The guy is so awesomely
For someone who criticisms Christian emperors saints so much, this man is certainly draped in a lot of purple.. is cI think when it comes to reading things like this, anymore I approach Carnap's disdain of Heidegger: "Metaphysicians are musicians without musical ability."
How many of these people are ultra cantankerous failed artists?
My guess is I'd have to slog through thousands upon thousands of tortured pages of his quaint German academic folk traditions and customs to find out what he really means by "capitalism", if he means anything at all by it. Is he talking about economic systems? Is he talking about a critique of secularism? What does this matter? Does he want a communist theocracy? Does he want to take a "more hip" version of "The Benedict Option"?
Why is he criticizing someone for using "common sense" in one area, then saying "Christ's words are unambiguous" in the same article? Saying the "teachings are plain" here, but in other articles points out that ultra allegory and nuance is the way to go? Dismissing one Church Father in one area, while pointing to desert monks in another? I'm confused.
And when people start to ask him for clarifications, he just hurls invective after invective on them.