OrthodoxChristianity.net
October 20, 2014, 11:02:13 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: British Royal Family and Orthodoxy?  (Read 32223 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
PeterTheAleut
The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
Section Moderator
Protospatharios
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 32,646


Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!


« Reply #45 on: October 28, 2007, 01:45:29 AM »

What about Scotch Tape, ...
Technically, as pertains to transparent tape, Scotch® is a brand name now owned by 3M, so I don't know that this counts.  3M also owns Scotchgard® and Scotchprint®, so I don't think you can count these, either.
« Last Edit: October 28, 2007, 01:47:58 AM by PeterTheAleut » Logged
TinaG
I am not a pessimist - I'm just grimly realistic!
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 870


If only my family were this normal !


WWW
« Reply #46 on: October 28, 2007, 01:45:41 AM »

What about Scotch Tape, Scotch Eggs, Scotch Broth, Scotch Pie?

And lest we forget Scotch Pine, Hop Scotch and Scotch Collie.
Logged

On the spiritual path somewhere between the Simpsons and St. Theophan the Recluse, but I still can't see the Springfield city limits sign yet.
GabrieltheCelt
Hillbilly Extraordinaire
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 6,988


Chasin' down a Hoodoo...


« Reply #47 on: October 28, 2007, 01:46:57 AM »

^^Don't forget Butterscotch. Wink Though Scotch Pine is actually known as Scots Fir everywhere else but America and 'scotch' in Hopscotch is an old English word meaning scratch.  And the Scotch Collie?  Well, it's an American breed descended from the Great Britain breed known as a Farm Collie.  I doubt it was named by a Scot, but I could be wrong.

Regardless as to how many words and products we can come up with that has the word 'Scotch' in it, "Scots-Irish" is the [i preferred[/i] usage among those of Scottish ancestry today as the word 'Scotch' would be considered a pejorative.   
« Last Edit: October 28, 2007, 02:23:10 AM by Jibrail Almuhajir » Logged

"The Scots-Irish; Brewed in Scotland, bottled in Ireland, uncorked in America."  ~Scots-Irish saying
GiC
Resident Atheist
Site Supporter
Merarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Mathematician
Posts: 9,490



« Reply #48 on: October 28, 2007, 02:24:51 AM »

Well, since this seems to be of such great interest Scotch, Scottish, and Scots are all proper English, though some are prefered over others depending on the context. Here's the OED discussion of the matter:

Quote
Scotch, a. and n., Also Scot’sh.
[Contracted var. of Scottish.
The three forms of the adj., Scotch, Scottish, Scots, are still current, with some difference in use, which, however, is somewhat unsettled. Down to the middle of the 16th c. the only form used in southern English was Scottish; but in the dialect of Scotland (and in that of the north of England in the 14th and 15th c.) the form was Scottis (cf. Inglis = English), subsequently contracted to Scots. So far as our quotations show, the contraction of Scottish into Scotch is not recorded before 1570 (in the compound Scotchman), though the colloquial pronunciation which it represents may well be much older; instances of Scotch cap, Scotch jig occur in 1591­99, but the adj. did not become common in literature until the second half of the 17th c. From that time until the 19th c. Scotch has been the prevailing form in England, though Scottish has always been in use as a more formal synonym. In Scotland, the authors who wrote in dialect (down to Ramsay and Fergusson early in the 18th c.) used Scots, while those who anglicized adopted the form Scottish. But before the end of the 18th c. Scotch had been adopted into the northern vernacular; it is used regularly by Burns, and subsequently by Scott; still later, it appears even in official language in the title of the ‘Scotch Education Office’. Since the mid 19th c. there has been in Scotland a growing tendency to discard this form altogether, Scottish, or less frequently Scots, being substituted. At the beginning of the 20th c., while in England Scotch was the ordinary colloquial word, the literary usage prefered Scottish in applications relating to the nation or the country at large or its institutions or characteristics. Thus it was usual to speak of ‘Scottish literature’, ‘Scottish history’, ‘the Scottish character’, ‘a Scottish lawyer’, ‘the Scottish border’. On the other hand, it would have sounded affected to say ‘a Scottish girl’, ‘a Scottish gardener.’ Although ‘the Scottish dialect’ is now the usual designation, it is seldom that Scottish is used as a n. instead of Scotch. Recent usage favours Scots in ‘Scots law’, and it is now almost universal in historical references to money, as ‘a pound Scots’.In the 20th c. the word Scotch has been falling into disuse in England as well as in Scotland, out of deference to the Scotsman’s supposed dislike of it; except for certain fixed collocations, (such as ‘Scotch mist’, ‘Scotch whisky’) Scottish (less frequently Scots) is now the usual adjective, and to designate the inhabitants of Scotland the pl. n. Scots is preferred (see Gowers/Fowler Mod. Eng. Usage (1965)).]
« Last Edit: October 28, 2007, 02:26:08 AM by greekischristian » Logged

