Author Topic: What makes a group canonical?  (Read 7829 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike

  • Stratopedarches
  • **************
  • Posts: 22,594
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #45 on: November 18, 2008, 03:45:17 PM »
I've been looking for them for more than two months and You gave me an answer in half an hour. Incredible.

BTW http://www.ortodoxia-brasil.blogspot.com/2007/10/viagem-pastoral.html - this is a site of Polish Archdiocese in Brazil which remains canonical
« Last Edit: November 18, 2008, 03:47:02 PM by mike »
Hyperdox Herman, Eastern Orthodox Christian News - fb, Eastern Orthodox Christian News - tt

not everything I typed before [insert current date] may reflect my current views on the subject

Offline lubeltri

  • Latin Catholic layman
  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,795
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #46 on: November 18, 2008, 03:53:01 PM »
So are the Old Calendarists, etc., Orthodox or not? All I hear are conflicting answers. Isn't it time for a council to decide this? Aren't souls at stake in this question?

Offline ialmisry

  • There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 39,494
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #47 on: November 18, 2008, 04:00:46 PM »
So are the Old Calendarists, etc., Orthodox or not? All I hear are conflicting answers. Isn't it time for a council to decide this? Aren't souls at stake in this question?
There has been plenty of councils: that's how they started.  Yes.  They are Orthodox, and only a percentage are schismatic.
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth

Offline lubeltri

  • Latin Catholic layman
  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,795
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #48 on: November 18, 2008, 06:43:43 PM »
So are the Old Calendarists, etc., Orthodox or not? All I hear are conflicting answers. Isn't it time for a council to decide this? Aren't souls at stake in this question?
There has been plenty of councils: that's how they started.  Yes.  They are Orthodox, and only a percentage are schismatic.

But how does a group strike its bishops from the diptych and put up its own rival hierarchy in the same territory and not be schismatic? Isn't this un-Orthodox?

Offline Mexican

  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 489
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #49 on: November 18, 2008, 10:25:14 PM »
Hi Mike

You're probably right about the non-existence of parishes in Spain. However the full title was "orthodox Church of Spain, Portugal and Brazil". The problems started around the 2000 when Metropolitan Joao of Lisbon made a pilgrimage to the Holy Land without having authorization from Metropolitan Sava of Poland. Soon after that, Metropolitan Joao excommunicated some nuns in Portugal. Metropolitan Sava interfered in favour of the nuns and allowed them to enter a Serbian monastery in France. This angered Metropolitan Joao, who thought his authority was not being respected. The Portuguese clergy and the Polish Church could not get along again and the Polish Church withdrew its support to the Portuguese clergy.

After the Polish Church removed its protection from Joao, only the Brazilian Bishops Chrysostomos and Amvrosios continued to be part of the Church of Poland. The majority of the clergy in Brazil decided to leave Poland's jurisdiction and enter the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of USA and the Diaspora. However, Metropolitan Sava of Poland refused to approve their request because he did not recognize the canonicity of the UOC-USA as long as it remained under the Ecumenical Patriarchate. It's for this reason that they were received by the Serbian Patriarchate.

From what I know, the Portuguese clergy are not part of any official Church, but I might be wrong. The logical thing for them would be to request union with the Ecumenical Patriarch, as the pro-Moscow Churches will most likely not receive them.

Offline Byzantine2008

  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 280
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #50 on: November 18, 2008, 10:54:51 PM »
Is the Church in F.Y.R.O.M canonical? ???
Let your will be done O Lord Jesus Christ through the intercession of you All Pure Mother and all the saints!

Offline prodromas

  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,239
  • Greek Orthodox
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #51 on: November 19, 2008, 03:27:57 AM »
Is the Church in F.Y.R.O.M canonical? ???

No it isn't
The sins I don't commit are largely due to the weakness of my limbs.

1915-1923 Հայոց Ցեղասպանութիւն ,never again,
ܩܛܠܐ ܕܥܡܐ ܐܬܘܪܝܐ 1920-1914, never again,
השואה  1933-1945, never again,
(1914-1923) Ελληνική Γενοκτονία, never again

Offline SolEX01

  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,425
    • Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Metropolis of New Jersey
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #52 on: November 19, 2008, 03:35:16 AM »
After the Polish Church removed its protection from Joao, only the Brazilian Bishops Chrysostomos and Amvrosios continued to be part of the Church of Poland. The majority of the clergy in Brazil decided to leave Poland's jurisdiction and enter the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of USA and the Diaspora. However, Metropolitan Sava of Poland refused to approve their request because he did not recognize the canonicity of the UOC-USA as long as it remained under the Ecumenical Patriarchate. It's for this reason that they were received by the Serbian Patriarchate.

An autocephalous Orthodox Church (e.g. Poland) does not recognize the canonicity of a Jurisdiction (e.g. UOC-USA) under the omophorion of the Ecumenical Patriarchate?  That's either astounding or an error must exist somewhere....   ???

