-Christian faith) There is no way I'm ever going to regard any of these groups as worshiping the same God as I. That is simply just blasphemy and I would argue, is in fact the bad, heretical type of Ecumenism that we need to avoid at all costs.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2010, 03:47:03 PM by 88Devin12 » Logged
PeterTheAleut
The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
Section Moderator
Protospatharios
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 31,964


Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!


« Reply #63 on: December 27, 2010, 05:17:11 PM »

Also, there is only one God, and that is our God. Our God is not the same as the Mormon God, and it's not the same as the Muslim God, and it's not the same as the Jewish God. (the modern Jews are Jews only by name and ethnicity, they don't worship the same God as OT Jews and Hebrews)

You have stepping into philosophically insupportable territory in making this claim. How can what we say about the god to whom we pray possibly affect who that God is? As the OT makes abundantly clear, it is up to God to choose those to whom He listens.

What the Mormons say about God is so utterly incompatible with what we say about Him that it impedes pretty much anything we could do together or hold in discourse. With the Muslims, even more so. But Jesus does hold a central place in Mormon theology so that I can talk about Jesus with them and have some commonality of language, whereas Jesus hardly figures in Islamic thought. With the Mormons I can call Jesus "Savior", and they will in some sense understand and agree (even though their idea of salvation is way off); with the Muslims I cannot. It is important in all of this that both groups add (false) revelation which largely supplants the Orthodox deposit of faith.

The Jews present the opposite side of the coin. Saying that modern Jews are praying to a different God is to my mind nonsensical. It leads one to either making weird (and apparently false) racial claims on the one side, and on the other side stating that for instance the various figures in the gospels are also worshipping the wrong god, when it's quite clear that Jesus is attacking them for worshipping Him wrongly.


I'm sorry, but there is a definite reason that I reject the Protestant definition of Christian. We are the Early Christians, and we are the Early Church, no offense intended, and I'm not meaning to boast or use my "Orthodoxy" (though I'm a poor Orthodox Christian) to argue, but I'm going to say that the members of our Church were the first ones to be called Christians, and so we should let the Church tell us what being a Christian is and what it is not.

It is also blasphemous to say that the Muslims, Mormons and Jews all worship the same God as we do. That is simply NOT true. You absolutely must worship the same God as Christianity. To argue that doctrine, dogmatics, theology, etc... doesn't matter is wrong and that is something I'm not going to sit here and stand for.

I just spent the whole semester taking a class learning about different views of Christ within "Christianity", and I'm going to tell you that there are some brands of "Christianity" that are not Christian at all. To refuse to call Christ God, or to refuse to accept the Holy Trinity is to mean that you are rejecting the essence of Christianity itself.
We were taught in-class that there are some "Christians" who don't believe that any miracles occurred and that all the "miracles", even those by Christ were just metaphors. There are also some "Christians" that don't believe that Christ was a God, and was just a really "holy" man, that is, a moral teacher. There are also some "Christians" that reject 95% of the New Testament, arguing it was all written by the Church, and didn't come from the mouth of Christ himself. I'm sorry, but these beliefs are not Christian.

Doctrine, Dogmatics, Theology, Orthodoxy, Orthopraxis, Faith, Works, it's all a part of being a Christian. To be a Christian doesn't mean you are "good" at it, in fact most of us are very poor at being Christians. But you must affirm not just a belief in Christ, but you must affirm that Christ is God, you must affirm the Holy Trinity. Essentially, you must accept that which is defined in the Nicene Creed, because this is the faith of the Apostles, this is the faith of the Earliest Christians. To be a Christian is much, much more than just a "belief" or "acceptance" of Jesus Christ. This is something that I'm going to have to say should be absolutely rejected by modern Christianity, and is a very unfortunate belief that modern Protestantism has brought to the table.

To illustrate my point, here is a hypothetical situation:

Say I believe in Jesus Christ, and accept him as my Lord and Savior. Yet I also believe that this Jesus Christ is not God himself, but rather a lesser deity. I also believe that he really didn't die on the cross, but that was simply an illusion put forth by Jesus so that people would think he had died, when in reality, he ascended into "heaven" and rules over our world. However, what he did for us, is showed us that every one of us can become deities ourselves. I believe that as long as we live good, moral lives according to how Jesus lived his, then we will attain this godhood. I also believe that there is no Holy Trinity, but rather that the Father is a Force-like entity, and that Jesus was born through this entity. Not only that, but I also believe that the Holy Spirit is the use of this entity, and that through the use of the entity, and your connection with it, that you attain the godlike status that Christ attained. So essentially, if we live moral, "Christ-like" lives, and if we "connect" to this entity (through prayer, good works, etc...) then we are saved from our mortality and our imperfectness (what some call sin) by becoming deities.

Now tell me, is this belief Christian? I'm going to argue that it is not Christian. Just believing in Jesus Christ as your savior, etc... is not the criteria for being a Christian. Nor is just being "Christ-like" because even the non-Christians can be Christ-like.

The Christian faith consists of many aspects, Orthodoxy, Orthopraxis, Dogmatics, Doctrine, Works, Faith etc... We aren't perfect Christians, but that doesn't mean that you can through the baby out with the bathwater and just toss out everything that Christianity stands for just so you can be "tolerant" and "accepting" of any group that wants to call themselves Christian.

I'm not going to stand for this. As much as I love my Protestant brethren, this belief, that to be a Christian is simply to "accept Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior" is nothing but utter bull.

Keep in mind, that I live in an area that is extremely important to Mormons, and I've had many friends that are Mormons. I love them dearly. But I'm not going to refer to them as Christians, because I know what they believe, and although they believe in Jesus Christ, it isn't the same Jesus Christ that Christians worship.

If I sound passionate about this, that is because I am. I'm not suggesting I'm a better Christian than some, I know I'm not. But I am absolutely going to stand against this tendency to try and "blur" the lines between what is being a Christian and what isn't. It is very black and white.

Again, I'm not saying that being a non-Christian condemns you. God saves who he wills to save. Even if Ghandi is saved, that does not mean that his belief system was okay, or that it's okay to be Hindu. Nor does that mean he was a Christian in his earthly life. Christianity does not give you an automatic key to heaven. Being a non-Christian doesn't automatically exclude you.
But we do know that Christianity is the complete truth, and is the correct way to attaining communion with God. We have to stand for Christianity and although we need to be tolerant of other faiths and although we need to be respectful. We need to stand strong against anything that tries to blur the lines and suggest that Christian is a vague term, and we need to stand strong against anything that tries to reduce the Christian faith to just a couple qualifications in order to avoid offending some groups.