"The liberties of people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." -- Patrick Henry
Νεκτάριος
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,437



« Reply #49 on: October 28, 2007, 03:43:20 AM »

And rest assured, the scots-irish in me really doesn't have much regard for any authority, whether it wears a crown or a suit...it is all the seed of tyranny. Grin

That is the GiC we all know and love.   Cool

Still, unless you can find a way to get rid of the bell curve, there will always be tyranny of the mob.  I don't see an solution to that one. 

Ahem.  Scotch is a drink mady by the Scots.  I won't hold that against you...this time. Cool  Wink

Freudian slip.  It was posted on a Friday evening after I had gotten home. 
Logged
Veniamin
Fire for Effect!
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA Diocese of the South
Posts: 3,372


St. Barbara, patroness of the Field Artillery


« Reply #50 on: October 28, 2007, 02:45:25 PM »

Actually, the correct name for the drink is "Scotch Whiskey" meaning "Scottish Whiskey".

Only if you're drinking a knockoff.  The correct name for the drink is "Scotch Whisky," not "whiskey."
Logged

Artillery adds dignity to what would otherwise be a vulgar brawl. ~Frederick the Great
Veniamin
Fire for Effect!
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA Diocese of the South
Posts: 3,372


St. Barbara, patroness of the Field Artillery


« Reply #51 on: October 28, 2007, 02:49:25 PM »

Still, unless you can find a way to get rid of the bell curve, there will always be tyranny of the mob.  I don't see an solution to that one. 

Simple, disenfranchise the mob. Wink
Logged

Artillery adds dignity to what would otherwise be a vulgar brawl. ~Frederick the Great
observer
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 546

Vivre die Raznitsa!


« Reply #52 on: November 14, 2007, 03:56:51 PM »

A non-Scot is a sassanach.  The Scots drink Scotch Whuskey.  The OED doesn't count, its not Scottish Roll Eyes  I don't know how the Royals mix their scotch or their Orthodoxy with membership of the Scottish Rite Embarrassed
Logged

Thou shalt not prefer one thing to another (Law of Liberalism)
stashko
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: ИСТОЧНИ ПРАВОСЛАВНИ СРБИН
Jurisdiction: Non Ecumenist Free Serbian Orthodox Church
Posts: 4,998


Wonderworking Sitka Icon


« Reply #53 on: November 14, 2007, 08:06:52 PM »

I'm bigger royalty than him, he cant even speak Serbian, nor does he know his serbian history. But yes, you are correct.

Brate ,who is the crown prince of serbia ,,,sta mu je ime ...stashko  Cheesy
Logged

ГОСПОДЕ ГОСПОДЕ ,ПОГЛЕДАЈ СА НЕБА ,ДОЂИ И ПОСЕТИ ТВОЈ ВИНОГРАД ТВОЈА ДЕСНИЦА ПОСАДИЛА АМИН АМИН.
PeterTheAleut
The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
Section Moderator
Protospatharios
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 32,646


Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!


