Author Topic: Western-rite Orthodoxy  (Read 54735 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Veniamin

  • Fire for Effect!
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,372
  • St. Barbara, patroness of the Field Artillery
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #45 on: December 18, 2006, 12:57:33 PM »
But we already have a liturgy, and a very nice one at that. Furthermore, these liturgies are not the customs of culture that has converted to Orthodxy, they are customs of a culture that is foreign to Orthodoxy. And we have no need of the imposition of foreign cultures on our Church.

I'm open to being proven wrong, but I find it highly unlikely that previous customs that have been baptized into the Church were adopted after the culture had converted in its entirely.  It's far more probable that they were baptized as part of the process of converting the culture, not after the task was finished.
Artillery adds dignity to what would otherwise be a vulgar brawl. ~Frederick the Great

Offline Landon77

  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 308
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #46 on: December 18, 2006, 12:58:48 PM »
"Quite true, but perhaps if we can get them on a theologically-correct path, they'll find their way home to the Divine Liturgy."
I think I'm going to throw up.
The more Orthodox I become, the more I love Her western liturgies.

"And we have no need of the imposition of foreign cultures on our Church."
Your liturgy is nice, I've been going to it since I moved, but I still like the WR liturgies more.  Orthodoxy has been influenced by her surrounding culture since the very begining.  If not, Russia and Greece would look a lot alike.  And come on, no one wants to be like the Greeks but the Greeks.
"How stands your mighty god? My God is stronger than he."  -St. Boniface

Offline GiC

  • Resident Atheist
  • Site Supporter
  • Merarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,490
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #47 on: December 18, 2006, 01:04:39 PM »
"And we have no need of the imposition of foreign cultures on our Church."
Your liturgy is nice, I've been going to it since I moved, but I still like the WR liturgies more.  Orthodoxy has been influenced by her surrounding culture since the very begining.  If not, Russia and Greece would look a lot alike.  And come on, no one wants to be like the Greeks but the Greeks.

Ah, but look at the Russian liturgy, it is essentially the same as the Greek liturgy, they just have strange looking clothes and sing funny. That is fundamentally different than adopting a foriegn religious rite in its entirety and making a few minor changes to make the theology at least palatable.
"The liberties of people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." -- Patrick Henry

Offline Veniamin

  • Fire for Effect!
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,372
  • St. Barbara, patroness of the Field Artillery
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #48 on: December 18, 2006, 01:07:29 PM »
That is fundamentally different than adopting a foriegn religious rite in its entirety and making a few minor changes to make the theology at least palatable.

As opposed to, oh, I don't know, adopting a pagan religious rite in its entirety and making some major changes to make the theology palatable?
Artillery adds dignity to what would otherwise be a vulgar brawl. ~Frederick the Great

Offline pensateomnia

  • Bibliophylax
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,360
  • metron ariston
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #49 on: December 18, 2006, 01:08:22 PM »
And come on, no one wants to be like the Greeks but the Greeks.

What about Lord Byron?
But for I am a man not textueel I wol noght telle of textes neuer a deel. (Chaucer, The Manciple's Tale, 1.131)

Offline GiC

  • Resident Atheist
  • Site Supporter
  • Merarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,490
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #50 on: December 18, 2006, 01:11:20 PM »
As opposed to, oh, I don't know, adopting a pagan religious rite in its entirety and making some major changes to make the theology palatable?

Ah, but these were pagan religious rites indigenous to a culture (Greek Culture) that converted nearly in its entirety. Thus it was a natural and organic growth within the Church. Now the same could be said for the Anglican services IF the whole of England converted to Orthodoxy and Canterbury entered into communion with Constantinople. But until such time a better analogy would be if we were to adopt ancestor worship because two or three chinese converted to Orthodoxy.
"The liberties of people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." -- Patrick Henry

Offline Elisha

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 4,648
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #51 on: December 18, 2006, 01:18:13 PM »
If, however, they want services in line with the Traditions of the Empire,...

What is this 'Empire' you speak of?  I don't think any Empires have existed on the planet earth for a few hundred years at least.