Lastly, I'm going to reiterate that I love my Protestant brethren, as well as my Roman Catholic brethren, but I'm going to absolutely stand against anything that tries to blur the lines of Christianity. I love Mormons, Jews and Muslims. But I do stand against Mormonism, Judaism and Islam. (and any other non-Christian faith) There is no way I'm ever going to regard any of these groups as worshiping the same God as I. That is simply just blasphemy and I would argue, is in fact the bad, heretical type of Ecumenism that we need to avoid at all costs.
Are you really responding to what Keble has argued, or are you battling a straw man interpretation of what he has said, a straw man interpretation built on generalizations and stereotypes of the Protestant position he seems to represent?
« Last Edit: December 27, 2010, 05:17:27 PM by PeterTheAleut » Logged
88Devin12
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 4,864



« Reply #64 on: December 27, 2010, 05:23:29 PM »

Also, there is only one God, and that is our God. Our God is not the same as the Mormon God, and it's not the same as the Muslim God, and it's not the same as the Jewish God. (the modern Jews are Jews only by name and ethnicity, they don't worship the same God as OT Jews and Hebrews)

You have stepping into philosophically insupportable territory in making this claim. How can what we say about the god to whom we pray possibly affect who that God is? As the OT makes abundantly clear, it is up to God to choose those to whom He listens.

What the Mormons say about God is so utterly incompatible with what we say about Him that it impedes pretty much anything we could do together or hold in discourse. With the Muslims, even more so. But Jesus does hold a central place in Mormon theology so that I can talk about Jesus with them and have some commonality of language, whereas Jesus hardly figures in Islamic thought. With the Mormons I can call Jesus "Savior", and they will in some sense understand and agree (even though their idea of salvation is way off); with the Muslims I cannot. It is important in all of this that both groups add (false) revelation which largely supplants the Orthodox deposit of faith.

The Jews present the opposite side of the coin. Saying that modern Jews are praying to a different God is to my mind nonsensical. It leads one to either making weird (and apparently false) racial claims on the one side, and on the other side stating that for instance the various figures in the gospels are also worshipping the wrong god, when it's quite clear that Jesus is attacking them for worshipping Him wrongly.


I'm sorry, but there is a definite reason that I reject the Protestant definition of Christian. We are the Early Christians, and we are the Early Church, no offense intended, and I'm not meaning to boast or use my "Orthodoxy" (though I'm a poor Orthodox Christian) to argue, but I'm going to say that the members of our Church were the first ones to be called Christians, and so we should let the Church tell us what being a Christian is and what it is not.

It is also blasphemous to say that the Muslims, Mormons and Jews all worship the same God as we do. That is simply NOT true. You absolutely must worship the same God as Christianity. To argue that doctrine, dogmatics, theology, etc... doesn't matter is wrong and that is something I'm not going to sit here and stand for.

I just spent the whole semester taking a class learning about different views of Christ within "Christianity", and I'm going to tell you that there are some brands of "Christianity" that are not Christian at all. To refuse to call Christ God, or to refuse to accept the Holy Trinity is to mean that you are rejecting the essence of Christianity itself.
We were taught in-class that there are some "Christians" who don't believe that any miracles occurred and that all the "miracles", even those by Christ were just metaphors. There are also some "Christians" that don't believe that Christ was a God, and was just a really "holy" man, that is, a moral teacher. There are also some "Christians" that reject 95% of the New Testament, arguing it was all written by the Church, and didn't come from the mouth of Christ himself. I'm sorry, but these beliefs are not Christian.

Doctrine, Dogmatics, Theology, Orthodoxy, Orthopraxis, Faith, Works, it's all a part of being a Christian. To be a Christian doesn't mean you are "good" at it, in fact most of us are very poor at being Christians. But you must affirm not just a belief in Christ, but you must affirm that Christ is God, you must affirm the Holy Trinity. Essentially, you must accept that which is defined in the Nicene Creed, because this is the faith of the Apostles, this is the faith of the Earliest Christians. To be a Christian is much, much more than just a "belief" or "acceptance" of Jesus Christ. This is something that I'm going to have to say should be absolutely rejected by modern Christianity, and is a very unfortunate belief that modern Protestantism has brought to the table.

To illustrate my point, here is a hypothetical situation:

Say I believe in Jesus Christ, and accept him as my Lord and Savior. Yet I also believe that this Jesus Christ is not God himself, but rather a lesser deity. I also believe that he really didn't die on the cross, but that was simply an illusion put forth by Jesus so that people would think he had died, when in reality, he ascended into "heaven" and rules over our world. However, what he did for us, is showed us that every one of us can become deities ourselves. I believe that as long as we live good, moral lives according to how Jesus lived his, then we will attain this godhood. I also believe that there is no Holy Trinity, but rather that the Father is a Force-like entity, and that Jesus was born through this entity. Not only that, but I also believe that the Holy Spirit is the use of this entity, and that through the use of the entity, and your connection with it, that you attain the godlike status that Christ attained. So essentially, if we live moral, "Christ-like" lives, and if we "connect" to this entity (through prayer, good works, etc...) then we are saved from our mortality and our imperfectness (what some call sin) by becoming deities.

Now tell me, is this belief Christian? I'm going to argue that it is not Christian. Just believing in Jesus Christ as your savior, etc... is not the criteria for being a Christian. Nor is just being "Christ-like" because even the non-Christians can be Christ-like.

The Christian faith consists of many aspects, Orthodoxy, Orthopraxis, Dogmatics, Doctrine, Works, Faith etc... We aren't perfect Christians, but that doesn't mean that you can through the baby out with the bathwater and just toss out everything that Christianity stands for just so you can be "tolerant" and "accepting" of any group that wants to call themselves Christian.

I'm not going to stand for this. As much as I love my Protestant brethren, this belief, that to be a Christian is simply to "accept Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior" is nothing but utter bull.

Keep in mind, that I live in an area that is extremely important to Mormons, and I've had many friends that are Mormons. I love them dearly. But I'm not going to refer to them as Christians, because I know what they believe, and although they believe in Jesus Christ, it isn't the same Jesus Christ that Christians worship.

