January 28, 2015, 08:17:15 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
Author Topic: The Anaphora of Mar Addai and Mari  (Read 2532 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Offline Offline

Posts: 3

« on: January 28, 2007, 01:29:24 PM »

Dear all,

The anaphora of Mar Addai & Mari is valid?


Rafael R. Daher
it's as if..Saint Photios and Saint Mark Ephesus, has come back
OC.net guru
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,325

...even though Romania Falls, another will Rise...

« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2007, 03:48:55 PM »

Its Valid for whatever Church honors THAT Liturgy.

I can't say for the Eastern Chalcedonian Orthodox Though.

Keep Breed Mixing, and this Maine Coon Cat will be the last of it's kind. /\
No profanities in your sig line if you're going to post in the public forum.
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Armenian
Posts: 343

« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2007, 07:58:20 PM »

I rather like it, though I can only read it in translation.
Its antiquity is impressive.

"I don't think I've ever eaten anything Armenian I didn't like.  I even drink my non-Armenian coffee out of a St Nersess Seminary coffee mug because it is better that way." --Mor Ephrem
Deacon Lance
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Jurisdiction: Archeparchy of Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,103

Liturgy at Mt. St. Macrina Pilgrimage

« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2007, 08:07:14 PM »

The Catholic Church accepts it as valid, even without the Institution Narrative.  The Vatican issued a statement on it a few years ago and it sent many into a tizzy especially the SSPX.  I am unsure how often it is taken without the though.  The Chaldean and Malabar Catholic Churches both insert the Institution Narrative.  The Assyrian Church was urged to insert them for the benefit of Chaldeans in attendance, which has always been an option since the Anglicans printed missals for them in the 1800's.

On the otherhand the Assyrians of Urmia that joined the Russian Orthodox Church used the Anaphora of St. John Chrysostom translated into Syriac. Whether this was due to Orthodox feeling that the Anaphora of Mar Addai and Mar Mari was invalid or whether they simply wanted uniformity I do know but I suspect the latter.

Fr. Deacon Lance

My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Getting too old for this
Offline Offline

Faith: Holy Catholic and Apostolic Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Antioch
Posts: 2,968

Does anyone really care what you think?

« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2007, 09:02:23 PM »

The anaphora of Mar Addai & Mari is valid?
What do you mean by valid?

Sr. Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 154

« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2007, 10:28:06 AM »

Dear all,

The anaphora of Mar Addai & Mari is valid?

I am not sure....   I am familiar with "the Liturgy of the Holy Apostles Mari and Addai", which is the oldest Christian liturgy in continuos use.   Dating around AD 200.   It is of course from the Assyrian Church of the East considered Nestorian.   I know it is respected by the Catholics and Chaldean Catholic rite is based upon it.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2007, 10:29:41 AM by Addai » Logged

Tags: Church of the East Assyrian anaphora liturgy of Addai and Mari ancient liturgies 
Pages: 1   Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.053 seconds with 33 queries.