Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
Reviews / Re: What movies are you watching?
« Last post by biro on Today at 10:21:52 PM »
A Cure for Wellness. Creepy, creepy, creepy.
2
Other Topics / Re: Picture of the Day
« Last post by HaydenTE on Today at 09:49:09 PM »
Found in a cemetery today...
3
Faith Issues / Re: Strange icons
« Last post by HaydenTE on Today at 09:44:58 PM »
The New Martyrs of the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries.
4
Reviews / Re: What movies are you watching?
« Last post by Gebre Menfes Kidus on Today at 09:24:14 PM »
Bridge of Spies was pretty good.

Selam
5
Faith Issues / Re: Aphthartodocetism
« Last post by NicholasMyra on Today at 09:18:04 PM »
6
Faith Issues / Re: Aphthartodocetism
« Last post by NicholasMyra on Today at 09:17:28 PM »
Whether or not it's culpable in some intentional sense isn't the big deal for me, the big deal is that people are teaching it, and condemning those who do not teach it as nestorians/antipatristic/whatever.

I think some people who used to post here did that.
7
Orthodox-Protestant Discussion / Re: what is Zionism?
« Last post by MichaelGA on Today at 08:37:24 PM »
Zionism means different things to different people.  It is also presented to the world in one way, but its reality as practiced can be very different.  It is Jewish aspiration for a state of their own and this desire is justified on both political history and biblical interpretation.  It is sold to Evangelicals as God's will based primarily on Old Testament scriptures and is used to justify any atrocity as being justifiable if it leads toward Jewish dominion in Palestine.   Since the moderator wants to limit the conversation to Orthodox Christian response to Zionism, I will say two things: 

1)There is a good article on the Antiochian Orthodox website, entitled Who is the New Israel?

2) Also, I will tell you a story from my time attending a Protestant church.  Oh, they loved the state of Israel.  Israel could do no wrong in their eyes, and concomitant with this tenacious embrace of Zionism came a dismissal of the value of ethics, morality, or justice. 

One day I pointed out Galatians Chapter 3:16 & 3:26-29 to one of these misguided zealots.  These scriptures blew his mind.

IMHO, these five verses should guide a Christian to the proper position toward Zionism.
8
Other Topics / Re: W.A.G.-word association game
« Last post by Gamliel on Today at 07:32:57 PM »
You're on Candid Camera
9
Oriental Orthodox Discussion / Re: Rakovskyana: A Journal
« Last post by rakovsky on Today at 07:04:15 PM »
I've studied a bit about the Alawites and I'm of the opinion that they are descendants of Gnostics who were heavily Islamised and driven underground, but managed to keep a separate identity, even though they eventually forgot they were "Christian" Gnostics, while Ibn Nusayr would have been a late organiser of the sect.
Interesting!
10
Faith Issues / Re: List of 1st century writings by or about Christians
« Last post by rakovsky on Today at 06:55:33 PM »
Thanks for trying to answer it.

"What is above" would be the "heavenly" because it's above, ie. spiritual, holy, divine.
What is "below would mean either what's on earth below heaven or else whats in hell, below.

When it says "everything is above" it sounds like it means everything that exists is in the heavenly sphere.

"The imagination of those that are without knowledge" would be the imagining or illusion of those who lack the Christian "gnosis".

It reminds me of the idea in Advaita Hinduism that the "absolute reality" is Brahman, the creative "Nature", whereas the world is Maya, illusion. In Hinduism, a key goal is to escape the material "illusory" world.

Quote
Advaita:
Reality - Any entity which is finite, temporal or can be defined using attributes is treated as unreal and the spirit (aatman) is supposed to be the only real entity. The spirit is attribute-less and infinite by definition. Any entity outside the realm of the spirit is Maya (unreal, finite, temporal and illusory).
------------------------------------------
In Adwaita, emphasis is laid on transcendental God as pure consciousness. It has more to do with the subjective nature of God. All that is objective i.e the creation is discarded as Maya or as an illusion, in spite of the fact that Maya also owes its existence to brahman.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-Dvaita-Advaita-and-Visishtadvaita

Quote
God is,…..we must remember…. the creator and is’ the TOTAL universe i.e. all the good and even the bad have to depend on him for its existence.. Only he can let bad be created and only he can dissolve it. …….So, Bad and Sin, is just an illusion in our minds and god is beyond it (nirgun)…….. He perhaps lets bad exist in the gross world of maya (Hindu\Buddhist word for illusion that this entire universe is), for us to be punished by the bad, we create by our own wrong choices and actions
http://www.esamskriti.com/essay-chapters/Reinterpreting-Dwaita-versus-Adwaita-1.aspx

Advaita Hinduism can be either pantheistic or AFAIK atheistic. Eastern Orthodox Christianity, on the other hand is definitely not pantheistic - God and His Creation are both real and separate.

The opposite of Advaita philosophy is Dvaita philosophy in Hinduism, which is non-pantheistic theism.

According to the ESamskriti page, the famous Dvaita Hindu teacher, Madhva, rejected Advaitism and its theory of Maya, and instead proposed that God and the Creation were two separate real entities:
Quote
The scheme of five-fold difference spelled out by Madhva implies that this diversity of the world, perceived by our senses, is not an illusion or magic or Maya. Madhva is never tired of quoting numerous statements from scriptures, confirming the creation, preservation, regulation and control of the world of matter and souls by a Supreme Divinity. 
http://www.esamskriti.com/essay-chapters/Reinterpreting-Dwaita-versus-Adwaita-1.aspx

Quote
The theory of māyā was developed by the ninth-century Advaita Hindu philosopher Adi Shankara. However, competing theistic Dvaita scholars contested Shankara's theory,[73] and stated that Shankara did not offer a theory of the relationship between Brahman and Māyā.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_(illusion)

Another writer says:
Quote
According to Dvaita philosophy souls are eternal and are not created by God, yet, like maya or other fundamental realities they are not independent but are dependent on the Supreme God for their existence. Souls are many and uncountable. How come the individual souls which are mingled with Maya (māyān + veshtita = mayanveshtita, meaning, enveloped or completely covered with maya) can be of the same level of the Supreme God which is ever transcendental to maya and also to whom maya even cannot touch. Maya, though revocably but strongly, binds the souls but cannot bind God, it cannot even touch God.
http://www.justforkidsonly.com/truth/?cat=813

See also the relationship between avidya (ignorance) and maya (illusion) in Hinduism:
Quote
In Hinduism, Avidya includes confusing the mundane reality to be the only reality, and it as a permanent though it is ever changing.[3] Its doctrines assert that there is a spiritual reality consisting of Atman-Brahman, one that is the true, eternal, imperishable reality beyond time.
...
The effect of avidya is to suppress the real nature of things and present something else in its place. In effect it is not different from Maya (pronounced Māyā) or illusion. Avidya relates to the individual Self (Ātman), while Maya is an adjunct of the cosmic Self (Brahman).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avidya_(Hinduism)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10