OrthodoxChristianity.net
July 24, 2014, 08:20:41 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Byzantine?  (Read 4003 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Hypatos
*****************
Offline Offline

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 37,124



« on: November 13, 2007, 01:16:08 AM »

Any thoughts on the term "Byzantine?"

I got my training in historiography at the U of Chicago, and on those grounds I don't use it.  It was New Rome, the Roman Emperor, Romans and the Roman Empire in the East.  In Armenian, Syriac, Coptic, Arabic, Slavonic, Greek, etc. the term is "Roman."  The codification of Roman Law happened at New Rome, by the Emperor in the East, Justinian I, who was a Latin (in the ethnic sense, as was Constantine, btw).

There is no patriarch of Byzantium, nor was there ever.  So it's the Constantinopolitan Rite.


The term was concocted to discredit the Empire in the East and the Orthodox Church. I won't use the mislabeling.

The term as applied to those in the East who have submitted to Rome fits the attitude of a lot in the West towards their coreligionists, but as those congregations reassert the terms of union, and reassert their native ecclesiology, etc., the term loses its accuracy.
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
Salpy
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Armenian Church
Posts: 12,344


Pray for the Christians of Iraq and Syria.


« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2007, 01:54:31 AM »

Actually, in Armenian, the word I hear for that empire is "piuzantagan."  I think I have also heard "Hooyn."  I don't think I have ever heard the word Roman ("hrovmeagan") used for that.  But then, I don't exactly run with the most scholarly crowd.   Smiley
Logged

ozgeorge
I'll take you for who you are if you take me for everything.
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Oecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, the New Rome, the Great Church of Christ.
Posts: 16,382


My plans for retirement.


WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2007, 04:49:26 AM »

The term was concocted to discredit the Empire in the East and the Orthodox Church.
Yep.
Logged

If you're living a happy life as a Christian, you're doing something wrong.
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Hypatos
*****************
Offline Offline

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 37,124



« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2007, 05:46:16 AM »

Actually, in Armenian, the word I hear for that empire is "piuzantagan."  I think I have also heard "Hooyn."  I don't think I have ever heard the word Roman ("hrovmeagan") used for that.  But then, I don't exactly run with the most scholarly crowd.   Smiley

Now all of the above languages (except Slavnoic, being a dead language and all) do have their equivalents to "Byzantine."  But the term Roman is the one used in the Classical sources, e.g. in the case of Armenian Aghatangelos, Koriwn, etc.., "Byzantine" we learned during the Western captivity.
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
wynd
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 501


Transfiguration


« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2007, 10:23:57 AM »

The term was concocted to discredit the Empire in the East and the Orthodox Church. I won't use the mislabeling.
Didn't this happen also with "Greek?"
Logged
ozgeorge
I'll take you for who you are if you take me for everything.
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Oecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, the New Rome, the Great Church of Christ.
Posts: 16,382


My plans for retirement.


WWW
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2007, 08:31:31 PM »

Didn't this happen also with "Greek?"
Yep.
Logged

If you're living a happy life as a Christian, you're doing something wrong.
Salpy
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Armenian Church
Posts: 12,344


Pray for the Christians of Iraq and Syria.


« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2007, 09:23:50 PM »


The term was concocted to discredit the Empire in the East and the Orthodox Church.


ialmisry and ozgeorge:

Just to clarify--which church do you mean by the "Orthodox Church?"
Logged

prodromas
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Under the Green Pope
Posts: 1,239

Greek Orthodox


« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2007, 09:31:14 PM »

ialmisry and ozgeorge:

Just to clarify--which church do you mean by the "Orthodox Church?"
The Eastern and Oriental together of course because they are the Orthodox church.
Logged

The sins I don't commit are largely due to the weakness of my limbs.

1915-1923 Հայոց Ցեղասպանութիւն ,never again,
ܩܛܠܐ ܕܥܡܐ ܐܬܘܪܝܐ 1920-1914, never again,
השואה  1933-1945, never again,
(1914-1923) Ελληνική Γενοκτονία, never again
Salpy
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Armenian Church
Posts: 12,344


Pray for the Christians of Iraq and Syria.


« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2007, 09:35:29 PM »

Thank you Prodromas.  That's what I would think, except I am trying to understand how not calling that empire "Roman" would discredit the OO Church.  But then I'm not a history buff.    Smiley
« Last Edit: November 13, 2007, 09:36:00 PM by Salpy » Logged

Fr. George
formerly "Cleveland"
Administrator
Stratopedarches
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox (Catholic) Christian
Jurisdiction: GOA - Metropolis of Pittsburgh
Posts: 19,914


May the Lord bless you and keep you always!