Offline mike

  • Stratopedarches
  • **************
  • Posts: 22,594
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #53 on: November 19, 2008, 09:03:46 AM »
For me it's also unbelievable. Polish Church recognises both Estonia jurisdictions as canonical, so why not UOC-USA?
Hyperdox Herman, Eastern Orthodox Christian News - fb, Eastern Orthodox Christian News - tt

not everything I typed before [insert current date] may reflect my current views on the subject

Offline Fr. George

  • formerly "Cleveland"
  • Administrator
  • Stratopedarches
  • *******
  • Posts: 20,239
  • May the Lord bless you and keep you always!
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Metropolis of Pittsburgh
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #54 on: November 19, 2008, 09:17:20 AM »
I think it is hard for outsiders to understand that canonicity, and communion (which seem to get confused with "canonical"), are inherently complicated issues which at times are very simply defined, and yet at other times are quite complicated.  We could indeed somehow adopt a more simple system, but that would involve not only adopting limitations on the freedom of the local churches, but also essentially changing the ecclesiastical structure from the Church, which from its earliest days has been focused on the diocese, and focus it more on the super-national Churches or the monolithic structure (i.e. RCC-ish structure).
"O Cross of Christ, all-holy, thrice-blessed, and life-giving, instrument of the mystical rites of Zion, the holy Altar for the service of our Great Archpriest, the blessing - the weapon - the strength of priests, our pride, our consolation, the light in our hearts, our mind, and our steps"
Met. Meletios of Nikopolis & Preveza, from his ordination.

Offline mike

  • Stratopedarches
  • **************
  • Posts: 22,594
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #55 on: November 19, 2008, 09:27:21 AM »
What's the difference between churches which are "canonical" and this which are "in communion". I thought that these two statements mean exactly the same. One particular Church recognises the other one as canonical and automatically they're in communion with each other.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2008, 09:31:07 AM by mike »
Hyperdox Herman, Eastern Orthodox Christian News - fb, Eastern Orthodox Christian News - tt

not everything I typed before [insert current date] may reflect my current views on the subject

Offline Fr. George

  • formerly "Cleveland"
  • Administrator
  • Stratopedarches
  • *******
  • Posts: 20,239
  • May the Lord bless you and keep you always!
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Metropolis of Pittsburgh
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #56 on: November 19, 2008, 09:31:41 AM »
What's the difference between churches which are "canonical" and this which are "in communion". I thought that these two statements mean exactly the same. One particular Church recognises the other one as canonical and automatically they're in communion.

While most of the time they are one and the same ideas, at other times Churches have been separated from "communion" but have not ceased to be Orthodox, and have been restored to Communion with little if any change; this suggests that "canonicity" is an idea independent of "communion" (a concept that our Old Calendarist / Traditionalist brethren would definitely ascribe to).  A Church might indeed remain "canonical" (i.e. maintaining the fullness of the faith), even if the other Churches don't see it that way.
"O Cross of Christ, all-holy, thrice-blessed, and life-giving, instrument of the mystical rites of Zion, the holy Altar for the service of our Great Archpriest, the blessing - the weapon - the strength of priests, our pride, our consolation, the light in our hearts, our mind, and our steps"
Met. Meletios of Nikopolis & Preveza, from his ordination.

Offline mike

  • Stratopedarches
  • **************
  • Posts: 22,594
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #57 on: November 19, 2008, 09:38:47 AM »
Understood, thanks :)
Hyperdox Herman, Eastern Orthodox Christian News - fb, Eastern Orthodox Christian News - tt

not everything I typed before [insert current date] may reflect my current views on the subject

Offline lubeltri

  • Latin Catholic layman
  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,795
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #58 on: November 19, 2008, 01:57:13 PM »
What's the difference between churches which are "canonical" and this which are "in communion". I thought that these two statements mean exactly the same. One particular Church recognises the other one as canonical and automatically they're in communion.

While most of the time they are one and the same ideas, at other times Churches have been separated from "communion" but have not ceased to be Orthodox, and have been restored to Communion with little if any change; this suggests that "canonicity" is an idea independent of "communion" (a concept that our Old Calendarist / Traditionalist brethren would definitely ascribe to).  A Church might indeed remain "canonical" (i.e. maintaining the fullness of the faith), even if the other Churches don't see it that way.

So do many Orthodox in full communion with Constantinople see the Old Calendarists as in a sort of irregular state but not schismatic (as Rome considers the SSPX in the Catholic Church)---the irregular clearly meaning that something is amiss and the integrity of dioceses should be restored at some future point?

So I would guess that many "mainstream" Orthodox recognize that the Old Calendarists maintain the Orthodox faith in full but are just disobedient (justified or unjustified, depending on your perspective)?

Thanks for trying to explain all this, because I've always been confused by it.

Offline lubeltri

  • Latin Catholic layman
  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,795
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #59 on: November 19, 2008, 01:57:14 PM »
Bless, Fr. Anastasios.

Great photo! Did you wear the beard while still a layman?

Online Justin Kissel

  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 32,771
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #60 on: November 22, 2008, 01:50:39 AM »
Quote
So I would guess that many "mainstream" Orthodox recognize that the Old Calendarists maintain the Orthodox faith in full but are just disobedient (justified or unjustified, depending on your perspective)?

That may be, though I don't personally consider them disobedient, but rather rebelling for what they consider to be a valid reason.

Offline mike

  • Stratopedarches
  • **************
  • Posts: 22,594
Re: What makes a group canonical?
« Reply #61 on: November 23, 2008, 11:18:31 AM »
An autocephalous Orthodox Church (e.g. Poland) does not recognize the canonicity of a Jurisdiction (e.g. UOC-USA) under the omophorion of the Ecumenical Patriarchate?  That's either astounding or an error must exist somewhere....   ???

Somenone must have made a mistake. On Church of Poland's official website, although it's poor there is a link to UOC USA's site so it must be recognised.
« Last Edit: November 23, 2008, 11:19:29 AM by mike »
Hyperdox Herman, Eastern Orthodox Christian News - fb, Eastern Orthodox Christian News - tt

not everything I typed before [insert current date] may reflect my current views on the subject