Does it mean those God forsaken liberals who are always trying to push their fruity little agenda onto religious people or religious people who actually stan up to the threat of those freaks?
Just a hint about argumentation: It's possible to disagree with anything and support your case. But if you want people to think that your motivation is 'loving the sinner but hating the sin', avoid using emotive expressions like 'God forsaken liberals', 'their fruity little agenda' and 'those freaks'. Maybe these expressions are neutral in Portuguese (assuming that's your main language), but in English they're not.
Oh, I know. Didn't do it for the sake of argument
If I can sum up a trend in some of your posts it's this:
There is an original (often times innocuous) post, you overtly draw out the most political and sectarian implications. You make a comment like "I'm trying to avoid politics". And at least on this thread you stated you weren't even trying to argue? What's your function?
If I read you right: I could accuse anything ever stated as being ideological and political. The problem with that is it is an unwarranted act of extreme suspicion and will automatically lead down unproductive paths that turn into some kind of dog eat dog world view. It's a dead end and fallacious way of behaving.
I always tend to think some people will study the most crazy stuff. But someone trying to aprehend OC.net's posters patterns is a wild one. Got endorsement for your research?
Some of my functions, let me know if you need more material for that paper:
Now, seriously, the only unproductive path here is trolling the opposition without going political or argumentative. Because it's all they deserve: mockery.
That's why I stay out of the politics forum, but will still give a position some smear, for I can't remain neutral - I'm not that good.
But it's a funny thing, isn't it?. If you go liberal all the way those kind of "people" will not try to belittle you saying you're toxic. It's only when you stand up against the attacks of post-modernity on religion that you become some kind of bummer.
Biased junk. And you call it "good stuff". And then you try to be analitic hwen I'm just being over the top.