OrthodoxChristianity.net
September 20, 2014, 08:17:10 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Sex and Morality (outside religion)  (Read 783 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
TryingtoConvert
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Disbelief in your belief
Jurisdiction: All in your mind
Posts: 384



« on: November 30, 2010, 03:13:27 AM »

So, outside of religion, is there any basis for a personal restriction on premarital sex? Are there any objective limitations for sexual behavior?


I would argue that, outside of the prohibitions of religion, there actually are still objective reasons to moderate one's sexual behavior. Of course there are the obvious ones, such as risk from STDs and unwanted pregnancy, but I think there are also emotional ones. Although emotional/psychological impacts of certain behavior can't always be quantified, I think we can at least make empirical estimates of what they might be.

I don't think it's always an issue of certain behavior being "right" or "wrong". Rather, I think it's kindof like the Buddhist concept of karma - whatever choices you make, there is a "karma" associated with it. So if you have sex with random chicks you meet at the club, that creates one type of karma. If you only have sex with one person in a mutually monogamist relationship, that creates another type of karma. It's just up to you to decide which type of karma you want in your life.

And although we can't always clearly delineate the tangible consequences of different behaviors, I think the differences do exist. It's like choosing to go left or right on a path - either direction will take you somewhere, it just depends on where you want to go.


As far as objective limitations for sexual behavior, I think that objectively we can say first and foremost that anything that harms someone should be considered wrong (but that's probably obvious).

Also, sex with kids should be considered wrong because even if they are "mature" and willing, they are not as mentally developed as an adult, no matter how mature they are. As long as we don't live in primitive societies where people die in their thirties, kids should be able to grow up without the influence and pressure of someone else's sexual desire imposed on them.

Sex with animals should be considered wrong because they can't give consent (Again, I'm just trying to lay out a rational standard for behavior here without invoking religion).

Incest should be considered wrong because of the conflict it creates with the structure of family relationships. Intimate relationships can come and go, but families are usually involved and support one another throughout one's entire life. Plus, you don't want any children with damaged genes.

I think those are the big issues that religious people argue would be allowable outside of religion. But there seems to be plenty of reason to not do them regardless.


Also, I think the current standard for becoming sexually active should be whenever you can support yourself financially. I often hear people talk about becoming sexually active when someone "feels" they are ready, or when they meet someone "special". Until you have a job and ARE paying the rent, I kindof think that's bull****. If you're dependent on your parents (or anyone else), or you don't have money to pay for a kid if pregnancy does happen, or to pay for treatment for an STD, then you are not "ready" no matter how old you are or how "special" the person you're with might be. I think if more people had that standard then that would solve a lot of problems in society.


Alright, that's all I got. Thoughts?
Logged
Alveus Lacuna
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,888



« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2010, 03:19:24 AM »

Alright, that's all I got. Thoughts?

You need a cable talk show!
Logged
Jetavan
Argumentum ad australopithecum
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Christic
Jurisdiction: Dixie
Posts: 6,576


Barlaam and Josaphat


WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2010, 04:45:21 PM »

As far as objective limitations for sexual behavior, I think that objectively we can say first and foremost that anything that harms someone should be considered wrong (but that's probably obvious).
What if someone wants to engage in sexual masochism, where "harm" is deemed sexually exciting?

Quote
Also, sex with kids should be considered wrong because even if they are "mature" and willing, they are not as mentally developed as an adult, no matter how mature they are.
Define 'adult'. Is there an objective definition for "mentally developed"?
Quote
As long as we don't live in primitive societies where people die in their thirties, kids should be able to grow up without the influence and pressure of someone else's sexual desire imposed on them.
What about if two kids want to have sex? Is one kid pressuring the other kid? Should we separate the sexually pressuring kids, from the kids who are pressured?

Quote
Sex with animals should be considered wrong because they can't give consent (Again, I'm just trying to lay out a rational standard for behavior here without invoking religion).
So, if two animals are having sex, neither one is giving consent?

Quote
Incest should be considered wrong because of the conflict it creates with the structure of family relationships.
Interracial relationships once created (and still do create) conflicts in families.
Quote
Intimate relationships can come and go, but families are usually involved and support one another throughout one's entire life. Plus, you don't want any children with damaged genes.
Damaged genes could be easily corrected, in the near future, via genetic engineering.

« Last Edit: November 30, 2010, 04:47:54 PM by Jetavan » Logged

If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.
Sinful Hypocrite
Everyday I am critical of others. Every day I make similar mistakes. Every day I am a hypocrite.
OC.net guru
*******
Online Online

Faith: Greek Orthodox
Jurisdiction: "The Orthodox Church" by Bishop Kallistos Ware: "We know where the Church is but we cannot be sure where it is not; and so we must refrain from passing judgment on non-Orthodox Christians."
Posts: 1,696


Great googly moogly!


« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2010, 05:22:28 PM »

I know from my own personal journey that had I waited for sex until after we were married I would have had a better life.

It has a purpose other than the dangerous ones such as disease and pregnancy.
It is a motivating factor that helps keep the marriage healthy at the beginning, and you also have a better outlook later. You will be proud if you did abstain.
But if you have sex for a year before getting married , then the most exciting and tender moments have been wasted before the marriage . This has an effect on you after you do get married.
Logged

The Lord gathers his sheep, I fear I am a goat. Lord have mercy.