If I sound passionate about this, that is because I am. I'm not suggesting I'm a better Christian than some, I know I'm not. But I am absolutely going to stand against this tendency to try and "blur" the lines between what is being a Christian and what isn't. It is very black and white.

Again, I'm not saying that being a non-Christian condemns you. God saves who he wills to save. Even if Ghandi is saved, that does not mean that his belief system was okay, or that it's okay to be Hindu. Nor does that mean he was a Christian in his earthly life. Christianity does not give you an automatic key to heaven. Being a non-Christian doesn't automatically exclude you.
But we do know that Christianity is the complete truth, and is the correct way to attaining communion with God. We have to stand for Christianity and although we need to be tolerant of other faiths and although we need to be respectful. We need to stand strong against anything that tries to blur the lines and suggest that Christian is a vague term, and we need to stand strong against anything that tries to reduce the Christian faith to just a couple qualifications in order to avoid offending some groups.

Lastly, I'm going to reiterate that I love my Protestant brethren, as well as my Roman Catholic brethren, but I'm going to absolutely stand against anything that tries to blur the lines of Christianity. I love Mormons, Jews and Muslims. But I do stand against Mormonism, Judaism and Islam. (and any other non-Christian faith) There is no way I'm ever going to regard any of these groups as worshiping the same God as I. That is simply just blasphemy and I would argue, is in fact the bad, heretical type of Ecumenism that we need to avoid at all costs.
Are you really responding to what Keble has argued, or are you battling a straw man interpretation of what he has said, a straw man interpretation built on generalizations and stereotypes of the Protestant position he seems to represent?

Yes I am, I was responding to his last two posts (and the earlier one)...
Logged
KFLINT
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 15


« Reply #65 on: December 27, 2010, 06:17:54 PM »

Lets face it the Church is segmented. Each partition believes it is the only TRUE  path to following God. This can be said about most religions, Christian or not. 

The real truth, as I see it, is that all these point of views are out of context to the teachings that we all follow. Following a religion takes dedication and research. It is not enough to just read your Bible. Not if you really want to know whats going on.

I suggest really looking into the history of religion and Christianity. A good concordance with Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin and English gives great insight. Also looking into what the Vatican has done through the ages in relation to doctrine would not hurt.
Logged
Keble
All-Knowing Grand Wizard of Debunking
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,410



« Reply #66 on: December 27, 2010, 06:42:31 PM »

I'm sorry, but there is a definite reason that I reject the Protestant definition of Christian. We are the Early Christians, and we are the Early Church, no offense intended, and I'm not meaning to boast or use my "Orthodoxy" (though I'm a poor Orthodox Christian) to argue, but I'm going to say that the members of our Church were the first ones to be called Christians, and so we should let the Church tell us what being a Christian is and what it is not.

You imply offense all over the place; the only reason you use this definition is to claim everything for your party and to cast everyone else into the darkness.

The church does not control the English language, nor indeed any natural language at all. Sorry, that's just the way it is. If you want to use "Christian" to mean "a member of an Orthodox Church", nobody can stop you, but nobody has to care about your definition unless you are speaking. And attributing your meaning to anyone else is dishonest and that's that.

Quote
It is also blasphemous to say that the Muslims, Mormons and Jews all worship the same God as we do. That is simply NOT true. You absolutely must worship the same God as Christianity. To argue that doctrine, dogmatics, theology, etc... doesn't matter is wrong and that is something I'm not going to sit here and stand for.

...and meanwhile in the "intending offense department".... As far as the Mormons and the Muslims are concerned, I would say the phrase "same God" here is more or less meaningless. It's clear that they and the Jews intend (in some manner) to worship the same God, and moreover the same God as we worship, but that what each of them says about God is in some way in error. I said before that the nature of that error is not irrelevant, but in the end you have no way of telling, much less demonstrating, exactly what the relationship is between their acts of worship and the One True LORD God. Jesus says many things which, taken together, imply that God may well hear the prayers of those who do not call upon Him "correctly".

We already have a word for what is too wrong to be accepted: heresy. In the interests of being able to be understood by the 99+% of English speakers who aren't Orthodox, I distinguish between "heretical Christians" and "non-Christians" and the orthodox (where in this case "orthodox" can be constrained by context, as opposed to "Orthodox" meaning "eastern church Orthodox"). The Muslims and most Unitarians and all pagans are non-Christian; the JWs are Christian heretics (being Arians), and the Mormons are a borderline case which we could argue either way, though I think it's simpler to acknowledge them as really really heretical Christians, since once you've tagged them with heresy theological discourse is going to be pretty limited.

Quote
To illustrate my point, here is a hypothetical situation:

Say I believe in Jesus Christ, and accept him as my Lord and Savior. Yet I also believe that this Jesus Christ is not God himself, but rather a lesser deity. I also believe that he really didn't die on the cross, but that was simply an illusion put forth by Jesus so that people would think he had died, when in reality, he ascended into "heaven" and rules over our world. However, what he did for us, is showed us that every one of us can become deities ourselves. I believe that as long as we live good, moral lives according to how Jesus lived his, then we will attain this godhood. I also believe that there is no Holy Trinity, but rather that the Father is a Force-like entity, and that Jesus was born through this entity. Not only that, but I also believe that the Holy Spirit is the use of this entity, and that through the use of the entity, and your connection with it, that you attain the godlike status that Christ attained. So essentially, if we live moral, "Christ-like" lives, and if we "connect" to this entity (through prayer, good works, etc...) then we are saved from our mortality and our imperfectness (what some call sin) by becoming deities.

Now tell me, is this belief Christian?

It's a New Age heresy, but it is a Christian heresy.
Logged
Marc1152
Warned
Toumarches
************
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Rocor
Posts: 12,653


Probiotic .. Antibiotic


« Reply #67 on: December 27, 2010, 07:33:18 PM »

Whenever this question comes up, there are always some who can be counted on to give cruel and self-aggrandizing answers. I am even willing to call the Mormons Christians, though I will call them heretics in the next breath because what they believe about Jesus is plainly wrong. The word "Christian", at least in English, has a perfectly clear meaning, and those of us English Christians are quite willing to allow the Orthodox to go on using the term to describe themselves.

I don't see how the Mormons are possibly Christians, they don't even believe in the same God as us. If they are Christians, then so are Muslims and Jews...
Did you not read Keble's post far enough to see that he also calls Mormons heretics?