« Reply #54 on: November 15, 2007, 01:30:48 AM »

The Scots drink Scotch Whuskey.
Whuskey?  That sounds like something only a wuss would drink.
Logged
GabrieltheCelt
Hillbilly Extraordinaire
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 6,988


Chasin' down a Hoodoo...


« Reply #55 on: November 15, 2007, 01:37:55 AM »

Whuskey?  That sounds like something only a wuss would drink.
Or someone who's been drinkin' whiskey all night. Cheesy
Logged

"The Scots-Irish; Brewed in Scotland, bottled in Ireland, uncorked in America."  ~Scots-Irish saying
Didymus
Peace and grace.
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: HG Coptic Bishop Anba Daniel of Sydney
Posts: 563


St. Thomas Didymus the Apostle of India


« Reply #56 on: November 15, 2007, 02:09:06 AM »

Well, if the Prince is flirting with Orthodoxy, he will have to give up more than most do.  Legally, in order to wear the crown, he must be an Anglican; if he renounces the state religion, he renounces his birthright.

Forgive me please if somebody has already said this but that is not entirely accurate.

British law forbids the Monarch from being a Roman Catholic but otherwise the Monarch is free to change the state religion as was done so many times in the past especially prior to the time when the Monarch was forbidden to be a Roman Catholic.

As such, the future King is free to change his own faith and the state religion to any faith he pleases so long as it is not Roman Catholic Christianity. The Monarch may be a Jew, a Muslim, a Sikh, a Hindu or even an Orthodox Christian if this should so please.

Are you aware there is a British Orthodox Church?
Logged

...because I was not with you when the Lord came aforetime.
...because I am blind and yet I see.
ozgeorge
I'll take you for who you are if you take me for everything.
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Oecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, the New Rome, the Great Church of Christ.
Posts: 16,382


My plans for retirement.


WWW
« Reply #57 on: November 15, 2007, 05:08:10 AM »

British law forbids the Monarch from being a Roman Catholic but otherwise the Monarch is free to change the state religion
This is not accurate.
The British Law which regulates the Succession of the British Throne is the Act of Settlement 1700. While it is true that under this law the Monarch must not be Roman Catholic or married to one, he or she is also required to be in Communion with the Church of England.
The Act says:
"That whosoever shall hereafter come to the Possession of this Crown shall joyn [sic] in Communion with the Church of England as by Law established"
Source: http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=1565208
« Last Edit: November 15, 2007, 05:08:40 AM by ozgeorge » Logged

If you're living a happy life as a Christian, you're doing something wrong.
Didymus
Peace and grace.
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: HG Coptic Bishop Anba Daniel of Sydney
Posts: 563


St. Thomas Didymus the Apostle of India


« Reply #58 on: November 15, 2007, 08:09:57 AM »

ozgeorge, alright thanks for that.
So in other words as the Monarch is the head of the Church of England the Monarch simply has to enter communion with it and then command it to do whatever he wishes because he is its head.
By the way, the word "joyn" is an older spelling of "join" so it's not actually incorrect. Also, if you look in the 1611 you will find the word "ioynt" which means "joint" (in St. James I think).
Logged

...because I was not with you when the Lord came aforetime.
...because I am blind and yet I see.
ozgeorge
I'll take you for who you are if you take me for everything.
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Oecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, the New Rome, the Great Church of Christ.
Posts: 16,382


My plans for retirement.


WWW
« Reply #59 on: November 15, 2007, 08:16:55 AM »

By the way, the word "joyn" is an older spelling of "join" so it's not actually incorrect.
"[sic]" doesn't mean "incorrect", it's Latin for "thus", in other words "it was written thus".
Logged

If you're living a happy life as a Christian, you're doing something wrong.
Didymus
Peace and grace.
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: HG Coptic Bishop Anba Daniel of Sydney
Posts: 563


St. Thomas Didymus the Apostle of India


« Reply #60 on: November 15, 2007, 08:33:39 AM »

"[sic]" doesn't mean "incorrect", it's Latin for "thus", in other words "it was written thus".

You're right again Cheesy (How about you stop being right all the time mate and let somebody else have a turn Wink?)