"A Christian is someone who follows and worships a perfectly good God who revealed his true face through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth.“
Aindriú
Faster! Funnier!
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Cynical
Jurisdiction: Vestibule of Hell
Posts: 3,918



WWW
« Reply #4 on: November 30, 2010, 06:29:01 PM »

Somethings are best learned through the experience and failings of others.
Logged


I'm going to need this.
TryingtoConvert
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Disbelief in your belief
Jurisdiction: All in your mind
Posts: 384



« Reply #5 on: November 30, 2010, 09:44:07 PM »

What if someone wants to engage in sexual masochism, where "harm" is deemed sexually exciting?
"Harm" should be considered something someone can't heal from. If some one likes being whipped, that's fine, but if you want to stab someone or cut off someone's limb, that's not.

Quote
Define 'adult'. Is there an objective definition for "mentally developed"?
A mentally developed adult is basically able to manage their emotions and impulses. Some "adults" never seem reach this stage, but for an average person, it's basically near or sometime after puberty. We may not be able to say definitively when that is for everyone, but we can generally estimate that it is sometime after the late teen years. There has actually been research done however, that showed that the average age at which people's brains are fully "developed" is around age 25.

Quote
What about if two kids want to have sex? Is one kid pressuring the other kid? Should we separate the sexually pressuring kids, from the kids who are pressured?
Both kids may want to have sex, but they should still be discouraged from doing so, in part because of the issue of "development" I mentioned previously and also because of the reason I mentioned later for what I think should be the actual standard for beginning sexual activity, which is to be able to care for oneself completely. Of course, there are also clear physiological reasons why really young kids shouldn't be having sex as well.

Quote
So, if two animals are having sex, neither one is giving consent?
No, not in human terms. No more so than a small child can be considered to "give consent" to anything. Or course, it's fine for animals to mate with each other because they aren't held to human standards. Just like it's fine for a lion to kill and eat a zebra.

Quote
Interracial relationships once created (and still do create) conflicts in families.
Interracial relationships don't inherently create conflicts within families. That's an issue with personal perspectives and bias. And the interpersonal conflicts that those relationships might create are not the same as the damage incest does to the functional roles family serves in a person's life. Lovers may come and go, but sisters, brothers, mothers and fathers are usually a part of a person's life for the duration of their life, without the burdens of romantic expectations, which is a beneficial dynamic to maintain.

Quote
Damaged genes could be easily corrected, in the near future, via genetic engineering.
Unless you've seen some research that I haven't, that's just random speculation. But even if that were the case, there is also the issue of limiting genetic diversity. The benefit of mating with others you're not related to is that it introduces variation in the genetic code which contributes to our survival as a species.
Logged
Entscheidungsproblem
Formerly Friul & Nebelpfade
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Machine God
Posts: 4,495



WWW
« Reply #6 on: November 30, 2010, 10:06:39 PM »

I'm slightly confused, where is the empiricism you initially hinted to?  This has been an opinion piece and nothing more.
Logged

As a result of a thousand million years of evolution, the universe is becoming conscious of itself, able to understand something of its past history and its possible future.
-- Sir Julian Sorell Huxley FRS
TryingtoConvert
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Disbelief in your belief
Jurisdiction: All in your mind
Posts: 384



« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2010, 11:08:13 PM »

Empiricism is knowledge gathered from sense and experience. That's EXACTLY what I'm describing here.
Logged
Justin Kissel
Formerly Asteriktos
Protospatharios
****************
Online Online

Posts: 29,847



« Reply #8 on: December 01, 2010, 02:34:23 AM »

What if someone wants to engage in sexual masochism, where "harm" is deemed sexually exciting?
"Harm" should be considered something someone can't heal from. If some one likes being whipped, that's fine, but if you want to stab someone or cut off someone's limb, that's not.

Harm is a difficult thing to determine sometimes. What about knife play? How about breath play? How far is too far? Or perhaps a slave tattoo, whether that be the slave registration number, or the name of the person's current master? Just thinking/wondering out loud here...  Smiley
Logged

"No man gives the same exegesis twice: for he is not the same man, and it is not the same text." - St. Heraclitus
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Warned
Hypatos
*****************
Offline Offline

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 37,649



« Reply #9 on: December 01, 2010, 04:33:04 AM »

Empiricism is knowledge gathered from sense and experience. That's EXACTLY what I'm describing here.
Speaking of gathering, where did you plagerize this from?
And this OP was pulled directly from here:

http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=Jesus

It appears we have quite the ironchariots fan here. Please start posting your sources, sir. I'm sure Matt wouldn't appreciate you shamelessly passing his work off as your own.

I have no problem replying to questions regarding the faith that are posed in a respectful manner. However, I have no patience for those who purposefully set out to actively disparage the faith with threads like these. Perhaps it is good for the OP that some of you have more patience than I.

BTW, the OP was copy and pasted from the following site maintained by the renown atheist from "The Atheist Experience" Matt Dillahunty.

http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=Sermon_on_the_mount
Less describing. More EXACT citation.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2010, 04:34:49 AM by ialmisry » Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
Dnarmist
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 88


Seems Uncertain


« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2010, 04:37:47 AM »

Hahaha
« Last Edit: December 01, 2010, 04:37:58 AM by Dnarmist » Logged
TryingtoConvert
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Disbelief in your belief
Jurisdiction: All in your mind
Posts: 384



« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2010, 04:38:45 AM »

i'm not plagarizing it from anywhere
Logged
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.071 seconds with 39 queries.