First, by what methods do we determine who is the present Incarnation? According to your website YOU are the present Incarnation, but Sathya Sai Baba also claims this, along with many others. How am I to determine if you or Sai Baba is the present Incarnation? What about those who in fact do not claim this for themselves, but whom their followers claim or at least speculate they are the present Incarnation, like Ammachi? I would think she might actually be a better fit as as far as I know she doesn't claim this herself, but rather her followers claim it. That brings me to my second issue/problem. I am skeptical of anyone who comes right out and says, "I am an Incarnation of God, worship and serve me!" This is at best a sign that that individual has not yet shed him or herself of the ego, (and thus cannot be God) at worst, well who knows, the worst could be a lot of different things to different people.
This is very interesing argument. Who is Human incarnation, Sai baba is also there, others are also there. Then how to find the human incarnation.
The Human incarnation which suits to your level is the Human incarnation for you. Same God exists in many human incarnations at the same time to cater to devotees of different levels. If you go to Sai baba, He mainly preaches about loving others, serving others, doing social service etc. He do not preach that He is God Himself many. What is the reason. At lower level path of loving or direct service cannot be introduced publically. It is not a public program, because majority of the people are at very low level and God has to preach at a lower level to them so that they can be uplifted to a higher level. THis does not mean that God is incapable. God is very much capable, but the devotees are not very much capable to understand higher divine knoweldge. Thus when Sai baba preaches that He is the present human form of GOd and if He preaches social service it means that it cater to that level of devotees to whome such preaching suits so that their ego and jealosy towards co-human being are controlled and over a period eliminated.
At the highest level, God preaches true divine knoweldge and He preaches His personal service in His mission of divine knowledge proapgation. Yes, this is very very tough preaching. Then true colour of people comes out. They will have millions of question. First question is: How this ordinary fellow who is just looking like is God? Second why GOd need service? All these practical question will arise in plenty. Thus at the higher level there will be only very few direct devotees of God in huamn form who preaches the path of loving service to God.
Generally the preaching at the higher level is misunderstood by the masses. Jesus preached mainly (Pravrutti: Social service) to masses. Because masses cannot digest higher level of divine knoweldge. Mainly they were behind bread and getting cure etc. They were not for Him but for His power and use it for their personal purpose. Thus such people are underserving due to their over attachment to world and little attachment to God. Hence if Jesus preached Nivrutti (loving practical service to God in Human form) these people could not digest. Thus to such people He acted like a messenger of GOd only and preach only Pravrutti. But to disciples He preached the path of Nivrutti which invovles lot of sacrifice:
Luke—14:26 to 27
“If any one comes to Me and does not hate his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple’’.
Such preaching if done to massess then masses will run away there and there itself, with out any delay. Hence He preached such high level truth to His disciples only. He also revealed to St.Peter that He is the God Himself (Christ) and strictly prohibited him not to tell to other. What is the reason, if peter says that Jesus is God in human form to ordinary people then ordinary people will tell that Jesus is a mad person. How can He be God? All such question will come due to their undeservingness. To such people Nivrutti cannot be preached. Actually due to this only Jesus was crucified.
The people could not even understand the concept of Human incarnation of God, and they crucified Jesus for the reason that He claimed Himself as God.
Human incarnation is a 2-in-1 system in which GOD and Son of God is mingled homogeneously.
Generally, incarnation of God is not interested in masses. Generally, people are in wrong route only. They want to exploit God for their personal solution. They do not come for learning the real spiritual knowledge and serve God without any aspiration. Nobody comes to God with this aim in mind. If the human incarnation encourages that wrong route, several people come to Him, then he must not be a human incarnation because God in human form is not fond of fame of masses. He is not fond of fame if God is really in that human body.
He has already enjoyed lot of fame. Will He be fond of masses and fame? No. He wants to guide the correct people in the correct path. For that purpose, He comes and not just to attract masses and get the fame etc. If such effort is done, surely he is not God. He is only a soul because the soul is always fond of fame. He has not tasted the fame already. However, God has tasted enough fame. Hence, any action of God will not be towards the fame. His action will be only to guide the people in the correct path. When His concentration is like that, generally masses will not be around Him. Rama and Krishna were not mass personalities. Similarly, Shankara. Shankara never drew masses. He only debated with scholars.
Therefore, it is not a question of mass attraction but it is the question of leading the people in the true path. When He concentrates in leading the people in the true path, generally, people will not like Him. So, there will not be masses around Him. There will not be fame. But, God is not perturbed because He has enough fame. In fact, He was bored with the fame. Therefore, His tendency will not be towards fame and attraction of masses. His tendency will always be only to give the correct guidance. In that case, generally, the real incarnation of God will not be after fame. That is why the incarnation of Datta means Guru Datta, Guru means preacher. Preacher always sticks to the truth. If He sticks to the truth, the people will be less. He does not bother because He is not fond of fame. He is not a politician, who draws or attracts the masses.
Thus the human incarnation who suits to you depends on your level. First you have to hear the divine knoweldge of Human incarnation and decide whether He is God or not from His divine knowledge itself by analysing it.
Human incarnation at the top most level preaches truth which is always harsh.
Datta is called as Unmatta Datta, which means that Datta is mad. The reason for this is that He gives the absolute divine knowledge from His absolute state, which is the absolute reality. In that state, every thing except Him is relatively real including the souls. In this state He is called as Nirguna Datta, which means that He is in the state of absolute reality without any relative reality.
The entire creation including the souls is a relative reality only and is just His imagination or quality or feeling (Guna) only. The guna is a property, which is not independent and depends on its substratum (Guni) only. Such substratum is God or Para Brahman who is far from imagination.
The knowledge radiating from that state is absolute truth, which cannot be digested by human beings who are in the lowest layer called as Maya. Therefore, Datta looks like a mad fellow whose statements are beyond the normal digestion.
Shri Rama Krishna Parama Hamsa was going to Panchavati for meditation and was in that top state. A newly married person told Him that his wife is hindering him from participating in the spiritual discussion (Satsanga). Immediately Parama Hamsa told him just to divorce his wife. He was shocked. For the plane of normal human beings such knowledge looks like the statements of a mad person. In fact, the souls are mad of the plane of lower relative reality. For mad people, a wise person is mad relatively.