There is a difference between being a heretic and a non-Christian. One could argue that Protestants and Roman Catholics are heretics, yet they are Christians. Mormons are simply not Christians.

Christian does not equal a belief in Christ, otherwise, as I said, Muslims and Jews would be Christians. (Heck you could even call the demons Christians)

Christian = Nicene Christianity

Also, there is only one God, and that is our God. Our God is not the same as the Mormon God, and it's not the same as the Muslim God, and it's not the same as the Jewish God. (the modern Jews are Jews only by name and ethnicity, they don't worship the same God as OT Jews and Hebrews)

Calling someone a non-Christian isn't judging them, because we aren't making a judgement about their salvation. You can judge someones belief and behavior, but you cannot judge their salvation.

And it's not the same as the Jewish God. (the modern Jews are Jews only by name and ethnicity, they don't worship the same God as OT Jews and Hebrews)




Come again?   Huh
« Last Edit: December 27, 2010, 07:34:07 PM by Marc1152 » Logged

Your idea has been debunked 1000 times already.. Maybe 1001 will be the charm
minasoliman
Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Online Online

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodox Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 11,099


Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)


WWW
« Reply #68 on: December 27, 2010, 07:40:57 PM »

Whenever this question comes up, there are always some who can be counted on to give cruel and self-aggrandizing answers. I am even willing to call the Mormons Christians, though I will call them heretics in the next breath because what they believe about Jesus is plainly wrong. The word "Christian", at least in English, has a perfectly clear meaning, and those of us English Christians are quite willing to allow the Orthodox to go on using the term to describe themselves.

I don't see how the Mormons are possibly Christians, they don't even believe in the same God as us. If they are Christians, then so are Muslims and Jews...
Did you not read Keble's post far enough to see that he also calls Mormons heretics?

There is a difference between being a heretic and a non-Christian. One could argue that Protestants and Roman Catholics are heretics, yet they are Christians. Mormons are simply not Christians.

Christian does not equal a belief in Christ, otherwise, as I said, Muslims and Jews would be Christians. (Heck you could even call the demons Christians)

Christian = Nicene Christianity

Also, there is only one God, and that is our God. Our God is not the same as the Mormon God, and it's not the same as the Muslim God, and it's not the same as the Jewish God. (the modern Jews are Jews only by name and ethnicity, they don't worship the same God as OT Jews and Hebrews)

Calling someone a non-Christian isn't judging them, because we aren't making a judgement about their salvation. You can judge someones belief and behavior, but you cannot judge their salvation.

And it's not the same as the Jewish God. (the modern Jews are Jews only by name and ethnicity, they don't worship the same God as OT Jews and Hebrews)




Come again?   Huh

I actually heard an Egyptian Jew who converted into Orthodoxy say this.  I'm no expert on this though.  I only know the Judaism I read about in the OT.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2010, 07:41:39 PM by minasoliman » Logged

Vain existence can never exist, for \\\"unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain.\\\" (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.
88Devin12
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 4,864



« Reply #69 on: December 27, 2010, 07:45:25 PM »

Whenever this question comes up, there are always some who can be counted on to give cruel and self-aggrandizing answers. I am even willing to call the Mormons Christians, though I will call them heretics in the next breath because what they believe about Jesus is plainly wrong. The word "Christian", at least in English, has a perfectly clear meaning, and those of us English Christians are quite willing to allow the Orthodox to go on using the term to describe themselves.

I don't see how the Mormons are possibly Christians, they don't even believe in the same God as us. If they are Christians, then so are Muslims and Jews...
Did you not read Keble's post far enough to see that he also calls Mormons heretics?

There is a difference between being a heretic and a non-Christian. One could argue that Protestants and Roman Catholics are heretics, yet they are Christians. Mormons are simply not Christians.

Christian does not equal a belief in Christ, otherwise, as I said, Muslims and Jews would be Christians. (Heck you could even call the demons Christians)

Christian = Nicene Christianity

Also, there is only one God, and that is our God. Our God is not the same as the Mormon God, and it's not the same as the Muslim God, and it's not the same as the Jewish God. (the modern Jews are Jews only by name and ethnicity, they don't worship the same God as OT Jews and Hebrews)

Calling someone a non-Christian isn't judging them, because we aren't making a judgement about their salvation. You can judge someones belief and behavior, but you cannot judge their salvation.

And it's not the same as the Jewish God. (the modern Jews are Jews only by name and ethnicity, they don't worship the same God as OT Jews and Hebrews)




Come again?   Huh

The Church teaches that the Church itself is Israel. Not to mention that the Jews are no longer a part of God's Covenant. Therefore, because they are no longer part of the Covenant, and have rejected God himself (Jesus Christ), they are not longer "Jews" in the same sense as pre-Christ Judaism. The Church and Pre-Christian Judaism worship one and the same God. Ancient Israel and the Church are also both the same thing.

The modern, post-Christ Jews no longer have a Covenant with God, and also no longer worship the same God as their ancestors, because to do so, would now require that they worship the Holy Trinity.

The Holy Trinity and the God of the Old Testament are one in the same, so after Christ, to reject the Holy Trinity, is to reject the one God revealed through the entirity of scripture, not just the Old Testament and not just the New Testament.
Logged
88Devin12
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 4,864



« Reply #70 on: December 27, 2010, 07:48:14 PM »

I'm sorry, but there is a definite reason that I reject the Protestant definition of Christian. We are the Early Christians, and we are the Early Church, no offense intended, and I'm not meaning to boast or use my "Orthodoxy" (though I'm a poor Orthodox Christian) to argue, but I'm going to say that the members of our Church were the first ones to be called Christians, and so we should let the Church tell us what being a Christian is and what it is not.

You imply offense all over the place; the only reason you use this definition is to claim everything for your party and to cast everyone else into the darkness.

The church does not control the English language, nor indeed any natural language at all. Sorry, that's just the way it is. If you want to use "Christian" to mean "a member of an Orthodox Church", nobody can stop you, but nobody has to care about your definition unless you are speaking. And attributing your meaning to anyone else is dishonest and that's that.

Quote
It is also blasphemous to say that the Muslims, Mormons and Jews all worship the same God as we do. That is simply NOT true. You absolutely must worship the same God as Christianity. To argue that doctrine, dogmatics, theology, etc... doesn't matter is wrong and that is something I'm not going to sit here and stand for.