« Reply #9 on: November 13, 2007, 09:39:42 PM »

The Eastern and Oriental together of course because they are the Orthodox church.

"May as well be all the same" to those west of the Balkans at that time.
Logged

"The man who doesn't read good books has no advantage over the one who can't read them." Mark Twain
---------------------
Ordained on 17 & 18-Oct 2009. Please forgive me if earlier posts are poorly worded or incorrect in any way.
Salpy
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Armenian Church
Posts: 12,344


Pray for the Christians of Iraq and Syria.


« Reply #10 on: November 13, 2007, 09:46:55 PM »

True.  All those easterners are the same, you know.   Tongue
Logged

ozgeorge
I'll take you for who you are if you take me for everything.
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Oecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, the New Rome, the Great Church of Christ.
Posts: 16,382


My plans for retirement.


WWW
« Reply #11 on: November 13, 2007, 11:03:42 PM »

It begins.... Roll Eyes
Logged

If you're living a happy life as a Christian, you're doing something wrong.
prodromas
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Under the Green Pope
Posts: 1,239

Greek Orthodox


« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2007, 04:31:05 AM »

It begins.... Roll Eyes

I don't want to divert this thread but if an EO poster or OO poster can give me a definitive argument that they are not the One True Church together I would with all seriousness like to hear it. (please PM me)
Logged

The sins I don't commit are largely due to the weakness of my limbs.

1915-1923 Հայոց Ցեղասպանութիւն ,never again,
ܩܛܠܐ ܕܥܡܐ ܐܬܘܪܝܐ 1920-1914, never again,
השואה  1933-1945, never again,
(1914-1923) Ελληνική Γενοκτονία, never again
ozgeorge
I'll take you for who you are if you take me for everything.
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Oecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, the New Rome, the Great Church of Christ.
Posts: 16,382


My plans for retirement.


WWW
« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2007, 04:38:10 AM »

I don't want to divert this thread
Too late.
It was diverted 7 posts ago....
Another one bites the dust.

Regards,
Your fellow Byzantine Eastern Orthodox Greek (and whatever else anyone wants to call me).
I could have called myself "Your Fellow Roman" which is what my Parents, Grandparents etc. called themselves, but apparently that's not up for discussion any more.....<sigh>
« Last Edit: November 14, 2007, 04:48:14 AM by ozgeorge » Logged

If you're living a happy life as a Christian, you're doing something wrong.
Αριστοκλής
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: American Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Diocese
Posts: 10,026


« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2007, 09:06:37 AM »

No, it's not done. "Roman" for us to be sure. My grandparents and still, my father.
The 'west' (a form of the undefined "they") replaced 'Roman' with Byzantine and "Greek" as well as hanging "Eastern" on us.

And then there is the term, "Greek"...
Logged

"Religion is a neurobiological illness and Orthodoxy is its cure." - Fr. John S. Romanides
Fr. George
formerly "Cleveland"
Administrator
Stratopedarches
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox (Catholic) Christian
Jurisdiction: GOA - Metropolis of Pittsburgh
Posts: 19,914


May the Lord bless you and keep you always!


« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2007, 09:27:32 AM »

I got my training in historiography at the U of Chicago, and on those grounds I don't use it.  It was New Rome, the Roman Emperor, Romans and the Roman Empire in the East.  In Armenian, Syriac, Coptic, Arabic, Slavonic, Greek, etc. the term is "Roman."  The codification of Roman Law happened at New Rome, by the Emperor in the East, Justinian I, who was a Latin (in the ethnic sense, as was Constantine, btw).

There is no patriarch of Byzantium, nor was there ever.  So it's the Constantinopolitan Rite.


The term was concocted to discredit the Empire in the East and the Orthodox Church. I won't use the mislabeling.

The term as applied to those in the East who have submitted to Rome fits the attitude of a lot in the West towards their coreligionists, but as those congregations reassert the terms of union, and reassert their native ecclesiology, etc., the term loses its accuracy. 

A man after my own heart. 
Logged

"The man who doesn't read good books has no advantage over the one who can't read them." Mark Twain
---------------------
Ordained on 17 & 18-Oct 2009. Please forgive me if earlier posts are poorly worded or incorrect in any way.
pathofsolitude
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: Immaculately Pure Hesychastic Orthodoxy of the Old Way
Jurisdiction: Unorganized Catacomb Communion in Exile- (the bishops have lost the faith)
Posts: 133


« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2007, 10:43:53 AM »

I will always use the term Byzantine. Its an irreplaceable part of my vocabulary. Its just a matter of words really. I dont know what the big deal is. Or would you rather Americans call you the Roman Church?
Logged

The great apostasy has occured. Get out of there while you can!!! Its better to be priestless than to have a heretic bishop. The apostles taught that the church consists of saints only. There are about 7,000 Spirit-bearers currently in the catacombs.
Anastasios
Webdespota
Administrator
Merarches
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Greek Old Calendarist
Posts: 10,440


Metropolitan Chrysostomos of Florina

anastasios0513
WWW
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2007, 10:52:43 AM »

I will always use the term Byzantine. Its an irreplaceable part of my vocabulary. Its just a matter of words really. I dont know what the big deal is. Or would you rather Americans call you the Roman Church?