Offline Veniamin

  • Fire for Effect!
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,372
  • St. Barbara, patroness of the Field Artillery
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #52 on: December 18, 2006, 01:22:17 PM »
What is this 'Empire' you speak of?  I don't think any Empires have existed on the planet earth for a few hundred years at least.

*cough*British Empire*cough*
Artillery adds dignity to what would otherwise be a vulgar brawl. ~Frederick the Great

Offline pensateomnia

  • Bibliophylax
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,360
  • metron ariston
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #53 on: December 18, 2006, 01:30:07 PM »
What is this 'Empire' you speak of?  I don't think any Empires have existed on the planet earth for a few hundred years at least.

As long as we're coughing, why not evict some germs over the Russian, Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian, Japanese and German Empires?

Of course, there were others. But that covers about 50 percent of the Earth's land mass. Not too shaby.
But for I am a man not textueel I wol noght telle of textes neuer a deel. (Chaucer, The Manciple's Tale, 1.131)

Offline GiC

  • Resident Atheist
  • Site Supporter
  • Merarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,490
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #54 on: December 18, 2006, 01:35:02 PM »
What about Lord Byron?

'ΑΝ ΕΙΜΑΙ ΠΟΙΗΤΗΣ ΤΟ ΟΦΕΙΛΩ ΕΙΣ ΤΟΝ ΑΕΠΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΟΣ.' -- ΒΥΡΩΝ
« Last Edit: December 18, 2006, 01:36:14 PM by greekischristian »
"The liberties of people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." -- Patrick Henry

Offline Elisha

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 4,648
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #55 on: December 18, 2006, 01:47:29 PM »
As long as we're coughing, why not evict some germs over the Russian, Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian, Japanese and German Empires?

Of course, there were others. But that covers about 50 percent of the Earth's land mass. Not too shaby.

Were some of these even 'empires'?  Some of these that only lasted a few years or even decades could hardly be termed an 'empire'.

Offline Anastasios

  • Webdespota
  • Administrator
  • Merarches
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,497
  • Metropolitan Chrysostomos of Florina
    • AnastasiosHudson.com
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Greek Old Calendarist
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #56 on: December 18, 2006, 02:03:55 PM »
My basic POV: make use of Western Rite if parishes of Western Christians want to come over en masse and pastorally need it, or if there is a specific missionary reason in a specific circumstance to use it;

use the standard Orthodox liturgy for all other cases and by default.
Please Buy My Book!

Past posts reflect stages of my life before my baptism and may not be accurate expositions of Orthodox teaching. Also, I served as an Orthodox priest from 2008-2013, before resigning.

Offline Νεκτάριος

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,437
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #57 on: December 18, 2006, 02:22:53 PM »
Quote
My basic POV: make use of Western Rite if parishes of Western Christians want to come over en masse and pastorally need it, or if there is a specific missionary reason in a specific circumstance to use it;

As much as I love the Western liturgical tradition, I think its days of being an effective missionary tool, other than in the limited circumstances Anastasios mentioned, are waning.  My generation didn't grow up with the Tridentine Mass, so other than a handful of REALLY High Church Anglicans and Latin Mass Catholic - the Orthodox Western rite is just as foreign as the Byzantine rite. 

Offline AMM

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,076
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #58 on: December 18, 2006, 02:26:14 PM »
I have no issue with the WR, but the idea that it would be some kind of missionary tool to me is absurd.  It's the province of a certain crowd of liturgical enthusiasts (and I don't have a problem with that either).

Offline Veniamin

  • Fire for Effect!
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,372
  • St. Barbara, patroness of the Field Artillery
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #59 on: December 18, 2006, 02:37:43 PM »
I have no issue with the WR, but the idea that it would be some kind of missionary tool to me is absurd.  It's the province of a certain crowd of liturgical enthusiasts (and I don't have a problem with that either).

It's not that absurd, given that its a natural for Romans and high-church Protestants who are attracted to Orthodoxy but turned off by the "eastern-ness" of it.  If I had been presented with the option to attend a WR parish when converting from Anglicanism, it would have been a no-brainer.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2006, 02:37:59 PM by Veniamin »
Artillery adds dignity to what would otherwise be a vulgar brawl. ~Frederick the Great

Offline AMM

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,076
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #60 on: December 18, 2006, 02:51:59 PM »
It's not that absurd, given that its a natural for Romans and high-church Protestants who are attracted to Orthodoxy but turned off by the "eastern-ness" of it.  If I had been presented with the option to attend a WR parish when converting from Anglicanism, it would have been a no-brainer.