...and meanwhile in the "intending offense department".... As far as the Mormons and the Muslims are concerned, I would say the phrase "same God" here is more or less meaningless. It's clear that they and the Jews intend (in some manner) to worship the same God, and moreover the same God as we worship, but that what each of them says about God is in some way in error. I said before that the nature of that error is not irrelevant, but in the end you have no way of telling, much less demonstrating, exactly what the relationship is between their acts of worship and the One True LORD God. Jesus says many things which, taken together, imply that God may well hear the prayers of those who do not call upon Him "correctly".

We already have a word for what is too wrong to be accepted: heresy. In the interests of being able to be understood by the 99+% of English speakers who aren't Orthodox, I distinguish between "heretical Christians" and "non-Christians" and the orthodox (where in this case "orthodox" can be constrained by context, as opposed to "Orthodox" meaning "eastern church Orthodox"). The Muslims and most Unitarians and all pagans are non-Christian; the JWs are Christian heretics (being Arians), and the Mormons are a borderline case which we could argue either way, though I think it's simpler to acknowledge them as really really heretical Christians, since once you've tagged them with heresy theological discourse is going to be pretty limited.

Quote
To illustrate my point, here is a hypothetical situation:

Say I believe in Jesus Christ, and accept him as my Lord and Savior. Yet I also believe that this Jesus Christ is not God himself, but rather a lesser deity. I also believe that he really didn't die on the cross, but that was simply an illusion put forth by Jesus so that people would think he had died, when in reality, he ascended into "heaven" and rules over our world. However, what he did for us, is showed us that every one of us can become deities ourselves. I believe that as long as we live good, moral lives according to how Jesus lived his, then we will attain this godhood. I also believe that there is no Holy Trinity, but rather that the Father is a Force-like entity, and that Jesus was born through this entity. Not only that, but I also believe that the Holy Spirit is the use of this entity, and that through the use of the entity, and your connection with it, that you attain the godlike status that Christ attained. So essentially, if we live moral, "Christ-like" lives, and if we "connect" to this entity (through prayer, good works, etc...) then we are saved from our mortality and our imperfectness (what some call sin) by becoming deities.

Now tell me, is this belief Christian?

It's a New Age heresy, but it is a Christian heresy.


Sure, then I'll let modern society dictate to me what I should refer to people as, even if it conflicts with my views...

I don't care what the dictionary says, nor what modern society says. I'm sorry but you and I both know how much Protestant mindsets affect American Culture and Society. Even secular groups call Mormons and JW Christians, yet are we supposed to use groups like that as a judgement of what is true Christianity? Or are we going to trust the group that was first called Christians?

I'm not going to concern myself (any longer) with what non-Orthodox say about Christianity. That isn't my job and it does no good to argue about it. Believe what you want to, just realize that it is inconsistent with ancient Christianity of Christ and the Apostles.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2010, 07:54:54 PM by 88Devin12 » Logged
HandmaidenofGod
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the USA (Ecumenical Patriarch)
Posts: 3,397


O Holy St. Demetrius pray to God for us!


« Reply #71 on: December 27, 2010, 07:58:46 PM »

I'm sorry, but there is a definite reason that I reject the Protestant definition of Christian. We are the Early Christians, and we are the Early Church, no offense intended, and I'm not meaning to boast or use my "Orthodoxy" (though I'm a poor Orthodox Christian) to argue, but I'm going to say that the members of our Church were the first ones to be called Christians, and so we should let the Church tell us what being a Christian is and what it is not.

You imply offense all over the place; the only reason you use this definition is to claim everything for your party and to cast everyone else into the darkness.

The church does not control the English language, nor indeed any natural language at all. Sorry, that's just the way it is. If you want to use "Christian" to mean "a member of an Orthodox Church", nobody can stop you, but nobody has to care about your definition unless you are speaking. And attributing your meaning to anyone else is dishonest and that's that.

Quote
It is also blasphemous to say that the Muslims, Mormons and Jews all worship the same God as we do. That is simply NOT true. You absolutely must worship the same God as Christianity. To argue that doctrine, dogmatics, theology, etc... doesn't matter is wrong and that is something I'm not going to sit here and stand for.

...and meanwhile in the "intending offense department".... As far as the Mormons and the Muslims are concerned, I would say the phrase "same God" here is more or less meaningless. It's clear that they and the Jews intend (in some manner) to worship the same God, and moreover the same God as we worship, but that what each of them says about God is in some way in error. I said before that the nature of that error is not irrelevant, but in the end you have no way of telling, much less demonstrating, exactly what the relationship is between their acts of worship and the One True LORD God. Jesus says many things which, taken together, imply that God may well hear the prayers of those who do not call upon Him "correctly".

We already have a word for what is too wrong to be accepted: heresy. In the interests of being able to be understood by the 99+% of English speakers who aren't Orthodox, I distinguish between "heretical Christians" and "non-Christians" and the orthodox (where in this case "orthodox" can be constrained by context, as opposed to "Orthodox" meaning "eastern church Orthodox"). The Muslims and most Unitarians and all pagans are non-Christian; the JWs are Christian heretics (being Arians), and the Mormons are a borderline case which we could argue either way, though I think it's simpler to acknowledge them as really really heretical Christians, since once you've tagged them with heresy theological discourse is going to be pretty limited.

Quote
To illustrate my point, here is a hypothetical situation:

Say I believe in Jesus Christ, and accept him as my Lord and Savior. Yet I also believe that this Jesus Christ is not God himself, but rather a lesser deity. I also believe that he really didn't die on the cross, but that was simply an illusion put forth by Jesus so that people would think he had died, when in reality, he ascended into "heaven" and rules over our world. However, what he did for us, is showed us that every one of us can become deities ourselves. I believe that as long as we live good, moral lives according to how Jesus lived his, then we will attain this godhood. I also believe that there is no Holy Trinity, but rather that the Father is a Force-like entity, and that Jesus was born through this entity. Not only that, but I also believe that the Holy Spirit is the use of this entity, and that through the use of the entity, and your connection with it, that you attain the godlike status that Christ attained. So essentially, if we live moral, "Christ-like" lives, and if we "connect" to this entity (through prayer, good works, etc...) then we are saved from our mortality and our imperfectness (what some call sin) by becoming deities.

Now tell me, is this belief Christian?

It's a New Age heresy, but it is a Christian heresy.


Sure, then I'll let modern society dictate to me what I should refer to people as, even if it conflicts with my views...