Just thought I should clarify that the British didn't make spelling mistakes in their own legal documents that's all Cool Forgive me if I offended you please.
Logged

...because I was not with you when the Lord came aforetime.
...because I am blind and yet I see.
Ebor
Vanyar
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,423



« Reply #61 on: November 15, 2007, 04:43:07 PM »

British law forbids the Monarch from being a Roman Catholic but otherwise the Monarch is free to change the state religion as was done so many times in the past especially prior to the time when the Monarch was forbidden to be a Roman Catholic.

OzGeorge has given the correction re the law, but would you please explain what you mean by the above?  When did any English King or Queen "change the state religion"  "many times"?   Huh

Quote
Are you aware there is a British Orthodox Church?

Yes, but it is afaik a fairly recent organization.  It is also related to the Coptic Churches rather then the EO.

Ebor
« Last Edit: November 15, 2007, 04:44:20 PM by Ebor » Logged

"I wish they would remember that the charge to Peter was "Feed my sheep", not "Try experiments on my rats", or even "Teach my performing dogs new tricks". - C. S. Lewis

The Katana of Reasoned Discussion

For some a world view is more like a neighborhood watch.
Sloga
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Serbian Orthodox Church
Posts: 830



« Reply #62 on: November 16, 2007, 12:18:34 AM »

I got the (false?) impression that there is an English Orthodox Church?

This website provides a lot of info about The Royal Family and Orthodoxy but also Orthodoxy in general on the isles.

http://www.orthodoxengland.org.uk/hp.htm
« Last Edit: November 16, 2007, 12:19:09 AM by Sloga » Logged

Христе Боже, Распети и Свети!

"In the history of the human race there have been three principal falls: that of Adam, that of Judas, and that of the pope." Saint Justin Popovic
Αριστοκλής
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: American Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Diocese
Posts: 10,026


« Reply #63 on: November 16, 2007, 12:31:44 AM »

There is the British Orthodox Church under the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria. I do not think the site above is referring to it.

As to that site, I'll let someone here more versed in western Orthodoxy to comment, if indeed that is what it represents (unclear).
Logged

"Religion is a neurobiological illness and Orthodoxy is its cure." - Fr. John S. Romanides
stashko
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: ИСТОЧНИ ПРАВОСЛАВНИ СРБИН
Jurisdiction: Non Ecumenist Free Serbian Orthodox Church
Posts: 4,998


Wonderworking Sitka Icon


« Reply #64 on: November 16, 2007, 12:46:57 AM »

Huh? stashko
« Last Edit: November 16, 2007, 02:13:34 AM by stashko » Logged

ГОСПОДЕ ГОСПОДЕ ,ПОГЛЕДАЈ СА НЕБА ,ДОЂИ И ПОСЕТИ ТВОЈ ВИНОГРАД ТВОЈА ДЕСНИЦА ПОСАДИЛА АМИН АМИН.
Ian Lazarus
The Main Man!
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: AOA
Posts: 1,545


yIjah, Qey' 'oH!


« Reply #65 on: November 17, 2007, 09:43:28 AM »

But does religion really matter to British Royalty? Or even to the people anymore?  Back in the day, you had to support your king and the nobles that supported him, or be found a traitor.  Or you were a commoner with no say in the matter.  Nowadays, no one in the Royal Palace is holding any political clout, and the noble class is nothing more than a tradition.  Why would it matter when the people don't even attend the C of E  in great numbers any more?  Last I checked, you had to pay to get into Canterbury Cathedral because it can't support itself by the number of tithing parishoners.   
Logged

"For I am With thee, withersoever thou goest"

Joshua 1:9
Ebor
Vanyar
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,423



« Reply #66 on: November 18, 2007, 07:38:05 PM »

But does religion really matter to British Royalty? Or even to the people anymore?  Back in the day, you had to support your king and the nobles that supported him, or be found a traitor.  Or you were a commoner with no say in the matter.  Nowadays, no one in the Royal Palace is holding any political clout, and the noble class is nothing more than a tradition.  Why would it matter when the people don't even attend the C of E  in great numbers any more?  Last I checked, you had to pay to get into Canterbury Cathedral because it can't support itself by the number of tithing parishoners.   

