OrthodoxChristianity.net
April 25, 2014, 05:28:51 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The Rules page has been updated.  Please familiarize yourself with its contents!
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Catholic "Communion Service" (not Mass)  (Read 562 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Nephi
Section Moderator
Archon
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Auntie Oak
Posts: 3,006



« on: March 19, 2014, 01:32:21 AM »

So I just stumbled onto something offered at a local Catholic parish. They had two things listed for their weekday services, "Mass" and this thing called a "Communion Service." I was confused so needless to say I did a Google search. I found this:

Quote
What is a Communion service? I think our parish is rather typical of what parishes are doing across the country. In our parish, for example, on days when the pastor is absent, the pastoral associate, Sister Jane, leads a Communion service. She calls the assembly together with the Sign of the Cross and a prayer. Then she (or another member of the parish) reads the Scripture passages assigned to the Mass for the day. Sister Jane then says a prayer thanking Christ for the gift of the Eucharist. Everyone recites the Lord—s Prayer. Then Sister distributes holy Communion with hosts consecrated at a previous Mass and taken from the tabernacle. She concludes the service with a prayer.

Anyone ever had any experience with this or have any thoughts on it? Seems rather strange that a non-clergy can distribute the Eucharist in a service without any clergy (priest, deacon, etc.) present at all. Although not entirely related, it reminds me of a lay classmate of mine that once talked about how a priest gave him a host to carry around until he got the chance to give it to someone who couldn't make it to Mass.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2014, 01:35:48 AM by Nephi » Logged

Liberalochian: Ecumenism Lite™
WUnland
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Faith: Traditional Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: Japan / Bayern
Posts: 44


« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2014, 02:06:58 AM »

Unfortunately yes I have experienced a "service".  Here in Japan we have 5 priests for every 7 parishes so once a month there is no priest available to celebrate mass.  When the priest is not available a lay person leads the service which mimics the mass up to the  readings but stops after the gospel.  After the gospel someone will give a personal faith experience speech after which Extraordinary Ministers will distribute pre-consecrated communion keeps since the last consecration a week earlier.  There is no daily mass here except for religious sisters at their convent, and those are not available to the laity.

The lay person leading the service does so from the pews and not the sanctuary, so there is no make believe priest.  Same banal songs as mass though.

I hate these things and try to avoid them by travelling to the next town on my parish "service" Sunday if a mass is available there.

I imagine it is much the same elsewhere. I understand why they are necessary here.  This is an non-religious country and most of the priests are elderly foreign missionaries, mine a 72 year old priest from Ireland who has been here for 40+ years. There just aren't any vocations, and the days of Irish missions are long gone.

W.Unland
« Last Edit: March 19, 2014, 02:11:30 AM by WUnland » Logged
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong." - Carl Kraeff
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12,138


I'm back, Mom...miss Me?


WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2014, 11:03:08 AM »

Anyone ever had any experience with this or have any thoughts on it? Seems rather strange that a non-clergy can distribute the Eucharist in a service without any clergy (priest, deacon, etc.) present at all.

I've never witnessed one of these, but I don't understand why they bothered to create a "Sunday Service in the Absence of a Priest" or whatever they call it when they have something called "The Liturgy of the Hours".  It shouldn't have been so difficult to add the Sunday readings into a Lauds or a Vespers and tack on Communion toward the end (if this is an absolute must), after the Lord's Prayer.   

Quote
Although not entirely related, it reminds me of a lay classmate of mine that once talked about how a priest gave him a host to carry around until he got the chance to give it to someone who couldn't make it to Mass.

Ugh.  At that point, why not just put it in an envelope and send it through the mail? 
Logged

"Best of all, Mor Ephrem won't trap you into having his baby." - dzheremi

"Mor Ephrim will not be allowed in(to the getes of heaven) because God doesnt know him." - Cackles

"You are consistently one of the cruelest posters on this forum." - William
Deacon Lance
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,735


Liturgy at Mt. St. Macrina Pilgrimage


« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2014, 05:11:59 PM »

Anyone ever had any experience with this or have any thoughts on it? Seems rather strange that a non-clergy can distribute the Eucharist in a service without any clergy (priest, deacon, etc.) present at all.

I've never witnessed one of these, but I don't understand why they bothered to create a "Sunday Service in the Absence of a Priest" or whatever they call it when they have something called "The Liturgy of the Hours".  It shouldn't have been so difficult to add the Sunday readings into a Lauds or a Vespers and tack on Communion toward the end (if this is an absolute must), after the Lord's Prayer.   

That is actually an option.  It is also an option to have a Vesperal/Laudinal Mass, but it is rarely done.
Logged

My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong." - Carl Kraeff
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12,138


I'm back, Mom...miss Me?


WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2014, 06:15:15 PM »

It shouldn't have been so difficult to add the Sunday readings into a Lauds or a Vespers and tack on Communion toward the end (if this is an absolute must), after the Lord's Prayer.   

That is actually an option. 

Is there a reason, then, why they created a Communion Service format if the LOH is also an option?  For example, is the Communion Service just a matter of omitting certain sections from the order of Mass as printed in the missalette whereas the LOH requires a whole other set of books? 

Quote
It is also an option to have a Vesperal/Laudinal Mass, but it is rarely done.

I was aware of both the option and its rarity (I attended one once, but only one, and it was a special occasion).  I always thought it was unfortunate that even this way of incorporating the LOH into parish life was so unknown.  In most places with which I'm familiar, if the LOH is a part of parish life, it's because the early bird prayer group that meets to say the Rosary before Saturday morning Mass bought a few books and learned how to do it on their own. 
Logged

"Best of all, Mor Ephrem won't trap you into having his baby." - dzheremi

"Mor Ephrim will not be allowed in(to the getes of heaven) because God doesnt know him." - Cackles

"You are consistently one of the cruelest posters on this forum." - William
JoeS2
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,004


St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)


« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2014, 06:30:57 PM »

Unfortunately yes I have experienced a "service".  Here in Japan we have 5 priests for every 7 parishes so once a month there is no priest available to celebrate mass.  When the priest is not available a lay person leads the service which mimics the mass up to the  readings but stops after the gospel.  After the gospel someone will give a personal faith experience speech after which Extraordinary Ministers will distribute pre-consecrated communion keeps since the last consecration a week earlier.  There is no daily mass here except for religious sisters at their convent, and those are not available to the laity.

The lay person leading the service does so from the pews and not the sanctuary, so there is no make believe priest.  Same banal songs as mass though.

I hate these things and try to avoid them by travelling to the next town on my parish "service" Sunday if a mass is available there.

I imagine it is much the same elsewhere. I understand why they are necessary here.  This is an non-religious country and most of the priests are elderly foreign missionaries, mine a 72 year old priest from Ireland who has been here for 40+ years. There just aren't any vocations, and the days of Irish missions are long gone.

W.Unland

Why does this sound sooooo Protestant to me.......you know the Evangelical style Protestantism....?
Logged
JoeS2
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,004


St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)


« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2014, 06:35:20 PM »

Anyone ever had any experience with this or have any thoughts on it? Seems rather strange that a non-clergy can distribute the Eucharist in a service without any clergy (priest, deacon, etc.) present at all.

I've never witnessed one of these, but I don't understand why they bothered to create a "Sunday Service in the Absence of a Priest" or whatever they call it when they have something called "The Liturgy of the Hours".  It shouldn't have been so difficult to add the Sunday readings into a Lauds or a Vespers and tack on Communion toward the end (if this is an absolute must), after the Lord's Prayer.   

That is actually an option.  It is also an option to have a Vesperal/Laudinal Mass, but it is rarely done.

In Orthodoxy, a "Reader's service" is usually done when a Liturgy is not possible, BUT a big BUT here, Communion is NOT distributed.   The parishioners recognize that this is not a replacement for the Liturgy but only a way of gathering the parish in one place for communal prayer.   A wiser choice than trying to imitate a Mass communion et al.  Just something not quite right about this...
Logged
WUnland
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Faith: Traditional Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: Japan / Bayern
Posts: 44


« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2014, 07:57:59 PM »

Unfortunately yes I have experienced a "service".  Here in Japan we have 5 priests for every 7 parishes so once a month there is no priest available to celebrate mass.  When the priest is not available a lay person leads the service which mimics the mass up to the  readings but stops after the gospel.  After the gospel someone will give a personal faith experience speech after which Extraordinary Ministers will distribute pre-consecrated communion keeps since the last consecration a week earlier.  There is no daily mass here except for religious sisters at their convent, and those are not available to the laity.

The lay person leading the service does so from the pews and not the sanctuary, so there is no make believe priest.  Same banal songs as mass though.

I hate these things and try to avoid them by travelling to the next town on my parish "service" Sunday if a mass is available there.

I imagine it is much the same elsewhere. I understand why they are necessary here.  This is an non-religious country and most of the priests are elderly foreign missionaries, mine a 72 year old priest from Ireland who has been here for 40+ years. There just aren't any vocations, and the days of Irish missions are long gone.

W.Unland

Why does this sound sooooo Protestant to me.......you know the Evangelical style Protestantism....?