I don't care what the dictionary says, nor what modern society says. I'm sorry but you and I both know how much Protestant mindsets affect American Culture and Society. Even secular groups call Mormons and JW Christians, yet are we supposed to use groups like that as a judgement of what is true Christianity? Or are we going to trust the group that was first called Christians?

I'm not going to concern myself (any longer) with what non-Orthodox say about Christianity. That isn't my job and it does no good to argue about it. Believe what you want to, just realize that it is inconsistent with ancient Christianity of Christ and the Apostles.

May I suggest that you concern yourself less with the state and "title" associated with the souls of others, and spend more time reflecting on the state of your own soul?

Instead of reflecting on whether or not others are "Christian," I suggest you head the advice of St. Seraphim of Sarov; “Acquire the Spirit of Peace and a thousand souls around you will be saved.”
Logged

"For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, says the LORD, thoughts of peace and not of evil, to give you a future and a hope." Jer 29:11
88Devin12
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 4,864



« Reply #72 on: December 27, 2010, 08:10:52 PM »

I'm sorry, but there is a definite reason that I reject the Protestant definition of Christian. We are the Early Christians, and we are the Early Church, no offense intended, and I'm not meaning to boast or use my "Orthodoxy" (though I'm a poor Orthodox Christian) to argue, but I'm going to say that the members of our Church were the first ones to be called Christians, and so we should let the Church tell us what being a Christian is and what it is not.

You imply offense all over the place; the only reason you use this definition is to claim everything for your party and to cast everyone else into the darkness.

The church does not control the English language, nor indeed any natural language at all. Sorry, that's just the way it is. If you want to use "Christian" to mean "a member of an Orthodox Church", nobody can stop you, but nobody has to care about your definition unless you are speaking. And attributing your meaning to anyone else is dishonest and that's that.

Quote
It is also blasphemous to say that the Muslims, Mormons and Jews all worship the same God as we do. That is simply NOT true. You absolutely must worship the same God as Christianity. To argue that doctrine, dogmatics, theology, etc... doesn't matter is wrong and that is something I'm not going to sit here and stand for.

...and meanwhile in the "intending offense department".... As far as the Mormons and the Muslims are concerned, I would say the phrase "same God" here is more or less meaningless. It's clear that they and the Jews intend (in some manner) to worship the same God, and moreover the same God as we worship, but that what each of them says about God is in some way in error. I said before that the nature of that error is not irrelevant, but in the end you have no way of telling, much less demonstrating, exactly what the relationship is between their acts of worship and the One True LORD God. Jesus says many things which, taken together, imply that God may well hear the prayers of those who do not call upon Him "correctly".

We already have a word for what is too wrong to be accepted: heresy. In the interests of being able to be understood by the 99+% of English speakers who aren't Orthodox, I distinguish between "heretical Christians" and "non-Christians" and the orthodox (where in this case "orthodox" can be constrained by context, as opposed to "Orthodox" meaning "eastern church Orthodox"). The Muslims and most Unitarians and all pagans are non-Christian; the JWs are Christian heretics (being Arians), and the Mormons are a borderline case which we could argue either way, though I think it's simpler to acknowledge them as really really heretical Christians, since once you've tagged them with heresy theological discourse is going to be pretty limited.

Quote
To illustrate my point, here is a hypothetical situation:

Say I believe in Jesus Christ, and accept him as my Lord and Savior. Yet I also believe that this Jesus Christ is not God himself, but rather a lesser deity. I also believe that he really didn't die on the cross, but that was simply an illusion put forth by Jesus so that people would think he had died, when in reality, he ascended into "heaven" and rules over our world. However, what he did for us, is showed us that every one of us can become deities ourselves. I believe that as long as we live good, moral lives according to how Jesus lived his, then we will attain this godhood. I also believe that there is no Holy Trinity, but rather that the Father is a Force-like entity, and that Jesus was born through this entity. Not only that, but I also believe that the Holy Spirit is the use of this entity, and that through the use of the entity, and your connection with it, that you attain the godlike status that Christ attained. So essentially, if we live moral, "Christ-like" lives, and if we "connect" to this entity (through prayer, good works, etc...) then we are saved from our mortality and our imperfectness (what some call sin) by becoming deities.

Now tell me, is this belief Christian?

It's a New Age heresy, but it is a Christian heresy.


Sure, then I'll let modern society dictate to me what I should refer to people as, even if it conflicts with my views...

I don't care what the dictionary says, nor what modern society says. I'm sorry but you and I both know how much Protestant mindsets affect American Culture and Society. Even secular groups call Mormons and JW Christians, yet are we supposed to use groups like that as a judgement of what is true Christianity? Or are we going to trust the group that was first called Christians?

I'm not going to concern myself (any longer) with what non-Orthodox say about Christianity. That isn't my job and it does no good to argue about it. Believe what you want to, just realize that it is inconsistent with ancient Christianity of Christ and the Apostles.

May I suggest that you concern yourself less with the state and "title" associated with the souls of others, and spend more time reflecting on the state of your own soul?

Instead of reflecting on whether or not others are "Christian," I suggest you head the advice of St. Seraphim of Sarov; “Acquire the Spirit of Peace and a thousand souls around you will be saved.”

I am certainly trying. But it upsets me when people try to blur the lines like this. To me, it's the same as if someone suggests we should go immediately for inter-communion with Roman Catholics and other groups because we have "too much in common" and the rest is just unimportant... It's something I will strongly oppose no matter who it is.

When people try to push this agenda, it makes me want to vomit. Some people have no guts and no value of their faith when they sacrifice it just to be "politically-correct" and "tolerant".
« Last Edit: December 27, 2010, 08:12:08 PM by 88Devin12 » Logged
Shiny
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 13,267


Paint It Red


« Reply #73 on: December 27, 2010, 09:13:25 PM »

I'm not going to stand for this. As much as I love my Protestant brethren, this belief, that to be a Christian is simply to "accept Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior" is nothing but utter bull.

AMEN!! Preach.

Quote
If I sound passionate about this, that is because I am. I'm not suggesting I'm a better Christian than some, I know I'm not. But I am absolutely going to stand against this tendency to try and "blur" the lines between what is being a Christian and what isn't. It is very black and white.

AMEN!! Again preach.

