Please read what I wrote again. You're saying that the canonization process of your particular churches is inferior to the way that the Vatican does it, and if they don't get Rome's stamp of approval, their own saints are demoted to the status of an optional saint, which is no real confirmed saint at all. So we go from the notion of particular churches with equal dignity to the Roman See to the reality that they are inferior tributaries which ultimately have to flow back West for any real authority to their claims. This is why Eastern Vaticanism isn't a legitimate option. At the end of the day, they're just the bastard kids on the back porch.and you do the same to the COE, so that makes you guys doubly bad.
What on earth are you talking about? We aren't concerned with the saints of the ACOE, because it is not one of our churches, nor has it been for some 1600 years. How does the criticism I've lobbed against Eastern Vaticanism apply to our relations to your church? There is no relationship, because you are outside of the Church. You are heretics, and you have been appropriately disfellowshipped.
This whole critique was with the way that the Vatican talks about the equal dignity of the Eastern churches, but then ignores their canonizations as optional. In the Orthodox church, whenever a local church announces a saint's canonization, s/he is slowly added to the books of the other churches.