Indeed it IS VERY protestant at least to my mind, that is why I avoid them.  It certainly IS a "replacement mass" as it follows the same order. That said the entire Novus Ordo culture is protestant so really no surprise.  Here in Japan they have watered down the liturgy so much that it is unrecognizable.  I was told that the Japanese would not understand such "western" concepts as guilt and sin so those terms have been redacted.  I asked some of my parish members if they had ever confessed, and nobody ever had.  Just before Easter they have some weird protestant like "reconciliation" service where everyone lines up and  whispers to the priest his misdeed, then everyone gathers in little groups and bless each other and pray for their forgiveness, and a general absolution is given.  I believe that this is totally illicit, even by Catholic standards, but the church here does things its own way.

I live here and really have no choice.  There is NO traditional rite anywhere in the country, and a lot of parishes were going Neocat because of the Filipino base until the Bishops here outlawed it.  When I first came to this forum I was looking towards Orthodoxy, but that too is very scarce here which makes honest inquiry impossible.  The closest community is 2 hours by train away, so I do my best with what is available. At least my priest was trained pre VatII so he does accept my requests for personal confession and doesn't get excited when I call the "Liturgy services" the "phony mass", which he knows that I avoid.

I cringe sometimes at the direction my church is headed. I come from a protestant background, and it seems that as the years go by I am returning to the same type of practice that I left through no choice of my own,  at least in the public representation of the liturgy.

W.Unland
« Last Edit: March 19, 2014, 08:05:43 PM by WUnland » Logged
xOrthodox4Christx
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Protestant (Inquirer)
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Christianity
Posts: 1,946


xOrthodox4Christx
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2014, 08:10:24 PM »

Quote
I was told that the Japanese would not understand such "western" concepts as guilt and sin so those terms have been redacted.

Of course they wouldn't. Though, there is a Japanese word, 罪 (つみ) that is usually translated as 'sin' in English.
Logged

I'm sorry.

Lord have mercy on me.
Nephi
Section Moderator
Archon
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Auntie Oak
Posts: 3,006



« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2014, 08:10:55 PM »

Ugh.  At that point, why not just put it in an envelope and send it through the mail? 

Jesuits. Wink
Logged

Liberalochian: Ecumenism Lite™
Nephi
Section Moderator
Archon
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Auntie Oak
Posts: 3,006



« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2014, 08:12:37 PM »

That is actually an option.  It is also an option to have a Vesperal/Laudinal Mass, but it is rarely done.

Can a Vesperal Mass also be done without a priest/deacon? As much as I love Catholics and am around them regularly, this sort of thing just makes me cringe.
Logged

Liberalochian: Ecumenism Lite™
Deacon Lance
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,735


Liturgy at Mt. St. Macrina Pilgrimage


« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2014, 08:26:36 PM »

Is there a reason, then, why they created a Communion Service format if the LOH is also an option?  For example, is the Communion Service just a matter of omitting certain sections from the order of Mass as printed in the missalette whereas the LOH requires a whole other set of books?

They really didn't have to create anything.  It is simply the Liturgy of the Word from Mass (minus the priests blessings) with the Rite for Communion outside Mass added, so yes I would think not needing books was a motivator.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2014, 08:32:20 PM by Deacon Lance » Logged

My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Deacon Lance
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,735


Liturgy at Mt. St. Macrina Pilgrimage


« Reply #12 on: March 19, 2014, 08:28:56 PM »

That is actually an option.  It is also an option to have a Vesperal/Laudinal Mass, but it is rarely done.

Can a Vesperal Mass also be done without a priest/deacon? As much as I love Catholics and am around them regularly, this sort of thing just makes me cringe.

No.  No priest, no Mass.  One could have Vespers or Lauds with the Rite for communion outside Mass.  And really this shouldn't make you cringe because this is really what Presanctified Liturgy is.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2014, 08:30:52 PM by Deacon Lance » Logged

My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Deacon Lance
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,735


Liturgy at Mt. St. Macrina Pilgrimage


« Reply #13 on: March 19, 2014, 08:35:06 PM »

Anyone ever had any experience with this or have any thoughts on it? Seems rather strange that a non-clergy can distribute the Eucharist in a service without any clergy (priest, deacon, etc.) present at all.

I've never witnessed one of these, but I don't understand why they bothered to create a "Sunday Service in the Absence of a Priest" or whatever they call it when they have something called "The Liturgy of the Hours".  It shouldn't have been so difficult to add the Sunday readings into a Lauds or a Vespers and tack on Communion toward the end (if this is an absolute must), after the Lord's Prayer.   

That is actually an option.  It is also an option to have a Vesperal/Laudinal Mass, but it is rarely done.

In Orthodoxy, a "Reader's service" is usually done when a Liturgy is not possible, BUT a big BUT here, Communion is NOT distributed.   The parishioners recognize that this is not a replacement for the Liturgy but only a way of gathering the parish in one place for communal prayer.   A wiser choice than trying to imitate a Mass communion et al.  Just something not quite right about this...