Quote
But we do know that Christianity is the complete truth, and is the correct way to attaining communion with God. We have to stand for Christianity and although we need to be tolerant of other faiths and although we need to be respectful. We need to stand strong against anything that tries to blur the lines and suggest that Christian is a vague term, and we need to stand strong against anything that tries to reduce the Christian faith to just a couple qualifications in order to avoid offending some groups.
AMEN.

Quote
Lastly, I'm going to reiterate that I love my Protestant brethren, as well as my Roman Catholic brethren, but I'm going to absolutely stand against anything that tries to blur the lines of Christianity. I love Mormons, Jews and Muslims. But I do stand against Mormonism, Judaism and Islam. (and any other non-Christian faith) There is no way I'm ever going to regard any of these groups as worshiping the same God as I. That is simply just blasphemy and I would argue, is in fact the bad, heretical type of Ecumenism that we need to avoid at all costs.

Amen amen amen!

Brilliant post.
Logged

“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan
stashko
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: ИСТОЧНИ ПРАВОСЛАВНИ СРБИН
Jurisdiction: Non Ecumenist Free Serbian Orthodox Church
Posts: 4,998


Wonderworking Sitka Icon


« Reply #74 on: December 27, 2010, 09:37:59 PM »

Looks like her Church is alined to His Holiness the Ecumenical Patriarch .that could be where the Ecumenism is coming from...
Blaaaahh Grin we have our own ecumenist Patriarch as well...Double ...Blaaaah... Grin
« Last Edit: December 27, 2010, 09:39:36 PM by stashko » Logged

ГОСПОДЕ ГОСПОДЕ ,ПОГЛЕДАЈ СА НЕБА ,ДОЂИ И ПОСЕТИ ТВОЈ ВИНОГРАД ТВОЈА ДЕСНИЦА ПОСАДИЛА АМИН АМИН.
PeterTheAleut
The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
Section Moderator
Protospatharios
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 31,964


Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!


« Reply #75 on: December 27, 2010, 09:58:08 PM »

I'm sorry, but there is a definite reason that I reject the Protestant definition of Christian. We are the Early Christians, and we are the Early Church, no offense intended, and I'm not meaning to boast or use my "Orthodoxy" (though I'm a poor Orthodox Christian) to argue, but I'm going to say that the members of our Church were the first ones to be called Christians, and so we should let the Church tell us what being a Christian is and what it is not.

You imply offense all over the place; the only reason you use this definition is to claim everything for your party and to cast everyone else into the darkness.

The church does not control the English language, nor indeed any natural language at all. Sorry, that's just the way it is. If you want to use "Christian" to mean "a member of an Orthodox Church", nobody can stop you, but nobody has to care about your definition unless you are speaking. And attributing your meaning to anyone else is dishonest and that's that.

Quote
It is also blasphemous to say that the Muslims, Mormons and Jews all worship the same God as we do. That is simply NOT true. You absolutely must worship the same God as Christianity. To argue that doctrine, dogmatics, theology, etc... doesn't matter is wrong and that is something I'm not going to sit here and stand for.

...and meanwhile in the "intending offense department".... As far as the Mormons and the Muslims are concerned, I would say the phrase "same God" here is more or less meaningless. It's clear that they and the Jews intend (in some manner) to worship the same God, and moreover the same God as we worship, but that what each of them says about God is in some way in error. I said before that the nature of that error is not irrelevant, but in the end you have no way of telling, much less demonstrating, exactly what the relationship is between their acts of worship and the One True LORD God. Jesus says many things which, taken together, imply that God may well hear the prayers of those who do not call upon Him "correctly".

We already have a word for what is too wrong to be accepted: heresy. In the interests of being able to be understood by the 99+% of English speakers who aren't Orthodox, I distinguish between "heretical Christians" and "non-Christians" and the orthodox (where in this case "orthodox" can be constrained by context, as opposed to "Orthodox" meaning "eastern church Orthodox"). The Muslims and most Unitarians and all pagans are non-Christian; the JWs are Christian heretics (being Arians), and the Mormons are a borderline case which we could argue either way, though I think it's simpler to acknowledge them as really really heretical Christians, since once you've tagged them with heresy theological discourse is going to be pretty limited.

Quote
To illustrate my point, here is a hypothetical situation:

Say I believe in Jesus Christ, and accept him as my Lord and Savior. Yet I also believe that this Jesus Christ is not God himself, but rather a lesser deity. I also believe that he really didn't die on the cross, but that was simply an illusion put forth by Jesus so that people would think he had died, when in reality, he ascended into "heaven" and rules over our world. However, what he did for us, is showed us that every one of us can become deities ourselves. I believe that as long as we live good, moral lives according to how Jesus lived his, then we will attain this godhood. I also believe that there is no Holy Trinity, but rather that the Father is a Force-like entity, and that Jesus was born through this entity. Not only that, but I also believe that the Holy Spirit is the use of this entity, and that through the use of the entity, and your connection with it, that you attain the godlike status that Christ attained. So essentially, if we live moral, "Christ-like" lives, and if we "connect" to this entity (through prayer, good works, etc...) then we are saved from our mortality and our imperfectness (what some call sin) by becoming deities.

Now tell me, is this belief Christian?

It's a New Age heresy, but it is a Christian heresy.


Sure, then I'll let modern society dictate to me what I should refer to people as, even if it conflicts with my views...

I don't care what the dictionary says, nor what modern society says. I'm sorry but you and I both know how much Protestant mindsets affect American Culture and Society. Even secular groups call Mormons and JW Christians, yet are we supposed to use groups like that as a judgement of what is true Christianity? Or are we going to trust the group that was first called Christians?

I'm not going to concern myself (any longer) with what non-Orthodox say about Christianity. That isn't my job and it does no good to argue about it. Believe what you want to, just realize that it is inconsistent with ancient Christianity of Christ and the Apostles.

May I suggest that you concern yourself less with the state and "title" associated with the souls of others, and spend more time reflecting on the state of your own soul?

Instead of reflecting on whether or not others are "Christian," I suggest you head the advice of St. Seraphim of Sarov; “Acquire the Spirit of Peace and a thousand souls around you will be saved.”

I am certainly trying. But it upsets me when people try to blur the lines like this. To me, it's the same as if someone suggests we should go immediately for inter-communion with Roman Catholics and other groups because we have "too much in common" and the rest is just unimportant... It's something I will strongly oppose no matter who it is.