I have two theories about this.

- The overwhelming majority of those who convert are attracted to the Easterness of it, and thus the WR is never going to be an effective missionary tool.

- People who are attracted to the WR it seems to me would probably be happy remaining Anglicans or Catholics if their own bishops had not gone wacko.  It is a different type of attraction than for those who go Byzantine.

Anyhow, believe me, I'm not putting down the WR and I wish them all possible success.  There's just no way it ever could have been or ever will be a missionary tool.  It's a liturgical interest group, and something that will only hold an attraction for a small group of people.


Offline Anastasios

  • Webdespota
  • Administrator
  • Merarches
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,497
  • Metropolitan Chrysostomos of Florina
    • AnastasiosHudson.com
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Greek Old Calendarist
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #61 on: December 18, 2006, 03:21:02 PM »
Quote

- The overwhelming majority of those who convert are attracted to the Easterness of it, and thus the WR is never going to be an effective missionary tool.

I was certainly attracted to the easterness of it but is that a valid reason to convert in the same vein?

Quote
- People who are attracted to the WR it seems to me would probably be happy remaining Anglicans or Catholics if their own bishops had not gone wacko.  It is a different type of attraction than for those who go Byzantine.

Perhaps.  I certainly know you are right about some of these people. But I think you are overstating your case and generalizing.  I do know some sincere Western Christians who DO believe their bishops were heretics and thus became Orthodox, but loved their liturgy and could not give it up. Why make more burdens for them?

Quote
Anyhow, believe me, I'm not putting down the WR and I wish them all possible success.  There's just no way it ever could have been or ever will be a missionary tool.  It's a liturgical interest group, and something that will only hold an attraction for a small group of people.

Yes, it may be true that it is of small interest, but for those who are of that mind, it is an effective missionary tool.  Before the Antiochians picked up the EOC, the WR was envisioned as their missionary arm and they were able to get some solid congregations through it.

Anastasios
« Last Edit: December 18, 2006, 03:45:34 PM by Anastasios »
Please Buy My Book!

Past posts reflect stages of my life before my baptism and may not be accurate expositions of Orthodox teaching. Also, I served as an Orthodox priest from 2008-2013, before resigning.

Offline Landon77

  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 308
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #62 on: December 18, 2006, 03:37:43 PM »
FWIW, this year has seen two congregations come home via the WR.  One Anglican bishop in VA, and an Episcopal priest in Houston.  They are small groups, but Jesus started with 12.  And a Lutheran minister in the midwest has came home- he is interrested in the WR, but only time will tell what happens.

There is one argument that has been used over and over on this site that I don't understand.  Why does conversion in masse make a difference in the liturgy that can be used? 
And what is the difference between people who convert because they think the eastern DL is cool and the people who convert because they think the western DL is cool?  I think many come for the wrong reasons and stay for the right ones.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2006, 03:38:15 PM by Landon77 »
"How stands your mighty god? My God is stronger than he."  -St. Boniface

Offline alexp4uni

  • Site Supporter
  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 329
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #63 on: December 18, 2006, 03:37:50 PM »
Well the Armenian liturgy seems to be an appropriate East-West connection if Western Christians prefer not the Byzantine-rite then why not the Armenian-rite?

Offline Anastasios

  • Webdespota
  • Administrator
  • Merarches
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,497
  • Metropolitan Chrysostomos of Florina
    • AnastasiosHudson.com
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Greek Old Calendarist
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #64 on: December 18, 2006, 03:49:44 PM »
There is one argument that has been used over and over on this site that I don't understand.  Why does conversion in masse make a difference in the liturgy that can be used? 

Because there is something to be said for liturgical unity in a diocese, and our patriarchates all use the Divine Liturgy of St John Chrysostom as the received liturgy.  It is artificial for us to try to start and support WR missions--it can easily end up looking vagante, and in fact often did when people broke off.  However, if real, organic communities of Western Christians come over, they can bring a real environment to the mix that will make the liturgy work in context.

