a) My intention of posting an article written by a Professor of Church History
I thought she was a teacher of music?
My intention .... to provide a retrospective and information which could serve as the axe of an objective discussion
You absolutely refused to engage in discussion.
b) Questions and comments related to the subject of discussion were answered,
They most definitely were not. For example, you were asked several times to provide what you mean by "apostacy" -the title of the thread and the focus of your complaint against the Russian Church Abroad You refused. How could there be meaningful discussion when even that most basic point was not clarified by you.
b) Trivializing the thread by transforming an objective discussion
Again... there was no discussion. You refused to discuss..
c) Flooding the thread with unrelated information,
I never saw any of that. Would you point it out please.
I've noticed that as soon as a specific subject is placed in the forum, the very same people who do not like those kind of subjects, get into action.
An example of this is N..... who as soon as I started posting information, he/she started flooding frenetically. In an estimate, each message I posted, was followed by 3 messages posted by N..
I presume this refers to me. I was not posting "frenetically." I think that everyone else can see that for themselves. But I was certainly interested in countering the manifold accusations you were making against my Church and against the Russian Church.
Would you like to use this new thread you have started to enter into a discussion of what "apostasy" means?
I post, N answers, I reply to N
I think this was one of the major complaints about you - you did NOT reply. You simply abused the freedom of the Free-for-all section to flood the thread with polemical material against the Russian Church.