Yeah--we're the real Roman Catholics   Cool
Logged

Met. Demetrius's Enthronement

Disclaimer: Past posts reflect stages of my life before my baptism may not be accurate expositions of Orthodox teaching.

I served as an Orthodox priest from June 2008 to April 2013, before resigning for personal reasons
JoeS
(aka StMarkEofE)
Site Supporter
OC.net guru
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,122


Global Warming Enthusiast.


« Reply #18 on: November 15, 2007, 05:13:45 PM »

Yeah--we're the real Roman Catholics   Cool

Hadnt really given it much thought lately but your right. Lets look at this a minute.
There was the Eastern and Western Roman Empires each with their own emperors. This was true even at the time of the Schism.  Technically, the Eastern Orthodox are Eastern Roman Catholics as opposed to the Roman Catholics of the Western empire. Ha, what do you know about that.
Logged
Anastasios
Webdespota
Administrator
Merarches
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Greek Old Calendarist
Posts: 10,440


Metropolitan Chrysostomos of Florina

anastasios0513
WWW
« Reply #19 on: November 15, 2007, 05:35:35 PM »

Hadnt really given it much thought lately but your right. Lets look at this a minute.
There was the Eastern and Western Roman Empires each with their own emperors. This was true even at the time of the Schism.  Technically, the Eastern Orthodox are Eastern Roman Catholics as opposed to the Roman Catholics of the Western empire. Ha, what do you know about that.

A polemical article, sometimes it is stated that he overstates his case, but useful for understanding a Greek Orthodox perspective on this issue of identity:

http://www.romanity.org/htm/rom.03.en.franks_romans_feudalism_and_doctrine.01.htm
Logged

Met. Demetrius's Enthronement

Disclaimer: Past posts reflect stages of my life before my baptism may not be accurate expositions of Orthodox teaching.

I served as an Orthodox priest from June 2008 to April 2013, before resigning for personal reasons
JoeS
(aka StMarkEofE)
Site Supporter
OC.net guru
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,122


Global Warming Enthusiast.


« Reply #20 on: November 15, 2007, 05:53:11 PM »

A polemical article, sometimes it is stated that he overstates his case, but useful for understanding a Greek Orthodox perspective on this issue of identity:

http://www.romanity.org/htm/rom.03.en.franks_romans_feudalism_and_doctrine.01.htm

"The schism between Eastern and Western Christianity was not between East and West Romans. In actuality, it was a split between East Romans and the conquerors of the West Romans."

An interesting perspective indeed.

Logged
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Hypatos
*****************
Offline Offline

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 37,124



« Reply #21 on: November 16, 2007, 06:45:14 AM »

ialmisry and ozgeorge:

Just to clarify--which church do you mean by the "Orthodox Church?"

The Orthodox Church:EO, OO and WRO.

Thank you Prodromas.  That's what I would think, except I am trying to understand how not calling that empire "Roman" would discredit the OO Church.  But then I'm not a history buff.    Smiley

Simple. The empire falls in the West, so obviously those in the East can't be united because they don't possess the unity of THE capital Rome.  Without her staying hand the provinces in the East reverted to the squabbling, between the Byzantines (read EO, Constantinople), the Copts (read Alexandria), the Syrians (read Antioch) and the federati/allies (read Armenia, Georgia, Ethiopia, etc). This helps downplay the Dark Ages (Dark only in the West) and ignores the suppression of the Celtic, Mozarabic, Gallican (actually, much of it self-inflicted), and Ambrosian rites/churches by Rome.

In other words, the EO are not united, the OO are not united, and the EO and the OO are not united and they need to be united through Rome, i.e. Old Rome.  Just read Fr. Ryland's articles on the Orthodox: portrays us as a bunch of preschoolers that the teacher has to attend to.  Actual case in point: they have three patriarchates of Antioch (Maronite, Melkite, Syriac) overlapping, with three separate patriarchs of Antioch.  As far as I know (correct me if I am wrong) there is no connection between the three except submission to Rome.  This would be odd in Orthodoxy (witness the metochia) of adjoining patriarchates, let alone those inhabiting the same place.