Quote
And what is the difference between people who convert because they think the eastern DL is cool and the people who convert because they think the western DL is cool?  I think many come for the wrong reasons and stay for the right ones.

I think the perception is that some convert to the WR and never abandon their Western heretical ideas. From personal experience, I know this to often be true.  Some are chrismated as a pro forma act and continue to be Anglican or Catholic in their beliefs.  However, I do not in any way intend or mean to begrudge the many other WR Orthodox who ARE Orthodox completely.

As for people who convert because the DL is cool, like I said, I don't exactly think that is the best reason to convert LOL. After all, sometimes we get Eastern Catholics coming over because we are "less latinized."  That to me is just as bad as Anglicans becoming WR and keeping Anglican beliefs.

Anastasios
« Last Edit: December 18, 2006, 03:50:26 PM by Anastasios »
Please Buy My Book!

Past posts reflect stages of my life before my baptism and may not be accurate expositions of Orthodox teaching. Also, I served as an Orthodox priest from 2008-2013, before resigning.

Offline Anastasios

  • Webdespota
  • Administrator
  • Merarches
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,497
  • Metropolitan Chrysostomos of Florina
    • AnastasiosHudson.com
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Greek Old Calendarist
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #65 on: December 18, 2006, 03:52:19 PM »
Well the Armenian liturgy seems to be an appropriate East-West connection if Western Christians prefer not the Byzantine-rite then why not the Armenian-rite?

That would be even worse. Copying Armenian customs without having any connection to Armenians would be off the wall. :)
Please Buy My Book!

Past posts reflect stages of my life before my baptism and may not be accurate expositions of Orthodox teaching. Also, I served as an Orthodox priest from 2008-2013, before resigning.

Offline AMM

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,076
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #66 on: December 18, 2006, 03:52:42 PM »
I was certainly attracted to the easterness of it but is that a valid reason to convert in the same vein?

What do you mean?  I'm not exactly sure what you're saying there.

Quote
But I think you are overstating your case and generalizing.  I do know some sincere Western Christians who DO believe their bishops were heretics and thus became Orthodox, but loved their liturgy and could not give it up. Why make more burdens for them?

I am generalizing, but I would still be willing to bet that if the Anglican/Episcopal Church hadn't gone off the rails, most of the WR people would never consider conversion.  The bishops have though, so that's just a moot point anyway.

Personally, I don't advocate putting barriers in their way.  I have no issue with the WR as I've said.  I would attend one of their services if I was ever near where one was held.


Quote
Yes, it may be true that it is of small interest, but for those who are of that mind, it is an effective missionary tool.  Before the Antiochians picked up the EOC, the WR was envisioned as their missionary arm and they were able to get some solid congregations through it.

I just don't think there will be that many that will follow.  It's just my feeling.

I think the main reason they will never really be an effective missionary tool, aside from the reasons I stated, is I doubt they will ever have their own hierarchy.  I believe they will be under the care, guidance and whims of Byzantine bishops.  One need only look at the Eastern Catholics to see what that can lead to.

Offline Anastasios

  • Webdespota
  • Administrator
  • Merarches
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,497
  • Metropolitan Chrysostomos of Florina
    • AnastasiosHudson.com
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Greek Old Calendarist
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #67 on: December 18, 2006, 03:55:41 PM »
Another consideration is that for many of us who reject the modern liturgical theology floating around, liturgies did not develop primarily out of happenstance, but rather by being guided by the Lord himself, so the Byzantine Rite winning out over other liturgies being used in the Chalcedonian Church was part of some unknown providence.  Therefore, reintroducing liturgies that are not used organically is beyond our authority, but if a community comes to Orthodox that uses said liturgy organically, that is a valid reason.  To create a new community not used to that organic liturgy would be going against the historical development of the liturgy by the hand of God, while of course I would not want to be dogmatic and say it should never happen because there may be like I said reasons to do it for the good of the faithful.
Please Buy My Book!

Past posts reflect stages of my life before my baptism and may not be accurate expositions of Orthodox teaching. Also, I served as an Orthodox priest from 2008-2013, before resigning.