What do you think Typica with Communion is? 
Logged

My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Deacon Lance
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,735


Liturgy at Mt. St. Macrina Pilgrimage


« Reply #14 on: March 19, 2014, 09:03:22 PM »

Unfortunately yes I have experienced a "service".  Here in Japan we have 5 priests for every 7 parishes so once a month there is no priest available to celebrate mass.  When the priest is not available a lay person leads the service which mimics the mass up to the  readings but stops after the gospel.  After the gospel someone will give a personal faith experience speech after which Extraordinary Ministers will distribute pre-consecrated communion keeps since the last consecration a week earlier.  There is no daily mass here except for religious sisters at their convent, and those are not available to the laity.

The lay person leading the service does so from the pews and not the sanctuary, so there is no make believe priest.  Same banal songs as mass though.

I hate these things and try to avoid them by travelling to the next town on my parish "service" Sunday if a mass is available there.

I imagine it is much the same elsewhere. I understand why they are necessary here.  This is an non-religious country and most of the priests are elderly foreign missionaries, mine a 72 year old priest from Ireland who has been here for 40+ years. There just aren't any vocations, and the days of Irish missions are long gone.

W.Unland

Why does this sound sooooo Protestant to me.......you know the Evangelical style Protestantism....?

Because your not well read.  This is actually very Orthodox.  Typica is the old Palestinian monastic rite for Communion when no priest was around.  Typica with Communion and this service are similar.
Logged

My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Maria
Orthodox Christian
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,382


O most Holy Theotokos, save us.


« Reply #15 on: March 19, 2014, 09:07:54 PM »

Unfortunately yes I have experienced a "service".  Here in Japan we have 5 priests for every 7 parishes so once a month there is no priest available to celebrate mass.  When the priest is not available a lay person leads the service which mimics the mass up to the  readings but stops after the gospel.  After the gospel someone will give a personal faith experience speech after which Extraordinary Ministers will distribute pre-consecrated communion keeps since the last consecration a week earlier.  There is no daily mass here except for religious sisters at their convent, and those are not available to the laity.

The lay person leading the service does so from the pews and not the sanctuary, so there is no make believe priest.  Same banal songs as mass though.

I hate these things and try to avoid them by travelling to the next town on my parish "service" Sunday if a mass is available there.

I imagine it is much the same elsewhere. I understand why they are necessary here.  This is an non-religious country and most of the priests are elderly foreign missionaries, mine a 72 year old priest from Ireland who has been here for 40+ years. There just aren't any vocations, and the days of Irish missions are long gone.

W.Unland

Why does this sound sooooo Protestant to me.......you know the Evangelical style Protestantism....?

Because your not well read.  This is actually very Orthodox.  Typica is the old Palestinian monastic rite for Communion when no priest was around.  Typica with Communion and this service are similar.

Did hermits in deserts use the Typica?

If so, did the Monks of St. Benedict have a typica?
Logged

Glory to Jesus Christ!
Glory to Him forever!
Alveus Lacuna
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Serbian
Posts: 6,674



« Reply #16 on: March 19, 2014, 09:15:08 PM »

I cringe sometimes at the direction my church is headed. I come from a protestant background, and it seems that as the years go by I am returning to the same type of practice that I left through no choice of my own,  at least in the public representation of the liturgy.

Many people seem to have similar experiences in other denominations as well, where they say things like: "I didn't leave my church, my church left me." Orthodoxy seems to have avoided this thus far, by God's grace. May it stay so.
Logged
Nephi
Section Moderator
Archon
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Auntie Oak
Posts: 3,006



« Reply #17 on: March 19, 2014, 09:26:28 PM »

That is actually an option.  It is also an option to have a Vesperal/Laudinal Mass, but it is rarely done.

Can a Vesperal Mass also be done without a priest/deacon? As much as I love Catholics and am around them regularly, this sort of thing just makes me cringe.

No.  No priest, no Mass.  One could have Vespers or Lauds with the Rite for communion outside Mass.  And really this shouldn't make you cringe because this is really what Presanctified Liturgy is.

If the "Communion Service" was done with a priest or at least a deacon, like a Presanctified Liturgy, I wouldn't have even started this thread. Extraordinary Eucharistic ministers make me cringe as it is, so this is just icing on the cringe-cake.
Logged

Liberalochian: Ecumenism Lite™
Deacon Lance
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,735


Liturgy at Mt. St. Macrina Pilgrimage


« Reply #18 on: March 19, 2014, 09:55:46 PM »

Unfortunately yes I have experienced a "service".  Here in Japan we have 5 priests for every 7 parishes so once a month there is no priest available to celebrate mass.  When the priest is not available a lay person leads the service which mimics the mass up to the  readings but stops after the gospel.  After the gospel someone will give a personal faith experience speech after which Extraordinary Ministers will distribute pre-consecrated communion keeps since the last consecration a week earlier.  There is no daily mass here except for religious sisters at their convent, and those are not available to the laity.

