OrthodoxChristianity.net
July 24, 2014, 07:19:32 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Production of Son and Spirit: simultaneous?  (Read 1167 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
nonchal
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 116


« on: December 23, 2006, 06:53:51 PM »

The traditional EO notion is that the production of the Son and the Spirit is simultaneous. One does not come before the other. I wonder: how does this explain that the Son is called "second" and the Spirit is called "third"? Could not the Spirit also be called "second" in this view?
Logged
Justin Kissel
Formerly Asteriktos
Protospatharios
****************
Offline Offline

Faith: BZZT
Posts: 29,247



« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2006, 07:12:49 PM »

I might be misunderstanding you, but I'll give this a shot. The son is not second and the Holy Spirit is not third, if you are speaking of their timeless existence. Words (order) like this only have meaning in a context which has time as a factor. Both the Son and the Holy Spirit are supposedly "co-eternal" with the Father. The son is begotten by the Father, and the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father, as an actual state of existence, and not as a set of relational actions which was one time not present, and then afterwards came into existence.
Logged
nonchal
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 116


« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2006, 07:25:49 PM »

In the Latin view the Son comes into existence THEN the Spirit comes into existence. Thus the order is obvious: first the Father, second the Son, third the Spirit. But I have read that the traditional EO notion does not admit that the Father produces the Son first and THEN produces the Spirit second. Its simultaneous. How does this account for the fact that the Son is called second and the Spirit is called third?


Logged
Justin Kissel
Formerly Asteriktos
Protospatharios
****************
Offline Offline

Faith: BZZT
Posts: 29,247



« Reply #3 on: December 23, 2006, 07:41:00 PM »

I hope you'll excuse my unfamiliarity with some of this, but where exactly is the son called second and the spirit called third?
Logged
Salpy
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Armenian Church
Posts: 12,356


Pray for the Christians of Iraq and Syria.


« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2006, 07:41:33 PM »

Are you saying that in the Latin tradition they believe that there was a time when the Son and the Holy Spirit were not in existence?  And that the Son came into existence before the Holy Spirit?  I don't think that is accurate.  I may be misunderstanding you.  I hope I am.

Also, where is the Son called "second" and the Holy Spirit called "third?"  Are you quoting from some document?
Logged

nonchal
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 116


« Reply #5 on: December 23, 2006, 08:00:28 PM »

Yikes. Thats not what I meant. Of course there was never a time when the Son and Spirit were not in existence. I meant that the Father is anterior to both, since he is their Cause, while the Son and Spirit are posterior to the Father. (Perhaps these words work better than "before" and "after" though the Church Fathers use either.) Now in the Latin tradition, the Son is anterior to the Spirit, as the Father is anterior to the Son. So the Father exists, then the Son exists, THEN the Spirit exists. But in the EO tradition the production of the Son and Spirit is simultaneous.

Eastern Orthodox:           
    O             
   /  \
 o     o     

I think Photius drew a silimar diagram.

Now the Church Fathers are unanimous that the Son is second from the Father and the Spirit is third from the Father. But how is this possible in the EO notion?
Logged
serb1389
Lord, remember me when you come into your Kingdom!
Global Moderator
Merarches
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Metropolis of San Francisco
Posts: 8,198


Michał Kalina's biggest fan

FrNPantic
WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2007, 01:12:41 PM »

I havn't read a whole deal on this, and I can't quote anyone, but I think the numbering system is arbitrary.  More used to give us an idea of what is going on, rather than to say that the Son is Second to the Father, etc.

I think the numbering was put there to better describe who does what.  The Son was begotten of the father, therefore Second, and the Spirit proceeds from the Father, "used" by the Son, therefore third. 

I have no idea if I answered any questions.  My statements were by no means official.  Just some random thoughts... Wink Grin
Logged

I got nothing.
I forgot the maps
March 27th and May 30th 2010 were my Ordination dates, please forgive everything before that
nonchal
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 116


« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2007, 02:05:00 PM »

I found the answer last night when reading an article from Romanides. He said that the ordering is due not to the eternal processions but to (1) the eternal manifestations and (2) the temporal relations.
Logged
GiC
Resident Atheist
Site Supporter
Merarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Mathematician
Posts: 9,490



« Reply #8 on: January 04, 2007, 02:07:34 PM »

While I wouldn't take the statements about orders of greatness amongst One, Word, and Spirit literally, as for the logical ordering of the Trinity I would strongly recommend the Second Tractate of Plotinus' Fifth Ennead, it's only a couple pages long and fairly useful, the First Tractate of the same Ennead is worth reading as well if you find the Second intersting.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/plotenn/index.htm
Logged

"The liberties of people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." -- Patrick Henry
Tags: Trinity 
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.051 seconds with 35 queries.