Offline Νεκτάριος

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,437
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #68 on: December 18, 2006, 04:23:18 PM »
Quote
It's not that absurd, given that its a natural for Romans and high-church Protestants who are attracted to Orthodoxy but turned off by the "eastern-ness" of it.

It depends on what is being defined as Eastern-ness.  A friendly Byzantine parish that uses all English is probably less exotic to the average American of the younger generation than a Tridentine mass. 

Offline James2

  • Mr.
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 753
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #69 on: December 18, 2006, 04:49:36 PM »
James,

Good to see someone from a Western rite parish posting here! 

This is puzzling to me.  Since many Orthodox view the supplices te rogamus as an equivalent to the epiclesis, wouldn't the epiclesis be viewed as being superfluous in this instance?

BTW, does your parish have a website with pics?  I'd like to see them.  If you don't want to share with everyone here, perhaps you could PM me? 

JB

JB,

Not being a liturgical expert, I can't really comment on the possible superfluity of the epiclesis from a liturgical standpoint.  I would say that from an historical perspective, however, since the pre-schism Roman canon was the same as the Tridentine canon adapted for use in the Rite of St. Gregory, the insertion of the epiclesis was not strictly necessary to "make it Orthodox".  Then there is also the ceremonial incongruity of the elevations and adoration taking place within the Institution narrative but before the epiclesis, which I think is pretty common in Western rite Orthodox parishes.

There is at least one other change that was made in the canon for the Rite of St. Gregory - "merits" was dropped from the translation of the last line of the Communicantes so that it reads, "through whose prayers grant that in all things we may be guarded by the help of thy protection."  A more accurate translation of the Latin original is, "for the sake of whose merits and prayers do thou grant that in all things we may be defended by the help of thy protection."  Even the ICEL translation of the Novus Ordo Roman Canon retains "merits".  I think "merits" was also in the pre-schism canon.

Here is the URL for our parish web site.  It has a link to some pictures.

   http://www.stgregoryoc.org/

James

Offline BrotherAidan

  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,568
  • OC.net
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #70 on: December 19, 2006, 12:17:59 AM »
I have a question.
How long is the WR liturgy?
The RC mass is so short (almost less than 60 minutes) and most protestant services are an hour or less.

The one thing I've found to be a virtue of the ER is its length. Some weeks it takes me 45 minutes to settle my busy mind and shut it up; at least there is another 40 - 45 minutes left to worship!

I think anything less than 75 -90 minutes now would seem too short!
« Last Edit: December 19, 2006, 12:20:18 AM by BrotherAidan »

Offline Starlight

  • Site Supporter
  • OC.net guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,537
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #71 on: December 19, 2006, 12:42:31 AM »
Possibly, it depends from a parish. At St. Gregory the Great in Washington, DC, the length exceeded an hour. As far as I can recall, probably 70 - 85 minutes. May be 90.

Offline Νεκτάριος

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,437
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #72 on: December 19, 2006, 12:50:01 AM »
Quote
I think anything less than 75 -90 minutes now would seem too short!

A Tridentine High Mass with a sermon and a fair number of communicants is easily 75-90 minutes. 

Offline Landon77

  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 308
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #73 on: December 19, 2006, 12:58:18 AM »
At St. Benedict's in TX, I belive it lasted about 90 min.  That is the high Mass, with the optional parts left out.  You can make it pretty long.
"How stands your mighty god? My God is stronger than he."  -St. Boniface

Offline Fr. David

  • The Poster Formerly Known as "Pedro"
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,833
    • Iglesia Ortodoxa de los Santos Apóstoles
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #74 on: December 19, 2006, 02:14:59 AM »
However, if real, organic communities of Western Christians come over, they can bring a real environment to the mix that will make the liturgy work in context.

I've seen this happen, and, to bring back the specific example from a few pages ago, St. Peter's here in Ft. Worth is a good example of this.  I've talked with folks who've attended other WR parishes and have said that those parishes are Orthodox in name only.  I'm convinced that Fr. Anthony (of St. Peter's) is deliberate in his efforts to emphasize that they are not Episcopalian; they are not Catholic; they are Orthodox--and he's not talking to any Greek bishop who's naysaying out there; he's laying down the gauntlet to his own flock, making it clear what and who they are.  It's sad that not all WR parishes do this.

