Resources on the Filioque

[montalban]

Has anyone got some good book recommendations for Orthodox apologetics on the filioque issue? I've already got St. Photius' Mystagogy.

[ialmisry]

Has anyone got some good book recommendations for Orthodox apologetics on the filioque issue? I've already got St. Photius' Mystagogy.

New Rome has spoken.  The case is closed.

On a serious note, you probably would do better with the Scholastics to present the arguments but not attatch St. Photius' name to it.  They seem to shut off without knowing why at the mere mention of his name.

Btw is the Mystagogy and the acts, etc. of Constantinople IV (the real one, 879) on line?  The sites I had are down now.

I'm afraid that now that they admit that the term filioque can't be translated into the original Greek without a result that even they deem heretical, they will have to get their mind straight on that issue.

[Apotheoun]

Below are a few texts that (in varying degrees) touch upon the issue of the filioque:


A. Edward Siecienski. The Use of Maximus the Confessor's Writing on the Filioque at the Council of Ferrara-Florence (1438–1439). Ann Arbor, Michigan: UMI Dissertation Services, 2005.

Aristeides Papadakis. Crisis in Byzantium: The Filioque Controversy in the Patriarchate of Gregory II of Cyprus (1283–1289). New York: Fordham University Press, 1983.

Aristeides Papadakis. The Christian East and the Rise of the Papacy. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1994, pp. 232-238 and 379-408.

Richard Haugh. Photius and the Carolingians: The Trinitarian Controversy. Belmont, MA: Nordland Publishing Company, 1975.

David Bradshaw. Aristotle East and West: Metaphysics and the Division of Christendom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 214–220.




I have also posted a brief essay that I wrote on the filioque at my own website, click the link below if you wish to peruse it:

The Filioque Controversy

[JoeS]

Below are a few texts that (in varying degrees) touch upon the issue of the filioque:


A. Edward Siecienski. The Use of Maximus the Confessor's Writing on the Filioque at the Council of Ferrara-Florence (1438–1439). Ann Arbor, Michigan: UMI Dissertation Services, 2005.

Aristeides Papadakis. Crisis in Byzantium: The Filioque Controversy in the Patriarchate of Gregory II of Cyprus (1283–1289). New York: Fordham University Press, 1983.

Aristeides Papadakis. The Christian East and the Rise of the Papacy. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1994, pp. 232-238 and 379-408.

Richard Haugh. Photius and the Carolingians: The Trinitarian Controversy. Belmont, MA: Nordland Publishing Company, 1975.

David Bradshaw. Aristotle East and West: Metaphysics and the Division of Christendom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 214–220.




I have also posted a brief essay that I wrote on the filioque at my own website, click the link below if you wish to peruse it:

The Filioque Controversy

I would like to add another:

St. Photios the Great by Asterios Gerostergios(Institute for Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies) Pages: 63,64& 94

ISBN 0-914744-51-9

 

[Athanasios]

Hello,

Not an Orthodox source, but if you study the issue, you should know the other side's argument. Here is the Catholic Church's Clarification on the Filioque:

http://www.catholicculture.org/library/view.cfm?recnum=1176

And here is an Orthodox response to that clarification:

http://www.orthodoxresearchinstitute.org/articles/dogmatics/john_zizioulas_single_source.htm

[Pravoslavbob]

One Orthodox point of view regarding the issue of the filioque that simply cannot be passed up is to be found in The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church by Vladimir Lossky.

[Papa Gregorio]

Have you read this work by Dragas?

[Tags:]

OrthodoxChristianity.net > Moderated Forums > Orthodox-Other Christian Discussion > Orthodox-Catholic Discussion (Moderator: username!) > Topic: Resources on the Filioque