One does not have to pay to attend services at Canterbury Cathedral.  It is people who are sightseeing/tourists who are asked to pay.  It is due to a huge many centuries old cathedral needing a lot of help in the maintenance department.  There is a drive on to try and raise 50 million pounds to repair and refurbish things such as the windows and the roof.

http://www.canterbury-cathedral.org/visit/information.aspx
http://www.canterbury-cathedral.org/fundraising/index.aspx

I would also suggest that religion matters to members of the royal family and nobility on a personal level rather then on a public or political one.

Ebor
Logged

"I wish they would remember that the charge to Peter was "Feed my sheep", not "Try experiments on my rats", or even "Teach my performing dogs new tricks". - C. S. Lewis

The Katana of Reasoned Discussion

For some a world view is more like a neighborhood watch.
Ebor
Vanyar
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,423



« Reply #67 on: November 18, 2007, 07:42:54 PM »

I got the (false?) impression that there is an English Orthodox Church?

This website provides a lot of info about The Royal Family and Orthodoxy but also Orthodoxy in general on the isles.

http://www.orthodoxengland.org.uk/hp.htm

The website above is, the last I knew, from a parish that is part of ROCOR.

The "British Orthodox Church" is Coptic
http://www.britishorthodox.org/

iirc a person who used to post here Peter Farrington is/was with this Church.

Ebor
Logged

"I wish they would remember that the charge to Peter was "Feed my sheep", not "Try experiments on my rats", or even "Teach my performing dogs new tricks". - C. S. Lewis

The Katana of Reasoned Discussion

For some a world view is more like a neighborhood watch.
Irish Hermit
Kibernetski Kaludjer
Warned
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,991


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us


« Reply #68 on: November 18, 2007, 07:54:19 PM »

Nowadays, no one in the Royal Palace is holding any political clout,
I remember that in the 1970s the Queen exercised her sovereign power through her Governor General in Australia and removed Goff Whitlam as Prime Minister of Australia. It gave the Aussies quite a shock to find she could do that!   Grin
« Last Edit: November 18, 2007, 07:55:49 PM by Irish Hermit » Logged
Νεκτάριος
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,437



« Reply #69 on: November 18, 2007, 08:26:41 PM »

Last I checked, you had to pay to get into Canterbury Cathedral because it can't support itself by the number of tithing parishoners.

Many of the well known tourist churches in Russia charge admission.  Every monastery that I visited also charged admission.  Then in the churches that don't charge admission there is a commercial  bonanza going on in the narathax.  When the protestants who were part of my group pointed out the tale of the money changers, there really wasn't anything I could say.   
Logged
Αριστοκλής
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: American Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Diocese
Posts: 10,026


« Reply #70 on: November 18, 2007, 08:31:27 PM »

Not exactly analogous situations.
Logged

"Religion is a neurobiological illness and Orthodoxy is its cure." - Fr. John S. Romanides
Νεκτάριος
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,437



« Reply #71 on: November 18, 2007, 08:44:19 PM »

Indeed, not at all.  It is, after all, being done by graceless heretics in Canterbury, whereas if it is done in Holy Rus' - well then it is a different matter. 
Logged
GabrieltheCelt
Hillbilly Extraordinaire
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 6,988


Chasin' down a Hoodoo...


« Reply #72 on: November 18, 2007, 08:48:14 PM »

Many of the well known tourist churches in Russia charge admission.  Every monastery that I visited also charged admission.  Then in the churches that don't charge admission there is a commercial  bonanza going on in the narathax.  When the protestants who were part of my group pointed out the tale of the money changers, there really wasn't anything I could say.   
Too bad you didn't know about James River Assembly of God- complete with Starbucks and giftshop!
Logged

"The Scots-Irish; Brewed in Scotland, bottled in Ireland, uncorked in America."  ~Scots-Irish saying
Νεκτάριος
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,437



« Reply #73 on: November 18, 2007, 08:53:42 PM »

Too bad you didn't know about James River Assembly of God- complete with Starbucks and giftshop!