I have to say, when I first became Orthodox, I did so in spite of the Byzantine tones, liturgics, etc.  I did so because the true faith was within this communion, and that's it.  I knew I had to take the wrapping with the package, in other words.  When my wife and I moved to Ft. Worth, I (due to my stopovers in western liturgical churches on my way to Orthodoxy) was ready to join St. Peter's.  My wife--who had had no such stopovers--asked if we could also visit some ER churches.  We wound up at the OCA parish we've called home for four and a half years--she got to stay consistent in rite, and I was able to settle in easily to the much-more-palatable-to-western-ears Russian tones--and, oddly enough...I prefer ER now.  I'll say in a heartbeat that I still love the WR presence in the Church--may God grant them growth and many, many years!--and I can slip right into worship at St. Peter's without even blinking, but the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom is "my" liturgy now.

Perhaps, should God grant, a western rite vicar will eventually be a bishop of sorts over the AWRV--this would, I would think, lead to much more uniformity and unity of identity and purpose within the vicariate--but until then, our brothers and sisters who share the same faith, the same creed and the same chalice as we ER-ers have to blaze a trail that may not always be convenient or pleasing to us.  They need, I think, our patience and compassion during this time of trial; they do not need our suspicion or unfounded nitpicking.
Priest in the Orthodox Church in America - ordained on March 18, 2012

Oh Taste and See (my defunct blog)

From Protestant to Orthodox (my conversion story)

Offline Ebor

  • Vanyar
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,492
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #75 on: December 19, 2006, 05:42:51 PM »
My question is what is wrong with Eastern-rite Orthodoxy?

It is not a question of something being "wrong" with the EO liturgy but that such a service does not necessarily work with every human being and why should it.  God made every person unique; we are not cookie cutter images.   I am one such person.  I have been to many EO services and I cannot worship there the way I can in an Anglican one. 

Quote
But the idea of compromising Orthodox Tradition to make it more American compatable should not be considered. 

What is "compromising" and what is adapting or adjusting or to use someone else's words "baptizing" the culture?  What of 't' vs 'T' tradition?

Ebor
"I wish they would remember that the charge to Peter was "Feed my sheep", not "Try experiments on my rats", or even "Teach my performing dogs new tricks". - C. S. Lewis

The Katana of Reasoned Discussion

For some a world view is more like a neighborhood watch.

Offline Ebor

  • Vanyar
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,492
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #76 on: December 19, 2006, 05:46:33 PM »
Have you ever participated in one of these liturgies, Ebor or anyone else?  If you did, what was your impression?

Yes, I have been to a WR service or two.  Such parishes are thin on the ground as you probably know.  There were familiar hymns and prayers and structures.  There were a few bits that were different, but that did not faze me as the Book of Common Prayer has 4 different Eucharistic prayers and in the parishes I've been in they often change with the liturgical seasons (along with the vestment colours  ;) )

Ebor
"I wish they would remember that the charge to Peter was "Feed my sheep", not "Try experiments on my rats", or even "Teach my performing dogs new tricks". - C. S. Lewis

The Katana of Reasoned Discussion

For some a world view is more like a neighborhood watch.

Offline Ebor

  • Vanyar
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,492
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #77 on: December 19, 2006, 05:48:57 PM »
I have two theories about this.

- The overwhelming majority of those who convert are attracted to the Easterness of it, and thus the WR is never going to be an effective missionary tool.

- People who are attracted to the WR it seems to me would probably be happy remaining Anglicans or Catholics if their own bishops had not gone wacko.  It is a different type of attraction than for those who go Byzantine.

Well, in that is another aspect... are some people going *TO* EO or going *AWAY* from where they were.  There is a difference. 

Ebor
"I wish they would remember that the charge to Peter was "Feed my sheep", not "Try experiments on my rats", or even "Teach my performing dogs new tricks". - C. S. Lewis

The Katana of Reasoned Discussion

For some a world view is more like a neighborhood watch.

Offline Ebor

  • Vanyar
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,492
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #78 on: December 19, 2006, 05:56:56 PM »
Quite true, but perhaps if we can get them on a theologically-correct path, they'll find their way home to the Divine Liturgy.