Fowden has a book "From Empire to Commonwealth: the implications of Monotheism in Late Antiquity" which talks about the connection between the idea of the Roman empire and its universalist claims and the implications for the OO: in brief the OO, although separated in politics (though the Armenians played a LARGE role in East Rome's history, especially 8-11 centuries.) and religion, none the less operate in the universe of Rome, as opposed to say, Zororastrian Iran, which Armenia was part of, yet alien.   Treadgold (and others like Mango), speak of how the Church for the first time united the empire, changing it from just a motley of subjects under an emperor, to a society whose members saw themselves as a body politique (e.g. see Treadgold "A History of the Byzantine [sic] State and Society"). 

The Copts, Syriacs and (at least part) the Armenians were part and parcel of that body (the Armenians would play a large part in East Roman history, particularly in the Macedonian Renaissance, whose dynasty was of Armenian origin), the OO Arabs were supported outside the empire by the empire (versus the Nestorians), Nubia and Ethiopia were allied.

Now, if the Eastern Roman Empire is not the contiuation of the empire in which the Church arose, but a successor state (like the Franks), then the Copts, Syrians and Armenians that were part of that Eastern Roman empire are distinguished from their forebears who were part of the Roman Empire. And if such a thing is comtemplated, then the claim ir rendered plausible that the Copts, Syrians, Armenians, Greeks etc. only entered the patrimony of the ancient Church when they "rentered Catholic unity," i.e. submitted to Rome, which is portrayed as the only link to that ancient church and society.  In effect, it makes the role of Rome over the Copts, Syriacs and Armenians (and Greeks) the same as her role in bringing the Visigoths (i.e. Spain), Franks (i.e. France and Germany).

"May as well be all the same" to those west of the Balkans at that time.

Fowden characterizes the Balkans (read Slavic nations) as the "Second Byzantine Commonwealth" (versus the First one of Armenia, Syria, Egypt and Ethiopia).  Yes, those in the West want to see it as the same thing, and this also effects the view of the OO.  All the OO (leaving aside the Mar Thoma for the present discussion) were part of the Roman empire, mostly directly, the Armenians partly indirectly (as Armenia was partitioned).  The Slavs can claim no such antiquity, they received their Church and civilization from New Rome later. 

Now, if New Rome was not the same Roman empire, then the Slavs did not receive the a direct link to the early Church and society.  Rather they received it second hand.  And if New Rome was second hand, so are those cultures of the OO, as the same views discrediting of the ties of New Rome to Old Rome also serve to discredit the connection of the OO to their forebears: e.g. Armenia of the Bagratunids can't claim a connection to that of the Arsacids, if a discontinuity is allowed between the Constantinople of the Roman emperor (and so named by all) Constantine and that of, say, the Macedonian dynasty.

And if that is so, then the OO are not in any closer relationship to the early Church, but are on the same level as the medieval slavic patriarchates.  And if their pedigree begins in the Middle Ages, then they have to get connected to the early Church through that only link, the pontifex maximus at (Old) Rome.

True.  All those easterners are the same, you know.   Tongue

This shows up in the distinction between the West (almost entirely Roman rite, but a few Mozarabic, and an actual viable Ambrosian rite) and the East in Rome's canon law codes, etc.  where the dicodomy West/East homogenizes the Eastern ChurchES as la meme chose.  Also in the mistaken notion that the EP is an Eastern Pope.
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
prodromos
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 1,463

Sydney, Australia


« Reply #22 on: November 23, 2007, 08:13:30 AM »

Yeah--we're the real Roman Catholics   Cool
Even the Turks acknowledge that

Mailing Address of the Ecumenical Patriarchate:
Rum Patrikhanesi, 342 20 Fener- Haliç, Istanbul.
Logged
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Hypatos
*****************
Offline Offline

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 37,124



« Reply #23 on: November 23, 2007, 01:16:26 PM »

Even the Turks acknowledge that

Mailing Address of the Ecumenical Patriarchate:
Rum Patrikhanesi, 342 20 Fener- Haliç, Istanbul.

I can't help but point out that little of this is Turkish:

Rum: Latin, via Arabic
Patrik:Greek
hane: Persian (house)
si: Turkish suffix (his)
Fener: Greek, via Arabic (lighthouse)
Halic: Arabic (Gulf, inlet)
Istanbul: Greek, via Arabic (to the city).

It just reminds me of the claims of the Turks over the Ecumenical Patriarch (though they won't allow that title) and Anatolia.

I remember seeing a poster from the Turkish board of Turism.  It said "Come to Turkey, the land of five civilizations"  My Greek doctor commented "too bad none of them are Turkish."
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
Tags: semantics Byzantine Empire Eastern Roman Empire 
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.118 seconds with 51 queries.