Somehow I didn't think retorting, "Your church sucks, too" was the best way to endear them to Orthodoxy.  Besides, I had bigger fish to fry... "No, they aren't worshiping the icons..."
Logged
Αριστοκλής
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: American Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Diocese
Posts: 10,026


« Reply #74 on: November 18, 2007, 08:57:02 PM »

Indeed, not at all.  It is, after all, being done by graceless heretics in Canterbury, whereas if it is done in Holy Rus' - well then it is a different matter. 

Good old Nektarios, spoiling for an argument again.

What has your interjection have to do with this thread's topic?
Logged

"Religion is a neurobiological illness and Orthodoxy is its cure." - Fr. John S. Romanides
Ian Lazarus
The Main Man!
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: AOA
Posts: 1,545


yIjah, Qey' 'oH!


« Reply #75 on: November 18, 2007, 09:31:38 PM »

Quote
One does not have to pay to attend services at Canterbury Cathedral.  It is people who are sightseeing/tourists who are asked to pay.  It is due to a huge many centuries old cathedral needing a lot of help in the maintenance department.  There is a drive on to try and raise 50 million pounds to repair and refurbish things such as the windows and the roof.

I stand corrected.  But if that's the case, why not ask Parliment to come up with the money for it?  It is, after all, a national treasure as well as a religious one.

Quote
I would also suggest that religion matters to members of the royal family and nobility on a personal level rather then on a public or political one.

Perhaps your right.  Never meant to infer that it didn't.  But the question I was asking is do the people really care?  to mean something to British Royalty is one thing, but I think a better phrased question would be "Would it be considered a scandal by the British People if one of their kings/queens was of another religious persuasion than Anglican?"  I remember Charles II, though Head of the Anglican Church was himself a Roman Catholic, and recieved last rites on his Death bed.  He kept the peace, if memory serves correct, between his official and religious duties.

Forgive me if I have offended.
Logged

"For I am With thee, withersoever thou goest"

Joshua 1:9
Ebor
Vanyar
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,423



« Reply #76 on: November 18, 2007, 10:04:50 PM »

I stand corrected.  But if that's the case, why not ask Parliment to come up with the money for it?  It is, after all, a national treasure as well as a religious one.

I don't know what the Cathedral Chapter has done regarding asking the government for money for repairs. But 50 million pounds is a lot of money and not found under every bush.  Wink

Quote
Perhaps your right.  Never meant to infer that it didn't.  But the question I was asking is do the people really care?  to mean something to British Royalty is one thing, but I think a better phrased question would be "Would it be considered a scandal by the British People if one of their kings/queens was of another religious persuasion than Anglican?" 

I think that it would matter to some of the British populace.  It would go against custom and Tradition for one thing.  I can think of other possiblities.

Quote
I remember Charles II, though Head of the Anglican Church was himself a Roman Catholic, and recieved last rites on his Death bed.  He kept the peace, if memory serves correct, between his official and religious duties.

According to both the official British government site on the royal family and the biography of Charles II by Ronald Hutton which I don't have a copy of to hand unfortunately to give you a precise quote, it was on his deathbed that Charles became RC and there is some question as to whether he was conscious or really committed to it.

http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page92.asp

and Charles II: King of England, Scotland, and Ireland by Ronald Hutton. (the same scholar who has written about pagan religions in ancient britain).

He was not RC during his years of rule.  And it was the succession of his brother, James, who had converted to RC that lead to the "Glorious Revolution" of 1688, James' removal from the throne, the acension of William and Mary and after them Queen Anne etc etc.

Quote
Forgive me if I have offended.

I need to work on my writing if I'm giving the impression that I'm offended when I offer a counter idea!  I"m very sorry to give you that idea. I'm not offended at all.  I try very hard to *not* take offense with postings and other peoples' ideas and writing. 

