OrthodoxChristianity.net
October 02, 2014, 12:35:31 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Canonical question: commemorating Hierarchs  (Read 1459 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Elisha
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 4,423


« on: August 08, 2008, 12:04:29 AM »

On the IndianaList either today or yesterday, there is some hubub about ROCOR priests not commemorating Patriarch Alexei II.

Retired Bishop Tikhon posted how it is canonically correct for priests in local parishes to ONLY needed to commemorate their diocesan bishop and thus this non-commemoration of Patriarch Alexei is not uncanonical, that the current practice of commemorating First Hierarchs confuses what is and is not canonical, that local parishes should return to only commemorating their diocesan bishop and leave the commemoration of the First Hierarch to their diocesan bishop.

What do the resident experts here say?
Logged
Fr. George
formerly "Cleveland"
Administrator
Stratopedarches
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox (Catholic) Christian
Jurisdiction: GOA - Metropolis of Pittsburgh
Posts: 20,077


May the Lord bless you and keep you always!


« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2008, 12:25:45 AM »

Retired Bishop TIKHON is spot-on.  The parishes are only to commemorate their local hierarch; the local hierarchs commemorate their synodal presidents, and so forth.  The practice of commemorating First Hierarchs at the parishes all the time is a bit strange, and possibly a reflection of an incorrect ecclesiological model (a diocese has only one bishop, no matter how you slice it).
Logged

"The man who doesn't read good books has no advantage over the one who can't read them." Mark Twain
---------------------
Ordained on 17 & 18-Oct 2009. Please forgive me if earlier posts are poorly worded or incorrect in any way.
Elisha
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 4,423


« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2008, 02:42:42 AM »

Retired Bishop TIKHON is spot-on.  The parishes are only to commemorate their local hierarch; the local hierarchs commemorate their synodal presidents, and so forth.  The practice of commemorating First Hierarchs at the parishes all the time is a bit strange, and possibly a reflection of an incorrect ecclesiological model (a diocese has only one bishop, no matter how you slice it).

Thanks for confirming that my retired bishop is not completely insane.   Wink
Logged
Αριστοκλής
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: American Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Diocese
Posts: 10,026


« Reply #3 on: August 08, 2008, 08:35:17 AM »

Thanks for confirming that my retired bishop is not completely insane.   Wink

Never insane! But always armed with a keyboard and ready to use it he remains  Cheesy
Logged

"Religion is a neurobiological illness and Orthodoxy is its cure." - Fr. John S. Romanides
PeterTheAleut
The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
Section Moderator
Protospatharios
*****
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 32,350


Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!


« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2008, 03:10:13 AM »

Never insane! But always armed with a keyboard and ready to use it he remains  Cheesy
You know him well, do you?
Logged
Αριστοκλής
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: American Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Diocese
Posts: 10,026


« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2008, 08:28:31 AM »

You know him well, do you?

Yes, we've crossed keyboards on occasion.
Logged

"Religion is a neurobiological illness and Orthodoxy is its cure." - Fr. John S. Romanides
Esteban
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Posts: 99



« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2008, 02:01:53 AM »

I recall that Father Kyril Jenner, in a message posted to one of the lists in the not-too-distant past, explained that the practice of commemorating both the first hierarch and the diocesan bishop at services has its origins in the time before the autocephaly of the Russian Church, when there was only one ruling bishop, the Metropolitan, who was assisted by various regional vicar bishops. When these regions became canonically established dioceses and their bishops proper ruling bishops, the long-standing practice of commemorating both simply wasn't discontinued.

This would explain why this peculiar practice—and regarding this Bishop Tikhon is quite right!—is generally observed in the broader Russian sphere of influence (which for these purposes would include, I suppose, Poles, Ukrainians and Carpatho-Russians, as well as the North American Metropolia and the Parish Exarchate, and others), but not beyond it. An exception to this is the Serbian Church in North and South America (and perhaps also in Australia?), in which all priests commemorate the Patriarch — a practice, I imagine, related to the reconciliation of the Patriarchal and Free Serbs in 1992. Liturgical books printed in Serbia, however, only call for the commemoration of one's own bishop.

-e.
« Last Edit: September 08, 2008, 02:23:13 AM by Esteban » Logged

"This life has been given to you for repentance. Do not waste it in vain pursuits."

--St Isaac the Syrian
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.048 seconds with 33 queries.