The lay person leading the service does so from the pews and not the sanctuary, so there is no make believe priest.  Same banal songs as mass though.

I hate these things and try to avoid them by travelling to the next town on my parish "service" Sunday if a mass is available there.

I imagine it is much the same elsewhere. I understand why they are necessary here.  This is an non-religious country and most of the priests are elderly foreign missionaries, mine a 72 year old priest from Ireland who has been here for 40+ years. There just aren't any vocations, and the days of Irish missions are long gone.

W.Unland

Why does this sound sooooo Protestant to me.......you know the Evangelical style Protestantism....?

Because your not well read.  This is actually very Orthodox.  Typica is the old Palestinian monastic rite for Communion when no priest was around.  Typica with Communion and this service are similar.

Did hermits in deserts use the Typica?

If so, did the Monks of St. Benedict have a typica?
St Sabbas' monastery was a blend of cenobitic and eremitcal life, for Great Lent the monks would retire to caves in the desert.  He also did not allow monks to be ordained.  So several factors were at play that led to the development of a Communion service.

St. Benedict, on the other hand wrote a cenobitic rule.  He also did not object to monks being ordained nor did the Roman Church have aliturgical days so there would have been no need.

Logged

My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
JoeS2
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,004


St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)


« Reply #19 on: March 19, 2014, 11:44:50 PM »

That is actually an option.  It is also an option to have a Vesperal/Laudinal Mass, but it is rarely done.

Can a Vesperal Mass also be done without a priest/deacon? As much as I love Catholics and am around them regularly, this sort of thing just makes me cringe.

No.  No priest, no Mass.  One could have Vespers or Lauds with the Rite for communion outside Mass.  And really this shouldn't make you cringe because this is really what Presanctified Liturgy is.

Then why the distribution of Our Lords Body if this is not a Rite of Communion?  Why is the RCC allowing this sort of practice to continue?  Is this a rogue practice ?   As a RC I would never attend such a service.....
Logged
JoeS2
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,004


St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)


« Reply #20 on: March 19, 2014, 11:46:03 PM »

Anyone ever had any experience with this or have any thoughts on it? Seems rather strange that a non-clergy can distribute the Eucharist in a service without any clergy (priest, deacon, etc.) present at all.

I've never witnessed one of these, but I don't understand why they bothered to create a "Sunday Service in the Absence of a Priest" or whatever they call it when they have something called "The Liturgy of the Hours".  It shouldn't have been so difficult to add the Sunday readings into a Lauds or a Vespers and tack on Communion toward the end (if this is an absolute must), after the Lord's Prayer.   

That is actually an option.  It is also an option to have a Vesperal/Laudinal Mass, but it is rarely done.

In Orthodoxy, a "Reader's service" is usually done when a Liturgy is not possible, BUT a big BUT here, Communion is NOT distributed.   The parishioners recognize that this is not a replacement for the Liturgy but only a way of gathering the parish in one place for communal prayer.   A wiser choice than trying to imitate a Mass communion et al.  Just something not quite right about this...

What do you think Typica with Communion is? 

We  have not typical with communion......   Do you?
Logged
Deacon Lance
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,735


Liturgy at Mt. St. Macrina Pilgrimage


« Reply #21 on: March 19, 2014, 11:56:52 PM »

Anyone ever had any experience with this or have any thoughts on it? Seems rather strange that a non-clergy can distribute the Eucharist in a service without any clergy (priest, deacon, etc.) present at all.

I've never witnessed one of these, but I don't understand why they bothered to create a "Sunday Service in the Absence of a Priest" or whatever they call it when they have something called "The Liturgy of the Hours".  It shouldn't have been so difficult to add the Sunday readings into a Lauds or a Vespers and tack on Communion toward the end (if this is an absolute must), after the Lord's Prayer.   

That is actually an option.  It is also an option to have a Vesperal/Laudinal Mass, but it is rarely done.

In Orthodoxy, a "Reader's service" is usually done when a Liturgy is not possible, BUT a big BUT here, Communion is NOT distributed.   The parishioners recognize that this is not a replacement for the Liturgy but only a way of gathering the parish in one place for communal prayer.   A wiser choice than trying to imitate a Mass communion et al.  Just something not quite right about this...

What do you think Typica with Communion is? 

We  have not typical with communion......   Do you?

