It seems for some reason that the OO hierarchs are avoiding analyzing the various parts of the Chalcedon and post-Chalcedonian Traditions and determining what they think of it. I have no idea why this would be. It seems to me like our chances of reunion with the EO would probably be boosted if we gave them some idea of what we thought of various parts of their Tradition. For instance, I was just reading a Sunday of Orthodoxy thread that is being discussed here. I think if we gave the EO a better idea of what we think of the Second Council of Nicaea and its decisions that they would probably be more comfortable reuniting. And the same could be said about various other parts of the EO Tradition, such as the matter of Christ's will(s), Palamism, etc. I'd be interested to hear comments from both OO and EO dropping by.