Thinking differently is not the same as being offended.  Smiley Wink

Ebor
Logged

"I wish they would remember that the charge to Peter was "Feed my sheep", not "Try experiments on my rats", or even "Teach my performing dogs new tricks". - C. S. Lewis

The Katana of Reasoned Discussion

For some a world view is more like a neighborhood watch.
Ian Lazarus
The Main Man!
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: AOA
Posts: 1,545


yIjah, Qey' 'oH!


« Reply #77 on: November 18, 2007, 10:11:22 PM »

Quote
I need to work on my writing if I'm giving the impression that I'm offended when I offer a counter idea!  I"m very sorry to give you that idea. I'm not offended at all.  I try very hard to *not* take offense with postings and other peoples' ideas and writing



Not at all.  It's my writing style that I tend to be carefull of.  Pride, even if unintended, is one of my worst sins. Smiley
Logged

"For I am With thee, withersoever thou goest"

Joshua 1:9
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Warned
Hypatos
*****************
Offline Offline

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 37,960



« Reply #78 on: November 25, 2007, 03:52:07 AM »

Too bad you didn't know about James River Assembly of God- complete with Starbucks and giftshop!

Or Willow Creek.  (I'd say what I call it, but it might be against forum rules). Mc+

My ex wife started going there (from my divorce lawyer, it seems that's typical).  I found out because the boys started refering to their mother's church as "the church where we don't pray."

Some time after this, my older son asked if his friend Ben (a follower of Rome) had icons.  When I said yes, that others had icons, not just us, but some don't, like grandma's (my mother, Evangelical Lutheran).  He then brought up that "mama's church doesn't have icons. Or even a cross" and then asked why.  "Because they think it makes people sad," I replied (the founder of WC said that polls showed people didn't like crosses, and someone said "the cross is a downer.").

My son thought for a moment, then shook his head and said, "Tsk! They call that a church.  it's not a church, it's a mall."

Last year, they decided that because Christmas was on a Sunday, they wouldn't have services.  My 7 year old's response?  "That's dumb."

I joked that perhaps this year they'd cancel Easter services, because it falls on a Sunday this year  Tongue.

My sons told me that they did have Easter services, and it was all dark.  "Why?" I asked.  "Because it's not really a church.  It's more a place where we sit and watch people" was the reply.

And I'd like to ask those televagelists (all protestant, that I've seen) who hath appointed them God's IRS and collector of tithes?
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Warned
Hypatos
*****************
Offline Offline

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 37,960



« Reply #79 on: November 25, 2007, 04:10:42 AM »

Actually, the 1710 Act of Settlement does not say that the British Monarch must be Anglican.
I believe it says that they must not be a Roman Catholic or married to one and must defend the Anglican Church. Technically, an Orthodox Christian can be the British Monarch.

Perhaps now we see the sour grapes from which Lub's whine is pressed? Tongue
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Warned
Hypatos
*****************
Offline Offline

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 37,960



« Reply #80 on: November 25, 2007, 04:17:49 AM »

The title of the British Monarch is "Defender of the Faith and Supreme Governor of the Church" but that doesn't mean that they have to be Anglican. In fact, the first to ascend to the British Throne after the Act of Settlement was King George I who was not Anglican but Lutheran, thus starting the Hanoverian Line which ended with Queen Victoria. Our own Orthodox St. Elizabeth the Grand Duchess, was herself a member of the Hanoverian Line and was Lutheran before her conversion to Orthodoxy.

In present day Anglicanism, who CAN'T be Anglican (oh, yeah, those under Rome).

Charles ascends the throne, appoints an WRO for Archbishop of Canteberry and the time for reformin' will start rolling in.
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Warned
Hypatos
*****************
Offline Offline

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 37,960



« Reply #81 on: November 25, 2007, 04:24:09 AM »

I'd rather die on the barricade proclaiming Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité than to live as a subject of a monarch.  You sorely disappoint, GiC (where's that scotch-irish in you?). 

yeah, the Jacobins were sooo much better than the ancien regime.