Yes.  As do the Antiochians and ACROD, I think OCA allows this as well.
Logged

My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
JoeS2
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,004


St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)


« Reply #22 on: March 19, 2014, 11:58:01 PM »

Anyone ever had any experience with this or have any thoughts on it? Seems rather strange that a non-clergy can distribute the Eucharist in a service without any clergy (priest, deacon, etc.) present at all.

I've never witnessed one of these, but I don't understand why they bothered to create a "Sunday Service in the Absence of a Priest" or whatever they call it when they have something called "The Liturgy of the Hours".  It shouldn't have been so difficult to add the Sunday readings into a Lauds or a Vespers and tack on Communion toward the end (if this is an absolute must), after the Lord's Prayer.   

That is actually an option.  It is also an option to have a Vesperal/Laudinal Mass, but it is rarely done.

In Orthodoxy, a "Reader's service" is usually done when a Liturgy is not possible, BUT a big BUT here, Communion is NOT distributed.   The parishioners recognize that this is not a replacement for the Liturgy but only a way of gathering the parish in one place for communal prayer.   A wiser choice than trying to imitate a Mass communion et al.  Just something not quite right about this...

What do you think Typica with Communion is? 

We  have not typical with communion......   Do you?

Yes.  As do the Antiochians and ACROD, I think OCA allows this as well.
Communion is only distributed at Liturgy or the Presanctified Liturgies......
Logged
Deacon Lance
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,735


Liturgy at Mt. St. Macrina Pilgrimage


« Reply #23 on: March 19, 2014, 11:58:08 PM »

That is actually an option.  It is also an option to have a Vesperal/Laudinal Mass, but it is rarely done.

Can a Vesperal Mass also be done without a priest/deacon? As much as I love Catholics and am around them regularly, this sort of thing just makes me cringe.

No.  No priest, no Mass.  One could have Vespers or Lauds with the Rite for communion outside Mass.  And really this shouldn't make you cringe because this is really what Presanctified Liturgy is.

Then why the distribution of Our Lords Body if this is not a Rite of Communion?  Why is the RCC allowing this sort of practice to continue?  Is this a rogue practice ?   As a RC I would never attend such a service.....
It is a Communion Rite.  
Logged

My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Deacon Lance
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,735


Liturgy at Mt. St. Macrina Pilgrimage


« Reply #24 on: March 19, 2014, 11:59:38 PM »

Anyone ever had any experience with this or have any thoughts on it? Seems rather strange that a non-clergy can distribute the Eucharist in a service without any clergy (priest, deacon, etc.) present at all.

I've never witnessed one of these, but I don't understand why they bothered to create a "Sunday Service in the Absence of a Priest" or whatever they call it when they have something called "The Liturgy of the Hours".  It shouldn't have been so difficult to add the Sunday readings into a Lauds or a Vespers and tack on Communion toward the end (if this is an absolute must), after the Lord's Prayer.   

That is actually an option.  It is also an option to have a Vesperal/Laudinal Mass, but it is rarely done.

In Orthodoxy, a "Reader's service" is usually done when a Liturgy is not possible, BUT a big BUT here, Communion is NOT distributed.   The parishioners recognize that this is not a replacement for the Liturgy but only a way of gathering the parish in one place for communal prayer.   A wiser choice than trying to imitate a Mass communion et al.  Just something not quite right about this...

What do you think Typica with Communion is? 

We  have not typical with communion......   Do you?

Yes.  As do the Antiochians and ACROD, I think OCA allows this as well.
Communion is only distributed at Liturgy or the Presanctified Liturgies......
I am pretty sure OCA people here have stated their bishops allow it.
Logged

My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Nephi
Section Moderator
Archon
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Auntie Oak
Posts: 3,006



« Reply #25 on: March 20, 2014, 12:00:33 AM »

Communion is only distributed at Liturgy or the Presanctified Liturgies......

Not quite.

Quote
in some jurisdictions, it can also be a service led by a deacon which includes the distribution of Holy Communion.

[...]

This Typika service is a form of Pre-Sanctified Liturgy held by a deacon and authorized by the local bishop when a priest is unavailable. The deacon distributes communion to the faithful present at the service. It should be noted that while this service is blessed in some jurisdictions, it is not universally accepted, nor is it of ancient origin. However, the idea of deacons bringing communion to those unable to attend the Liturgy is an ancient custom, and so it can be argued that the ancient custom provides the basis for this more recent practice.

However, the important part is that it is still a deacon leading the service and distributing the Communion, not a layperson.
« Last Edit: March 20, 2014, 12:01:16 AM by Nephi » Logged

Liberalochian: Ecumenism Lite™
JoeS2
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,004


St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)


« Reply #26 on: March 20, 2014, 12:03:02 AM »

That is actually an option.  It is also an option to have a Vesperal/Laudinal Mass, but it is rarely done.

