[Otherwise, please stop spreading misinformation!]
[The Novos ordo is an attempt to make the catholic church more "open" "friendly" and *ahem* familiar (read protestant) So with the new mass came bad art, priest facing forward and REALLY bad song writing.
I firmly believe that if it were not for american bias towards catholics then the mass would have been translated from latin to the "vulgar vernacular" of the people.]
Is your point that the liturgy was revised for the USA to help us fit in more with our Prot neighbors. If so I disagree. The revised liturgy was done for the whole church not with America in view. The people on the comission weren't being guided by a need to make the Church more Prot. In fact the Prot observers went away from Vat2 shaking their heads as the RCC had stuck to it's guns regarding doctrine.
[I also noticed he didn't really list any sources. I suppose we should take his word for it, hmm? You seem to chastise the Catholics here for taking the word of the Pope, rather erudite scholar and theologian. Would we not be doing the same by taking Mr. Coornaswamy's word for it?]
I have no clue who this Dr. What's his name is. When someone invokes a source it gives it more weight if you give a little background on who the person is. Did this doctor fellow help out at Vat2? Probably not. Maybe he has some RC patients?? Well if he does that's ok then it makes him a valid source.
As for the Prot divines mentioned as having helped draft the NO check out the previous post on this thread. These fellows were observers nothing more. But hey maybe they were using their secret Prot mind control techniques to influence the RCs who actually worked on the NO.