And of course the Bolsheviks established democracy after getting rid of that tyrannical czar.

And the Islamic Republic ushered in prosperity and happiness when it exiled the shah.....
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Warned
Hypatos
*****************
Offline Offline

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 37,960



« Reply #82 on: November 25, 2007, 04:26:53 AM »

Actually, in Great Britain, "Scotch" is understood to mean "whiskey that's made in Scotland" unless otherwise specified (indeed, whiskey CANNOT be labeled as Scotch unless it was made and bottled in Scotland).  And in Scottish society, polite or otherwise, a person from Scotland is known as a "Scotsman" or simply a "Scot" as well as "Scottish", depending on who is speaking and hearing, as it were.   I have this on direct authority from several Scotsman from Scotland as well as a Scots-Irishman from Ireland.  And as a Scots-Irish American myself, I've studied quite a bit on the subject.  As for a non-person, I have no idea what they're called as I've yet to meet one.  Wink

Scots-Irish?  Then what's up with the Arabic?

Well, you obviously haven't studied it at Scotch College, Melbourne. Wink

Dare I ask, what do they teach there? Tongue

Well, since this seems to be of such great interest Scotch, Scottish, and Scots are all proper English, though some are prefered over others depending on the context. Here's the OED discussion of the matter:


Of course.  Let the English define who or what a Scot is.
« Last Edit: November 25, 2007, 04:39:17 AM by ialmisry » Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
Ebor
Vanyar
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,423



« Reply #83 on: November 26, 2007, 11:56:07 AM »

In present day Anglicanism, who CAN'T be Anglican (oh, yeah, those under Rome).

 Huh

Quote
Charles ascends the throne, appoints an WRO for Archbishop of Canteberry and the time for reformin' will start rolling in.

Erm, that's not how 'tis done.

Ebor
Logged

"I wish they would remember that the charge to Peter was "Feed my sheep", not "Try experiments on my rats", or even "Teach my performing dogs new tricks". - C. S. Lewis

The Katana of Reasoned Discussion

For some a world view is more like a neighborhood watch.
Nyssa The Hobbit
Used to be OrthodoxFairyQueen
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian as of 1/10/09
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox
Posts: 396



WWW
« Reply #84 on: November 27, 2007, 09:08:06 PM »

I've been to Willow Creek.  "Mall" is a good term.  I was impressed at the time, but knew I could never go to a church so big.  I'd get lost among all those people!  Amazing how, among all the things I noticed about that church (and wrote about in e-mails to friends), I didn't notice the lack of prayer or a cross.  I'm sure I'd notice it now.


Or Willow Creek.  (I'd say what I call it, but it might be against forum rules). Mc+

My ex wife started going there (from my divorce lawyer, it seems that's typical).  I found out because the boys started refering to their mother's church as "the church where we don't pray."

Some time after this, my older son asked if his friend Ben (a follower of Rome) had icons.  When I said yes, that others had icons, not just us, but some don't, like grandma's (my mother, Evangelical Lutheran).  He then brought up that "mama's church doesn't have icons. Or even a cross" and then asked why.  "Because they think it makes people sad," I replied (the founder of WC said that polls showed people didn't like crosses, and someone said "the cross is a downer.").

My son thought for a moment, then shook his head and said, "Tsk! They call that a church.  it's not a church, it's a mall."

Last year, they decided that because Christmas was on a Sunday, they wouldn't have services.  My 7 year old's response?  "That's dumb."

I joked that perhaps this year they'd cancel Easter services, because it falls on a Sunday this year  Tongue.

My sons told me that they did have Easter services, and it was all dark.  "Why?" I asked.  "Because it's not really a church.  It's more a place where we sit and watch people" was the reply.

And I'd like to ask those televagelists (all protestant, that I've seen) who hath appointed them God's IRS and collector of tithes?
Logged

Author of "Tojet" (fantasy) and "The Lighthouse" (Gothic), info available at my website URL.
Tags: Prince Charles British monarchy Church of England British royal family 
Pages: « 1 2  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.152 seconds with 67 queries.