Can a Vesperal Mass also be done without a priest/deacon? As much as I love Catholics and am around them regularly, this sort of thing just makes me cringe.

No.  No priest, no Mass.  One could have Vespers or Lauds with the Rite for communion outside Mass.  And really this shouldn't make you cringe because this is really what Presanctified Liturgy is.

Then why the distribution of Our Lords Body if this is not a Rite of Communion?  Why is the RCC allowing this sort of practice to continue?  Is this a rogue practice ?   As a RC I would never attend such a service.....
It is a Communion Rite.  
In Orthodoxy , I would not be too sure of this......
Logged
Deacon Lance
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,735


Liturgy at Mt. St. Macrina Pilgrimage


« Reply #27 on: March 20, 2014, 12:06:47 AM »

Communion is only distributed at Liturgy or the Presanctified Liturgies......

Not quite.

Quote
in some jurisdictions, it can also be a service led by a deacon which includes the distribution of Holy Communion.

[...]

This Typika service is a form of Pre-Sanctified Liturgy held by a deacon and authorized by the local bishop when a priest is unavailable. The deacon distributes communion to the faithful present at the service. It should be noted that while this service is blessed in some jurisdictions, it is not universally accepted, nor is it of ancient origin. However, the idea of deacons bringing communion to those unable to attend the Liturgy is an ancient custom, and so it can be argued that the ancient custom provides the basis for this more recent practice.

However, the important part is that it is still a deacon leading the service and distributing the Communion, not a layperson.

Yes but the service itself began of necessity so non-ordained monks could commune.
Logged

My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Nephi
Section Moderator
Archon
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Auntie Oak
Posts: 3,006



« Reply #28 on: March 20, 2014, 12:14:45 AM »

Yes but the service itself began of necessity so non-ordained monks could commune.

The EO practice of Typika with Communion? It seems that having at least a deacon is an integral part, unless I'm missing something.
Logged

Liberalochian: Ecumenism Lite™
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong." - Carl Kraeff
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12,138


I'm back, Mom...miss Me?


WWW
« Reply #29 on: March 20, 2014, 12:24:58 AM »

Yes but the service itself began of necessity so non-ordained monks could commune.

The EO practice of Typika with Communion? It seems that having at least a deacon is an integral part, unless I'm missing something.

IIRC, Typica originally developed as Fr Lance describes, but eventually Communion dropped out as self-communing dropped out.  That Communion has been reintroduced in certain contexts is fairly recent. 
Logged

"Best of all, Mor Ephrem won't trap you into having his baby." - dzheremi

"Mor Ephrim will not be allowed in(to the getes of heaven) because God doesnt know him." - Cackles

"You are consistently one of the cruelest posters on this forum." - William
Reader KevinAndrew
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian/Western Rite
Posts: 127



« Reply #30 on: March 30, 2014, 06:16:39 PM »

Yes but the service itself began of necessity so non-ordained monks could commune.

The EO practice of Typika with Communion? It seems that having at least a deacon is an integral part, unless I'm missing something.

IIRC, Typica originally developed as Fr Lance describes, but eventually Communion dropped out as self-communing dropped out.  That Communion has been reintroduced in certain contexts is fairly recent. 

In the Eastern Rite of the Antiochian Church typica is always sans Communion. It's a lay service, as you know, when no priest or deacon are available. So when or where has reintroduction of Communion taken place? I don't even see where it's even an option to add in the rubrics. Would this reintroduction be some homemade, fused together service?
Logged
Deacon Lance
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,735


Liturgy at Mt. St. Macrina Pilgrimage


« Reply #31 on: March 30, 2014, 06:48:04 PM »

Yes but the service itself began of necessity so non-ordained monks could commune.

The EO practice of Typika with Communion? It seems that having at least a deacon is an integral part, unless I'm missing something.

IIRC, Typica originally developed as Fr Lance describes, but eventually Communion dropped out as self-communing dropped out.  That Communion has been reintroduced in certain contexts is fairly recent. 

In the Eastern Rite of the Antiochian Church typica is always sans Communion. It's a lay service, as you know, when no priest or deacon are available. So when or where has reintroduction of Communion taken place? I don't even see where it's even an option to add in the rubrics. Would this reintroduction be some homemade, fused together service?
Absolutely incorrect.  From the website of the Antiochian Orthodox Diocese of Wichita:
http://www.dowama.org/sites/docs/SVCTypika_No_Priest.pdf
Logged

My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
OrthoNoob
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 942



« Reply #32 on: March 30, 2014, 06:53:49 PM »

Yes but the service itself began of necessity so non-ordained monks could commune.

