Author Topic: Ecclesiastical Protocol Inquiry  (Read 819 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Basil 320

  • Site Supporter
  • Archon
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,147
Ecclesiastical Protocol Inquiry
« on: June 07, 2008, 08:15:55 PM »
Does anyone know why the Church of Russia refers to the heads of the later proclaimed autocephalos Churches, Russia, Bulgaria, Serbia and Romania, as "His Holiness," while the Greek Churches refer to them as "His Beatitude?"

Also, I saw the Dyptics on the OCA's website.  Why do they refer to the Ecumenical Patriarch as "His Holiness," rather than "His All Holiness," which is how his jurisdiction refers to him; "Tou Panahgiotatou."
« Last Edit: June 07, 2008, 08:18:59 PM by BTRAKAS »
"...Strengthen the Orthodox Community..."

Offline SolEX01

  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,134
    • Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Metropolis of New Jersey
Re: Ecclesiastical Protocol Inquiry
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2008, 09:15:20 PM »
Does anyone know why the Church of Russia refers to the heads of the later proclaimed autocephalos Churches, Russia, Bulgaria, Serbia and Romania, as "His Holiness," while the Greek Churches refer to them as "His Beatitude?"

While both terms may be equally acceptable for use, the official term of address is derived by each Hierarch, not by EP, MP or anyone else.

Also, I saw the Dyptics on the OCA's website.  Why do they refer to the Ecumenical Patriarch as "His Holiness," rather than "His All Holiness," which is how his jurisdiction refers to him; "Tou Panahgiotatou."

His All Holiness has never recognized OCA's autocephaly as issued by MP.  Maybe in return, the EP is referred to as His Holiness since He is considered an "equal" among "equals" (e.g. OCA Metropolitan) rather than first among equals.   Remember that each Orthodox Bishop is equal and that the titles do not convey anything resembling rank, order, status, etc.