C'mon, NFP people, is it really this difficult to assemble a coherent argument?
Isn't the blatant and deliberate use of chemical, physical, and biological weapons to kill sperm and an unborn child a coherent argument against the use of artificial birth control?
As opposed to the use of the menstrual cycle to allow sperm to die? No, it's not. Try again.
I have seen enough nonsense in my life that I believe that, on the basis of a given set of premises, a suitably coherent argument can be created to back up any silly idea. Because human reason is that wonderful and dangerous. So the great NFP argument is waiting there to be discovered. It just hasn't appeared on any thread that I've seen on this forum.
Officily.warned for.99 days.for.disregarding.my public warning