Many Eastern Orthodox Christians have accused that the Masoretic text of the Hebrew Bible is a gross corruption of the original, or even a retranslation from the Septuagint. However, among the Dead Sea Scrolls, there are some Hebrew texts that agree with the Septuagint, while others actually agree with the Masoretic, effectively disproving that the Masoretic is an anti-Christian alteration of the Old Testament. Instead of being a corruption, the Masoretic appears to be an attempt to synthesize various contradicting manuscripts into an acceptable whole. If so, that would make it the "Textus Receptus" of the Hebrew Scriptures. Having said this, what is the position of Oriental Orthodoxy on the Masoretic text?