Oh dear, the subject rests for a while and then rears its head again, again and again. The guy appears quite driven, clearly does a lot of research, but could you consider all the same 'evidence' and come to a different conclusion than he does?
I heard him criticised as being a self hating Jew, but feel this sort of labelling may stem from an attempt to label him in way that conveniently avoids any need to deal with the issues, views and conclusions he comes up with.
His contrasting of President Obama and President Putin amused but I never lost sight of Putin's background as a KGB/FSB officer. Disinformation was and still is a tool of this organisation. So I question (1) why should place too much confidence in Putin's seeming religious convictions, and (2) why is someone as cynical as Bro Nathanael so readily taken in by the Russian Federation leader's stance? As for President Obama, he simply appears to me at least as another worldly politician simply courting this, that the other constituency vote rather than a conviction politician. But that is only my opinion.
Bro Nathanael on the other hand leaves me with a feeling of unease, even when he says something I might agree with.