Speaking at least for myself, the EO liturgy is not "home" for me and never will be.  It cannot be "home" because I have never lived there nor was it part of my ancesors.  If at some point in the future the only place was EO it would be a place but not Home...

It would be an exile.

"By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept,..."  Psalm 137

Ebor 


My apologies. I'm feeling a bit grim at the moment.  I'll take a break before reading the threads on the most recent developements in my Church and the parishes in Virginia.


« Last Edit: December 19, 2006, 06:01:37 PM by Ebor »
"I wish they would remember that the charge to Peter was "Feed my sheep", not "Try experiments on my rats", or even "Teach my performing dogs new tricks". - C. S. Lewis

The Katana of Reasoned Discussion

For some a world view is more like a neighborhood watch.

Offline lubeltri

  • Latin Catholic layman
  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,795
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #79 on: December 19, 2006, 09:10:34 PM »
Speaking at least for myself, the EO liturgy is not "home" for me and never will be.  It cannot be "home" because I have never lived there nor was it part of my ancesors.  If at some point in the future the only place was EO it would be a place but not Home...

It would be an exile.

"By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept,..."  Psalm 137

Ebor 


My apologies. I'm feeling a bit grim at the moment.  I'll take a break before reading the threads on the most recent developements in my Church and the parishes in Virginia.




You have my sympathies. One good thing---at the very least, they will remain in the Anglican Communion.

On the matter of this thread, I am with you. I grew up loving the Byzantines and I very much appreciate and respect Eastern Christianity, but I myself am thoroughly Western liturgically, culturally and theologically. I couldn't imagine being otherwise.

My confirmation name is Baeda---the Bede of Northumbria fame.
« Last Edit: December 19, 2006, 09:12:03 PM by lubeltri »

Offline BrotherAidan

  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,568
  • OC.net
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #80 on: December 20, 2006, 12:10:06 AM »
(Referring back to the last post on page 5). In the early stages of my journey, I too was attracted to Russian Orthodoxy because it resonated with my western ears (not to mention a loving priest). That is where I ended up. But there is an Antiochian parish and priest who are dear to my heart and a Greek parish that I admire but is just too big to have tried to integrate into at the time.

The liturgy of St. John Chrysostom is likewise "my" liturgy now.


Regarding the page 6 sentiments of this thread, I feel schizo; there is a very intuitive part of me that is so at home, in love with and finally at peace in the Eastern ethos, dogma and liturgy. And there is a rationalistic side of me that thinks in very western theological categories. And there is nothing, especially at Christmas, like a "tall steeple" Presbyterian church with a great choir and paid brass quartet! The hymnology of the Reformed and Methodist churches is very strong aesthetically and lyrically.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2006, 12:24:29 AM by BrotherAidan »

Offline GiC

  • Resident Atheist
  • Site Supporter
  • Merarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,490
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #81 on: December 20, 2006, 12:18:43 AM »
Speaking at least for myself, the EO liturgy is not "home" for me and never will be.  It cannot be "home" because I have never lived there nor was it part of my ancesors.  If at some point in the future the only place was EO it would be a place but not Home...

It would be an exile.

But would it not also be artificial for you to be under an Eastern Patriarch using a western liturgy, being completely divorced from the entire liturgical tradition of your Bishop? The western liturgies have a place, under the western Bishops, be they of Rome or Canterbury; and just as it is most inappropraite for Rome to have churches with eastern liturgies, so is it inappropriate for the Orthodox to have western liturgies.
"The liberties of people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." -- Patrick Henry

Offline Landon77

  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 308
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #82 on: December 20, 2006, 12:25:41 AM »
Why does the bishop need to practice one liturgy exclusively?
"How stands your mighty god? My God is stronger than he."  -St. Boniface

Offline AMM

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,076
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #83 on: December 20, 2006, 12:26:44 AM »
Quote
just as it is most inappropraite for Rome to have churches with eastern liturgies, so is it inappropriate for the Orthodox to have western liturgies.

I must say there is a consistency to that argument.

Offline Elisha

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 4,648
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #84 on: December 20, 2006, 03:37:11 AM »
I'm wondering what some of you anti-Western Rite people (GiC first of all, of course) think of this article.  Please, take the arguement of the article and not the disagreement with his Eminence of Blessed Memory, Metropolitan Athony of SF.