When people try to push this agenda, it makes me want to vomit. Some people have no guts and no value of their faith when they sacrifice it just to be "politically-correct" and "tolerant".
But the problem with this, which Keble has already addressed, is that you're attributing nefarious motives to him without allowing him to defend himself. (He has defended himself, but you just won't listen, for you would rather attack the straw man you've built to represent Keble.)
« Last Edit: December 27, 2010, 10:00:26 PM by PeterTheAleut » Logged
HandmaidenofGod
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the USA (Ecumenical Patriarch)
Posts: 3,397


O Holy St. Demetrius pray to God for us!


« Reply #76 on: December 27, 2010, 10:07:40 PM »

Looks like her Church is alined to His Holiness the Ecumenical Patriarch .that could be where the Ecumenism is coming from...
Blaaaahh Grin we have our own ecumenist Patriarch as well...Double ...Blaaaah... Grin

If following the words of a recognized saint and the words of our Lord Jesus Christ makes me an Ecumenist, then so be it.

"Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye." Matthew 7:1-5
Logged

"For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, says the LORD, thoughts of peace and not of evil, to give you a future and a hope." Jer 29:11
PeterTheAleut
The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
Section Moderator
Protospatharios
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 31,964


Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!


« Reply #77 on: December 27, 2010, 10:13:16 PM »

Looks like her Church is alined to His Holiness the Ecumenical Patriarch .that could be where the Ecumenism is coming from...
Blaaaahh Grin we have our own ecumenist Patriarch as well...Double ...Blaaaah... Grin
Whose Church?
Logged
Keble
All-Knowing Grand Wizard of Debunking
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,410



« Reply #78 on: December 28, 2010, 02:25:39 AM »

The Church teaches that the Church itself is Israel. Not to mention that the Jews are no longer a part of God's Covenant. Therefore, because they are no longer part of the Covenant, and have rejected God himself (Jesus Christ), they are not longer "Jews" in the same sense as pre-Christ Judaism. The Church and Pre-Christian Judaism worship one and the same God. Ancient Israel and the Church are also both the same thing.

The modern, post-Christ Jews no longer have a Covenant with God, and also no longer worship the same God as their ancestors, because to do so, would now require that they worship the Holy Trinity.

The Holy Trinity and the God of the Old Testament are one in the same, so after Christ, to reject the Holy Trinity, is to reject the one God revealed through the entirety of scripture, not just the Old Testament and not just the New Testament.

This is the rankest heresy, not the least in that it conspicuously violates the creed! The One LORD God always was and is and will be triune; it does not matter that the full revelation of this came late in time. The Jews therefore were always wrong and always worshipped the wrong god, because they always insisted on its absolute unity. Since God didn't change, and their worship didn't change, it has to be that they are worshipping wrongly, because they refuse to get on board with what has now been made manifest; but as the object of their worship has not changed, it must be that they still worship Him. Yes, in some sense they reject God, as we all do.

I do not think you are repeating some church's teaching, still less The Church's teaching. It seems to me that you have seized upon some points and extrapolated from them. But your extrapolation is not well-formed, and it has carried you into error. Are you therefore not a Christian? I think not.
Logged
Keble
All-Knowing Grand Wizard of Debunking
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,410



« Reply #79 on: December 28, 2010, 02:38:34 AM »

Sure, then I'll let modern society dictate to me what I should refer to people as, even if it conflicts with my views...

I don't care what the dictionary says, nor what modern society says.

Then stop talking. Seriously. You cannot do the world any good by speaking in a language in which everything you say is falsified by your parochial twisting of each word you utter.

Quote
I'm sorry but you and I both know how much Protestant mindsets affect American Culture and Society. Even secular groups call Mormons and JW Christians, yet are we supposed to use groups like that as a judgement of what is true Christianity? Or are we going to trust the group that was first called Christians?

The POINT all along is that nothing is preventing you from doing this; you can still distinguish between "True" or "good" or whatever word you care to apply to the "right" faith, and also characterize "bad" or "wrong" or "false" or "heretical" Christianity. The problem here is that you are trying to blur the distinction between what is Christianity done or believed badly, and what is not Christian at all, rightly or wrongly. I see three categories; you see two, and you falsely try to assert that I also see only two categories. That's really where the heart of the matter lies: you are trying to control the language so that I have no choice but make the distinction as you make it, because you are trying to make it impossible for me to distinguish between (say) Hinduism and Methodism. But everyone can see the difference, and they can see that the Methodists are allied with the Orthodox in a way that they can never be allied with the Hindus. Everyone can see it, and I'll bet that you can see it too, because that way is Jesus. Methodists confess him, no matter how badly; the Orthodox also confess him, no matter how badly. The Hindus do not confess him. But you are so dogged in your denial of this simple reality that you are willing to resort to defective theology in order to defend that denial.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2010, 02:38:51 AM by Keble » Logged
88Devin12
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 4,864



« Reply #80 on: December 28, 2010, 03:24:41 AM »

It actually is not heresy, at least according to the eastern orthodox point of view.
The orthodox church affirms that it is ancient Israel. This is one of the reasons we venerate the old testAtment figures so much; such as King David, King Solomon, the Prophets, the Patriarchs, etc...
To us, the Holy Trinity is the same as YHWY and Elohim of the Old Testament. The Covenant with God in the Old Testament was fulfilled, not abolished in Christ. In fact, the Covenant was extended to the Gentiles and we now have a new covenant with God. In fact I remember a recent podcast where it was pointed out that there was no real schism between Jews and Christians until a few decades after Christs resurrection and ascension. The Orthodox Church believes itself to be Israel of the Old Testament, the undefiled and spotless bride of Christ. The modern Jews are not a part of this and while they still use the Old Covenant and still recognize YHWY or Elohim, it isn't the same God that the OT figures worshiped because that God has revealed himself to us, and so to not recognize him now would be worshipping a different God.

Now, I would also like to say that you misunderstand me a bit. I believe that there are non-Christians and there are Christians. But within Christianity you have the heretics, the heterodoxy, the schismatics and the Orthodox.
So we would agree regarding heretics and Christianity. However, I don't regard Mormonism and Jehovahs Witnesses as Christians. To me, they aren't just heretics and heterodox but are so far removed from Christianity that they cannot be considered Christian, but are their own religions entirely.
To use your wording, I guess I have two-level perspective, but the level of Christianity itself is subdivided inti four parts, yet I don't classify those two groups as any of those categories within Christianity.
Logged
Tags:
Pages: 1 2 All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.298 seconds with 107 queries.