The EO practice of Typika with Communion? It seems that having at least a deacon is an integral part, unless I'm missing something.

IIRC, Typica originally developed as Fr Lance describes, but eventually Communion dropped out as self-communing dropped out.  That Communion has been reintroduced in certain contexts is fairly recent. 

In the Eastern Rite of the Antiochian Church typica is always sans Communion. It's a lay service, as you know, when no priest or deacon are available. So when or where has reintroduction of Communion taken place? I don't even see where it's even an option to add in the rubrics. Would this reintroduction be some homemade, fused together service?
Absolutely incorrect.  From the website of the Antiochian Orthodox Diocese of Wichita:
http://www.dowama.org/sites/docs/SVCTypika_No_Priest.pdf

You still cannot distribute Holy Communion without a deacon present, according to that document.
Logged

http://avengingredhand.wordpress.com -- My blog

'These words I, Leo, have set down for love and as a safeguard of the Orthodox Faith'
WPM
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,805



« Reply #33 on: March 30, 2014, 06:59:21 PM »

Ugh.  At that point, why not just put it in an envelope and send it through the mail?  


Sure< ... Why not send a personal letter to the Metropolitan? ... Please do that. Make the case for an appeal.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2014, 06:59:58 PM by WPM » Logged
Deacon Lance
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,735


Liturgy at Mt. St. Macrina Pilgrimage


« Reply #34 on: March 30, 2014, 07:19:53 PM »

Yes but the service itself began of necessity so non-ordained monks could commune.

The EO practice of Typika with Communion? It seems that having at least a deacon is an integral part, unless I'm missing something.

IIRC, Typica originally developed as Fr Lance describes, but eventually Communion dropped out as self-communing dropped out.  That Communion has been reintroduced in certain contexts is fairly recent. 

In the Eastern Rite of the Antiochian Church typica is always sans Communion. It's a lay service, as you know, when no priest or deacon are available. So when or where has reintroduction of Communion taken place? I don't even see where it's even an option to add in the rubrics. Would this reintroduction be some homemade, fused together service?
Absolutely incorrect.  From the website of the Antiochian Orthodox Diocese of Wichita:
http://www.dowama.org/sites/docs/SVCTypika_No_Priest.pdf

You still cannot distribute Holy Communion without a deacon present, according to that document.
Reader Kevin claimed Communion wasn't distributed at all. 
Logged

My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Reader KevinAndrew
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian/Western Rite
Posts: 127



« Reply #35 on: March 30, 2014, 10:09:21 PM »

Yes but the service itself began of necessity so non-ordained monks could commune.

The EO practice of Typika with Communion? It seems that having at least a deacon is an integral part, unless I'm missing something.

IIRC, Typica originally developed as Fr Lance describes, but eventually Communion dropped out as self-communing dropped out.  That Communion has been reintroduced in certain contexts is fairly recent. 

In the Eastern Rite of the Antiochian Church typica is always sans Communion. It's a lay service, as you know, when no priest or deacon are available. So when or where has reintroduction of Communion taken place? I don't even see where it's even an option to add in the rubrics. Would this reintroduction be some homemade, fused together service?
Absolutely incorrect.  From the website of the Antiochian Orthodox Diocese of Wichita:
http://www.dowama.org/sites/docs/SVCTypika_No_Priest.pdf

You still cannot distribute Holy Communion without a deacon present, according to that document.
Reader Kevin claimed Communion wasn't distributed at all. 
With no priest or deacon, no
Logged
Deacon Lance
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,735


Liturgy at Mt. St. Macrina Pilgrimage


« Reply #36 on: March 31, 2014, 06:56:12 PM »

Yes but the service itself began of necessity so non-ordained monks could commune.

The EO practice of Typika with Communion? It seems that having at least a deacon is an integral part, unless I'm missing something.

IIRC, Typica originally developed as Fr Lance describes, but eventually Communion dropped out as self-communing dropped out.  That Communion has been reintroduced in certain contexts is fairly recent. 

In the Eastern Rite of the Antiochian Church typica is always sans Communion. It's a lay service, as you know, when no priest or deacon are available. So when or where has reintroduction of Communion taken place? I don't even see where it's even an option to add in the rubrics. Would this reintroduction be some homemade, fused together service?
Absolutely incorrect.  From the website of the Antiochian Orthodox Diocese of Wichita:
http://www.dowama.org/sites/docs/SVCTypika_No_Priest.pdf

You still cannot distribute Holy Communion without a deacon present, according to that document.
Reader Kevin claimed Communion wasn't distributed at all. 
With no priest or deacon, no
But that is not how you qualified it.  You said always.  You were wrong. 
Logged

My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.167 seconds with 65 queries.