I thought it gave good food for thought at the very least:
http://www.westernorthodox.com/Lux-Occidentalis

Offline Timos

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 856
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #85 on: December 20, 2006, 09:58:15 AM »
I see nothing wrong with having a bishopb administer two rites, his own, and that of another ppl still orthodox but of another rite. There is a Chinese Catholic church in my city which attracts lots of attention from chinese and non-chinese. The church is shaped like a chinese building but there is a cross and a statue of the Virgin Mary on the front lawn. Why couldn't we have a Chinese Orthodox Church in America? They would use their own rite no?

Offline Ebor

  • Vanyar
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,492
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #86 on: December 20, 2006, 10:42:19 AM »
But would it not also be artificial for you to be under an Eastern Patriarch using a western liturgy, being completely divorced from the entire liturgical tradition of your Bishop?

I am pondering this question and I'm afraid that I don't quite get what you're driving at. My apologies for being a bit thick. Is it that there is an idea that all must be alike under a bishop or archbishop?  Why would this be so, if that is your meaning?  "Completely divorced"? Being Christian there would be some relation, I should think, but again I'm not quite catching your idea. 

In the Anglican Churches we have a number of liturgies and services in which there is some leeway according to the rubrics in how things are done, some higher, some simpler.  Depending on where one is there are also local differences, I have a New Zealand Book of Common Prayer as well as ones from the US, England and Scotland.  There is a common frame but within that there are differences based on the local culture and people.

Quote
The western liturgies have a place, under the western Bishops, be they of Rome or Canterbury; and just as it is most inappropraite for Rome to have churches with eastern liturgies, so is it inappropriate for the Orthodox to have western liturgies.

Well, then that might suggest that EO is not for every human being.  As to it being inappropriate for Rome to have the Byzantine Catholic parishs, I don't have a dog in that hunt as the saying goes so it is not my place to speak of that of which I know little.

I'll get more coffee and see if I can understand more what you're saying.  ;)

Ebor
"I wish they would remember that the charge to Peter was "Feed my sheep", not "Try experiments on my rats", or even "Teach my performing dogs new tricks". - C. S. Lewis

The Katana of Reasoned Discussion

For some a world view is more like a neighborhood watch.

Offline Ebor

  • Vanyar
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,492
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #87 on: December 20, 2006, 10:46:16 AM »
I see nothing wrong with having a bishopb administer two rites, his own, and that of another ppl still orthodox but of another rite. There is a Chinese Catholic church in my city which attracts lots of attention from chinese and non-chinese. The church is shaped like a chinese building but there is a cross and a statue of the Virgin Mary on the front lawn. Why couldn't we have a Chinese Orthodox Church in America? They would use their own rite no?

In my area we have a Vietnamese Catholic parish with nice asian architecture in which one of their customs from that country was that when the bishop visited (for the consecration it might have been) he was carried in on a kind of palanquin.  The RC bishop did so, out of respect for the people, but I think he was a little non-plussed.  :)

Ebor
"I wish they would remember that the charge to Peter was "Feed my sheep", not "Try experiments on my rats", or even "Teach my performing dogs new tricks". - C. S. Lewis

The Katana of Reasoned Discussion

For some a world view is more like a neighborhood watch.

Offline BoredMeeting

  • Loving the Life of a Council Member
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 722
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #88 on: December 20, 2006, 04:03:58 PM »
...and just as it is most inappropraite for Rome to have churches with eastern liturgies, so is it inappropriate for the Orthodox to have western liturgies.
Conversely, it would only be inappropriate for the Orthodox to have western liturgies if it were inappropriate for Rome to have eastern liturgies.

It would appear that Rome has given its approval to the latter so they do not consider the former to be inappropriate at all. When in Rome...  ;D

Offline lubeltri

  • Latin Catholic layman
  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,795
Re: Western-rite Orthodoxy
« Reply #89 on: December 20, 2006, 05:10:16 PM »
Of course it isn't inappropriate. We consider the Bishop of Rome more than patriarch of the Latin church. C-A-T-H-O-L-I-C is the word, not Latin. I'm glad more Latins recognize that of late.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2006, 05:11:05 PM by lubeltri »